Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

MODERN GUERILLA WARFARE AND PENETRATING MISSILE INJURIES OF THE CERVICAL SPINE: CHARACTERISTICS OF PENETRATING MISSILE INJURIES TO THE CERVICAL SPINE IN A LARGE WARTIME COHORT OF MODERN GUERRILLA WARFARE

NSpine 5th Major Multi-Disclipinary Spine Conference, held online, 13–16 July 2021.



Abstract

Introduction

Missile injuries are very serious injuries particularly in the cervical region. They are classified into high and low missile injuries when it involves the cervical spine. In modern guerrilla warfare, one must be aware of ballistic pathology with bullets as well as from explosives. In particular, improvised explosive devices commonly known as IED's play a new and important pathophysiology whether they are suicided vests or roadside bombs. They usually produce severe or lethal injuries and serious neurovascular deficit is frequent. We present the details of 40 patients with local experience on how to handle serious penetrating cervical missile injuries.

Methods

All cases were collected from the record of Basrah University Hospital, Iraq. Healthy military gentlemen with ages ranging between 20–35 years were included.

Results

11 patients had bullet injuries and 29patients had fragments of shell injuries. The sites of injuries were 9: C2–C3, 12: C5–C6, 12: C4–C5 and 7: C7-T1. Bullet entrance was anterior in 23 patients, posterior in 7 patients and lateral in 10 patients. The cervical vertebrae were injured in 37 patients at body or lamina level while in 3 patients it was only neural tissue injuries.

Missiles were retained in 13 patients. All injuries showed some degree of neurological deficit with quadriplegia in 26 patients. 9 patients presented with very serious injuries. No relation was found between the size of the missile and the extent of damage.

Outcome of treatment in all patients was poor.

Conclusion

Gunshot wounds only account for approximately one third of penetrating missile injuries in patients who survive and are well enough to receive medical treatment. 62% of patients' cohort were from explosive devices, consistent with data from 2010, where 58% of fatalities were from IED's occurring in foreign soldiers in Afghanistan. We discuss the importance of general supportive measures, generous wound excision, removal of the retained missiles and heavy cover of antibiotics.


*Email: