Abstract
Functional evaluations using the Harris hip scoring system and the delayed Trendelenberg test were performed on fifty randomly selected patients who had undergone cemented primary CPT total hip replacements (Zimmer UK) at least 12 months previously using Hardinge approach. The prosthesis used increases offset with femoral stem diameter but did not allow separate correction of neck offset.
Patients were grouped according to whether hip offset had been accurately reconstructed, increased or decreased. Their functional outcomes were compared. There was no significant difference (p value 0.57) in the final functional outcome between the three groups. Reconstruction of the hip using a standard cemented CPT prosthesis produced considerable variation in the reconstructed hip arthroplasty offset. This resulted in no functionally significant effect.
Accurate reconstruction of the hip joint offset in total hip arthroplasty may therefore not be as important in the early functional outcome as recently advocated.
Editoral Secretary Mr Peter Howard. Correspondence should be addressed to BHS at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35 - 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN.
