Introduction. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ulnar fixation and postoperative satisfaction among patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures, with a particular focus on how sociodemographic factors influence outcomes. Method. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 120 patients aged 26-53 who underwent surgical treatment for distal radius fractures with concomitant ulna styloid fractures between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether ulnar fixation was performed. Sociodemographic data, including age, gender, socioeconomic status, education level, and occupation, were collected. All patients underwent similar physical therapy protocols in the postoperative period, and no complications were observed in any patient. Postoperative satisfaction was assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores at 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of ulnar fixation and sociodemographic factors on patient satisfaction. Result. Patients who underwent ulnar fixation (n=60) reported significantly higher satisfaction levels compared to those who did not (n=60), as evidenced by lower PRWE and DASH scores (p < 0.05). Age, gender, and socioeconomic status were significant predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Younger patients, females, and those with higher socioeconomic status exhibited greater improvements in functional outcomes and satisfaction. However, education level and occupation did not significantly influence satisfaction scores. Conclusion. Ulnar fixation in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures is associated with improved postoperative satisfaction. Sociodemographic factors, particularly age, gender, and socioeconomic status, play a crucial role in patient-reported outcomes. Tailoring postoperative care to address these sociodemographic differences may enhance overall patient satisfaction and recovery

Introduction. The main postoperative complications in fixation of ulna shaft fractures are non-union and implant irritation using currently recommended 3.5-mm locking compression plates. An alternative approach using a combination of two smaller plates in orthogonal configuration has been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a single 3.5-mm locking compression plate versus double plating using one 2.5-mm and one 2.0-mm mandible plate in a human ulna shaft fracture model. Method. Eight pairs human ulnar specimens with a standardized 10-mm fracture gap were pairwise assigned for instrumentation with either a single 3.5-mm plate placed posteriorly, or for double plating using a 2.5-mm and a 2.0-mm mandible plate placed posteriorly under the flexor muscles and laterally under the extensor muscles. All constructs were initially non-destructively biomechanically tested in axial compression, torsion, and bending, which was followed by cyclic torsional loading to failure. Interfragmentary movements were monitored by means of optical motion tracking. Result. There were no significant differences between the two plating techniques for axial stiffness (p=0.335), torsional stiffness in supination (p=0.462), torsional stiffness in pronation (p=0.307), medio-lateral bending stiffness (p=0.522), and antero-posterior bending stiffness (p=0.143). During cyclic torsional loading over the first 3000 cycles, there were no significant differences between the two plating techniques for shear displacement across the fracture gap, p=0.324. The numbers of cycles until clinically relevant failure of 5° angular deformation were 1366±685 for double plating and 2024±958 for single plating, which was statistically non-significantly different, p>0.05. The constructs treated with both plating techniques failed due to bone breakage at the most distal screw. Conclusion. From a biomechanical perspective double plating of ulna shaft fractures using a 2.5-mm and a 2.0-mm locking mandible plate demonstrated equivalent fixation strength as conventional plating using a single 3.5-mm locking compression plate

Advancements in treating complications of operatively treated distal radius fractures. We will review tips and tricks to avoid complications associated with operative fixation of these complicated injuries. We will cover treatment of the distal radioulnar joint, associated distal ulna fracture, complications of malreduction and implant prominence. During this session, we will review the latest techniques for treating these complex distal radius fractures and how to avoid associated complications

Introduction. Two randomised trials concluded cast type (above or below elbow) makes no significant difference in the re-displacement rate of paediatric forearm fractures involving the distal third of the radius. This has not, however, led to the universal use of below elbow casts. In particular we noted one trial reported significant re-displacement in 40% or more of cases, which was much higher than we would expect. To review the radiological outcomes and need for re-manipulation of paediatric distal forearm fractures treated with closed manipulation under anaesthesia in our institution, in part for subsequent comparison with published results. All forearm fractures treated at a specialist children's hospital in one year were reviewed retrospectively. Based on the methodology of one trial, we included all fractures involving the distal third of the radius, with or without an ulna fracture, which underwent closed manipulation. Outcomes were radiological alignment using existing radiographs and need for re-manipulation. Cast type was at the discretion of the treating surgeon. The radiological criteria for re-displacement were based on published methodology. 79 children underwent manipulation, 71 receiving above elbow casts and 8 below elbow casts. Radiologically 21% of injuries treated in an above elbow cast re-displaced (15/71) compared to 38% of those in below elbow plasters (3/8). In 2 cases the re-displacement was treated with re-manipulation. The preference in our institution was clearly for above elbow casts in this injury pattern. The small number of below elbow casts in our series limits any comparisons. Our rate of re-displacement using above elbow casts was half that of one of the published studies, so the existing literature is not consistent with our experience