Improvised Explosive Device (IED) attacks on vehicles have been a significant feature of recent conflicts. The Dynamic Response Index (DRI), developed for predicting spinal injury in aircraft ejection, has been adopted for testing vehicles in underbelly blast. Recent papers suggest that DRI is not accurate in blast conditions. We suggest that the distribution of blast and ejection injuries is different. A literature review identified the distribution of spinal fractures in aircraft ejection incidents. A Joint Theatre Trauma Registry search identified victims of mounted IED blast with spinal fractures. The distribution of injuries in the two groups was compared using the Kruskall Wallis test. 329 fractures were identified in ejector seat incidents; 1% cervical, 84% thoracic and 16% lumbar. 245 fractures were identified in victims of mounted blast; 16% cervical, 34% thoracic and 50% lumbar. There was no significant similarity between the two (p=1). There was no statistically significant difference between the distribution of fractures in blast survivors versus fatalities. The difference between blast and ejection injury patterns suggests that injury prediction models for ejection should not be extrapolated to blast mechanisms and that new models need to be developed.
Recent evidence suggests that both the accepted mechanism of blast-mediated traumatic amputation (TA) (shockwave then blast wind exposure) and the link with fatal shockwave exposure merit review. Searching UK military prospectively gathered trauma registry data and post mortem CT (PM-CT) records identified casualties from August 2008 to August 2010 with blast-mediated TAs. TA level and associated injuries were recorded. Data on pre-debridement osseous and soft tissue injuries were only consistently available for fatalities through PM-CT imaging. 146 Cases (75 survivors and 71 fatalities) with 271 TAs (130 in survivors and 141 in fatalities) were identified. Through-joint TA rate in fatalities was 34/141 (24.1%). PM-CT analysis demonstrated only 9/34 through joint TAs with contiguous fractures in the immediately proximal long bone/limb girdle. 18/34 had no fracture, and 7/34 had a non-contiguous fracture. The previously reported link between TA and blast lung injury was not present, calling into question the significance of shockwaves in generating blast-mediated TAs. Furthermore, contemporary blast injury theory cannot account for the high prevalence of through joint TAs (previously published rate 1.3%). The proportion of through joint TAs with no associated fracture or a non-contiguous fracture (74%) is supportive of pure flail as a mechanism for blast-mediated TA.
2014 sees the withdrawal of British troops from Afghanistan. It is documented that the conflict is associated with increased survivability form military related trauma attributed to personal protection equipment, improved on the ground medical care and rapid extraction of the casualty. However, the consequence is that of complex trauma patients and in particular trauma-related amputations (TA). With the draw down a complete picture is now possible. This report quantity's and quality's the extent and nature of TA from Afghanistan by means of a retrospective analysis of an accurate database of TA casualties forms this conflict. This will provide useful information for the resources required for managing these complex patients in the future. Data extracted included number of amputations, locations and level of amputations and date of injury. 265 casualties sustained 416 amputations. The commonest injury pattern per casualty seen was that of a single amputation. The commonest level of amputation was trans-femoral (TF)(153), followed by 143 trans-tibial (TT)(143. Single amputations associated with TT injuries. TF amputations were commonest in double and triple amputees. The commonest double amputee pattern was TF:TF casualty. Casualties form this conflict are more likely to have greater number of amputations and higher levels.
A retrospective analysis of all paediatric patients admitted to Camp Bastion Role 3 between June 2006 and March 2013 was conducted from the UK trauma database. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, anatomical distribution of injury and treatment are described. Two hundred and ninety eight children were admitted, 225 males with a median age of 9 years old. The highest number of cases (78) was recorded in 2011. Overall there were 55 fatalities (85.6% male). Most injuries were by IED (68% of cases) with 74% requiring operative intervention. Seventy-four percent of casualties had three or more anatomical regional injuries. Whilst the most commonly injured region was the lower limb (78%), head injuries were seen in 41%, abdominal injuries in 48% and thorax injuries in 44%. Debridement (including amputations) (59.4%) and laparotomy (30.6%) were the commonest operations performed. Sixty percent of cases were in theatre within one hour of arrival. Amongst survivors the mean ISS score was 17 and amongst fatalities 43; NISS 22 and 51; RTS 5.45 and 2.91. Paediatric blast injuries represent a significant burden to medical facilities in contemporary conflict. Whilst limb injuries predominate, the proportion of head and torso injuries is higher than seen in adult blast injuries.
Surgical planning is the first step in operative fracture management. Complex situations are often faced which pose difficulties on both technical and logistic fronts. Surgical planning is the first step in operative fracture management. The degree of planning that is required is therefore determined by a number of factors including: the nature of the injury mechanism and its concomitant physiological insult, complexity of the fracture and region, expertise of the surgical team and equipment limitations. This paper explores a novel planning process in orthopaedic trauma surgery based upon British Military Doctrine. The seven questions of surgical planning represent a novel method that draws inspiration from the combat estimate process. It benefits from a global approach that encompasses logistic as well as surgical constraints. This, in turn, allows the surgical team to form an understanding of the nature of the fracture in order to develop, document and deliver a surgical plan. This has benefits for the operating surgeon, operating room practitioners and trainees alike and ultimately can result in improved patient care.
Current military conflicts are characterised by the use of the Improvised Explosive Device (IED). Improvements in personal protection, medical care and evacuation logistics have resulted in increasing numbers of casualties surviving with complex musculoskeletal injuries, often leading to life-long disability. Thus, there exists an urgent requirement to investigate the mechanism of extremity injury caused by these devices in order to develop mitigation strategies. In addition, the wounds of war are no longer restricted to the battlefield; similar injuries can be witnessed in civilian centres following a terrorist attack. Key to mitigating such injuries is the ability to deconstruct the complexities of an explosive event into a controlled, laboratory-based environment. In this study, an anti-vehicle underbelly injury simulator, capable of recreating in the laboratory the impulse from an anti-vehicle (AV) explosion, is presented and characterised. Tests were then conducted to assess the simulator's ability to interact with human cadaveric legs. Two mounting conditions were assessed, simulating a typical seated and standing vehicle passenger using instrumented cadaveric lower limbs. This experimental device, will now allow us (a) to gain comprehensive understanding of the load-transfer mechanisms through the lower limb, (b) to characterise the dissipating capacity of mitigation technologies, and (c) to assess the biofidelity of surrogates.
The defining weapon of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan has been the Improvised Explosive Device (IEDs). When detonated under a vehicle, they result in significant axial loading to the lower limbs, resulting in devastating injuries. Due to the absence of clinical blast data, automotive injury data using the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) has been extrapolated to define current NATO injury thresholds for Anti-vehicle (AV) mine tests. We hypothesized that AIS, being a marker of fatality rather than disability would be a worse predictor of poor clinical outcome compared to the lower limb specific Foot and Ankle Severity Score (FASS). Using a prospectively collected trauma database, we identified UK Service Personnel sustaining lower leg injuries from under-vehicle explosions from Jan 2006–Dec 2008. A full review of all medical documentation was performed to determine patient demographics and the severity of lower leg injury, as assessed by AIS and FASS. Clinical endpoints were defined as (i) need for amputation or (ii) poor clinical outcome. Statistical models were developed in order to explore the relationship between the scoring systems and clinical endpoints. 63 UK casualties (89 limbs) were identified with a lower limb injury following under-vehicle explosion. The mean age of the casualty was 26.0 yrs. At 33.6 months follow-up, 29.1% (26/89) required an amputation and a further 74.6% (41/89) having a poor clinical outcome (amputation or ongoing clinical problems). Only 9(14%) casualties were deemed medically fit to return to full military duty. ROC analysis revealed that both AIS=2 and FASS=4 could predict the risk of amputation, with FASS = 4 demonstrating greater specificity (43% vs 20%) and greater positive predictive value (72% vs 32%). In predicting poor clinical outcome, FASS was significantly superior to AIS (p<0.01). Probit analysis revealed that a relationship could not be developed between AIS and the probability of a poor clinical outcome (p=0.25). Foot and ankle injuries following AV mine blast are associated with significant morbidity. Our study clearly demonstrates that AIS is not a predictor of long-term clinical outcome and that FASS would be a better quantitative measure of lower limb injury severity. There is a requirement to reassess the current injury criteria used to evaluate the potential of mitigation technologies to help reduce long-term disability in military personnel. Our study highlights the critical importance of utilising contemporary battlefield injury data in order to ensure that the evaluation of mitigation measures is appropriate to the injury profile and their long-term effects.
A 7-day randomised controlled pre-clinical trial utilising an existing extremity war wound model compared the efficacy of saline soaked gauze to commercially available dressings. The Flexor Carpi Ulnaris of anaesthetised rabbits was exposed to high-energy trauma using a computer-controlled jig and inoculated with 106 Clinical observations were made throughout the study. Haematology and plasma cytokines were analysed at intervals. Post-mortem histopathology included subjective semi-quantitative assessment of pathology severity using light microscopy to grade muscle injury and lymph node activation. Tissue samples were also examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). There were no bacteraemias, abscesses, purulent discharge or evidence of contralateral axillary lymph node activation. There were no significant differences in animal behaviour, weight change, maximum body temperature or white blood cell count elevation nor in pathology severity in muscle or lymph nodes (Kruskal-Wallis). There was no evidence of bacterial penetration or biofilm formation on SEM. Interleukin-4 and Tumour Necrosis Factor α levels were significantly higher in the ACTIVON TULLE group (1-way ANOVA p<0.05). This time-limited study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in
In a recent publication, 4.6% of 6450 Coalition deaths over ten years were reported to be due to junctional bleeding. The authors suggested that some of these deaths could have been avoided with a junctional hemorrhage control device. Prospectively collected data on all injuries sustained in Afghanistan by UK military personnel over a 2 year period were reviewed. All fatalities with significant pelvic injuries were identified and analysed, and the cause of death established. Significant upper thigh, groin or pelvic injuries were recorded in 124 casualties, of which 92 died. Pelvic injury was the cause of death in 42; only 1 casualty was identified where death was at least in part due to a vascular injury below the inguinal ligament, not controlled by a tourniquet, representing <1% of all deaths. Twenty one deaths were due to vascular injury between the aortic bifurcation and the inguinal ligament, of which 4 survived to a medical facility. Some potentially survivable deaths due to exsanguination may be amenable to more proximal vascular control. We cannot substantiate previous conclusions that this can be achieved through use of a groin junctional tourniquet. There may be a role for more proximal vascular control of pelvic bleeding.
Recent advances in combat casualty care have enabled survival following battlefield injuries that would have been lethal in past conflicts. While some injuries remain beyond our current capability to treat, they have the potential to be future ‘unexpected’ survivors. The greatest threat to deployed coalition troops currently and for the foreseeable future is the improvised explosive device (IED) Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct an analysis of causes of death and injury patterns in recent explosive blast fatalities in order to focus research and mitigation strategies, to further improve survival rates. Since November 2007, UK Armed Forces personnel killed whilst deployed on combat operations undergo both a post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan and an autopsy. With the permission of the coroners, we analysed casualties with PMCTs between November 2007 and July 2010. Injury data were analysed by a pathology-forensic radiology-orthopaedic multidisciplinary team. Cause of death was attributed to the injuries with the highest AIS scores contributing to the NISS score. Injuries with an AIS < 4 were excluded. During the study period 227 PMCT scans were performed; 211 were suitable for inclusion, containing 145 fatalities due to explosive blast from IEDs. These formed the study group. 24 cases had such severe injuries (disruptions) that further study was inappropriate. Of the remaining 121, 79 were dismounted, and 42 were mounted (in vehicles). Leading causes of death were head CNS injury (47.6%), followed by intra-cavity haemorrhage (21.7%) in the mounted group, and extremity haemorrhage (42.6%), junctional haemorrhage (22.2%) and head CNS injury (18.7%) in the dismounted group. The severity of head trauma in both mounted and dismounted IED fatalites would indicate that prevention and mitigation of these injuries is likely to be the most effective strategy to decrease their resultant mortality. Two thirds of dismounted fatalities have haemorrhage implicated as a cause of death that may have been amenable to prehospital treatment strategies. One fifth of mounted fatalites have haemorrhagic trauma which currently could only be addressed surgically. Maintaining the drive to improve all haemostatic techniques for combat casualties from point of wounding to definitive surgical proximal control alongside development and application of novel haemostatics could yield a significant survival benefit.
The mechanism of traumatic amputation (TA) from explosive blast has traditionally been considered to be a combination of blast wave induced bone injury – primary blast - followed by limb avulsion from the blast wind – tertiary blast. This results in a transosseous TA, with through joint amputations considered to be extremely rare. Data from previous conflicts has also suggested that this injury is frequently associated with a non-survivable primary blast lung injury (PBLI), further linking the extremity injury to the primary blast wave. However, our current experience in the Middle East would suggest that both the mechanism of TA and the link with fatal primary blast exposure need to be reconsidered. The aim of this study was to analyse the injury profile of the current cohort of TA fatalities to further investigate the underlying blast injury mechanism and to allow hypotheses on injury mechanisms to be developed for further analysis. With the permission of the coroners, 121 post-mortem CT (PMCT) scans of UK Armed Forces personnel who died following an IED blast were analysed. All orthopaedic injuries were identified, classified and the anatomical level of any associated soft tissue injury noted. PMCT evidence of PBLI was used as a marker of significant primary blast exposure. 75/121 (62%) sustained at least 1 TA, with 138 TAs seen in total. 31/138 (22%) were through joints, with through knee amputations most common (23/31, 74%). Only 7/31(23%) through joint amputations had an associated fracture proximal to and contiguous with the amputation site. The soft tissue injury profile of through joint and transosseous TAs were not significantly different (p=0.569). When fatality location was considered (i.e. mounted or dismounted), no overall relationship between PBLI and TA was evident. The two pathologies were not seen to consistently occur concurrently, as has been previously reported. The accepted mechanism for traumatic amputation following explosive blast does not adequately explain the significant number of through joint TAs presented here. The previously reported link between TA and PBLI in fatalities was not supported by this analysis of modern combat blast fatalities. Lack of an associated fracture with the majority of through joint TAs in conjunction with a lesser contribution of primary blast may implicate flail and periarticular soft tissue failure as a potential injury mechanism. Analysis of through joint TA incidence and associated injuries in survivors is now indicated. Case studies within the fatality dataset may facilitate generation of injury mechanism hypotheses. To further investigate the injury mechanism, work is required to understand osseous, ligamentous and other soft tissue behaviour and failure at high strain rates. This should allow characterisation and modeling of these injuries and inform mitigation strategies.
Counter-insurgency warfare in recent military operations has been epitomised by the use of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) against coalition troops. Emerging patterns of skeletal fractures, limb amputations and organ injuries, which are caused by these weapons have been described over recent years. This paper describes a retrospective case series of knee dislocations caused by IEDs in recent conflict. Data was obtained about military personnel from 2006 to 2011, who had sustained a knee dislocation while serving in Afghanistan from a prospectively gathered database, the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR), maintained by the Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine. The diagnosis of knee dislocation and its associated skeletal injuries was assessed by review of all relevant plain radiographs, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance images. The mechanism of injury, incidence of vascular injuries and other skeletal injuries was recorded. During the study period, 23 casualties sustained a knee dislocation caused by an IED. Four casualties had an associated popliteal vascular injury. Eleven injuries were caused in enclosed spaces, and 10 injuries caused by IEDs out in the open. Anterior dislocations were common in the group caused in enclosed spaces. 19/20 patients had at least one other skeletal fracture. Knee dislocations represent an uncommon but important diagnosis in modern warfare. Urgent and careful assessment for any associated vascular injuries or other skeletal injuries may help ensure timely treatment and promote future recovery. Mitigation against knee dislocation may be possible in the enclosed environment because of the predictable pattern of injury.
To review current military orthopaedic experience and establish if there exists a consensus of opinion in how and if to perform fasciotomy of the foot and to guide other clinicians. A questionnaire was sent to 10 DMS orthopaedic consultants to identify their experience with foot compartment syndrome and performing fasciotomies.Aim
Method
The outcomes of 261 nerve injuries in 100 patients
were graded good in 173 cases (66%), fair in 70 (26.8%) and poor in
18 (6.9%) at the final review (median 28.4 months (1.3 to 64.2)).
The initial grades for the 42 sutures and graft were 11 good, 14
fair and 17 poor. After subsequent revision repairs in seven, neurolyses
in 11 and free vascularised fasciocutaneous flaps in 11, the final
grades were 15 good, 18 fair and nine poor. Pain was relieved in
30 of 36 patients by nerve repair, revision of repair or neurolysis,
and flaps when indicated. The difference in outcome between penetrating
missile wounds and those caused by explosions was not statistically
significant; in the latter group the onset of recovery from focal
conduction block was delayed (mean 4.7 months (2.5 to 10.2)
Aim To develop a militarily relevant complex extremity wounding model. Study Design Controlled laboratory study with New Zealand White Rabbits. Method Phase One: Injury Development. Under general anaesthesia, the flexor carpi ulnaris of the right forelimb was exposed and high energy, short duration impact delivered via drop test rig. Anaesthesia was maintained for three hours, the animal was recovered and saline soaked gauze and supportive bandaging applied. 48 hrs later, the animal was culled and muscle harvested for histological analysis. Analgesia was administered daily, animals checked by experienced staff at least twice daily and temperatures recorded by subcutaneous transponder. Phase Two: Contamination. Sequential groups of animals had inoculums of 1×102, 1×106 and 1×108/100μl of Staphylococcus aureus administered to the muscle immediately after injury. Animals were recovered as phase one. At 48 hours, animals were culled, muscle harvested and axillary lymph nodes sampled. Quantitative microbiological analysis was performed on the muscle. Results: Six animals given a loading of 0.5kg yielded consistent injury with 20% of the muscle becoming necrotic. Representative of injury from ballistic trauma, this was adopted as standard. Twenty-two subsequent animals were exposed to the injury and inoculated with the challenge doses. 1×106/100μl S.aureus provided the greatest consistency in recovered yield. There were no adverse effects on animal welfare and body temperatures were always within normal limits. Discussion. This model enables a consistent, contaminated soft tissue injury to be delivered in vivo. It will allow the investigation of complex wound management including wound coverage and fracture fixation.
The types of explosive devices used in warfare
and the pattern of war wounds have changed in recent years. There has,
for instance, been a considerable increase in high amputation of
the lower limb and unsalvageable leg injuries combined with pelvic
trauma. The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan prompted the Department
of Military Surgery and Trauma in the United Kingdom to establish
working groups to promote the development of best practice and act
as a focus for research. In this review, we present lessons learnt in the initial care
of military personnel sustaining major orthopaedic trauma in the
Middle East.
We describe 261 peripheral nerve injuries sustained
in war by 100 consecutive service men and women injured in Iraq
and Afghanistan. Their mean age was 26.5 years (18.1 to 42.6), the
median interval between injury and first review was 4.2 months (mean
8.4 months (0.36 to 48.49)) and median follow-up was 28.4 months
(mean 20.5 months (1.3 to 64.2)). The nerve lesions were predominantly
focal prolonged conduction block/neurapraxia in 116 (45%), axonotmesis
in 92 (35%) and neurotmesis in 53 (20%) and were evenly distributed
between the upper and the lower limbs. Explosions accounted for
164 (63%): 213 (82%) nerve injuries were associated with open wounds.
Two or more main nerves were injured in 70 patients. The ulnar,
common peroneal and tibial nerves were most commonly injured. In
69 patients there was a vascular injury, fracture, or both at the
level of the nerve lesion. Major tissue loss was present in 50 patients:
amputation of at least one limb was needed in 18. A total of 36 patients
continued in severe neuropathic pain. This paper outlines the methods used in the assessment of these
injuries and provides information about the depth and distribution
of the nerve lesions, their associated injuries and neuropathic
pain syndromes.
Introduction. This is the first study to illustrate spinal fracture distribution and the impact of different injury mechanisms on the spinal column during contemporary warfare. Methods Retrospective analysis of Computed Tomography (CT) spinal images entered onto the Centre for Defence Imaging (CDI) database, 2005-2009. Isolated spinous and transverse process fractures were excluded to allow focus on cases with implications for immediate management and prospective disability burden. Fractures were classified by anatomical level and stability with validated systems. Clinical data regarding mechanism of injury and associated non-spinal injuries for each patient was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by Fisher's Exact test. Results 57 cases (128 fractures) were analysed. Ballistic (79%) and non-ballistic (21%) mechanisms contribute to vertebral fracture and spinal instability at all regions of the spinal column. There is a low incidence of cervical spine fracture, with these injuries predominantly occurring due to gunshot wounding. There is a high incidence of lumbar spine fractures which are significantly more likely to be caused by explosive devices than gunshot wounds (p<0.05). 66% of thoracolumbar spine fractures caused by explosive devices were unstable, the majority being of a burst configuration. Associated non-spinal injuries occurred in 60% of patients. There is a strong relationship between spinal injuries caused by explosive devices and lower limb fractures Conclusion Explosive devices account for significant injury to both combatants and civilians in current conflict. Injuries to the spine by explosions account for greater numbers, associated morbidity and increasing complexity than other means of injury.