Replacing a fused or ankylosed hip with a prosthesis has several advantages. It reduces the pain in the lumbar-sacral spine and the ipsilateral knee. It gives a better range of movement and leg length is restored. In this study we present our experience of 50 cases of total hip arthroplasty in fused or ankylosed hips. Aetio-pathogenesis was rhizomelic spondylitis in 35 cases, sequelae of cox it is in 2, posttraumatic in 4, Ankylosis in 6, and fusion in 3. For clinical assessment we used the Merle D’Aubignè score, and for radiographic evaluation we used the Gruen method of area subdivision Of the 50 prosthesis implanted, 3 were removed due to aseptic loosening. The other were the radiographically stable after an average follow-up of 12 years. Preoperative clinical scores were: pain (2.9), range of motion (2.5), and walking (2.1). At the latest exam the scores were: pain (5.5), motion (4.6), walking (4.5). Preoperative leg shortening was 3.5 cm, whereas at the latest exam it was 0.9 cm. Lumbalgia decreased notably in 62%. Total hip arthroplasty may have advantages over fusion on one hand, but on the other it is technically more difficult and gives results that are inferior to common indications. It is therefore important to assess patients (time of fusion, age of patient, residual muscular function) preoperatively to obtain good results.
Preliminary results confirmed that the use of platelet gel and packed medullary cells as adjuvant for the lyophilized bone aid bone repair and graft integration. Morphological and morphometric tests showed that at six week the newly formed bone of group 3 had better mechanical properties. This study shows that the use of platelet gel and packed autologous medullary cells combined with lyophilized bone chips produces a faster and mechanically stronger recovery of bone stock in the treatment of bone defects.
Girdlestone’s arthroplasty is often used to treat septic loosening of hip prostheses. Although this operation provides goodresults with regards to pain and loosening, it causes instability and in the hip and limb shortening that force the patient to use walking aids. From 1990 to 1999 we treated ten cases of revisionhip arthroplasty after Girdlestone’s arthroplasty. Girdleston e’sarthroplasty was carried out in all cases due to sepsis in the previousimplant. Preoperatively all patients underwent granulocyte-labeledscintigraphy. For clinical evaluation we used the Merle D’Aubignè score. From 1990 to 1999 we treated ten cases of revisionhip arthroplasty after Girdlestone’s arthroplasty. Girdleston e’sarthroplasty was carried out in all cases due to sepsis in the previousimplant. Preoperatively all patients underwent granulocyte-labeledscintigraphy. For clinical evaluation we used the Merle D’Aubignè score. Girdlestone’s arthroplasty is very effective for treating septic loosening of hip prostheses, but it causes severe walking impediment. Revision surgery restores limb length and walking. Patients that undergo this treatment should be checked for residual sepsis, which may jeopardize the operation. Currently we are experimenting with spacers with antibiotics and our initial results are promising.
The patients were divided into two groups according to the fracture site. Group 1 included 71 patients with medial fracture, and Group 2 contained 56 patients pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture. All patients were assessed by the Merle d’Aubignè clinical evaluation method. Radiographically, the bone-implant interface was assessed by the presence of radiolucency lines according to the DeLee-Charnley method modified by Martell