Abstract
Introduction Total hip arthroplasty in patients affected by major dysplasia poses great surgical difficulties due to insufficient primary acetabulum, small femoral canal, excessive anteversion of the femoral neck, traction on the neurovascular structures, muscular imbalance that is difficult to restore, and marked epiphyseal rising. In this study we present our experience in lowering and arthroplasty in major hip dysplasia, obtained by shortening osteotomy achieved in a single stage, using techniques designed to diminish possible risks.
Materials and methods From 1989 to 2000 we treated 20 patients (27 operations, 7 bilateral) at our institute who were affected by the sequela (lowering of the prosthesis) of Eftekhar Grade-C (11 cases) or Grade-D (16 cases) congenital luxation of the hip. Mean follow-up was 63 months. Clinical results were assessed before and after surgery according to the Merle D’Aubigné method. We also evaluated the presence and degree of Trendelenburg position and the possible use of shoe lifts. The radiographic results of the hip prosthesis were assessed by the Gruen and Dee Lee methods for the stem and cup respectively.
Results The mean preoperative clinical score according to the Merle D’Aubigné classification was 3 ± 1 for pain, 3 ± 1 for walking, and 4 ± 2 for movement. The preoperative Trendelemburg position was very marked in all patients. In 18 cases out of 27 a shoe lift was used with a mean height of 60 mm ± 10. We performed a “Z” osteotomy in 14 cases and an oblique osteotomy in 13 cases. The postoperative mean clinical score was 6 ± 1 for pain, 6 ± 1 for walking, and 5 ± 1 for movement. Postoperative Trendelemburg position was present in 19 cases, and 9 cases out of 27 still used a shoe lift with a mean height of 30 mm ± 10. Movement of the cup and stem was observed at 84 months and 112 months’ follow-up respectively, which required revision surgery.
Conclusions The choice between oblique and Z osteotomy depends on two parameters: the surgeon’s experience and the extent of femoral resection. Z osteotomy may be more difficult to perform technically, but it enables better adaptation of the prosthesis to the femoral segments for resections over 35 mm. No significant differences in time to unite were observed between oblique and Z osteotomies.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
