Currently, there is little information about the need for peri-operative
blood transfusion in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of transfusion
and its predisposing factors, and to establish a blood conservation
strategy. We identified all patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty
at our hospital between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. The
rate of transfusion was determined from the patient’s records. While
there were exceptions, patients typically underwent transfusion
if they had a level of haemoglobin of <
7.5 g/dl if asymptomatic,
<
9.0 g/dl if they had a significant cardiac history or symptoms
of dizziness or light headedness. Multivariable regression analysis was undertaken to identify
predictors of transfusion. High- and low-risk cohorts for transfusion
were identified from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this article is to provide the
reader with a seven-step checklist that could help in minimising
the risk of PJI. The check list includes strategies that can be
implemented pre-operatively such as medical optimisation, and reduction
of the bioburden by effective skin preparation or actions taking
during surgery such as administration of timely and appropriate
antibiotics or blood conservation, and finally implementation of
post-operative protocols such as efforts to minimise wound drainage
and haematoma formation. Cite this article:
The pre-operative level of haemoglobin is the strongest predictor
of the peri-operative requirement for blood transfusion after total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are, however, no studies reporting
a value that could be considered to be appropriate pre-operatively. This study aimed to identify threshold pre-operative levels of
haemoglobin that would predict the requirement for blood transfusion
in patients who undergo TKA. Analysis of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of
2284 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral TKA was used to
determine gender specific thresholds predicting peri-operative transfusion
with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity (area under
ROC curve 0.79 for males; 0.78 for females).Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Vitamin E infusion helpful in polyethylene; Hip replacement in fracture and arthritis; Non-surgical treatment for arthritis; Cost and approach in hip surgery; Who does well in FAI surgery?; AAOS Thromboembolism guidelines; Thromboprophylaxis and periprosthetic joint infection; Fluid collections not limited to metal-on-metal THR
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
To define Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds
for the Oxford hip score (OHS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) at mid-term
follow-up. In a prospective multicentre cohort study, OHS and OKS were collected
at a mean follow-up of three years (1.5 to 6.0), combined with a
numeric rating scale (NRS) for satisfaction and an external validation
question assessing the patient’s willingness to undergo surgery
again. A total of 550 patients underwent total hip replacement (THR)
and 367 underwent total knee replacement (TKR).Objectives
Methods
The October 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Traumatic spinal cord injury under the spotlight; The odontoid peg nonunion; Driving and spinal surgery; Drains and antibiotics post-spinal surgery; Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty equally effective; Who will benefit from steroid injections?; Back pain following lumbar discectomy
The number of clinical negligence claims in the UK is constantly increasing. As a specialty, trauma and orthopaedic surgery has one of the highest numbers of negligence claims. A formal request was made to the NHSLA under the Freedom of Information Act in order to obtain all data related to claims against orthopaedic surgery. It was found that the number of claims, and percentage of successful claims, has been constantly increasing over this period, with compensation paid of over £349 million.* Errors in clinical management accounted for the highest number of closed claims (2933 claims), costing over £119 million.* The level of compensation paid out has a significant financial impact on the NHS. Reforms need to be made in order to tackle the high cost of legal fees generated by these claims, which further drain the limited resources available to the NHS.
The October 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Allergy and outcome in arthroplasty; Physiotherapy and drains not such a bad combination?; Another nail in the coffin for arthroscopists?; Graft precondition hocus pocus; Extended dose steroids in knee arthritis?; Indolent peri-prosthetic infection; Computer modelling and medial knee arthritis
The October 2015 Research Roundup360 looks at: Wasted implants; Biofilms revisited; Peri-operative anticoagulation not required in atrial fibrillation; Determinants in outcome following orthopaedic surgery; Patient ‘activation’ and outcomes; Neuroplasticity and nerve repair; KOOS Score in predicting injury?
Arthritis of the wrist is a painful disabling
condition that has various causes and presentations. The traditional treatment
has been a total wrist fusion at a price of the elimination of movement.
However, forms of treatment which allow the preservation of movement
are now preferred. Modern arthroplasties of the wrist are still
not sufficiently robust to meet the demands of many patients, nor
do they restore normal kinematics of the wrist. A preferable compromise
may be selective excision and partial fusion of the wrist using
knowledge of the aetiology and pattern of degenerative change to
identify which joints can be sacrificed and which can be preserved. This article provides an overview of the treatment options available
for patients with arthritis of the wrist and an algorithm for selecting
an appropriate surgical strategy. Cite this article:
The August 2015 Research Roundup360 looks at: Lightbulbs, bleeding and procedure durations; Infection and rheumatoid agents; Infection rates and ‘bundles of care’ revisited; ACI: new application for a proven technology?; Hydrogel coating given the thumbs up; Hydroxyapatite as a smart coating?
The August 2015 Wrist &
Hand Roundup360 looks at: Scaphoid screws out?; Stiff fingers under the spotlight; Trigger finger: is complexity needed?; Do we really need to replace the base of the thumb?; Scapholunate ligament injuries and their treatment: a missed research opportunity?; Proximal row carpectomy
The August 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: The well-fixed acetabular revision; Predicting complications in revision arthroplasty; Is infection associated with fixation?; Front or back? An enduring question in hip surgery; Muscle-sparing approaches?; Gabapentin as a post-operative analgesic adjunct; An Indian take on AVN of the hip; Weight loss and arthroplasty
A patient-centred approach, usually achieved through shared decision
making, has the potential to help improve decision making around
knee arthroplasty surgery. However, such an approach requires an
understanding of the factors involved in patient decision making.
This review’s objective is to systematically examine the qualitative literature
surrounding patients’ decision making in knee arthroplasty. A systematic literature review using Medline and Embase was conducted
to identify qualitative studies that examined patients’ decision
making around knee arthroplasty. An aggregated account of what is
known about patients’ decision making in knee arthroplasties is
provided.Objectives
Methods
The effective capture of outcome measures in
the healthcare setting can be traced back to Florence Nightingale’s
investigation of the in-patient mortality of soldiers wounded in
the Crimean war in the 1850s. Only relatively recently has the formalised collection of outcomes
data into Registries been recognised as valuable in itself. With the advent of surgeon league tables and a move towards value
based health care, individuals are being driven to collect, store
and interpret data. Following the success of the National Joint Registry, the British
Association of Spine Surgeons instituted the British Spine Registry.
Since its launch in 2012, over 650 users representing the whole
surgical team have registered and during this time, more than 27 000
patients have been entered onto the database. There has been significant publicity regarding the collection
of outcome measures after surgery, including patient-reported scores.
Over 12 000 forms have been directly entered by patients themselves,
with many more entered by the surgical teams. Questions abound: who should have access to the data produced
by the Registry and how should they use it? How should the results
be reported and in what forum? Cite this article:
The June 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: neuraxial anaesthesia and large joint arthroplasty; revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery; acetabular version and clinical outcomes in impingement surgery; hip precautions may be ineffective; implant selection and cost effectiveness; femoroacetabular impingement in the older age group; multiple revision in hip arthroplasty
