This study compared the pullout forces of the initial implantation and the “cement-in-cement” revision technique for short and standard-length (125 mm vs. 150 mm) Exeter^® V40 femoral stems used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The idea that the pullout force for a double taper slip stem is relative to the force applied to the femur and that “cement-in-cement” revision provides the same reproduction of force.

A total sample size of 15 femoral stems were tested (Short, n = 6 and Standard, n = 9). 3D printed fixtures for repeatable sample preparation were used to minimize variance during testing. To promote stem subsidence and to simulate an in vivo environment, the samples were placed in an incubator at 37°C at 100% humidity and experienced a constant compressive loading of 1335 N for 14 days. The samples underwent a displacement-controlled pullout test. After the initial pullout test, “cement-in-cement” revision will be performed and tested similar to the initial implantation to observe the efficacy of the revision technique. To compare the pullout forces between the two groups, a Kruskal-Wallis test using a significance level of 0.05 was conducted.

The mean maximum pullout force for the short and standard-length femoral stems were 3939 ± 1178 N and 5078 ± 1168 N, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test determined no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the initial implantation (p = 0.13). The “cement-in-cement” revision pullout force will be conducted in future testing.

This study demonstrated the potential use of short stem designs for THA as it provides similar levels of fixation as the standard-length femoral stem. The potential benefits for using a short stem design would be providing similar load transfer to the proximal femur, preserving proximal metaphyseal femoral bone in primary replacement, and reducing the invasiveness during revision.

Arthroscopic hip procedures have increased dramatically over the last decade as equipment and techniques have improved. Patients who require hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement on occasion require surgery on the contralateral hip. Previous studies have found that younger age of presentation and lower Charlson comorbidity index have higher risk for requiring surgery on the contralateral hip but have not found correlation to anatomic variables. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the factors that predispose a patient to requiring subsequent hip arthroscopy on the contralateral hip.

This is an IRB-approved, single surgeon retrospective cohort study from an academic, tertiary referral centre. A chart review was conducted on 310 primary hip arthroscopy procedures from 2009-2020. We identified 62 cases that went on to have a hip arthroscopy on the contralateral side. The bilateral hip arthroscopy cohort was compared to unilateral cohort for sex, age, BMI, pre-op alpha angle and centre edge angle measured on AP pelvis XRay, femoral torsion, traction time, skin to skin time, Tonnis grade, intra-op labral or chondral defect. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant.

Of the 62 patients that required contralateral hip arthroscopy, the average age was 32.7 compared with 37.8 in the unilateral cohort (p = 0.01) and BMI was lower in the bilateral cohort (26.2) compared to the unilateral cohort (27.6) (p=0.04). The average alpha angle was 76.3⁰ in the bilateral compared to 66⁰ in the unilateral cohort (p = 0.01). Skin to skin time was longer in cases in which a contralateral surgery was performed (106.3 mins vs 86.4 mins) (p=0.01). Interestingly, 50 male patients required contralateral hip arthroscopy compared to 12 female patients (p=0.01). No other variables were statistically significant.

In conclusion, this study does re-enforce existing literature by stating that younger patients are more likely to require contralateral hip arthroscopy. This may be due to the fact that these patients require increased range of motion from the hip joint to perform activities such as sports where as older patients may not need the same amount of range of motion to perform their activities. Significantly higher alpha angles were noted in patients requiring contralateral hip arthroscopy, which has not been shown in previous literature. This helps to explain that larger CAM deformities will likely require contralateral hip arthroscopy because these patients likely impinge more during simple activities of daily living. Contralateral hip arthroscopy is also more common in male patients who typically have a larger CAM deformity. In summary, this study will help to risk stratify patients who will likely require contralateral hip arthroscopy and should be a discussion point during pre-operative counseling. That offering early subsequent or simultaneous hip arthroscopy in young male patients with large CAMs should be offered when symptoms are mild.

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume.

This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant.

For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161

Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique.

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume.

This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant.

For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161

Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique.

Although the impact of sexual difficulties on quality of life in patients with hip osteoarthritis has been documented in previous literature, recent research has shown that surgeons rarely discuss this sensitive topic with patients. The purpose of this study was to develop an educational tool to address common questions that patients may have regarding returning to sexual activity following their total hip arthroplasty (THA).

The study was conducted in two phases. In Phase 1, patients who underwent a THA between 2013–2017 at a single centre were retrospectively identified and sent an anonymous online survey. This survey was aimed at assessing patient-specific concerns regarding whether they would have liked to receive information about returning to sexual activity, what information they would have liked to know and how they would have liked to receive this information. An educational tool was developed based on the findings of Phase 1. In Phase 2, prospective patients who were scheduled for a unilateral or bilateral THA were provided with the educational tool prior to their surgery. A questionnaire was administered to evaluate the effectiveness of this educational tool. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests were used for data analysis.

In Phase 1, the overall response rate was 34.7% (n = 58/167). Out of the total respondents, 51.7% indicated an interest in receiving information on when to return to sexual activity following a THA. Patients selected an informational pamphlet as the most desired method of receiving information (p = .044). In Phase 2, the response rate was 54.5% (n = 30/55). Overall, 90% of patients felt that the pamphlet addressed all their concerns, and 93.3% felt they were provided with adequate information on how they could get more information. The pamphlet addressed questions regarding when it was safe to resume sexual activity following a THA, what positions were safe, and the associated risks.

Individuals undergoing a THA are modestly interested in receiving information regarding when to return to sexual activity following their surgery, especially those who are sexually active preoperatively. This educational pamphlet may be useful in routine clinical practice in addressing concerns regarding returning to sexual activity. Understanding patients' goals and expectations for their postoperative course may help surgeons provide a more comprehensive approach to patient care.

Necrotizing Fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening infectious condition which requires expedient diagnosis to proceed with urgent surgical debridement. However, it can be difficult to establish an early diagnosis and expedite operative management as signs and symptoms are often non-specific and may mimic other pathology. Scoring systems such as The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) have been proposed to incorporate laboratory findings to predict whether a soft tissue infection is likely to be NF. Recent studies have found the sensitivity and specificity of the LRINEC tool to be lower than originally cited by the LRINEC authors in a validation cohort. Furthermore, there seems to be a predilection for certain geographic locations of patients with NF transferred to our tertiary care center for management, however, to our knowledge, geographic risk factors for NF have not been reported. This study also aims to determine the morbidity and mortality rate of NF at our Canadian tertiary hospital in recent years.

Comorbidities such as smoking, diabetes, and steroid use will be analyzed for any correlation with developing NF. Identification of patient factors in correlation with laboratory values may help identify patients at higher risk for having NF upon their presentation to the emergency department. A resultant earlier diagnosis of necrotizing soft tissue infections would allow for earlier surgical debridement and positively influence patient outcomes.

A retrospective chart review of 125 cases of NF at Kingston Health Sciences Centre from 2005 to 2017 was carried out to assess the validity of the LRINEC in our population and to examine the effect of comorbid factors such as smoking, diabetes, and corticosteroid use on the development of NF. The study cohort included patients treated by all surgical disciplines at our institution over twelve years. A separate cohort of 125 cellulitis or abscess cases was analyzed to assess the validity of the LRINEC tool in differentiating necrotizing fasciitis from non-necrotizing infections such as cellulitis and soft tissue abscess.

The 30-day mortality rate of NF treated at our institution during the study period was 21%. Advanced age was found to be a significant risk factor for death within 30 days of diagnosis (p=0.001). Smoking and steroid use were both found to increase risk for developing NF (p=0.01 and p=0.03, respectively). Diabetes did not appear to increase risk NF. There was no statistical difference in mortality rates between males and females with NF. The sensitivity of LRINEC in detecting NF was only 47% with a specificity of 74%.

The mortality rate of NF at our center is similar to that of other countries in recent years. Males and females have nearly equal mortality rates from NF. Smoking and steroid use appear to increase risk for developing NF, while diabetes may not. The LRINEC assessment tool alone may underestimate risk for developing NF, however, use of other clinical factors such as comorbidity analysis will further aide in the diagnosis of NF allowing for earlier surgical debridement.

The inmate population is a unique cohort with several healthcare-related challenges. International studies have demonstrated higher rates of infectious diseases, chronic diseases and psychiatric disorders in inmates when compared to general population. However, little is known about the outcomes following total joint arthroplasty in this population. This retrospective chart review aims to outline the differences in clinical outcomes after hip and knee total joint arthroplasty in the Kingston inmate population compared to the national population standard.

A list of all inmate inpatient hospital visits with diagnostic/procedure codes pertaining to total joint arthroplasty within the last ten years was obtained through a computer-based search of the Kingston General Hospital Discharge Abstract Database(DAD). The patient charts were reviewed and demographic and outcome data pertinent to our study was collected. Data was compiled using Excel and imported into IBM SPSS for descriptive analysis.

Twenty male inmate patients underwent 24 primary Total Hip Arthroplasties(THA) or Total Knee Arthroplasties(TKA) and one medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from May 2003 to January 2013. The average age was 58 with mean Body Mass Index(BMI) of 34. Median American Society of Anesthesiologist(ASA) score was 3 and mean Charlston Comorbidity Index was 3.92. The rates of HCV and HIV were 35%(n=5) and 0%, respectively. Average length of stay from time of initial procedure was 4.2 days. The overall revision rate was 24% (n=6). Reasons for revision included deep prosthetic infection (50%, n=3), aseptic loosening (17%, n=1), arthrofibrosis (17%, n=1) and late periprosthetic fracture (17%, n=1). Infection rates were reported at 16% (n=4); 75% of which were deep prosthetic infections requiring revision surgery. Other complications included ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) (n=1), and postoperative knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia(MUA) (n=1).

Compared to Correctional Services Canada(CSC) data on male inmate health in 2012, our study population demonstrated a higher rate of HCV (35% vs. 9.4%), diabetes (30% vs. 4.2%) and overall cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities. This may reflect the higher rate of comorbidities associated with osteoarthritis, such as BMI>25, which was evident in 95% of our study population vs. 64.5% in Canadian inmates. Total joint revision rates in our inmate study population was 24%, which is higher than the 2014 Canadian Joint Replacement Registry's yearly revision rate of 8.7% in THA and 5.2% in TKA. Our study population also demonstrated infection as the leading cause for revision at 50%, compared to 14.5% for THA and 19.6% for TKA in the general Canadian population. Further study of the complex biopsychosocial risk factors in the inmate population is warranted to better define pre-surgical risk assessment criteria.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a condition in which the acetabulum provides insufficient coverage of the femoral head in the hip joint. This configuration gives poor biomechanical load distribution, with increased stress at the superior aspect of the joint surfaces, and can often lead to degenerative arthritis. Morphologically, the poor coverage may be due to an acetabulum that is too shallow or oriented in valgus.

The dysplastic deformity can be treated surgically with a group of similar procedures, often labeled periacetabular osteotomies or rotational acetabular osteotomies. Each involves separating the acetabulum from the pelvis and fixating the fragment back to the pelvis in an orientation with increased coverage of the femoral head. This redistributes the biomechanical loads relative to acetabulum.

Bone remodeling at the level of trabeculae is an accepted concept under research; however, it is unclear whether the hip undergoes gross morphology changes in response to changes in biomechanical loading. An understanding of the degree to which this remodeling occurs (if at all) may have an impact on surgical planning.

In this retrospective study, computed tomography (CT) scans of 13 patients (2 male, 11 female, 40 ± 9 years of age) undergoing unilateral periacetabular osteotomies were examined; scans were taken both pre-operatively and at least a year post-operatively with an in-plane resolution of 0.55 mm and a slice thickness of 1.25 mm. Scans were segmented to produce triangulated meshes for the proximal femurs and the pelvis. These scans were manually processed to isolate the articular portions of the femoral heads and acetabulums, respectively; the fovea, acetabular fossa, any osteophytes and any segmentation artifacts were excluded.

Post-operative meshes were registered to their pre-operative counterparts for both the femoral head and the acetabulum, for both the operative and non-operative hips, using the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm to 20 iterations. To account for differences in defining the edges of the articular surfaces in the manual isolation, metrics were only calculated using points that were within 0.3 mm of a normal from the opposing mesh. With the resulting matched data, nearest neighbour distances were calculated to form the remodeling metrics. Select spurious datapoints were removed manually.

For the operative femoral heads, the registered post-operative points were 0.24±0.53 mm outside of the pre-operative points. The maximum deviation was on average 1.94 mm with worst-case of 2.99 mm; the minimum deviation was −0.62 mm with worst-case of −2.06 mm. Positive numbers indicate the post-operative points are ‘outside’ of the pre-operative points – that is, farther from the head centre. The non-operative femoral heads have similar deviation values, 0.21±0.46 mm outside, with maximum and minimum deviation averaging to 1.24 mm and −0.74 mm respectively, with worst cases of 2.99mm and −1.80mm.

For the operative acetabulums, the post-operative deviations were −0.08±0.43mm. The maximum and minimum deviations averaged to 0.62mm and −0.82mm, with worst cases of 2.14mm and −1.51mm across the set. Again, the non-operative acetabulums were very similar; post-operative deviations were −0.02±0.43mm, maximum and minimum deviations averaged to 1.24mm and −0.65mm, with worst cases of 1.97mm and −2.00mm.

These quantitative measurements were reflected in manual examination of the meshes; generally speaking, there were small deviations with no overarching patterns across the anatomy.

All metrics were very similar across the same anatomy (that is, femoral head or acetabulum) regardless of whether the hip operative or non-operative. Femurs tended to ‘grow’ slightly post-operatively, but by less than a half voxel in size. Given that the CT voxels are large compared to the measured deviations, it is possible the results may be sensitive to the manual segmentations used as source data.

Manual examination of the deviations indicated a few potential trends. Seven operative and eleven non-operative acetabulums had a small patch of positive deviation (1mm to 1.5mm) in the anterosuperior aspect. This can be seen in the plot as the yellow-red area near the top right of the leftmost rendering. Other high-deviation areas included the superior aspect of the acetabulum (both positive and negative) and the superior aspect of the femoral head (generally positive).

The edges of the mesh were often a source of high deviation. This is likely an artifact of over-inclusion the manual isolation of the articular surfaces, as joint surfaces become non-articular as they move away from the joint interface.

Overall, the superior and anterosuperior aspects of the acetabulum and the superior aspect of the femoral head showed some indication of systemic changes; further study may clarify whether these data represent consistent anatomical changes. However, as the magnitude of the deviations between pre- and post-operative scans are on or below the order of the CT voxel size, we conclude that (in the absence of other strongly compelling evidence) periacetabular osteotomies for adults should be planned without the expectation of gross remodeling of the articular surfaces.

Femoroacetabular impingement is a condition in which the femoral head/neck region abnormally contacts the acetabulum, limiting the range of motion of the hip and often associated with pain, damage, and loss of function. The pathophysiology of osteoarthritic changes stemming from impingement syndromes has been linked to the shape of the hip; however, little is known about the influence of the soft tissues to this process.

In this pilot study, we used computer-assisted navigation technology to track motion on a cadaver that had mild bilateral cam-impingement lesions, and then performed a virtual simulation to locate sites of impingement. We hypothesised that soft tissues contribute to the degree and location of impingement, so we compared impingements across three different dissection states: (i) all soft tissues intact; (ii) post-capsulectomy; with only the labrum and ligamentum teres remaining; and (iii) disarticulated, with labrum and ligamentum teres removed.

With ethical approval, we used one fresh frozen cadaver pelvis that was sectioned above the fifth lumbar vertebra and at the knee. The femurs and pelvis were implanted with fiducial screws as an accurate means for surface-based image registration. With all soft tissues intact, tissues were imaged using computed tomography with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm. The CT scans were imported into Mimics (v13.0, Materialise, Belgium) and carefully segmented, with particular detail to the articular regions and fiducials, to create 3D digital models of the pelvis and femurs.

On each side, optical local coordinate reference (LCR) bodies were attached at the proximal femur and iliac crest to permit spatial tracking with an Optotrak Certus camera (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada). The 3D digital models were imported into the VSS navigation system (iGO Technologies, Kingston, Canada) and scrupulously registered to the anatomy using the fiducial screws and a calibrated probe. The pose of the femur and pelvis were recorded throughout a series of twelve movements involving various combinations of flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, internal-external rotation and circumduction, as well as functional movements typical of a clinical hip screening. Soft tissues were selectively removed and the movements were repeated post-capsulectomy and completely disarticulated.

The recorded pose data were applied to the 3D digital models to perform a computational simulation of the movements during the trials. The pose data were expressed in coordinates of the anterior pelvic plane to compute angles of motion in the principal directions (flexion, abduction, rotation). The motion data were further filtered so that only comparable ranges of motion were present for data analysis. Algorithms were developed to determine bone-on-bone impingement locations by finding contact points between the models.

Impingement locations were plotted on the digital models of the femur and pelvis in order to establish zones of impingement. The surface area of each impingement zone was computed by using a Crust-based algorithm that triangulated impingement points encompassing a region, and then summed the surface area of each triangle to estimate the total impingement surface area.

Upon visual inspection, it was immediately apparent that impingements tended to occur in well-defined regions. On the femur, these were found along aspects of the head-neck junction, especially on or near osteophytes. On the pelvis, impingement regions were found along the acetabular rim and extending into the lunate region.

With soft tissues intact, both femurs and pelvis had prominent anterior and posterior impingement zones. In contrast, post-capsulectomy impingement zones were predominately confined to the anterior region. It should be noted, however, that the total impingement area decreased post-capsulectomy, representing only about 25% of the total area of impingements when all soft tissues were intact. This was also true in the disarticulated state.

Both femurs had mild posterior cam lesions, the right worse than the left. Impingements were seen at these sites with soft tissues intact, but diminished almost entirely post-capsulectomy. The anterior lesions were located contra coup to these cam lesions.

With soft tissues intact, impingements tended to occur in external rotation and abduction. With soft tissues removed there was a pronounced shift towards impingements occurring in internal rotation. Impingements were also noted in large flexion angles and large abduction-adduction angles in the absence of soft tissues.

Although it is widely accepted that the hip is spherical in shape and has ball-and-socket kinematics, recent work suggests that the osteoarthritic hip is aspherical and that translational motion is present. On a very limited series, this work is supportive of the latter observation: if hip motion is purely spherical, a decrease in impingements post-capsulectomy is exceedingly hard to describe. However, if soft tissues cause translatory motion, then their absence logically should lead to a change in the impingement pattern (which we found).

This preliminary study provides a methodology for studying the effects of soft tissue on impingements. We conclude that soft tissues do indeed play an important role in impingement and may even contribute to the development of impingement lesions. Limitations include a small sample size, so further studies are required prior to conclusively establishing impingement patterns in passive kinematics of cadaver hips.

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) is a surgical technique that has become more popular in recent years for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis in young patients. For these patients, an HRA offers the advantages of preserving the physiologic anatomy of a patient's femoral head size and neck offset, which has been theoretically suggested to improve range of motion and muscle function, as well as preserving bone stock for future revision surgeries. Although the improvements in quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) are well-documented, there is a lack of literature documenting the improvements in quality of life in patients undergoing HRA.

Purpose

In the literature, the hip is near-ubiquitously described as a mechanical ball-and-socket joint. This implies purely rotational motion as well as sphere-on-sphere contact geometry. However, previous works, by several authors, have quantitatively demonstrated asphericity of the articular hip surfaces in a variety of populations. This in turn implies the true kinematics of the hip joint may be more complex than purely rotational motion.

Previously, general ellipsoidal shapes have been used to model the articular surface of the acetabulii of dysplastic hips. This work aims to orient the major axis of these ellipsoids with respect to the anterior pelvic plane (APP).

Aim: The purpose of this study was to report our experience mid to long-term results of hybrid cement fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: Patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty using a hybrid cement technique (press-fit diaphyseal fixation and cemented metaphyseal fixation) with a titanium fluted revision knee implant were reviewed. There were 127 patients. Mean age at surgery was 71 years (range 41–94 years). There were 56 males and 71 females. Mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 2–12 years). A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis using an end-point of revision surgery or radiographic loosening was employed to determine probability of survival at 5 and 10 years.

Results: 127 patients (135 knees), 31 patients (36 knees) died and 2 patients (2 knees) were lost to follow-up. Six patients (six knees) were revised at a mean of 3.5 years (range 1–8 yrs). Of the 6 revisions, two were for re-infection, two were for (MCL) instability, and two were for aseptic loosening. Mean Knee Society clinical and functional scores were 86 and 55 points, respectively. The mean range of motion was 108 degrees. End of stem pain was not reported in this group of patients. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed a probability of survival free of revision for aseptic loosening of 98% at 12 years.

Discussion: The results of this study suggest that the use of a hybrid cement technique in revision knee arthroplasty can provide good mid to long-term results. Radiographic analysis has shown continued satisfactory appearances regardless of constraint, stem size and augments. Our experience has shown that the survivorship of a hybrid fixation technique for revision knee arthroplasty is comparable to reported long-term survivorship of cemented revision knee arthroplasty.

The use of wound drains in arthroplasty patients is controversial. Previous work including a meta analysis looking at closed drainage systems has shown no benefit in their use. It is postulated that retransfusion drains may offer an advantage over closed drains and cut allogenic transfusion requirements and aid wound healing. This study was designed to assess the use of retransfusion drains in hip and knee replacement patients and prove the null hypothesis that there is no difference in post op haemaglobin levels or transfusion with their use.

Following an initial pilot audit of blood drainage in such patients we designed a protocol for a prospective trial. In a prospective randomised controlled study we evaluated the use of retransfusion drains in primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Eighty patients were randomised to removal of the drain at six or twenty-four hours post op, to assess the most efficient and beneficial use of such drains. The rate of blood drainage, post-operative haemaglobin (Hb) levels, blood transfusion, hospital stay, complications and rehabilitation observed. The two groups were comparable, have a follow up of two years and all attempts to control variables were made.

The drop in haemaglobin, hospital stay, complications and rehabilitation between both groups revealed no significant difference in all respects. Wound healing appeared better in six-hour group for hip and knee patients. There is no effect of type of joint or age on the drop in Hb. The TKR patients drained sig. more blood than the THR patients. The rate of blood loss is discussed. The amount of blood drained that was retransfused was 94% efficient. The allogenic transfusion rates were higher in the six-hour knee group. Three patients required post operative antibiotic but at latest follow up all patients were reported as having no problems and no evidence of infection.

This study concludes that retransfusion drains offer no advantage in the arthroplasty patients’ care.