Introduction. Missile injuries are very serious injuries particularly in the cervical region. They are classified into high and low missile injuries when it involves the cervical spine. In modern guerrilla warfare, one must be aware of ballistic pathology with bullets as well as from explosives. In particular, improvised explosive devices commonly known as IED's play a new and important pathophysiology whether they are suicided vests or roadside bombs. They usually produce severe or lethal injuries and serious neurovascular deficit is frequent. We present the details of 40 patients with local experience on how to handle serious penetrating cervical missile injuries. Methods. All cases were collected from the record of Basrah University Hospital, Iraq. Healthy military gentlemen with ages ranging between 20–35 years were included. Results. 11 patients had bullet injuries and 29patients had fragments of shell injuries. The sites of injuries were 9: C2–C3, 12: C5–C6, 12: C4–C5 and 7: C7-T1. Bullet entrance was anterior in 23 patients, posterior in 7 patients and lateral in 10 patients. The cervical vertebrae were injured in 37 patients at body or lamina level while in 3 patients it was only neural tissue injuries. Missiles were retained in 13 patients. All injuries showed some degree of neurological deficit with quadriplegia in 26 patients. 9 patients presented with very serious injuries. No relation was found between the size of the missile and the extent of damage. Outcome of treatment in all patients was poor. Conclusion. Gunshot wounds only account for approximately one third of penetrating missile injuries in patients who survive and are well enough to receive medical treatment. 62% of patients' cohort were from explosive devices, consistent with data from 2010, where 58% of fatalities were from IED's occurring in foreign soldiers in Afghanistan. We discuss the importance of general supportive measures, generous wound excision, removal of the retained missiles and heavy cover of antibiotics

Aims

CRP is an acute-phase protein that is used as a biomarker to follow severity and progression in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Its pathophysiological mechanisms of action are still poorly defined. CRP in its pentameric form exhibits weak anti-inflammatory activity. The monomeric isoform (mCRP) exerts potent proinflammatory properties in chondrocytes, endothelial cells, and leucocytes. No data exist regarding mCRP effects in human intervertebral disc (IVD) cells. This work aimed to verify the pathophysiological relevance of mCRP in the aetiology and/or progression of IVD degeneration.

Purpose of the study. We report septic shock as postoperative complication following an instrumented posterior spinal arthrodesis on a patient with multiple body piercings. The management of this potentially catastrophic complication and outcome of treatment is been discussed. Summary of Background Data. Body piercing has become increasingly more common due to change in culture or as a fashion statement. This has been associated with local or generalized ill effects including tissue injury, skin and systemic infections, and septic shock. There is no clear guideline pathway regarding removal and reinsertion of body piercings in patients who undergo major surgery. Complications following Orthopaedic or Spinal procedures associated with body piercing have not been reported. Methods. We reviewed the medical notes and radiographs of an adolescent patient with severe Scheuermann's kyphosis and multiple body piercings who underwent an uneventful posterior spinal arthrodesis with pedicle hook/screw/rod instrumentation and autologous iliac crest bone graft and developed septic shock. Results. Septic shock developed on postoperative day 2 after reinsertion of all piercings following patient's request. The patient became systemically very unwell and required intensive medical management, as well as a total course of antibiotics of 3 months. The piercings remained in situ. She did not develop a wound infection despite the presence of bacteraemia (coagulase-negative Staphylococci/Streptococci warneri) and spinal instrumentation. The patient had no new piercings subsequent to her deformity procedure. Two and a half years after spinal surgery she reported no medical problems, had a balanced spine with no loss of kyphosis correction and no evidence of nonunion or recurrence of deformity. Conclusion. The development of septic shock as a result of piercing reinsertion in the postoperative period has not been previously reported. This is an important consideration to prevent potentially life-threatening complications following major spinal surgery. Despite the wide array of complications associated to body art there are no clear guidelines for body piercing. There is growing public awareness and several countries are laying regulations which have not yet been internationally standardized. A clear practice guideline in the perioperative management of piercings is needed as the incidence of body piercing and associated complications is rising. There is need for surgeons to be aware of the hazards of body piercing and its implications. We propose that multiple piercings should not be reinserted after major surgery and appropriate counseling should be provided to the patients as part of the consent process

This short contribution aims to explain how intervertebral disc ‘degeneration’ differs from normal ageing, and to suggest how mechanical loading and constitutional factors interact to cause disc degeneration and prolapse. We suggest that disagreement on these matters in medico-legal practice often arises from a misunderstanding of the nature of ‘soft-tissue injuries’.

The belief that an intervertebral disc must degenerate before it can herniate has clinical and medicolegal significance, but lacks scientific validity. We hypothesised that tissue changes in herniated discs differ from those in discs that degenerate without herniation. Tissues were obtained at surgery from 21 herniated discs and 11 non-herniated discs of similar degeneration as assessed by the Pfirrmann grade. Thin sections were graded histologically, and certain features were quantified using immunofluorescence combined with confocal microscopy and image analysis. Herniated and degenerated tissues were compared separately for each tissue type: nucleus, inner annulus and outer annulus.

Herniated tissues showed significantly greater proteoglycan loss (outer annulus), neovascularisation (annulus), innervation (annulus), cellularity/inflammation (annulus) and expression of matrix-degrading enzymes (inner annulus) than degenerated discs. No significant differences were seen in the nucleus tissue from herniated and degenerated discs. Degenerative changes start in the nucleus, so it seems unlikely that advanced degeneration caused herniation in 21 of these 32 discs. On the contrary, specific changes in the annulus can be interpreted as the consequences of herniation, when disruption allows local swelling, proteoglycan loss, and the ingrowth of blood vessels, nerves and inflammatory cells.

In conclusion, it should not be assumed that degenerative changes always precede disc herniation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1127–33.