Accurate placement of the acetabular component is essential in
total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine
if the ability to achieve inclination of the acetabular component
within the ‘safe-zone’ of 30° to 50° could be improved with the
use of an inclinometer. We reviewed 167 primary THAs performed by a single surgeon over
a period of 14 months. Procedures were performed at two institutions:
an inpatient hospital, where an inclinometer was used (inclinometer
group); and an ambulatory centre, where an inclinometer was not
used as it could not be adequately sterilized (control group). We excluded
47 patients with a body mass index (BMI) of > 40 kg/m2,
age of > 68 years, or a surgical indication other than osteoarthritis
whose treatment could not be undertaken in the ambulatory centre.
There were thus 120 patients in the study, 68 in the inclinometer
group and 52 in the control group. The inclination angles of the acetabular
component were measured from de-identified plain radiographs by
two blinded investigators who were not involved in the surgery.
The effect of the use of the inclinometer on the inclination angle
was determined using multivariate regression analysis.Aims
Patients and Methods
Preservation of both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to near-normal post-operative joint mechanics and improved knee function. We hypothesised that a patient-specific bicruciate-retaining prosthesis preserves near-normal kinematics better than standard off-the-shelf posterior cruciate-retaining and bicruciate-retaining prostheses in TKA. We developed the validated models to evaluate the post-operative kinematics in patient-specific bicruciate-retaining, standard off-the-shelf bicruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining TKA under gait and deep knee bend loading conditions using numerical simulation.Objectives
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain. A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system.Objectives
Methods
Our aim was to compare kinematic with mechanical alignment in
total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We performed a prospective blinded randomised controlled trial
to compare the functional outcome of patients undergoing TKA in
mechanical alignment (MA) with those in kinematic alignment (KA).
A total of 71 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to either
kinematic (n = 36) or mechanical alignment (n = 35). Pre- and post-operative
hip-knee-ankle radiographs were analysed. The knee injury and osteoarthritis
outcome score (KOOS), American Knee Society Score, Short Form-36,
Euro-Qol (EQ-5D), range of movement (ROM), two minute walk, and timed
up and go tests were assessed pre-operatively and at six weeks,
three and six months and one year post-operatively.Aims
Patients and Methods
Anatomical total knee arthroplasty alignment
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
The use of robotics in arthroplasty surgery is expanding rapidly as improvements in the technology evolve. This article examines current evidence to justify the usage of robotics, as well as the future potential in this emerging field.
The June 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Cruciate substituting
We evaluated the accuracy with which a custom-made
acetabular component could be positioned at revision arthroplasty
of the hip in patients with a Paprosky type 3 acetabular defect. A total of 16 patients with a Paprosky type 3 defect underwent
revision surgery using a custom-made trabecular titanium implant.
There were four men and 12 women with a median age of 67 years (48
to 79). The planned inclination (INCL), anteversion (AV), rotation
and centre of rotation (COR) of the implant were compared with the post-operative
position using CT scans. A total of seven implants were malpositioned in one or more parameters:
one with respect to INCL, three with respect to AV, four with respect
to rotation and five with respect to the COR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which
CT data acquired for the pre-operative planning of a custom-made
revision acetabular implant have been compared with CT data on the
post-operative position. The results are encouraging. Cite this article:
Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable
procedure with reproducible long-term results. Nevertheless, there
are conditions related to the type of patient or local conditions
of the knee that can make it a difficult procedure. The most common
scenarios that make it difficult are discussed in this review. These
include patients with many previous operations and incisions, and
those with severe coronal deformities, genu recurvatum, a stiff knee,
extra-articular deformities and those who have previously undergone
osteotomy around the knee and those with chronic dislocation of
the patella. Each condition is analysed according to the characteristics of
the patient, the pre-operative planning and the reported outcomes. When approaching the difficult primary TKA surgeons should use
a systematic approach, which begins with the review of the existing
literature for each specific clinical situation. Cite this article:
The August 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: re-admission following total knee replacement; out with the old and in with the new? computer navigation revisited; approach less important in knee replacement; is obesity driving a rise in knee replacements?; knee replacement isn’t cheap in the obese; cruciate substitution doesn’t increase knee flexion; and sonication useful diagnostic aid in two-stage revision.
In a global environment of rising costs and limited funds, robotic and computer-assisted orthopaedic technologies could provide the means to drive a necessary revolution in arthroplasty productivity. Robots have been used to operate on humans for 20 years, but the adoption of the technology has lagged behind that of the manufacturing industry. The use of robots in surgery should enable cost savings by reducing instrumentation and inventories, and improving accuracy. Despite these benefits, the orthopaedic community has been resistant to change. If the ergonomics and economics are right, robotic technology just might transform the provision of joint replacement.
