Introduction: Infections associated with prosthetic joints cause significant morbidity and account for substantial costs for health care systems. The management of prosthetic joint infections is less standardized, because of the variable clinical presentations and the lack of data from randomized, controlled trials.

We evaluated the results of surgical one stage versus two stage exchange of patients diagnosed positive for prosthetic infection following total hip replacement in correlation with a classification described by Mc Pherson.

Material and Methods: 94 patients were diagnosed positive for prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement in the years 1995 to 2004: gender distribution was 45 male and 49 female patients. 37 patients were treated with a one stage exchange, 57 patients underwent a two step procedure. Patients were further divided into two groups following the mentioned classification described by Mc Pherson as infection type I+II and III. Further characterisation was performed following systemic host grade (A versus B+C) and local extremity grade 1 versus 2+3.

Results: Eradication of prosthetic infection was achieved in 94, 5% (n=52) within the group of two stage exchange and 56, 8% (n=21) of patients treated with a one stage procedure. Outcome of patients following a one stage or a two step exchange was overall significantly different with p< .001. Further deviations between the described two procedures were noted in the subgroups following the classification described by Mc Pherson. A benefit of patients who underwent a two step procedure was seen according the severity of the classification following Mc Pherson.

Conclusion: Eradication rate of prosthetic joint infections differs statistically significant overall and in the subgroups following Mc Pherson in dependence of the surgical procedure. For this reason the individual surgical procedure should be geared to an algorithm, following the classification described by Mc Pherson.

Introduction: Prosthetic joint infections occur in 1–2 % following total knee replacement. Different options of treatment are described in literature with a lack of data from randomized, controlled trials.

We classified septic revision surgeries following total knee according to a classification published by Mc Pherson. Eradication rate of one stage versus two stage exchange was compared.

Materials and Methods: We included 74 patients who underwent septic revision surgeries following total knee replacement in the years 1998 to 2005. Gender distribution was 42 female and 32 male patients. The mean age at revision surgery was 71 years, at primary implantation mean 68,8 years.

Results: The eradication rate overall was 77 %, in one stage exchange 41.7% and in two stage procedures 86%. Multiple stage revision showed an eradication rate of 75%, necrectomy/debridement 50%, arthrodesis and amputation 100%.

Regarding Mc Pherson’s systemic grades classification the eradication rate for two stage exchanges was 85,7% in group A+B and 60%% in group C. One stage procedures achieved 0% eradication rate in group B and 60% in group C. Regarding Mc Pherson’s local extremity grade classification eradication rates within two stage revisions were 84% in group 2 and 75% in group 3. One stage revision achieved 40% and 0%.

Conclusion: Although two stage revision surgeries achieved better results regarding eradication rates then one stage revision surgery, results were statistically not significant. Reason could be a too small number of included patients for a significant statistical impact. The individual surgical procedure should orientate on the classification published by Mc Pherson.

Objective: Metastases in the spinal column are a common manifestation of advanced cancer disease. Severe pain, pathologic fracture and neurologic deficit due to spinal metastases need adequate treatment. Considering oncologic aspects as well as quality of life, treatment decision should also include prediction of the survival period. In this study we analysed the scoring systems of Bauer, Bauer modified, Tokuhashi, Tokuhashi revised, Tomita, van der Linden and Sioutos, as well as the parameters they consist of, for their predictive value.

Methods: Two-hundred and fifty four patients with confirmed spinal metastases were investigated retrospectively (treatment 1998–2006; 62 received surgery, 189 only conservative therapy). The following factors were analysed: primary tumor, general condition (Kar-nofsky Performance Scale), neurological deficit, number of spinal and extraspinal bone metastases, visceral metastases, pathologic fracture. Survival period was calculated from date of diagnosis of the spinal metastases until date of death or last follow up (minimum follow-up: 12 months). For statistical analysis univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

Results: Median overall survival for all patients was 10.6 months. The following factors showed significant influence on survival in multivariate analysis: primary tumor (p< 0.0001), status of visceral metastases (p< 0.0001), and systemic therapy (p< 0.0001). Cox regression proved all scores significant in metric analysis. Distinguishing between the prognostic subgroups, only Bauer and Bauer modified showed significant results for this classification into good, moderate and poor prognosis. The other systems failed to distinguish significantly between good and moderate prognosis.

Conclusion: In our collective, Bauer and Bauer modified score prove to be the most reliable systems for predicting survival. We therefore want to propose the Bauer modified score (consisting of only four positive prognostic factors, excluding pathologic fracture) as valid for predicting survival and practicable for clinical use.

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in western countries and bone metastases of breast cancer cause significant morbidity. Tumor growth and progression requires the formation of new blood vessels, a process called angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is a complex multifactorial process involving a variety of proangiogenic and proteolytic enzyme activators and inhibitors. The most important regulator of angiogenesis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is overexpressed in several tumor tissues. The single nucleotide polymorphism 1498 C/T of VEGF was associated with increased plasma levels of VEGF. In this case controlled study, we analyzed the role of this polymorphism in bone metastasis of breast cancer.

Material and Methods: We genotyped 839 female breast cancer patients. The study was performed according to the Austrian Gene Technology Act and has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical University Graz. According to breast cancer staging, patients were divided in three groups, representing patients without metastases (n = 708), those with metastases other than bone (n = 69), and those with bone metastasis (n = 62). Results: Frequency of the 1498 CC genotype of VEGF was significantly lower among patients with bone metastases (6.5%) than among those with other metastases (23.2%; p=0.005) or no metastases (23.4%; p=0.002). Odds ratio of the CC genotype for bone metastases was 0.22 (95% CI 0.08 – 0.61; p = 0.004). Conclusion: We conclude that the homozygous 1498 C genotype of VEGF may be protective against development of bone metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Background: An acromiohumeral interval narrower than six millimeters has been considered pathologic and strongly indicative for rotator cuff tears by numerous authors. This prospective study was conducted as an assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation in the radiographic measurement of the acromiohumeral interval and its critical value.

Material and Methods: Thirty blinded, standardized anteroposterior shoulder radiographs were independently reviewed by five board certified orthopedic shoulder surgeons. The acromiohumeral distance, from the inferior anterior acromial aspect to the humeral head was measured in millimeters. The five investigators classified each film a second time in random order.

Results: Finally the same 27 radiographs (90%) have been evaluated by five investigators at both examination time points. The results of three investigators showed significant intra-observer variation ranging from 4 to 11 millimeters for the same radiograph. Six investigator pairs showed significant inter-observer variation at both examination time points (p< 0.05). The maximum inter-observer difference for the same radiograph was 11 millimeters (ranging from 1 to 11, SD 0.3 – 4.2).

Conclusion: In view of our results the assessment of the acromiohumeral interval using anteroposterior x-rays does not seem to be a reproducible method of measurement. Further investigations in combination with CT or MRI are necessary to ensure our findings.

We have investigated in a prospective, randomised placebo-controlled study the effect of high-dose aprotinin on blood loss in patients admitted for major surgery (revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee, or for resection of a soft-tissue sarcoma). The mean intraoperative blood loss was reduced from 1957 ml in the control group to 736 ml in the aprotinin group (p = 0.002). The mean requirement for intraoperative homologous blood transfusion in the aprotinin group was 1.4 units (95% CI 0.2 to 2.7) and 3.1 units (95% CI 1.7 to 4.6) in the control group (p = 0.033). The mean length of hospital stay was reduced from 27.8 days in the control group to 17.6 days in the aprotinin group which was not statistically significant.

The intraoperative use of aprotinin in major orthopaedic operations significantly reduced blood loss and the required amount of packed cells. It may result in a decrease in the length of hospital stay and costs.