Abstract
A 7-day randomised controlled pre-clinical trial utilising an existing extremity war wound model compared the efficacy of saline soaked gauze to commercially available dressings. The Flexor Carpi Ulnaris of anaesthetised rabbits was exposed to high-energy trauma using a computer-controlled jig and inoculated with 106Staphylococcus aureus 3 hours prior to application of dressing. Quantitative microbiological assessment demonstrated reduced bacterial counts in INADINE (Iodine) and ACTICOAT (Nanocrystalline Silver) groups and an increase in ACTIVON TULLE (Manuka Honey) group (2-way ANOVA p<0.05).
Clinical observations were made throughout the study. Haematology and plasma cytokines were analysed at intervals. Post-mortem histopathology included subjective semi-quantitative assessment of pathology severity using light microscopy to grade muscle injury and lymph node activation. Tissue samples were also examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
There were no bacteraemias, abscesses, purulent discharge or evidence of contralateral axillary lymph node activation. There were no significant differences in animal behaviour, weight change, maximum body temperature or white blood cell count elevation nor in pathology severity in muscle or lymph nodes (Kruskal-Wallis). There was no evidence of bacterial penetration or biofilm formation on SEM. Interleukin-4 and Tumour Necrosis Factor α levels were significantly higher in the ACTIVON TULLE group (1-way ANOVA p<0.05).
This time-limited study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in Staphylococcus aureus counts in wounds dressed with INADINE and ACTICOAT and an increase in wounds dressed with ACTIVON TULLE. There was no evidence that any of these dressings cause harm but nor have we established any definite clinical advantage associated with the use of the dressings tested in this study.
