A revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a major effect on the patient’s quality of life, including walking capacity. The objective of this case control study was to investigate the histological and ultrastructural changes to the gluteus medius tendon (GMED) in patients revised due to a PJI, and to compare it with revision THAs without infection performed using the same lateral approach. A group of eight patients revised due to a PJI with a previous lateral approach was compared with a group of 21 revised THAs without infection, performed using the same approach. The primary variables of the study were the fibril diameter, as seen in transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the total degeneration score (TDS), as seen under the light microscope. An analysis of bacteriology, classification of infection, and antibiotic treatment was also performed.Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty in the elderly may occur but has been subject to limited investigation. This study analyzed infection characteristics, surgical outcomes, and perioperative complications of octogenarians undergoing treatment for PJI in a single university-based institution. We identified 33 patients who underwent treatment for PJIs of the hip between January 2010 and December 2019 using our institutional joint registry. Mean age was 82 years (80 to 90), with 19 females (57%) and a mean BMI of 26 kg/m2 (17 to 41). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade was 3 (1 to 4) and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6 (4 to 10). Leading pathogens included coagulase-negative Staphylococci (45%) and Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and factors for developing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hemiarthroplasty (HA) for hip fracture, and to evaluate treatment outcome and identify factors associated with treatment outcome. A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients treated for HA PJI at a tertiary referral centre with a mean 4.5 years’ follow-up (1.6 weeks to 12.9 years). Surgeries performed included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and single-stage revision. The effect of different factors on developing infection and treatment outcome was determined.Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with prior multiple failed surgery for reinfection represent a huge challenge for surgeons because of poor vascular supply and biofilm formation. This study aims to determine the results of single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion in treating this condition. A retrospective analysis included 78 PJI patients (29 hips; 49 knees) who had undergone multiple prior surgical interventions. Our cohort was treated with single-stage revision using a supplementary intra-articular antibiotic infusion. Of these 78 patients, 59 had undergone more than two prior failed debridement and implant retentions, 12 patients had a failed arthroplasty resection, three hips had previously undergone failed two-stage revision, and four had a failed one-stage revision before their single-stage revision. Previous failure was defined as infection recurrence requiring surgical intervention. Besides intravenous pathogen-sensitive agents, an intra-articular infusion of vancomycin, imipenem, or voriconazole was performed postoperatively. The antibiotic solution was soaked into the joint for 24 hours for a mean of 16 days (12 to 21), then extracted before next injection. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated.Aims
Methods
With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty (THA), one of the major challenges is the management of proximal femoral bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) has already been popularized for tumour surgeries. Our aim was to describe the outcome of using PFA in these demanding non-neoplastic cases. A retrospective review of 25 patients who underwent PFA for non-neoplastic indications between January 2009 and December 2015 was undertaken. Their clinical and radiological outcome, complication rates, and survival were recorded. All patients had the Stanmore Implant – Modular Endo-prosthetic Tumour System (METS).Aims
Methods
Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision of hip arthroplasty necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two centres, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral bone cement in selected patients for septic hip revision surgery, both for single and the first of two-stage revision procedures. A prerequisite for adoption of this technique is that the surgeon considers the cement mantle to be intimately fixed to bone without an intervening membrane between cement and host bone. We aim to report our experience for this technique. We have analyzed patients undergoing this cement-in-cement technique for femoral revision in infection, and present a consecutive series of 89 patients. Follow-up was undertaken at a mean of 56.5 months (24.0 to 134.7) for the surviving cases.Aims
Methods
There is a paucity of long-term studies analyzing risk factors for failure after single-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We report the mid- to long-term septic and non-septic failure rate of single-stage revision for PJI after THA. We retrospectively reviewed 88 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. Mean follow-up was seven years (1 to 14). Septic failure was diagnosed with a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any reoperation for mechanical causes in the absence of evidence of infection was considered as non-septic failure. A competing risk regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic and non-septic failures. A Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to analyze mortality.Aims
Methods
We aimed to report the mid- to long-term rates of septic and aseptic failure after two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We retrospectively reviewed 96 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI. The mean follow-up was 90 months (SD 32). Septic failure was assessed using a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any further surgery undertaken for aseptic mechanical causes was considered as aseptic failure. The cumulative incidence with competing risk analysis was used to predict the risk of septic failure. A regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic failure. The cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was also analyzed.Aims
Methods
To explore the effect of different types of articulating antibiotic-loaded cement spacers in two-stage revision for chronic hip prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 36 chronic PJI patients treated with different types of articulating antibiotic-loaded cement spacers between January 2014 and December 2017. The incidence of complications and the therapeutic effects of different types of antibiotic-loaded articulating cement spacers were compared.Aims
Methods
Failure of irrigation and debridement (I&D) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is influenced by numerous host, surgical, and pathogen-related factors. We aimed to develop and validate a practical, easy-to-use tool based on machine learning that may accurately predict outcome following I&D surgery taking into account the influence of numerous factors. This was an international, multicentre retrospective study of 1,174 revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasties (TKA) undergoing I&D for PJI between January 2005 and December 2017. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. A total of 52 variables including demographics, comorbidities, and clinical and laboratory findings were evaluated using random forest machine learning analysis. The algorithm was then verified through cross-validation.Aims
Methods
Single-stage revision is not widely pursued due to restrictive inclusion criteria. In this study, we evaluated the results of single-stage revision of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) using broad inclusion criteria and cementless implants. Between 2010 and 2016, 126 patients underwent routine single-stage revision with cementless reconstruction with powdered vancomycin or imipenem poured into the medullary cavity and re-implantation of cementless components. For patients with a culture-negative hip, fungal infections, and multidrug-resistant organisms, a direct intra-articular infusion of pathogen-sensitive antibiotics was performed postoperatively. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Three patients died and 12 patients (none with known recurrent infection) were lost to follow-up. There were 111 remaining patients (60 male, 51 female) with a mean age of 58.7 (Aims
Patients and Methods
This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of reverse hybrid
total hip arthroplasty (THA) at medium-term follow-up. A consecutive series of 1082 THAs in 982 patients with mean follow-up
of 7.9 years (5 to 11.3) is presented. Mean age was 69.2 years (21
to 94). Of these, 194 (17.9%) were in patients under 60 years, 663
(61.3%) in female patients and 348 (32.2%) performed by a trainee.
Head size was 28 mm in 953 hips (88.1%) or 32 mm in 129 hips (11.9%).
Survival analysis was performed and subgroups compared using log
rank tests.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of the study were to review and analyse the reported
series of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR)
in the management of infected total hip arthroplasties (THAs) to
establish the overall success and the influencing factors. Using a standardised recognised study protocol, meta-analysis
of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines, a comprehensive
review and analysis of the literature was performed. The primary
outcome measure was the success of treatment. The search strategy
and inclusion criteria which involved an assessment of quality yielded
39 articles for analysis, which included 1296 patients.Aims
Patients and methods
Advances in the treatment of periprosthetic joint
infections of the hip have once more pushed prosthesis preserving techniques
into the limelight. At the same time, the common infecting organisms
are evolving to become more resistant to conventional antimicrobial
agents. Whilst the epidemiology of resistant staphylococci is changing,
a number of recent reports have advocated the use of irrigation
and debridement and one-stage revision for the treatment of periprosthetic
joint infections due to resistant organisms. This review presents
the available evidence for the treatment of periprosthetic joint
infections of the hip, concentrating in particular on methicillin
resistant staphylococci. Cite this article:
We report the five year outcomes of a two-stage
approach for infected total hip replacement. This is a single-surgeon
experience at a tertiary centre where the more straightforward cases
are treated using single-stage exchange. This study highlights the
vital role of the multidisciplinary team in managing these cases. A total of 125 patients (51 male, 74 female) with a mean age
of 68 years (42 to 78) were reviewed prospectively. Functional status
was assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean HHS improved
from 38 (6 to 78.5) pre-operatively to 81.2 (33 to 98) post-operatively.
Staphylococcus species were isolated in 85 patients (68%). The rate of control of infection was 96% at five years. In all,
19 patients died during the period of the study. This represented
a one year mortality of 0.8% and an overall mortality of 15.2% at
five years. No patients were lost to follow-up. We report excellent control of infection in a series of complex
patients and infections using a two-stage revision protocol supported
by a multidisciplinary approach. The reason for the high rate of
mortality in these patients is not known. Cite this article:
We retrospectively reviewed 44 consecutive patients
(50 hips) who underwent acetabular re-revision after a failed previous
revision that had been performed using structural or morcellised
allograft bone, with a cage or ring for uncontained defects. Of
the 50 previous revisions, 41 cages and nine rings were used with
allografts for 14 minor-column and 36 major-column defects. We routinely
assessed the size of the acetabular bone defect at the time of revision
and re-revision surgery. This allowed us to assess whether host
bone stock was restored. We also assessed the outcome of re-revision
surgery in these circumstances by means of radiological characteristics,
rates of failure and modes of failure. We subsequently investigated
the factors that may affect the potential for the restoration of bone
stock and the durability of the re-revision reconstruction using
multivariate analysis. At the time of re-revision, there were ten host acetabula with
no significant defects, 14 with contained defects, nine with minor-column,
seven with major-column defects and ten with pelvic discontinuity.
When bone defects at re-revision were compared with those at the
previous revision, there was restoration of bone stock in 31 hips, deterioration
of bone stock in nine and remained unchanged in ten. This was a
significant improvement (p <
0.001). Morselised allografting
at the index revision was not associated with the restoration of
bone stock. In 17 hips (34%), re-revision was possible using a simple acetabular
component without allograft, augments, rings or cages. There were
47 patients with a mean follow-up of 70 months (6 to 146) available
for survival analysis. Within this group, the successful cases had
a minimum follow-up of two years after re-revision. There were 22 clinical
or radiological failures (46.7%), 18 of which were due to aseptic
loosening. The five and ten year Kaplan–Meier survival rate was
75% (95% CI, 60 to 86) and 56% (95% CI, 40 to 70) respectively with
aseptic loosening as the endpoint. The rate of aseptic loosening
was higher for hips with pelvic discontinuity (p = 0.049) and less
when the allograft had been in place for longer periods (p = 0.040). The use of a cage or ring over structural allograft bone for
massive uncontained defects in acetabular revision can restore host
bone stock and facilitate subsequent re-revision surgery to a certain
extent. Cite this article:
Hip replacement is a very successful operation and the outcome is usually excellent. There are recognised complications that seem increasingly to give rise to litigation. This paper briefly examines some common scenarios where litigation may be pursued against hip surgeons. With appropriate record keeping, consenting and surgical care, the claim can be successfully defended if not avoided. We hope this short summary will help to highlight some common pitfalls. There is extensive literature available for detailed study.
Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard
for treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection after total hip replacement
(THR). In the first stage, all components and associated cement
if present are removed, an aggressive debridement is undertaken
including a complete synovectomy, and an antibiotic-loaded cement
spacer is put in place. Patients are then treated with six weeks
of parenteral antibiotics, followed by an ‘antibiotic free period’
to help ensure the infection has been eradicated. If the clinical
evaluation and serum inflammatory markers suggest the infection
has resolved, then the second stage can be completed, which involves
removal of the cement spacer, repeat debridement, and placement
of a new THR. Cite this article:
Hip arthrodesis remains a viable surgical technique
in well selected patients, typically the young manual labourer with
isolated unilateral hip disease. Despite this, its popularity with
patients and surgeons has decreased due to the evolution of hip
replacement, and is seldom chosen by young adult patients today.
The surgeon is more likely to encounter a patient who requests conversion
to total hip replacement (THR). The most common indications are
a painful pseudarthrosis, back pain, ipsilateral knee pain or contralateral
hip pain. Occasionally the patient will request conversion because
of difficulty with activities of daily living, body image and perceived
cosmesis. The technique of conversion and a discussion of the results
are presented. Cite this article:
Total hip replacement (THR) has been shown to
be a cost-effective procedure. However, it is not risk-free. Certain conditions,
such as diabetes mellitus, are thought to increase the risk of complications.
In this study we have evaluated the prevalence of diabetes mellitus
in patients undergoing THR and the associated risk of adverse operative
outcomes. A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted according
to the guidelines of the meta-analysis of observational studies
in epidemiology. Inclusion criteria were observational studies reporting
the prevalence of diabetes in the study population, accompanied
by reports of at least one of the following outcomes: venous thromboembolic
events; acute coronary events; infections of the urinary tract,
lower respiratory tract or surgical site; or requirement for revision
arthroplasty. Altman and Bland’s methods were used to calculate differences
in relative risks. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was found
to be 5.0% among patients undergoing THR, and was associated with
an increased risk of established surgical site infection (odds ratio
(OR) 2.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52 to 2.76)), urinary
infection (OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.55)) and lower respiratory
tract infections (OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.26)). Diabetes mellitus
is a relatively common comorbidity encountered in THR. Diabetic
patients have a higher rate of developing both surgical site and
non-surgical site infections following THR. Cite this article:
