In fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures, AO advocate using a lag screw and one-third tubular neutralisation plate for simple patterns. Where a lag screw cannot be placed, bridging fixation is required. A local pilot service evaluation previously identified variance in use of locking plates in all patterns with significant cost implications. The FAIR study aimed to evaluate current practice and implant use across the United Kingdom (UK) and review outcomes and complication rates between different fibula fixation methods. The study was supported by CORNET, the North East trainee research collaborative, and BOTA. Data was collected using REDCap from 22 centres in the UK retrospectively for a one-year period between 1st January 2019 and 31st December 2019 on injury mechanism, fracture characteristics, comorbidities, fixation and complications. Follow-up data was collected to at least two-years from the time surgery.Background
Method
Elevated synovial leukocyte count is a minor criterion derived from the musculoskeletal infection society (MSIS) widely used in clinical practice for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. There is evidence to suggest analysis within 1 hour, preferentially within 30 minutes, of aspiration reduces the risk of ex vivo cell lysis occurring during prolonged transport. Multiple site working is more common practice and the availability of a lab on site to perform these tests is not always possible. We aimed to assess whether we could safely perform synovial leukocyte counts within our cold site in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. We reviewed all orthopaedic synovial fluid aspirates within the lower limb arthroplasty unit from April 2021 – April 2022 performed at South Tees NHS Foundation Trust. We assessed time from aspirate to the lab using electronic data resources. This information was compared with the labs ability to perform a synovial leukocyte count to determine the impact of delays on testing. 110 patients (34.5% hips and 63.6% knees) were identified between two sites. Time from aspirate to lab ranged from 0 mins to 26 hrs 34 mins. Mean time to processing was 3hrs 10 mins. 50% of all samples had a synovial leukocyte count performed. 67% of patients had a cell differential performed. There was no difference in the ability to perform a synovial leukocyte count between samples process in < 2hours vs > 6 hours. We conclude that it is safe practice to perform joint aspirates for the work up of periprosthetic joint infections in sites where no laboratory is immediately available as the delay to processing synovial fluid does not alter the ability to perform a synovial leukocyte count. This study will provide evidence to enable the work up of periprosthetic joint infections in cold centres and therefore reduce the delay in diagnosis and proceeding management.
COMPOSE describes the demographics, fracture characteristics, management and associated outcomes of knee femoral periprosthetic fractures (KFPPF). Multicentre retrospective cohort study conducted 01/01/2018-31/12/2018. Data collected included: patient demographics, social and mobility characteristics, fracture characteristics, management strategy and post-treatment outcomes (length of stay, reoperation, readmission, 30-day and 12-month mortality).Abstract
Introduction
Methods
The NHS long term plan endorses ‘personalised’, ‘digitally enabled’, ‘out of hospital’ care. Multiagency guidance (CPOC(2021)/NICE(2021)/GIRFT(2021)/NHSX(2021)) advocates an integrated ‘pathway’ approach to information sharing, shared-decision making and patient support. Digital solutions are the vehicle to deliver these agendas. In 2018 we developed a digital joint pathway (DJP) spanning the surgical care pathway (prehabilitation to rehabilitation) using the GoWellHealth platform. Patients listed for joint replacement are offered the DJP as routine care. Activity and engagement are monitored using the DJP data library. We sought to evidence our DJP by assessing patient engagement, experience and outcomes (OKS/EQ5D/Readmission).Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Hip fracture principally affects the frailest in society, many of whom are care dependent, and are disproportionately at risk of contracting COVID-19. We examined the impact of COVID-19 infection on hip fracture mortality in England. We conducted a cohort study of patients with hip fracture recorded in the National Hip Fracture Database between 1st February 2019 and 31st October 2020, in England. Data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics to quantify patient characteristics and comorbidities, Office for National Statistics mortality data, and Public Health England's SARS-CoV-2 testing results. Multivariable Cox regression examined determinants of 90-day mortality. Excess mortality attributable to COVID-19 was quantified using Quasi-Poisson models. Analysis of 102,900 hip fractures (42,630 occurring during the pandemic) revealed that amongst those with COVID-19 infection at presentation (n=1,120) there was a doubling of 90-day mortality; hazard ratio (HR) 2.05 (95%CI 1.86–2.26), while for infections arising between 8–30 days after presentation (n=1,644) the figure was even higher at 2.52 (2.32–2.73). Malnutrition [1.44 (1.19–1.75)] and non-operative treatment [2.89 (2.16–3.86)] were the only modifiable risk factors for death in COVID-19 positive patients. Patients with previous COVID-19 initially had better survival compared to those who contracted COVID-19 around the time of their hip fracture; however, survival rapidly declined and by 365 days the combination of hip fracture and COVID-19 infection was associated with a 50% mortality rate. Between 1st January and 30th June 2020, 1,273 (99.7%CI 1,077–1,465) excess deaths occurred within 90 days of hip fracture, representing an excess mortality of 23% (20%–26%), with most deaths occurring within 30 days. COVID-19 infection more than doubled early hip fracture mortality; the first 30-days after injury were most critical, suggesting that targeted interventions in this period may have most benefit in improving survival.
Antibiotic-loaded bone cements (ALBCs) may offer early protection against the formation of bacterial biofilm after joint arthroplasty. Use in hip arthroplasty is widely accepted, but there is a lack of evidence in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of ALBC in a large population of TKA patients. Data from the National Joint Registry (NJR) of England and Wales were obtained for all primary cemented TKAs between March 2003 and July 2016. Patient, implant, and surgical variables were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the influence of ALBC on risk of revision. Body mass index (BMI) data were available in a subset of patients.Aims
Materials and Methods
There is significant variation and inconsistencies in the current advice and information delivered to patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR). The aim of this study was to assess a locally developed web-based electronic resource system for patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) surgery to see if this improves and standardises the content, structure, and delivery of information delivered to patients prior to and after surgery. Prospective study with patients recruited in clinic when listed for THR surgery. Patients are emailed login details for the web based electronic resource system (GoWellHealth). The platform delivers content in a time-lined fashion and is individualised to the patient. Data gathered includes the number of patients registering to use this system, their engagement and use of the resources, and results from forms and questionnaires administered.Background
Patients/Materials and Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be difficult to diagnose. A variety of techniques have been described. The efficacy of the alpha-defensin laboratory test was examined and compared with other established modalities in the diagnostic workup of ‘real world’ arthroplasty patients. This was a retrospective review of 210 episodes (86 hips, 124 Knees) in 172 patients at one centre, and included samples from acute admissions, elective aspirations, and planned revisions. MSIS (musculoskeletal infection society) major and minor criteria were used for diagnosing PJI. Each patient was investigated using a standardised protocol with inflammatory markers, synovial fluid analysis for white cell count (SWCC) and polymorphonuclear leukoctyes percentage (PMN %), and synovial fluid/tissue culture. Synovial fluid was also tested for alpha-defensin.Introduction
Methods
This study aimed to identify risk factors for development of deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients following surgical treatment of neck of femur fracture. This study identified a consecutive series of 2,822 (2,052 female, 73%) patients who underwent either hemiarthroplasty (n=1,825, 65%) or fixation (DHS) (n=997, 35%) for fractured neck of femur performed between January 2009 and June 2015 at our institution. Full patient demographics, co-morbidity and peri-operative complication data were determined. The majority of patients were either ASA 2 (n=663, 23%) or ASA 3 (n=1,521, 54%), mean age = 81.3 years (SD 10.3). All patients were followed up post-operatively by a dedicated surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring team in order to identify patients who developed a PJI within 1 year. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify patient and surgical factors associated with increased risk of infection. Predictors with a p-value of <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.Aim
Method
The aim of this study was to compare the pain caused by the application
of a tourniquet after exsanguination of the upper limb with that
occurring after simple elevation. We used 26 healthy volunteers (52 arms), each of whom acted as
their own matched control. The primary outcome measure was the total pain experienced by
each volunteer while the tourniquet was inflated for 20 minutes.
This was calculated as the area under the pain curve for each individual
subject. Secondary outcomes were pain at each time point; the total
pain experienced during the recovery phase; the ability to tolerate the
tourniquet and the time for full recovery after deflation of the
tourniquet. Aims
Patients and Methods
The highly cross-linked polyethylene Exeter RimFit flanged cemented
acetabular component was introduced in the United Kingdom in 2010.
This study aimed to examine the rates of emergence of radiolucent
lines observed when the Rimfit acetabular component was implanted
at total hip arthroplasty (THA) using two different techniques: firstly,
the ‘rimcutter’ technique in which the flange sits on a pre-prepared
acetabular rim; and secondly, the ‘trimmed flange’ technique in
which the flange is trimmed and the acetabular component is seated
inside the rim of the acetabulum. The radiographs of 150 THAs (75 ‘rimcutter’, 75 ‘trimmed flange’)
involving this component were evaluated to assess for radiolucencies
at the cement/bone interface by three observers. Aims
Patients and Methods
The Exeter RimFit™ flanged cemented cup features ultra-highly cross-linked polyethylene and was introduced onto the market in the UK in 2010. We aimed to examine the rates of radiolucent lines observed when the Rimfit™ cup was implanted using a ‘rimcutter’ technique with the cup sitting on a prepared acetabular rim, and a ‘trimmed flange’ technique were the flange is cut so that it sits inside the prepared acetabular rim. The radiographs of 150 (75 ‘rimcutter’, 75 ‘trimmed flange’) Rimfit™ hip replacements were critically evaluated to assess for radiolucency at the cement bone interface. This group was then compared to a historic pre-Rimfit™ cohort of 76 patients.Introduction
Patients/Materials & Methods
The aim of this study was to review the role
of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two
electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception
to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related
to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic
research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led
research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current
clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching
yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for
this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under
the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research
questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre
RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review
confirms growing international awareness of the important role research
networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary
collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial
for successful delivery of RCTs. Cite this article:
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of total hip replacement (THR) for displaced intracapsular fractured neck of femur (NOF) in cognitively intact patients who were independently mobile prior to the injury. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) has collected data on THRs performed since 2003. This retrospective cohort study explores risk factors independently associated with implant failure and perioperative mortality. NJR data recording a THR performed for acute fractured NOF between 2003 and 2010 were analysed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the extent to which risk of implant revision was related to specific covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse factors affecting 90-day perioperative mortality. Significance was taken as p< 0.01.Introduction
Methods
Current analysis of unicondylar knee replacements (UKR) by national registries is based on the pooled results of medial and lateral implants. Using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) we aimed to determine the proportion of lateral UKR implanted, their survival and reason for failure in comparison to medial UKR. By combining information on the side of operation with component details held on the NJR we were able to determine implant laterality (medial vs. lateral) for 32,847 of the 35,624 (92%) UKR registered before December 2010. Kaplan Meier plots, Life tables and Cox' proportion hazards were used to compare the risk of failure for lateral and medial UKRs after adjustment for patient and implant covariates.Background
Methods
Both surgeon and hospital volume influence patient outcomes following revision knee arthroplasty. To audit all centres performing revision knee procedures in England and Wales over a 2-year period. All centres were audited against two pre-defined standards linked to hospital volume Operative volume should be greater than 10 revisions per year; More than 2.5 revisions should be performed for every 100 primary arthroplasties implanted.Background
Purpose
Following in-depth analysis of the market leading brand combinations in which we identified implant influences on risk of revision, we compared revision in patients implanted with different categories of hip replacement in order to find implant with the lowest revision risk, once known flawed options were removed. All patients with osteoarthritis who underwent a hip replacement (2003–2010) using an Exeter-Contemporary (cemented), Corail-Pinnacle (cementless), Exeter-Trident (Hybrid) or a Birmingham Hip resurfacing (BHR) were initially included within the analysis. Operations involving factors that were significant predictors of revision were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models were then used to assess the relative risk of revision for a category of implant (compared with cemented), after adjustment for patient covariates.Introduction
Methods
To determine how patient characteristics; health status and pre-operative knee function effect patient reported satisfaction and operative success following total knee replacement (TKR). We hypothesised that a number of patient factors would influence the reported levels of symptomatic improvement (success) and satisfaction and that these two outcomes would represent different aspects of the patient's perception of outcome. Retrospective cohort analysis of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and National Joint Registry (NJR) data. Complete patient data was available for 9,874 TKRs performed for osteoarthritis between 1/8/08 and 31/12/10. The relationship of the background factors to patient perceived satisfaction and success was investigated using ordinal logistic regression and structural equation modelling (SEM).Purpose
Design
The most appropriate form of chemical thromboprophylaxis following knee replacement is a contentious issue. Most national guidelines recommend the use of low molecular weight Heparin (LMWH) whilst opposing the use of aspirin. We compared thromboembolic events, major haemorrhage and death after knee replacement in patients receiving either aspirin or LMWH. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales was linked to an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service. A total of 156 798 patients undergoing knee replacement between April 2003 and September 2008 were included and followed up for 90 days. Multivariable risk modelling was used to estimate odds ratios adjusted for baseline risk factors (AOR). An AOR < 1 indicates that risk rates are lower with LMWH than with aspirin.Background
Methods
To examine how patients viewed the outcome of their joint replacement at least one year post surgery. Emphasis was placed on investigating the relative influence of ongoing pain and functional limitation on patient satisfaction. Questionnaire based assessment of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), patient satisfaction, and need for reoperation in a group of 10,000 patients who had undergone primary unilateral knee replacement between April and December 2003. Questionnaires were linked to the NJR database to provide data on background demographics, clinical parameters and intraoperative surgical information for each patient. Data was analysed to investigate the relationship between the OKS, satisfaction rate and the background factors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to establish which factors influenced patient satisfaction.Purpose
Method
