Musculoskeletal disorders have been recognised as common occupational risks for all orthopaedic surgeons. The nature of tasks performed by hip surgeons often requires both forceful and repetitive manoeuvres, potentially putting them at higher risk of musculoskeletal injuries compared to other orthopaedic sub-specialities. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions among hip surgeons and evaluate the association between their workplace and lifestyle factors and musculoskeletal health.

An online questionnaire consisting of 22 questions was distributed to UK-based consultant hip surgeons via email and social media platforms. This survey was completed by 105 hip surgeons.

The mean age of the respondents was 49 years (range 35–69), with an average of 12 years (range 1–33) in service. 94% were full-time and 6% worked part-time. 49% worked at a district general hospital, 49% at a tertiary centre and 4% at a private institution. 80% were on the on-call rota and 69% had additional trauma commitments. 91% reported having one or more, 50% with three or more and 13% with five or more musculoskeletal conditions. 64% attributed their musculoskeletal condition to their profession. The most common musculoskeletal conditions were base of thumb arthritis (22%), subacromial impingement (20%), degenerative lumbar spine (18%) and medial or lateral epicondylitis (18%). 60% stated that they experienced lower back pain. Statistical analysis showed that being on the on-call rota was significantly (P<0.001) associated with a higher musculoskeletal burden. Regular resistance and/or endurance training and BMI<30 were statistically significant protective factors (P<0.001).

Over the last few decades, most of the hip-related literature has focused on improving outcomes in patients, yet very little is known about the impact of hip surgery on the musculoskeletal health of hip surgeons. This study highlights a high prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions among UK-based hip surgeons. Hip surgeons have a pivotal role to play in the ongoing recovery of elective orthopaedics services. There is a pressing need for the identification of preventative measures and improvement in the surgical environment of our hip surgeons.

Aims

With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty (THA), one of the major challenges is the management of proximal femoral bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) has already been popularized for tumour surgeries. Our aim was to describe the outcome of using PFA in these demanding non-neoplastic cases.

With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty, one of the major challenge is the management of bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral replacement (PFR) has already been popularised for tumour surgeries. The inherent advantages of PFR over allograft –prosthesis system, which is the other option for addressing severe bone loss include, early weight bearing and avoidance of non-union and disease transmission. Our study explores PFR as a possible solution for the management of complex hip revisions. Thirty consecutive hips (29 patients) that underwent PFR between January 2009 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively for their clinical and radiological outcomes. The Stanmore METS system was used in all these patients.

Mean age at the index surgery (PFR) was 72.69 years (range 50–89) with number of previous hip arthroplasties ranging from 1–5. At mean follow up of 32.27 months, there were no peri-prosthetic fractures and no mechanical failure of the implants. Clearance of infection was achieved in 80% of cases. There was 1 early failure due to intra-operative perforation of femoral canal needing further revision and two were revised for deep infection. Instability was noted in 26.7% (8) of the hips, of which, 87.5% (7) needed further revision with constrained sockets. Out of these 8 hips with instability, 5 had pre-operative infection. Deep infection was noted in 20% (6) of the hips, of which, 5 were primarily revised with PFR for septic loosening. However, further surgeries were essential for only 3 patients. One patient has symptomatic aseptic acetabular loosening and 1 had asymptomatic progressive femoral side loosening (lost to follow up).

Severe proximal femoral bone loss in complex revision arthroplasties has necessitated the use of PFR prosthesis. Our study supports the fact that PFR is probably a mechanically viable option for complex revisions. Significant numbers of dislocations and infections could be attributed to the poor soft tissue envelope around the hip. Further surgical techniques in the form use of dual mobility cups and silver coated PFR implants need to be explored.

Introduction

A recent paper suggested implanting an uncemented acetabular shell which is 6mm or greater than the native femoral head in total hip arthroplasty (THA) significantly increased the risk of postoperative pain. We retrospectively analyzed 265 Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (DCoC) THA comparing the native femoral head size to the implanted shell and reviewing if the patient suffered with post-operative pain (POP).

Aim: To identify the microbiology of infected knee arthroplasty, emerging patterns of resistance over the last decade, and suggest appropriate empirical treatment.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 121 patients with microbiologically proven infection, who underwent revision TKA between 1994–2008. The causative organism was identified from microbiological samples and the corresponding sensitivities recorded. The data was then collated to determine the most common causative organisms, changing patterns of antibiotic resistance over the time frame, and the antibiotics currently most effective at treating deep infection. A theoretical model combining gentamicin with other antibiotics was used to determine the most effective antibiotics for use as empirical treatments.

Results: Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CNS) was the most common causative organism (49%). Staphylococcus aureus (SA) accounted for 13% of cases. The prevalence of CNS appears to be increasing, while that of SA and other organisms is decreasing. Vancomycin and teicoplanin were the most effective antibiotics with overall sensitivity rates of 100% and 96% respectively. Levels of resistance were significantly higher among the antibiotics commonly used in the community. Antimicrobial resistance was higher when the causative organism was CNS, suggesting that MRSE is becoming a problem in knee arthroplasty. Our theoretical model showed that gentamicin combined with vancomycin would be the most effective empirical treatment.

Conclusion: Understanding the microbiology of deep infection of the knee allows surgeons to treat this complication as effectively as possible. Vancomycin and tei-coplanin appear to be the most effective antimicrobials, with relative invulnerability to the development of resistance. Given the effectiveness of these antibiotics, the use of vancomycin in gentamicin bone cement, combined with IV teicoplanin potentially allows for infected knee arthoplasties to be treated with a one-stage procedure. The rational use of antibiotics may help limit the amount of antibiotic resistance which develops in the future.

Introduction: The evolving pattern of bacterial resistance at septic revision surgery to the common antibiotics used during total hip arthroplasty is described.

Methods: A retrospective review of 72 case notes and microbiology data inclusive of bacterial sensitivity profiles was undertaken between January 2002 and April 2007. Data collected was combined with a previous study to demonstrate bacteriology trends over the last thirty years (327 cases). Antibiotic sensitivities to the two common infectious agents, Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococi were formulated into a hypothetical model combined with Gentamycin sensitivity, a constant factor (the sole antibiotic in bone cement), to assess the efficacy of the combination of antibiotics used in primary arthroplasty.

Results: When compared to previous microbiology data percentage isolates of each bacterium were found to be similar, confirming that the infectious agents at septic revision had remained the same, and were the common contaminants at primary surgery. The results also demonstrated an overall trend of increased resistance of the major organisms to the major classes of antibiotics used. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci were routinely tested against nine common antibiotics, inclusive of Gentamycin. Critical findings showed that the regimen used in routine primary surgery covers only 67% of staphylococcus infections (cefuroxine and Gentamycin); combinations that showed increased coverage included clindamycin and Gentamycin, and rifampicin plus Gentamycin, providing in excess of 100% coverage, and Erythromycin and Gentamycin, coverage in excess of 80%.

Discussion: Consequently we can recommend from prospective analysis of common infections at septic revision, that the antibiotic regimen at primary surgery is not sufficient to prevent infection (in isolation). Dynamic variations continuously develop in bacteria; genetic make up is regulated to optimise survival, continuously detrimentally affecting the efficacy of antibiotics against the power of super bugs, indicating a pattern in need of continuous monitoring and review.

Aim: PFC Sigma total knee was introduced in 1997 incorporating a number of design changes. We report our medium-term results of a consecutive series of PFC sigma knees performed between Nov 1997 and Dec 1998.

Method: Between November 1997 and December 1998 a consecutive series of 166 TKAs (156 patients)were carried out using the PFC Sigma total knee replacement system at Wrightington Hospital. Out of the 156 patients 9 were lost to follow-up. This left 147 patients (156 knees) with a mean follow-up of 90 months (range 84 – 96 months). 137 patients (88%) had primary osteoarthritis, 14(9%) had R.A and 5(3%) had post-traumatic arthritis. The mean age was 70 yrs (53 – 88 yrs).85 were female and 62 male. All patients were followed at 3 months, 6 months,1 year and then yearly. Clinical evaluation was done by American Knee Society and Oxford knee scores. Knee society score was used to assess the postoperative radiographs.

Results: The mean Knee society score improved from the preoperative mean of 45 (range 30 – 65) to postoperative mean of 84 points(range 45 – 92). The mean preoperative functional score was 38(range 25 –5) and mean postoperative functional score was 73 points(range 50–95). According to the final scoring 90 % of the knees were rated excellent, 4% good, 4 % fair and 2 % poor. The mean preoperative Oxford knee score was 43 (range 33–52) and mean postoperative score was 17 (14–29). Range of motion improved from a mean of 90(range 50–125) to 105(range 65–130). There was no significant difference (p = 0.03) in the American Knee Society score and Oxford knee score when comparing patients with and without resurfacing of the patella and PCL-retaining with PCL-substituting implants.1 knee (0.6%) was revised within 18 months due to aseptic loosening.1 knee(0.6%) had superficial wound infection which cleared with oral antibiotics.2 patients(2 knees) developed deep infection out of which one resolved following early debridement, the other developed chronic infection requiring long term suppressive antibiotics. 3 patients had proven below knee deep venous thrombosis; one of them developed a non-fatal pulmonary embolism. Radiological review using radiological knee society scoring showed radiolucent lines under 35 % of the tibial components(56 knees)and 11 % of Femoral components(18 knees). For survivorship analysis, the actuarial life- table method was used with calculation of the numbers at risk and the survival rates at annual intervals. The 95% confidence limits were calculated by the method of Rothman. The survivorship at the end of eight year follow-up was 99.40. None of the patellar components failed.

Conclusion: Our study shows excellent clinical results of PFC Sigma Total knee replacement after almost eight years follow-up. We plan to continue monitoring this cohort of patients for long-term results.

3610 primary and revision total knee replacements were performed at our hospital between 1969 and 1995. We conducted a survivorship analysis of 3234 primary total knee replacements to construct life tables and calculate survival curves. Each knee replacement was entered once only. Revision was defined as the end point. Data was collected both from patient records and by postal questionnaire. Eight types of knee prostheses were evaluated with best-case and worst-case scenarios compared over a 5, 10 and 15 year period.

The evidence suggests that certain types of prosthesis are more liable than others to fail or to fail early. The “Condylar type devices” which include the Total Condylar, Press Fit Condylar (PFC), Kinematic, Kinemax and Anatomic Modular Knee (AMK) have very similar survivorship curves and in the main have performed well up to a 10 year period. The LCS mobile bearing knee performed extremely well at 5 years. The Attenborough knee had an inferior result while the Load Angle Inlay (LAI) which was a very early resurfacing arthroplasty had the poorest results in terms of survivorship.

Restoration of the mechanical axis is thought to be a critical factor in determining the Outcome of knee replacement surgery. There is strong theoretical evidence that reproduction of this axis improves mechanical loading and hence longevity of the implant. Clinical studies are small in number.

Per-operative use of intra-and-extra-medullary alignment jigs help to determine the distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts. Studies have shown large margins of error using the standard jigs provided with most total knee replacement systems. On this basis computer assisted guidance systems are being introduced such as Orthopilot and BrainLab. These systems allow more accurate placement of the bony cuts and hence improve overall lower limb alignment.

No study has shown conclusively that accurately reproducing the mechanical axis of the lower limb improves survivorship of the implant. Prior to investing in these systems we felt it would be prudent to investigate how critical reproduction of the mechanical axis was in the primary total knee replacement.

We assessed 100 primary kinematic total knee replacements performed in 1990. All case notes were reviewed looking for basic demographics, pathology and clinical outcome.

All cases had a long leg film weight-bearing alignment film taken post-operatively. These were digitised and then analysed using Design CAD 97 software and from this the mechanical axis calculated.

Using these data the patients were divided into two groups. The first were within 3 degrees varus/valgus of the mechanical axis. The second were outside this range. These two groups were then correlated to clinical outcome.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that accurate reproduction of the lower limb alignment and the mechanical axis improves clinical outcome and survivorship of the implant using revision as an endpoint. Our data would support the introduction and use of intra operative computer aided guidance systems.

Fifty-seven revision total knee arthroplasties were performed in our hospital using the TC3 system between 1995 and 1997. Twelve patients died. Forty-five patients were followed up for an average of 5.6 years (range 4 – 7 years). No patients were lost to follow-up.

All patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated. A postal patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed. Two patients were revised; one for infection and one for instability. Survivorship using revision as the end point was 93.3% at 7 years.

Indications for revision were infection (4;9%), instability (38;84%), pain and stiffness (3;7%). 32 (71%) patients were satisfied with their outcome, 7 (16%) were noncommittal and 6 (13%) were disappointed at 5 years. We have analysed the 13 dissatisfied patients and highlight the lessons learned.

Pain and stiffness are not good indications for revision; insert thickness of more than 17.5mm is suggestive of elevation of the joint-line; instead the femoral component should be distalised; step wedges should be used in preference to angular wedges; Always long stem the tibial implant if augments are used; stems should be canal filling with adequate grip on the diaphysis.

We suggest the above lessons we have learned from our initial revision arthroplasty learning curve may correlate to the clinical outcome of this small group of dissatisfied patients.

Previous attempts to assess the comfort and protection afforded by surgical gowns have been extremely simplistic and limited in their nature relying on a single and subjective linear scoring system. We have performed a comfort assessment comparison between the Charnley exhaust suit, disposable gown plus visor and the Stryker Steri-Shield system using a newly developed objective multi-dimensional validated ergonomic tool.

A prospective, comparative study was conducted using a modification of the Comfort Rating Scales (CRS) designed to measure wearable comfort of computer devices during physical activity across 6 dimensions. These dimensions are emotion, attachment, harm, perceived change, movement and anxiety.

10 theatre staff were recruited to the study and completed modified CRS scores on three separate occasions after having worn a disposable surgical gown plus mask with visor, a Charnley exhaust suit and a Stryker Steri-Shield system. The total mean CRS for a disposable gown plus visor was 16.1 with a mean dimensional score of 2.7 (range: 0.2 – 8.4), for the Charnley system the values were 51.4 and 8.6 (range: 5.9 – 12.8) respectively and for the Stryker Steri-Shield 15.4 and 2.6 (range: 0.8–5.6).

Although disposable, impermeable gown plus visor or the Steri-Shield system provide a similar level of comfort, the modified CRS has demonstrated that over 6 dimensions of measurable comfort the Steri-Shield system provides the least variation in comfort and as such may offer the best combination of comfort, protective qualities and form or style of personal protection systems for lower limb arthroplasty operations.

Aim: To undertake clinical and radiological assessment of the TCIII prosthesis for Revision total knee arthroplasty with survivorship analysis.

Methods: We reviewed the clinical and radiological outcome of 57 Total Condylar III (TCIII) prostheses used for revision knee arthroplasty performed between December1995 and December1997 at Wrightington hospital. Twelve patients (12 knees) had died. At a mean follow-up of 6.75 years (range, 5–8years) 45 knees in 43 patients were available for review. None were lost to follow-up. There were 23 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 73 years. Radiographs were analysed for component position, alignment and bone-cement radio-lucencies.

Results: The reason for revision was instability in 38 knees, infection in 4 knees, pain in 2 knees and stiffness in one knee. The mean preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery HSS score was 36, improving to 70 after revision at latest review(p=< 0.001). The mean postoperative range of movement was 95 degrees. 2 prostheses were revised, one for infection and another for instability, Survival analysis using the Kaplan Meier method provided a cumulative survival rate of 95.56 % at 8 years.

Conclusion: The clinical and radiological results of our study support the continued use of the TCIII prostheses in revision total knee arthroplasty with satisfactory outcome in the medium term.

In 1999 a statement of best practice in primary total hip replacement was approved by the Council of the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and by the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) to provide a basis for regional and national auditable standards: we have compared practice in the North West of England to this document to ascertain adherence to this guide to best practice.

A direct comparison of data held on the North West Hip Arthroplasty Register for 2001/2002 and BASK/BOA guidelines was performed. 86 surgeons from 26 hospitals were included in the study. A mean of 93.3% of operations were performed in the surgeon’s usual theatre. All of these theatres had vertical laminar air flow systems. 42.2% of respondents routinely used exhaust suits. 68.1% of respondents routinely used impermeable disposable gowns. All surgeons use some form of anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis. 66.2% use a combination of both mechanical and chemical means. All surgeons used antibiotic prophylaxis. The most popular choice of antibiotic was a cephalosporin. 93.7% of surgeons routinely use antibiotic-loaded cement. The PFC and Kinemax prostheses were the most commonly used pros-theses. Interestingly, 97.7% of all first choice implants were cemented. Only 2 surgeons used uncemented TKR. 69.8% of surgeons used a posterior cruciate retaining design. A midline longitudinal skin incision is used by 87.2% of surgeons, a medial longitudinal skin incision by 7.0% and a lateral longitudinal skin incision by 5.8% 0f surgeons. A medial parapatellar capsular incision is preferred by 91.9% with the remainder using mid vastus or trivector retaining capsulotomy. Closure of capsulotomies is performed in flexion by 65.1% and in extension by 34.9%. In patients with osteoarthritis 38.4% routinely resurfaced the patella, 34.9% never resurfaced the patella and 26.7% selectively resurfaced. This was in direct contrast to practice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in whom 66.3% routinely resurfaced the patella, 22.1% never resurfaced the patella and 11.6% selectively resurfaced.

This study has demonstrated considerable variation of practice in hip arthroplasty across the North West region and significant divergence from the BASK/BOA statement of best practice. The introduction of a properly funded national arthroplasty register will surely help to clarify the effect of such diverse practice on patient outcome.

Injuries to the lower urinary tract are well recognized following fractures to the pelvic ring. The overall incidence of pelvic fractures is similar in men and women. However associated urological injuries occur less frequently in women. There are very few reported cases of combined bladder and urethral injury or combined intra- and extraperitoneal bladder rupture in women. Only two cases have been reported describing communication of the hip joint and an extra peritoneal bladder rupture.

To our knowledge we are the first to describe a pelvic ring injury complicated by combined intra and extra-peritoneal bladder rupture, urethral injury and direct intraperitoneal communication of the ruptured bladder with a central dislocation of the hip joint. The mechanism of bladder laceration was gross displacement of the quadrilateral plate and pubic rami following acetabular fracture. This bone was found at laparotomy to be lying within the bladder cavity.

Restoration of the mechanical axis is thought to be a critical factor in determining the outcome of knee replacement surgery. There is strong theoretical evidence that reproduction of this axis improves mechanical loading and hence longevity of the implant. Per operative use alignment jigs help to determine the bony cuts. Studies have shown large margins of error using the standard jigs. On this basis computer navigation systems are being introduced. No study has shown conclusively that accurately reproducing the mechanical axis of the lower limb improves survivorship of the implant. Prior to investing in these systems we felt it would be prudent to investigate how critical reproduction of the mechanical axis was in the primary total knee replacement.

We assessed 100 primary total knee replacements performed in 1990. All case notes were reviewed looking for basic demographics, pathology, and clinical outcome. All cases had a long leg þlm weight bearing alignment þlm taken post operatively. These were digitised and then analysed using CAD software. From this the mechanical axis calculated.

Using this data the patients were divided into two groups. The þrst were within 3 degrees varus/valgus of the mechanical axis. The second were outside this range. These two groups were then correlated to clinical outcome.

Our results suggest that accurate reproduction of the mechanical axis improves clinical outcome and survi-vorship of the implant. Our data would support the use of intra operative computer navigation systems

Deep infection is one of the most serious complications after total hip replacement (THR). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of one stage revision THR for deep infection with a long-term follow-up.

One stage revision THR for deep infection was carried out in 285 joints on 274 patients by a single surgeon (BMW) between 1974 and 2001. All infected hip replacements are primarily treated with one stage revision THR at the authors’ unit unless bone stock is extremely poor. This study included a review of 162 revisions in 154 for which a minimum follow-up of five years had been done. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.3 years.

Trochanteric osteotomy was done for extensive resection of infected tissue and removal of cement. Both cups and stems were revised with bone cement. Antibiotic-loaded cement was used in 152 cases (93.8%). Further antibiotics were commenced systemically for 6–12 weeks postoperatively.

Failure of infection control was defined as a) reoperation for recurrent infection or b) clinically persistent infection. Infection control. One hundred and thirty eight hips (85.2%) were free of infection at the time of the latest follow-up. 1) No sinus group (N=110): Success rate was 82.7 %. 2) Sinus group (N=52): Success rate was 90.4 %.

This study presents the longest follow-up with a large number of cases in revision THR for deep infection. At least, history of discharging sinus was not considered as a contraindication. The results suggested that one stage revision was an effective treatment for deep infection of hip replacement in the long term.

Pyrexia in the post-operative setting has often been associated with a possible systemic or wound infection. We assessed whether there is any justification for our concern regarding post-operative pyrexia following hip arthroplasty and subsequent deep prosthetic infection.

Method:

Study 1

An assessment of the clinical outcome of 97 sequential patients who underwent 103 primary hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis replacements. Daily temperature and systemic complications in the post-operative period were recorded. Clinical outcome was measured using an Oxford hip questionnaire.

Patients had a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (range 3.5–7.2years).

Study 2

A review of postoperative temperature records of 80 patients who had undergone primary total hip replacement. Thirty-one patients had required revision surgery at a mean time interval of 37.2 months (range 5–74 months) for confirmed deep prosthetic infection. The remaining Forty-nine patients were asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 31.5 months.

Results:

Study 1

Post-operative pyrexia of 38 degrees Celsius was present in 51% of patient’s undergoing primary hip replacement in the first post-operative week but in 21.1% no etiological cause could be identified. Clinical outcome measured by an oxford hip questionnaire was not influenced by the post-operative temperature pattern.

Study 2

The mean peak temperature on the first post-operative day was significantly lower in patients with deep prosthetic infection then patients with a clinically normal outcome (p=0.01).

Conclusion: Post-operative pyrexia is clearly not uncommon following primary arthroplasty and its presence should not be regarded as detrimental. Pyrexia in the post-operative setting is a component of the acute phase response to trauma and study 2 demonstrates patients who develop a low-grade infection following arthroplasty may have diminished febrile response to surgical trauma.

We retrospectively analysed three hundred and one infected total hip replacements. Infection was defined on the basis of the surgeons clinical impression. This included a thorough history and physical examination, laboratory and radiographic evaluation. Peri operative findings were also taken into consideration.

Despite the overt appearances of sepsis fifty seven of these three hundred and one cases demonstrated no bacterial growth. These were excluded from the microbiological analysis.

The remaining two hundred and forty four cases oven bacteriological evidence of deep infection. Thirty seven cases grew two different organisms both of which were felt to be clinically significant. The remainder grew a single organism. Hence a total two hundred and eighty one bacteriological isolates were grown.

Coagulase negative staphylococcus accounted for 54.8%, staphylococcus aureus 13.5%, streptococci 8.9%, Escherichia coli 6.1% and diptheroids 2.5%.These organisms were plated out in a standard fashion against a variety of antimicrobial agents.

We analysed ten antibiotics and their sensitivity profiles against the spectrum of organisms demonstrated by this series.

Best antimicrobial coverage by a single antibiotic was afforded by fucidic acid (85.3%) and erythromycin (79.6%). Gentamicin was found to be sensitive to only 76.1% of the bacteria present at the time of revision for deep infection.

Combining gentamicin with other antibiotics improved the theoretical coverage. A combination of gentamicin and fucidic acid demonstrated a 97.5% coverage. Gentamicin with erythromycin gave 95.2%.

When treating the infected arthroplasty it may be beneficial to add extra antibiotics to bone cement. This may either be to the cement spacer in a two stage revision or to the definitive cement in a single stage revision. We would suggest that fucidic acid or erythromycin would be good candidates for this. These candidates should also be considered when designing the next generation of combination antibiotic acrylic bone cements.

Bacterial resistance in joint replacement surgery is an emerging problem. A review of the bacteriology from infected revisions performed at Wrightington over the past 5 years has shown that the most common organism is coagulase negative staphylococcus (59%), followed by staphylococcus aureus (17%).

The sensitivity profiles are shown below.

Gentamicin is the most commonly pre formulated antibiotic added to acrylic bone cement. The above data clearly demonstrates that for 32% of infected cases gentamicin alone is inadequate prophylaxis. As a consequence of this the use of additional antibiotics for resistant cases is becoming commonplace.

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical properties of additional antibiotics in acrylic bone cement.

The 7 antibiotics listed above were selected on the basis of sensitivity to organisms isolated at revision for deep infection. Each was added at a loading of 1g active to CMW1 RO (plain) and CMW1 G (gentamicin). The antibiotics were mixed with the polymer by hand. The cement was then mixed as per manufacturer’s instructions.

Dough and setting times were noted. Standard samples were produced using ISO approved moulds. Each antibiotic/cement combination was tested for compression strength, impact strength and flexural strength.

All antibiotic/cement combinations performed as well as the control mix when tested for compression and impact strength. The flexural strength results for fusidic acid and erythromycin when added to acrylic cement were comparable to the control mix. Flucloxacillin, clindamycin and teicoplanin did lower the flexural strength to just below acceptable limits. However Vancomycin when added at 1g active reduced the flexural strength of acrylic bone cement significantly.

Although vancomycin may remain one of the last bastions of antibiotic therapy our study suggests that’s its addition to acrylic bone cement significantly weakens its mechanical properties. We would advise caution in its use as this may reduce the chances of long term success when undertaking revision for deep infection.