We reviewed prospectively cemented stem revision in 106 patients with severe femoral endosteal bone lysis without infection. Bone grafts were not used in any of the patients. The minimum follow-up was three years (mean 6 years 4 months). At the last review 76.4% of the patients were free of pain and 17.9% had only mild or occasional discomfort; radiographs showed well-fixed stable stems in 101 (95.3%). An intramedullary cement plug was used at revision to improve stability in 97.7%. There was new endosteal osteolysis after revision in 17 patients; only two had severe changes. Seven hips (6.6%) required a second revision; only four of these (3.8%) were for stem loosening. Survivorship of the revised stem, using radiological evidence of stem loosening as the end point, was 95.8% at seven years. The results of stem revision arthroplasty using cement in the presence of massive endosteal cavitation are satisfactory.

We reviewed the records and radiographs of 387 cemented revisions of aseptic loose sockets after total hip replacement at a mean follow-up of 5.5 years. The clinical results were satisfactory, but at the last radiological assessment 38 sockets (9.8%) had a continuous zone of demarcation greater than 1 mm thick and another 35 (9%) showed migration. Poor acetabular bone stock had a profound influence on the outcome of revision surgery, but the results of cemented revision were comparable to those reported for cementless revision at similar mean follow-up.

We reviewed 54 patients at a mean follow-up of 4 years 4 months after rerevisions for failure of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Rerevision for aseptic loosening in 26 hips was satisfactory; there were no clinical failures and at the latest radiological assessment only one stem and three sockets showed signs of loosening. By contrast, nine of 20 multiple revisions for recurrent dislocation failed, as did five of eight multiple revisions for deep infection. There was radiological evidence of loosening in one stem and nine sockets in the former group and in three stems and five sockets in the latter.

We reviewed 351 cemented revisions of femoral stems performed for aseptic loosening. At a mean of six years after the revision operation 72.1% of the patients were pain-free and 21.4% had only mild or occasional discomfort. The latest radiographs showed definite stem loosening in 10 (2.8%) and 20 hips (5.7%) had required rerevision, only nine (2.6%) of which were for mechanical failure of the stem. Survivorship analysis, taking the end point as rerevision of the stem, gave 97.0% survival at eight years and 91.6% at 11 years. Excellent results both clinically and radiologically can be achieved by cemented revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening.

We assessed 41 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (47 hips) who had had revision hip arthroplasty, at an average follow-up of 7 years 4 months (2 to 19). The clinical results were excellent or satisfactory in 43 hips. Radiologically, 45 stems were secure. Fifteen sockets (36.6%) were radiologically loose. Three hips required rerevision. Socket failure is the predominant problem in rheumatoid patients after cemented revision arthroplasty.

We report a prospective study of 57 one-stage cemented revisions of total hip replacement for deep infection with an actively discharging sinus. The average follow-up was 7 years 4 months. Seven patients had required rerevisions, but at latest follow-up, infection was under control in 49 (86%). A discharging sinus is not, in itself, a contraindication to one-stage revision of a hip replacement.

A flanged socket was introduced by Sir John Charnley for use in his low-friction hip arthroplasty in 1976. Experimental evidence has suggested that the flange offers an advantage in terms of cement pressurisation at the time of implantation. We have reviewed 302 primary Charnley arthroplasties followed for 9 to 11 years to determine the effect of the flanged socket on the radiological appearance. The incidence of radiological demarcation at the cement-bone interface is significantly reduced in early radiographs after the use of a flanged socket, and the advantage is maintained in the long-term results.

Laboratory wear testing of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene from 12 Charnley acetabular cups, removed after periods of up to 17.5 years showed that the large patient-to-patient variations in clinical penetration rate cannot be explained by batch-to-batch variation in the wear resistance of the material. Nor was there any evidence of a time-dependent degradation in wear resistance of the material.

In a prospective study, a double crossover wire with a compression spring was used to re-attach 52 un-united trochanters at revision operations on total hip arthroplasties. Bony union was achieved in 42 (81%) and was not influenced by the duration of the nonunion or the separation gap. The new method compared favourably with earlier revisions at which other methods of trochanteric re-attachment had been used.

A retrospective review of 72 cases of Charnley low friction arthroplasty revised for stem loosening, has identified a number of "at risk" factors. These were: previous hip surgery and, in radiographs taken at one year, demarcation of the distal cement and fracture of the cement near the tip of the stem. Separation of the back of the stem from the cement, as an isolated feature, was not considered significant. Endosteal cavitation of the femoral shaft, rare in the first year, indicated loosening of some duration. Patients whose radiographs show the "at risk" changes, should be followed-up indefinitely in order to plan timely revision and avoid gross loss of the femoral bone stock.

An experimental evaluation was made of the efficacy of an unflanged cup, an ogee-flanged cup and the Exeter pressuriser in the pressurisation of acetabular cement. Only a very modest injection pressure could be generated through an unflanged socket and even this was readily lost as the socket "bottomed out". The ogee-flanged socket gave a consistently high injection pressure which could be maintained throughout the process of polymerisation. The Exeter pressuriser gave marginally better results. Of the two cements tested, Palacos with gentamicin showed better intrusion than CMW Type 1 cement, but it also allowed greater extrusion once pressure was released. The importance of maintaining a continuous pressure on the cement throughout polymerisation is emphasised.

We report a retrospective review of 127 low friction arthroplasties carried out for the failure of a previous hip operation. After an average follow-up of 10.4 years, 20% of cases required further revision, over half of them for deep infection. We estimated from the radiographic appearances that eventual failure by loosening was probable in 58% on the femoral side and 56% on the acetabular side of the arthroplasties.

A retrospective review of 1542 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties was carried out to compare the incidence of deep infection arising after plain and gentamicin-containing acrylic cement. There was no significant difference between the two series in primary operations, the infection rate being 1.72% and 1.65% respectively. However, in secondary operations (conversions and revisions) the gentamicin-containing cement gave significantly better results--a 0.81% infection rate as compared with 3.46%. All operations were performed in a clean air enclosure using total-body exhaust suits. Radiological diagnosis of deep infection was possible within one year of operation in all cases. Late haematogenous infection occurred in one case and was related to a skin lesion.

We examined 59 cemented high density polyethylene sockets removed at revision hip arthroplasty. Of these 19 showed areas of wear between the outside of the socket and the acetabular bone. This was associated with lack of acrylic cement in those areas and was also related to the depth of the wear on the articulating surface of the socket. It is suggested that, in some cases, changes at the bone-cement junction are secondary to socket loosening and abrasion against the bone of the acetabulum, rather than to particles migrating from the metal-polyethylene interface. It is therefore important that impingement of the neck of the femoral stem on the edge of the cup be avoided and that, when the socket is inserted, it is not in direct contact with the bone.

Twenty-two high-density polyethylene sockets from Charnley low-friction arthroplasties have been studied. Acrylic casts and shadowgraph techniques were used to measure both the real and radiographic rates of wear; these rates showed a significant correlation. In the sagittal plane, nine of the sockets had worn lateral to a line drawn vertically from the centre of curvature of the socket, 12 had worn medial to that line and only one was worn exactly in the line. In the coronal plane, nine sockets had worn in front of a similar vertical line, two behind that line and 11 had worn exactly in the line. Evidence of impingement of the neck of the stem onto the rim of the socket was found in 14 patients; this is considered to be one of the causes of socket loosening. The obvious solution is to reduce the diameter of the neck of the stem from 12.5 mm to 10 mm; provided that it is made of cold-formed, high nitrogen-content stainless steel, this narrower neck is strong enough not to fracture.

A method of performing a biplanar intracapsular trochanteric osteotomy with a Gigli saw was designed and tested prospectively in 431 cases of Charnley low friction arthroplasty. Three methods of trochanteric reattachment were tested, and a double cross-over wire with a compression spring was best; this method was successful in 222 out of 226 patients (98.2%), of which half were revision operations. Adduction seemed to be the main movement leading to trochanteric detachment.