Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 22
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 5 | Pages 8 - 17
1 Oct 2024
Holley J Lawniczak D Machin JT Briggs TWR Hunter J



Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 3 | Pages 8 - 11
3 Jun 2024
Pickering GAE


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 6 - 10
1 Oct 2023
Arnaouti M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 3 | Pages 5 - 7
1 Jun 2023
Pickering GAE


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 4 | Pages 7 - 9
2 Aug 2024
Monsell F


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 6 | Pages 6 - 12
1 Dec 2023
Vallier HA Breslin MA Taylor LA Hendrickson SB Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 6 | Pages 8 - 10
1 Dec 2021
Spacey K Wimhurst J Hasan R Sharma D


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 4 | Pages 5 - 11
1 Aug 2021
Kurien T Scammell BE


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 6 - 10
1 Aug 2020
Machin JT Forward D Briggs T


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 1 | Pages 4 - 9
1 Feb 2021
White JJE Manktelow ARJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 2 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Apr 2017
Singh A Collins R Wimhurst J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 6 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Dec 2015
Dodd L Sharpe I Mandalia VI Toms AD Phillips JRA

The global economy has been facing a financial crisis. Healthcare costs are spiraling, and there is a projected £30 billion health funding gap by 2020 in the UK.1 This has prompted a drive for efficiency in healthcare provision in the UK, and in 2012, the Health and Social Care Act was introduced, heralding a fundamental change to the structure of the National Health Service, especially in the way that healthcare is funded in England.2

What is happening in the UK is a reflection of a global problem. Rationing of healthcare is a topic of much discussion; as unless spending is capped, providing healthcare will become unsustainable. Who decides how money is spent, and which services should be rationed?

In this article we aim to discuss the impact that rationing may have on orthopaedic surgery, and we will discuss our own experiences of attempts to ration local services.3 We also seek to inform and educate the general orthopaedic community on this topic.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 2 | Pages 3 - 6
1 Apr 2016
Patel M Eastley N Ashford R

This paper aims to provide evidence-based guidance for the general orthopaedic surgeon faced with the presentation of a potential soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Jun 2017
Das A Shivji F Ollivere BJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Feb 2015
Wright GM Porteous MJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 2 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Apr 2014
Copas DP Moran CG


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Jun 2013
McNamara K

According to a report by Millennium Research Group in January 2011, the US orthopaedic extremity device market will generate over $4.6 billion in revenue by 2015.1 With an ageing demographic and increasing demand for better quality of life into old age, there is clearly a commercial drive for the orthopaedic device community to develop new and innovative solutions to bone and joint problems. Devising such solutions is one thing; protecting them, so that research investment can be rewarded, is another. How is such protection achieved? The judicious use of intellectual property rights plays a key role, and this article aims to provide some information about the use of patents to protect innovation.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 6 - 14
1 Jun 2013
Wallace WA

In the UK we have many surgeon inventors – surgeons who innovate and create new ways of doing things, who invent operations, who design new instruments to facilitate surgery or design new implants for using in patients. However truly successful surgeon inventors are a rare breed and they need to develop additional knowledge and skills during their career in order to push forward their devices and innovations. This article reviews my own experiences as a surgeon inventor and the highs and lows over the whole of my surgical career.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 2 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Apr 2015
Lever CJ Robinson AHN

Ankle replacements have improved significantly since the first reported attempt at resurfacing of the talar dome in 1962. We are now at a stage where ankle replacement offers a viable option in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. As the procedure becomes more successful, it is important to reflect and review the current surgical outcomes. This allows us to guide our patients in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. What is the better surgical treatment – arthrodesis or replacement?