We aimed to examine the characteristics of deep venous flow in
the leg in a cast and the effects of a wearable neuromuscular stimulator
(geko; FirstKind Ltd) and also to explore the participants’ tolerance
of the stimulator. This is an open-label physiological study on ten healthy volunteers.
Duplex ultrasonography of the superficial femoral vein measured
normal flow and cross-sectional area in the standing and supine
positions (with the lower limb initially horizontal and then elevated).
Flow measurements were repeated during activation of the geko stimulator
placed over the peroneal nerve. The process was repeated after the
application of a below-knee cast. Participants evaluated discomfort
using a questionnaire (verbal rating score) and a scoring index
(visual analogue scale).Objectives
Methods
The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often
includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded
polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes.
Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections
has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison
between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has
been performed. In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy
of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass
S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis
of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively
with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound
(Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded
demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics
were also used in all groups. After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection
was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%)
patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out
of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means
of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up,
respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication
rate. Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass
without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection
and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded
calcium-based bone substitutes. Cite this article:
To review the current best surgical practice and detail a multi-disciplinary
approach that could further reduce joint replacement infection. Review of relevant literature indexed in PubMed.Objectives
Methods
