Background

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging scenario following complex primary THA for developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH). This study envisages the long-term outcomes of revision DDH and the role of lateral structural support in socket fixation in these young patients who may require multiple revisions in their life-time.

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging scenario following complex primary THA for developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH). Our study envisages the long-term outcomes of revision DDH and the role of lateral structural support in socket fixation in these young patients who may require multiple revisions in their life-time.

Hundred and eighteen consecutive cemented revision THAs with minimum follow up of 5 years following primary diagnosis of DDH operated between January 1974 and December 2012 were analysed for their clinical and radiological outcomes.

The mean follow-up of 118 patients was 11.0 years (5.1–39.6 years). The Kaplan Mier survivorship at 11 years with end point as revision for any reason was 89.8% (CI 81.1–98.4). Of 118 revisions, 88 acetabular revisions were for aseptic loosening. Out of the acetabular revisions, 21 had pre-existing structural bone grafts from primary surgery, of which only 3 needed structural re-grafting during revision. Amongst the remaining 18 hips, the lateral support from the previous graft facilitated revision with no requirement of additional structural graft. Sixty-three hips did not have any form of grafting during primary operation. Amongst them, 35 had bone grafting in revision surgery (18 structural grafting).

This study reports the largest number of revision THAs with primary diagnosis of DDH with the longest follow up. In our experience, the lateral support from the structural graft done in primary operation appears to have provided benefit in subsequent revision socket fixation.

Introduction: Revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of femoral component is successfully treated with impaction bone grafting technique. Owing to easier technique and shorter operative time, distally fixed non-cemented long stems have gained popularity in the present era. However, use of long stems could make subsequent re-revision difficult due to further bone loss. The standard length stem has been often critiqued due to apprehension of peri-prosthetic fracture.

This study aims to determine the long-term outcomes of the impaction bone grafting of the femur for aseptic loosening in revision hip arthroplasty using standard length C-stems. 168 total hip revisions of 162 patients with impaction bone grafting and cemented standard C-stem (done with standardized technique) between 1995 and 2008 at a tertiary referral centre were included. Revisions for infection and segmental bone defects were excluded.

Mean follow-up of the 168 revision hips was 10.5 years (range 5 – 19.1 years). 14 patients (8.3%) were re-revised, reasons being, persistent deep infection (1.8%), repeated dislocations (1.2%), cup loosening (4.8%) and stem loosening (1.2%). Only 1 patient (0.6%) was re-revised due to stem loosening alone. No peri-prosthetic fractures (intra-operative or post-operative) or stem breakage were identified.

Use of standard stem length in hip revisions with impaction bone grafting does not increase the risk of peri-prosthetic fractures, instead, reconstitutes the bone stock. This questions the conventional principle of bypassing the distal cavitation of femur by 2 cortical diameters with the use of long stem. In our experience, a good proximal femur support is key to performance of standard length cemented stems in revision for aseptic loosening irrespective of grade of distal cavitation for cavitatory defects of femur when treated with impaction bone grafting.

The choice of stem length in total hip revision with impaction bone grafting of femur is essentially based upon the grade of cavitation of femur and surgeon's preference. The standard length stem has been often critiqued for the apprehension of peri-prosthetic fracture. Our study highlights the importance of proximal bone stock rather than distal cavitation in determining the length of femoral stem.

168 total hip revisions of 162 patients with impaction bone grafting and cemented standard C-stem (done with standardized technique) between 1995 and 2008 at a tertiary referral centre were included. Revisions for infection and segmental bone defects were excluded. Serial radiographs were retrospectively analysed by two people independently, using Endoklinik classification, Gruen zones and more and outcomes were analysed.

Mean follow-up of the 168 revision hips was 10.5 years (range 5 – 19.1 years). 14 patients (8.3%) were re-revised, reasons being, persistent deep infection (1.8%), repeated dislocations (1.2%), cup loosening (4.8%) and stem loosening (1.2%). Only 1 patient (0.6%) was re-revised due to stem loosening alone. No peri-prosthetic fractures or stem breakage were identified.

Use of standard stem length in hip revisions with impaction bone grafting doesn't increase the risk of peri-prosthetic fractures even during long term follow up period. This questions the principle of bypassing the distal cavitation of femur by 2 cortical diameters with the use of long stem. In our experience, a good proximal femur support aids in the performance of standard length cemented stems in revision for aseptic loosening irrespective of grade of distal cavitation for cavitory defects of femur treated with impaction bone grafting.

Structural bulk autografts restore the severe bone loss at primary hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips and have shown to have good long term outcomes. There are only a few reports of revision arthroplasty for these sockets that fail eventually. We report on a series of such primary hips which underwent cemented revision of the socket for aseptic loosening and their outcomes.

A retrospective review was performed from our database to identify fifteen acetabular revisions after previous bulk autograft. The mean age at revision was 53.9 years (range 31–72.1). The mean duration between the primary and revision arthroplasty was 12.4 years (range 6.6 – 20.3). All procedures were done using trochanteric osteotomy and three hips also needed the femoral component revision. All fifteen hips needed re-bone grafting at the revision surgery to restore the new socket to the level of the true acetabulum. Of these ten hips had morsellised impaction allograft, and the remaining five also needing a structural bulk allograft.

Two sockets underwent re-revision at mean 7.5 years for aseptic loosening. One patient had a dislocation that was reduced closed. At a mean follow up of 5.7 years, one socket showed superior migration, but was stable and did not need further intervention. Two other sockets also showed radiological evidence of loosening, and are being closely monitored.

The medium term results of cemented acetabular revision in this younger age group are satisfactory, with repeat bone grafting being required to restore the true acetabular position. Though the primary arthroplasty with bulk bone graft recreates the acetabular bone stock, significant bone loss due to the mechanical loosening of the socket needs to be anticipated in revision surgery.

Introduction

Primary hip replacement in young active patients is on the increase. Due to the demands set by the patient, implants used in this patient group should have a proven long-term clinical and radiological outcome. We report our results in patients under the age of 50 using the C-Stem femoral component – a cemented triple tapered polished stem.

Introduction

Large acetabular bone defects caused by aseptic loosening are common. Reconstruction of large segmental defects can be challenging. Various implants and operative techniques have been developed to allow further acetabular revision in cases where bone stock is poor. Reconstitution of bone stock is desirable especially in younger patients. The aim of the study was to review the clinical and radiological results of hip revision with structural acetabular bone grafts using fresh frozen allograft and cemented components.

Introduction

We present the outcome of 297 acetabular revisions using bone grafting and cemented acetabular components in 297 patients, with a mean follow-up of 8 years 3 months (5–20 years).

The C-Stem in its design as a triple tapered stem, is the logical development of the original Charnley flat-back polished stem. The concept, design and the surgical technique cater for a limited slip of the stem within the cement mantle transferring the load more proximally.

Five thousand two hundred and thirty three primary procedures using a C-stem have been carried out since 1993. We reviewed all 621 cases that had their total hip arthroplasty before 1998.

Sixty nine patients (70 hips) had died and 101 hips had not reached a ten-year clinical and radiological follow-up and had not been revised. Thirty-two hips had been revised before 10 years, none were revised for aseptic stem loosening and no stems. The indications for revision were Infection in 4, dislocation in 3, aseptic cup loosening in 24 and unexplained pain in 1.

The remaining 418 hips had a mean follow-up of 12 years (range 10–15 years). There were 216 women and 173 men, and 34 patients had bilateral LFAs. The patients' mean age at surgery was 53 years (range 16–83 years). Thirty four hips had been revised at the time of review. The reasons for revision were infection in 5, dislocation in 2, aseptic cup loosening in 24 and 1 for neuralgia paraesthetica where the stem was well fixed. Two hips were revised for stem fracture.

There were no revisions for stem loosening but 2 stems were revised for fracture - both with a defective cement mantle proximally. The clinical results are very encouraging and they support the concept of the Charnley cemented low friction arthroplasty, but place a demand on the understanding of the technique and its execution at surgery.

Introduction

The aim of the study was to whether the bone grafting techniques used affected the long term stability of the acetabular implant.

Introduction:. The C-Stem in its design as a triple tapered stem, is the logical development of the original Charnley flat-back polished stem. The concept, design and the surgical technique cater for a limited slip of the stem within the cement mantle transferring the load more proximally.

Method: Five thousand two hundred and thirty three primary procedures using a C-stem have been carried out since 1993. We reviewed all 621 cases that had their total hip arthroplasty before 1998.

Results:. Sixty nine patients (70 hips) had died and 106 hips had not reached a ten-year clinical and radiological follow-up and had not been revised. In 22 hips, the stem had been changed before the 10 year follow-up, with infection, dislocation and loosening of the cup being the reasons for revision. None of the stems were loose.

The remaining 423 hips had a mean follow-up of 11 years (range 10 – 15 years). There were 216 women and 173 men, and 34 patients had bilateral LFAs. The patients’ mean age at surgery was 53 years (range 16 – 83 years). Thirty eight hips had been revised at the time of review. The reasons for revision were infection in 5: dislocation in 2: loose cup in 28: wear in 2 and 1 for meralgia paresthetica where the stem was found to be well fixed. In 1 case which had not been revised there was radiological loosening of the stem in a patient with Gaucher’s disease.

Discussion: With only 1 stem radiologically loose and no revisions for stem loosening the clinical results are very encouraging and they support the concept of the Charnley cemented low friction arthroplasty, but place a demand on the understanding of the technique and its execution at surgery.

With an increasing number of primary total hip arthroplasties being carried out worldwide, and a lack or inadequate follow-up leading to delays in revision surgery, more complex problems including periprosthetic fracture have to be dealt with at revision surgery.

Unawareness, that clinical results do not reflect the mechanical state of the arthroplasty, together with strain shielding in the femur, progressive endosteal cavitation and stem migration may result in deterioration of the periprosthetic bone stock and femoral fracture.

Acute onset due to the fracture, severe symptoms and poor medical status of the patient usually demands immediate surgical intervention.

We have developed a modular cemented femoral component for revisions where deficiency of the proximal femur, or the femoral fracture, demands a variable extra-femoral portion of the stem. The shaft of the stem is 200mm or longer allowing the extra-medullary position to vary up to 15cm. It has a double polished taper

Between 1985 and 2007 the stem has been used in 79 revisions where there was a periprosthetic fracture. The mean age at surgery was 70 years (37–93) and the mean follow-up was 4 years (0–14 years 10 months). In 86% the primary surgery had been performed at another hospital. In 80% the fracture had united at one year. The main post-operative problem was dislocation in 10 cases between 7 days and 9 years after revision and was most common where the abductors were absent. 2 patients died in the post-operative period. Five hips have been re-revised, 3 for dislocation, 1 for Infection and 1 stem loosening.

Overall revision for periprosthetic fracture using this implant has given good results.

Although the results of this type of surgery are encouraging, this must not be considered as an alternative to regular follow-up and early intervention in cases where progressive loosening and deteriorating bone stock are likely to lead to a more demanding surgery.

Increasing follow-up identifies the outcome in younger patients who have undergone total hip replacement (THR) and reveals the true potential for survival of the prosthesis. We identified 28 patients (39 THRs) who had undergone cemented Charnley low friction arthroplasty between 1969 and 2001. Their mean age at operation was 17.9 years (12 to 19) and the maximum follow-up was 34 years. Two patients (4 THRs) were lost to follow-up, 13 (16 THRs) were revised at a mean period of 19.1 years (8 to 34) and 13 (19 THRs) continue to attend regular follow-up at a mean of 12.6 years (2.3 to 29). In this surviving group one acetabular component was radiologically loose and all femoral components were secure. In all the patients the diameter of the femoral head was 22.225 mm with Charnley femoral components used in 29 hips and C-stem femoral components in ten. In young patients who require THR the acetabular bone stock is generally a limiting factor for the size of the component. Excellent long-term results can be obtained with a cemented polyethylene acetabular component and a femoral head of small diameter.

Introduction: The triple tapered polished cemented C-stem has evolved from the study on long-term results of the Charnley design, when first fractures of the stem and then proximal strain shielding of the femur and stem loosening were identified as the continuation of the same process. The design utilises the common engineering principle of male (stem) and female (cement) tapers engaging under load, loading the proximal femur.

Methods and Results: The C-stem was tested extensively and introduced into clinical practice in December 1993. Up to the end of October 2007, 4558 have been implanted in primary operations.

None of the 4558 stems have been revised for aseptic loosening or fracture.

The patient’s mean age at surgery was 48 years (range 15–76), and 171 hips with a mean follow-up of 11 years (range 10–13.7) have now passed 10 years. There were 97 females and 64 males in this group with 10 patients having bilateral C-stems. The main underlying pathologies were Primary Osteoarthritis 30%, Developmental Dysplasia of the hip 27% and Avascular Necrosis of the hip 19%.

Clinical outcome graded according to d’aubigne and postel for pain, function and movement has improved from 3.1, 3.1 and 2.9 to 5.9, 5.7 and 5.6 respectively.

A good quality proximal femur had been maintained in 47.1% and improved in a further 29.9%.

Discussion: The results achieved with the C-Stem design and technique are encouraging and support the concept of loading the proximal femur, but place a demand on the understanding of the technique and its execution at surgery.

Introduction. Presentation of results by survivorship analysis method offers uniformity of terminology and comparability of results, an essential aspect of scientific communication. The Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register (SNTHAR) has set the standards with revision as the failure endpoint.

We set out to examine the survivorship after primary Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty (LFA) with revision as the end point, but documenting all the operative findings.

Methods & Results. Between November 1962 and June 2005, 22,066 primary operations in 17409 patients had been carried out at the author’s hospital by over 330 surgeons. By June 2006, 1001 (4.5%) hips have been revised.

Survivorship with revision as the end point was: infection 95%, dislocation 98%, fractured stem 88.6%, loose stem 72.5%, loose cup 53,7%.

Infection and dislocation are early problems. With improved cementing techniques stem loosening does not become a problem until 11 years after the primary. Loosening and wear of the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene cup is a significant long-term problem.

Discussion. Since revision is an event interrupting a process, its timing will influence the survivorship analysis pattern and indications and detailed operative findings will become important issues. Since clinical results do not reflect the mechanical state of the arthroplasty to await symptoms would invariably mean that revisions are likely to be carried out late and as such the complexity of complications are likely to increase. Furthermore, if information gathered is of a single “indication for revision”, and not of the operative findings at revision, the information would be of limited value.

Our conclusion is that regular follow-up after hip replacement is essential. The frequency, judged from the revision patterns, would suggest that every two years would not be unreasonable. Recording of all operative findings at revision is essential.

The Triple-tapered cemented polished C-Stem has evolved from the study of long-term results of the Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty when the first fractured stem and then proximal strain shielding of the femur and stem loosening were identified as the continuation of the same process- the lack or loss of proximal stem support.

The concept, design and the surgical technique cater for a limited slip of the C-stem within the cement mantle transferring the load more proximally. With a follow-up past 12 years and 4063 primary procedures there have been no revisions for aseptic stem loosening and no stem is radiologically loose.

We have reviewed 1008 primary C-Stem hip arthroplasties performed by 23 surgeons with a minimum of 5 years clinical and radiological follow-up. The mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 5 – 12) and the mean age at surgery was 57 years (range (15 – 85). In 58% the underlying pathology was primary osteoarthritis, 20% congenital dysplasia, 10% quadrantic head necrosis, 5% rheumatoid arthritis, 5% slipped upper femoral epiphysis and 4% protrusio acetabulae.

The concept of the triple tapered stem is validated radiologically with an improved proximal femoral bone stock in over 20% of cases and a maintained bone stock in 60%.

There were no post-operative complications within 1 year in 87% and no late complications (after 1 year) in 91%. The main late complications were 3.9% aseptic cup loosening, 1% infection and 0.8% dislocation. There were no aseptic loose stems.

Twenty-eight hips have been revised (2.8%), 3 for infection, 2 for dislocation and 23 for aseptic cup loosening. There were no revisions for aseptic stem loosening.

The results support the concept but place a demand on the understanding of the technique and its execution at surgery.

Introduction: There is an increasing trend for autologous blood transfusion in hip and knee replacement and we therefore felt the need to properties of the fluid reinfused.

Objectives of the study: The study objective was to determine the volume and Haemoglobin content of the reinfused blood.

Materials and methods: We prospectively studied 108 patients with primary Hip and knee arthroplasty. The drained blood was reinfused within 6 hours as recommended by the manufacturer. The volume of the drained and reinfused fluid was measured in millilitres.. The Haemoglobin (Hb.) of the patient was measured preoperatively and postoperatively in recovery. The Hb. of the drained blood and reinfused blood were also measured.

Results : The mean volume of the drained blood in the hip replacement group was 180.6 ml. while that of the reinfused blood was 132.7 ml. The mean volume of the drained blood in the knee group was 372.78 ml. while that of the reinfused blood was 362.76 ml.

The mean Haemoglobin of the reinfused blood in the hip group was 6.9 gm/dl significantly lower (p< 0.05) than the drained blood Hb. of 10.9. Similarly the Haemoglobin of the blood reinfused in knee replacements was significantly lower at 6.8 gm/dl. (p< 0.001). This was less than half of the average Hb. content of homologous blood transfusion.

Conclusion: The Haemoglobin content of the reinfused blood in Hip and knee replacement was quite low to be considered as a replacement for homologous blood transfusion and further studies may be required to confirm the efficacy of reinfusion drainage compared to homologous blood transfusion.

Introduction: There is an increasing trend for autologous blood transfusion in hip and knee replacement and we therefore felt the need to properties of the fluid reinfused.

Objectives of the study: The study objective was to determine the volume and Haemoglobin content of the reinfused blood.

Methods: We prospectively studied 108 patients with primary Hip and knee arthroplasty. The drained blood was reinfused within 6 hours as recommended by the manufacturer. The volume of the drained and reinfused fluid was measured in millilitres.. The Haemoglobin (Hb.) of the patient was measured preoperatively and postoperatively in recovery. The Hb. of the drained blood and reinfused blood were also measured.

Results: The mean volume of the drained blood in the hip replacement group was 180.6 ml. while that of the reinfused blood was 132.7 ml. The mean volume of the drained blood in the knee group was 372.78 ml. while that of the reinfused blood was 362.76 ml.

The mean Haemoglobin of the reinfused blood in the hip group was 6.9 gm/dl significantly lower (p< 0.05) than the drained blood Hb. of 10.9. Similarly the Haemoglobin of the blood reinfused in knee replacements was significantly lower at 6.8 gm/dl. (p< 0.001). This was less than half of the average Hb. content of homologous blood transfusion

Discussion: The Haemoglobin content of the reinfused blood in Hip and knee replacement was quite low to be considered as a replacement for homologous blood transfusion and further studies may be required to confirm the efficacy of reinfusion drainage compared to homologous blood transfusion

Introduction: We performed a retrospective case control study in 80 patients who under went revision hip surgery at our unit.

Methodology: Group A (40 patients), received tranexamic acid and intra-operative cell salvage. Group B (40 patients) a matched control did not receive these treatments. Each group was divided into 4 sub groups; revision of both components, revision of components + bone grafting, revision acetabular component +/− bone grafting and revision femoral component +/− bone graft.

Results: In group A the total number of units transfused was 139 compared to 52 in group B. This represents a reduction in blood usage of 37%. The mean amount of blood transfused from cell salvage in each group was 858mls, 477mls, 228mls and 464mls. There was a significant difference in the amount of blood returned between the groups (p< 0.0001). In the control group 37 patients needed transfusion, in the study group 22 (p< 0.0001). At our unit a cost analysis calculation has shown total revenue saving of £88,000 and a potential saving throughout the trust of £316,688 per year.

Discussion: To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the use of cell salvage and tranexamic acid in revision hip surgery. Our results show that a significant reduction in blood transfusion can be made using this technique. It is vital that blood conserving strategies are developed so that future revision surgery can continue.

We carried out a retrospective case-control study in 80 patients who underwent a revision total hip replacement. Group A (40 patients) received tranexamic acid and intra-operative cell salvage. Group B (40 patients) was a matched control group and did not receive this management. Each group was divided into four subgroups: revision of both components, revision of both components with bone grafting, revision of the acetabular component with or without bone graft, and revision of the femoral component with or without bone graft.

In group A the total number of units transfused was 52, compared with 139 in group B, representing a reduction in blood usage of 62.5%. The mean amount of blood transfused from cell salvage in each group was 858 ml (113 to 2100), 477 ml (0 to 2680), 228 ml (75 to 315) and 464 ml (120 to 1125), respectively. There was a significant difference in the amount of blood returned between the groups (p < 0.0001).

In group A, 22 patients needed transfusion and in group B, 37 (p < 0.0001). A cost analysis calculation showed a total revenue saving of £70 000 and a potential saving throughout our facility of £318 288 per year.

Our results show that a significant reduction in blood transfusion can be made using combined cell salvage and tranexamic acid in revision surgery of the hip.