Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1662 - 1666
1 Dec 2013
Parker L Garlick N McCarthy I Grechenig S Grechenig W Smitham P

The AO Foundation advocates the use of partially threaded lag screws in the fixation of fractures of the medial malleolus. However, their threads often bypass the radiodense physeal scar of the distal tibia, possibly failing to obtain more secure purchase and better compression of the fracture.

We therefore hypothesised that the partially threaded screws commonly used to fix a medial malleolar fracture often provide suboptimal compression as a result of bypassing the physeal scar, and proposed that better compression of the fracture may be achieved with shorter partially threaded screws or fully threaded screws whose threads engage the physeal scar.

We analysed compression at the fracture site in human cadaver medial malleoli treated with either 30 mm or 45 mm long partially threaded screws or 45 mm fully threaded screws. The median compression at the fracture site achieved with 30 mm partially threaded screws (0.95 kg/cm2 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.8 to 1.2) and 45 mm fully threaded screws (1.0 kg/cm2 (IQR 0.7 to 2.8)) was significantly higher than that achieved with 45 mm partially threaded screws (0.6 kg/cm2 (IQR 0.2 to 0.9)) (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001, respectively). The fully threaded screws and the 30mm partially threaded screws were seen to engage the physeal scar under an image intensifier in each case.

The results support the use of 30 mm partially threaded or 45 mm fully threaded screws that engage the physeal scar rather than longer partially threaded screws that do not. A 45 mm fully threaded screw may in practice offer additional benefit over 30 mm partially threaded screws in increasing the thread count in the denser paraphyseal region.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1662–6.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 557 - 557
1 Sep 2012
Roberts D Garlick N
Full Access

Introduction

Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty THA is a major short term complication not infrequently resulting in revision arthroplasty. Malposition of the acetabular component in THA results in a higher rate of dislocation as well as increased wear and osteolysis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of mode of fixation on positioning of the acetabular component.

Patients, materials and methods

For all THAs performed at our hospital in 2008, angle of acetabular inclination was measured using PACS by two independent observers. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were assessed (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r). We determined whether the number of acetabular components outside the target angle range (eg:45±5°) was significantly different between cemented and cementless THA (chi squared test). An enquiry was made to the National Joint Registry (NJR) in respect to incidence of revision for dislocation of THA using cemented and cementless acetabular components, 2004–2009.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 58 - 58
1 May 2012
Parker L Smitham P McCarthy I Garlick N
Full Access

Conventionally, medial malleolus fractures are treated surgically with anatomical reduction and internal fixation using screws. There seems to be no consensus, backed by scientific study on the optimal screw characteristics in the literature.

We retrospectively examined case notes and radiographs of 48 consecutive patients taken from our trauma database (21 male, 27 female) with an average age of 50 years (range 16-85) who had undergone medial malleolus fracture fixation with screws at the Royal Free Hospital, London between January 2009 and June 2010.

The most commonly used screw was the AO 4.0 mm diameter cancellous partially-threaded screw in 40, 45 and 50 mm lengths (40 mm n = 28, 45 mm n = 26, 50 mm n = 23) with the threads passing beyond the physeal scar in all cases. Incomplete reduction defined as > 1mm fracture displacement was observed on post-operative x-rays in 12 out of 48 cases (25%), all of which relied on partially-threaded screw fixation. In 5 cases where AO 4.0 mm diameter fully-threaded screws engaging the physeal scar had been used, no loss of reduction was observed.

This unusual, occasional use of fully-threaded screws prompted us to investigate further using a porcine model and adapted pedo-barographic transducer. We compared pressures generated within the fracture site using AO 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws, 4.0 mm partially-threaded cancellous screws and 4.0 mm fully-threaded cancellous screws.

Fully-threaded cancellous 4.0 mm diameter screws generated almost 3 times the compression of a partially-threaded cancellous screw with superior stability at the fracture. Partially-threaded screws quickly lost purchase, compression and stability particularly when they were cannulated. We also observed that screw thread purchase seemed enhanced in the physeal region.

We conclude that fully-threaded cancellous 4.0 mm AO screws are superior to longer partially-threaded screws and that use of cannulated 4.0 mm partially-threaded screws should be avoided in fixation of medial malleolus fractures.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 242 - 243
1 May 2006
Krishnan S Carrington R Jeffery R Thevendran G Garlick N
Full Access

Functional evaluations using the Harris hip scoring system and the delayed Trendelenberg test were performed on fifty randomly selected patients who had undergone cemented primary CPT total hip replacements (Zimmer UK) at least 12 months previously using Hardinge approach. The prosthesis used increases offset with femoral stem diameter but did not allow separate correction of neck offset.

Patients were grouped according to whether hip offset had been accurately reconstructed, increased or decreased. Their functional outcomes were compared. There was no significant difference (p value 0.57) in the final functional outcome between the three groups. Reconstruction of the hip using a standard cemented CPT prosthesis produced considerable variation in the reconstructed hip arthroplasty offset. This resulted in no functionally significant effect.

Accurate reconstruction of the hip joint offset in total hip arthroplasty may therefore not be as important in the early functional outcome as recently advocated.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 354 - 354
1 Sep 2005
Krishnan S Morris R Garlick N Carrington R
Full Access

Introduction and aims: Increasingly the accurate reconstruction of the hip in total hip arthroplasty is planned using pre-operative pelvic radiographs. The accuracy of reconstruction is assessed using post-operative pelvic radiographs. This study defines significant variations in the offset, hip joint centre and femoral head centre-trochanteric height relations in normal radiographs.

Method: One hundred standard normal pelvic radiographs were examined based on a defined criterion. The medial offset, the vertical height of hip joint centre with reference to the ischial tuberosity and the femoral head centre-trochanterc height relation were measured for both hips. The differences in measurements were evaluated to determine the normal variation in offset and the hip joint centre. The relationship of the femoral head centre to the tip of the greater trochanter was determined.

Results: On average, the right hip and left hip differed by 2.54mm in their offset .The standard deviation of differences was 2.31. Therefore the offset of one hip will predict the offset of the other hip to within 4.62mm, with 95% accuracy. If the reconstructed hip has an offset to within + 4.62 to – 4.62mm of the contra lateral side, then the offset should be considered to be reconstructed as normal. The average difference in height of the hip joint centres of right hip from left hip with reference to bi-ischial line was found to be 3.49mm. The standard deviation of differences was 3.15. Therefore the hip joint centre height measured in one hip will predict the hip joint centre height of the opposite hip to within 6.3mm with 95% accuracy. Thus the hip joint centre height of one hip may differ from the opposite hip by 6.3mm in normal individuals. The tip of greater trochanter was on average 8mm higher than the centre of rotation of the femoral head. The greater trochanter was not at the same level as the femoral head centre as commonly believed.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates considerable variation in the medial offset and the hip joint centre location on pelvic wall. The femur head centre is lower than commonly assumed. These factors should be taken into account when pre-operative planning using pelvic radiographs and assessing the quality of the post-operative reconstruction.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 117 - 118
1 Jul 2002
Biant L Carrington R Tsui J Garlick N
Full Access

This study examined the reliability of pre-operative templating of the femur in total hip replacement (THR), and the accuracy of the templates provided by leading arthroplasty manufacturers. Templates are provided by arthroplasty manufacturers to be used with pre-operative radiographs as an aid to selecting the appropriate size of prosthesis that will allow an optimal cement mantle in THR. These templates vary in magnification from 10-20% (Mode 15%).

A retrospective review of the pre- and post-operative AP pelvis radiographs of 50 randomly selected patients who underwent THR in 1998 was performed. The radiographs were taken using the uniform standard technique. The magnification of the post-op radiograph was calculated by measuring the femoral head size. This was compared to the magnification of the pre-op radiographs using the ratio of the inter-teardrop distance. The post-operative radiographs were templated using a 15% template and compared to the size of prosthesis inserted.

The mean radiograph magnification was 22.5% (range 10.7 to 32.6%), with the majority (74%) between 20–25%. The 15% template oversized the prosthesis in 68% of cases. A 10% template would have been inaccurate in 96% of our sample group.

In a standard AP pelvis radiograph, the only variable that affects magnification is the extent to which the patient’s soft tissues raise the bony structures away from the plate. This variation in magnification renders preoperative templating of the femur in THR unreliable. Accuracy could be improved by using templates with a magnification of 22.5%.