A finite element study was carried out to compare the performance of a three-hole locking plate with angled screws to the ‘gold-standard’ four-hole hip plate. Two cases of the three-hole hip plate were examined; (a) three screws and (b) two screws (most proximal and most distal).

A 3D model of the proximal femur was constructed from CT scans. A 3D CAD model of the four-hole hip plate was also created. The three-hole hip plate was then created from the four-hole implant in a way that it was possible to switch between all three models by activating/deactivating sections and/or switching material properties. A single common finite element model was generated, and a static analysis of each model variation was then performed in two steps using ABAQUS/standard. In the first, screws were pre-tensioned up to 150N. In the second, loads corresponding to stair climbing were applied.

Forces in the screws, permitted to change in the second step, were examined and compared. Maximum principal stresses in the bone were also examined, with a focus on the stresses in the bone at the end of the plate in each model. The highest tensile force was in the proximal screw of the three-hole plate with three screws, followed by the most distal screw in the standard four-hole plate. This suggests that the risk of screw pull-out is highest at the proximal screw of the three-hole hip plate with three screws.

A comparison of the forces in the distal screws for all cases shows that the highest tensile force was in the four-hole plate, followed by the three-hole plate with two screws. The lowest was the three-hole plate with three screws, which was in compression at full load. The maximum tensile stresses in the bone at the end of the plate were greatest for the standard four-hole hip plate, followed by the three-hole plate with two screws and then the three-hole plate with three screws. This indicates that the risk of bone fracture at the end of the plate is lowest for the three-hole hip plate with three screws.

The risk of bone fracture is significantly lower for the three-hole hip plate, with either two or three screws, compared to the ‘gold-standard’ four-hole hip plate. This is partially offset by a small increase in the risk of screw pull out (in the proximal rather than the distal screw).

Squeaking ceramics bearing surfaces have been recently recognised as a problem in total hip arthroplasty. The position of the acetabular cup has been alluded to as a potential cause of the squeaking, along with particular combinations of primary stems and acetabular cups. This study has used the finite element method to investigate the propensity of a new large diameter preassembled ceramic acetabular cup to squeaking due to malpositioning.

A verified three-dimensional FE model of a cadaveric human pelvis was developed which had been CT scanned, and the geometry reconstructed; this was to be used to determine the behaviour of large diameter acetabular cup system with a thin delta ceramic liner in the acetabulum. The model was generated using ABAQUS CAE pre-processing software. The bone model incorporated both the geometry and the materials properties of the bone throughout based on the CT scan. Finite element analysis and bone material assignment was performed using ABAQUS software and a FORTRAN user subroutine. The loading applied simulated edge loading for rising from a chair, heel-strike, toe off and stumbling.

All results of the analysis were used to determine if the liner separated from the shell and if the liner was toggling out of the shell. The results were also examined to see if there was a propensity for the liner to demobilise and vibrate causing a squeaking sound under the prescribed loading regime.

This study indicates that there is a reduction in contact area between the ceramic liner and titanium shell if a patient happens to trip or stumble. However, since the contact between the liner and the shell is not completely lost the propensity for it to squeak is highly unlikely.

The Birmingham Hip Mid Head Resection (BMHR) was designed to accommodate patients with lower quality bone in the proximal half of the femoral head. It is a relatively new conservative hip implant with promising early results. Finite element modelling may provide an insight into mid-term results.

A cadaveric femur was CT scanned and 3D geometry of the intact femur constructed. The correctly sized BMHR implants (with and without visual stop) were positioned and these verified by a surgeon; hence constructing the post-operative models. Walking loads were applied and contact surfaces defined.

Stress analyses were performed using the finite element method and contact examined. Also, a strain-adaptive bone remodelling analysis was run using 45% gait hip loading data. Virtual DEXA images were computed and were analysed in seven regions of the bone surrounding the implants.

The BMHR was found to be mechanically stable with all surfaces indicating micromotion less than the critical 150 microns. Stress distribution was similar to the intact femur, with the exception of the head-neck region where some stress/strain shielding occurs. This is mirrored in the bone remodelling results, which show some bone resorption in this region. The visual stop, which is designed to ensure that the stem is not overdriven during implantation, did not affect the stress/strain results; only on a very local scale.

There is minimal data available in the literature regarding conservative hip implants and no data regarding the BMHR. This study is the first to look at the mechanical response of the bone to this implant.