Aims. The ulna is an extremely rare location for primary bone tumours of the elbow in paediatrics. Although several reconstruction options are available, the optimal reconstruction method is still unknown due to the rarity of proximal ulna tumours. In this study, we report the outcomes of osteoarticular ulna allograft for the reconstruction of proximal ulna tumours. Methods. Medical profiles of 13 patients, who between March 2004 and November 2021 underwent osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction after the resection of the proximal ulna tumour, were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were measured clinically by the assessment of elbow range of motion (ROM), stability, and function, and radiologically by the assessment of allograft-host junction union, recurrence, and joint degeneration. The elbow function was assessed objectively by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and subjectively by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) questionnaire. Results. The mean follow-up of patients was 60.3 months (SD 28.5). The mean elbow flexion-extension ROM was 95.8° (SD 21). The mean MSTS of the patients was 84.4 (SD 8.2), the mean TESS was 83.8 (SD 6.7), and the mean MEPS was 79.2 (SD 11.5). All the patients had radiological union at the osteotomy site. Symptomatic osteoarthritic change was observed in three patients (23%), one of whom ended up with elbow joint fusion. Two patients (15.4%) had recurrence during the follow-up period. Surgical complications included two allograft fractures, two plate fractures, three medial instabilities, and two infections. Conclusion. Osteoarticular ulna allograft reconstruction provides acceptable functional outcomes. Despite a high rate of complications, it is still a valuable reconstruction method, particularly in skeletally immature patients who need their distal humerus physis for the rest of hand growth. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(9):749–757

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of application of a 3D-printed megaprosthesis with hemiarthroplasty design for defects of the distal humerus or proximal ulna following tumour resection. Methods. From June 2018 to January 2020, 13 patients with aggressive or malignant tumours involving the distal humerus (n = 8) or proximal ulna (n = 5) were treated by en bloc resection and reconstruction with a 3D-printed megaprosthesis with hemiarthroplasty, designed in our centre. In this paper, we summarize the baseline and operative data, oncological outcome, complication profiles, and functional status of these patients. Results. Preparation of the prosthesis was a mean of 8.0 days (SD 1.5), during which time no patients experienced tumour progression. The mean operating time and intraoperative blood loss were 158.1 minutes (SD 67.6) and 176.9 ml (SD 187.8), respectively. All of the prostheses were implanted successfully. During a mean follow-up of 25.7 months (SD 7.8), no patients died, but four had complications (two superficial wound problems, one temporary palsy of radial nerve, and one dislocation). No aseptic loosening, structural failure, infection, heterotopic ossification, or degenerative arthritis was seen in this study. The mean flexion of the elbow was 119.6° (SD 15.9°) and the mean extension lag was 11.9° (SD 13.8°). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were 28.4 (SD 0.9) and 97.7 (SD 4.4), respectively. Conclusion. The custom-made, 3D-printed megaprosthesis with hemiarthroplasty is a feasible option for functional reconstruction after resection of a tumour in the distal humerus or proximal ulna. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):747–757

Summary Statement. This 3-dimensional CT study on cadaveric proximal ulna provides further insight into the size and geometry of the proximal ulna intramedullary cavity with potential applications to design and sizing of proximal ulna components. Introduction. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an established treatment for varying pathologies of the elbow with very good functional outcomes. Optimal fit of ulna components in TEA is predicated on a detailed appreciation of the 3-dimensional anatomy of the proximal ulna intra-medullary cavity, but literature remains scarce. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the proximal ulna have been constructed using computed tomography (CT) programs, accurately defining the angular relations with the cross-sectional extra-medullary dimensions. However, current CT-based thresholding techniques lack accuracy in differentiating cortical from cancellous bone in the metaphyseal region, and thus cannot properly define the intra-medullary region of uncored proximal ulnae. We investigate the geometric dimensions of the proximal ulna intra-medullary cavity using CT studies of cored cadaveric ulnae. Patients & Methods. Three-dimensional models based on CT data of 17 manually cored cadaveric proximal ulnae were created using Matlab program and analyzed. The cadaveric specimens were dissected to identify the medullary canal and coring of the canal of the proximal ulna to exclude the cancellous bone was performed as for ulna canal preparation during TEA. Using the center of a circle fitted over the trochlear ridge as the origin, the diameter, coronal and sagittal angulation of the canal were determined. The diameter, posterior and lateral offsets of the proximal medullary canal were plotted against the normalised axial distance from the origin which was represented in terms of R, the radius of the circle fitted to the trochlear ridge. The normalization of the axial distance was done to compensate for the varying individual ulna lengths. Results. The mean of the radius of the circle which was fitted to the trochlear ridge, R, was found to be 16.64 ± 2.71 mm. The minimum diameter of the canal increased from the origin and peak at 2.3R (just distal to the coronoid process) with a value of 7.08 ± 1.74 mm, decreasing in a linear fashion to 4.48 ± 0.91 mm at 6R. There was an increasing posterior offset which was linear in nature (R. 2. = 0.954) up to 6R (approximately 97mm from the origin). Likewise, the lateral offset increased in a linear fashion (R. 2. = 0.996). Discussion. The findings of our study most likely represent the effective minimum diameter for optimal implant placement, which are consistent with previously documented cadaveric dimensions. The findings also support the current tapered component design of the proximal ulna stemmed implants without the need for significant angulation. Conclusion. Our study provides further insight into the size and geometry of the proximal ulna intramedullary cavity with potential applications to design and sizing of proximal ulna components

Aims. Reconstruction after osteoarticular resection of the proximal ulna for tumours is technically difficult and little has been written about the options that are available. We report a series of four patients who underwent radial neck to humeral trochlea transposition arthroplasty following proximal ulnar osteoarticular resection. Methods. Between July 2020 and July 2022, four patients with primary bone tumours of the ulna underwent radial neck to humeral trochlea transposition arthroplasty. Their mean age was 28 years (12 to 41). The functional outcome was assessed using the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow, rotation of the forearm and stability of the elbow, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS), and the nine-item abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH-9) score. Results. All patients were available for follow-up at a mean of 33 months (25 to 43) and were disease-free. The mean flexion arc was 0° to 105°. Three patients had complications. One had neuropraxia of the ulnar nerve. The symptoms resolved after three months. In one patient, the screw used for fixation of the triceps tendon became exposed and was removed, six months postoperatively. One patient with wound dehiscence required a local flap for soft-tissue cover, four months postoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 33 months (25 to 43), the mean flexion arc was 0° to 105°. All patients had full supination (85°) but none had any pronation. The mean MSTS score was 23.5 (23 to 24) and mean QuickDASH-9 score was 26.13 (16.5 to 35.75). Three patients had varus-valgus instability on examination, although only one had a sense of instability while working. Conclusion. Radial neck to humeral trochlea transposition offers a satisfactory and cost-effective biological reconstructive option after osteoarticular resection of the proximal ulna, in the short term. It provides good elbow function and, being a biological reconstruction option using native bone, is likely to provide long-term stability and durability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(11):1301–1305

Fixation of comminuted olecranon and proximal ulna fractures can be a challenge. The goal of surgery is for stable fixation to encourage union and allow early elbow movement. Over a 3 year period, a low profile titanium, precon-toured olecranon plate (Acumed LLC, Hillsboro, Portland, Oregon) was used in 16 patients with comminuted olecranon and proximal ulna fractures, using a standard universal posterior approach to the olecranon with the patient in a lateral position and active flexion/extension of the elbow was started 48 hours postoperatively. Functional outcomes were measured during follow-up (FU), including range of movement (ROM), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). There were 9 isolated olecranon fractures, including one open fracture in a multiple injured patient and one an infected non-union and 7 with associated ipsilateral upper limb injuries. Mean age was 52 years (13 to 84) and mean FU was 12.8 months (3 to 33). All had achieved radiological union at 3 months. Overall mean ROM for both groups was 19.3 to 130.7 degrees flexion, 71.8 degrees pronation and 72.1 degrees supination. DASH was 19.1 and MEPS was 87.7. When comparing the 2 groups, there was no significant difference in supination or pronation but all other mean outcomes measurements showed statistical significance in favour of isolated, comminuted olecranon fractures. Extension 9.4 versus 35.0 degrees (p< 0.005), Flexion 140.6 versus 117.5 (p< 0.05), DASH 7.5 versus 34.7 (p=0.0007) and MEPS 96.3 (excellent) versus 78.3 (good) (p< 0.05). There were no infections or failure of metalwork, but two patients had the metalwork removed after union as they required further surgery to their elbows. We demonstrate this is a safe and reliable method of fixation and can expect excellent results when treating isolated comminuted olecranon/proximal ulna fractures and good results when there are associated ipsilateral injuries

Determining and accurately restoring the flexion-extension axis of the elbow is essential for functional recovery after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). We evaluated the effect of morphological features of the elbow on variations of alignment of the components at TEA. Morphological and positioning variables were compared by systematic CT scans of 22 elbows in 21 patients after TEA.

There were five men and 16 women, and the mean age was 63 years (38 to 80). The mean follow-up was 22 months (11 to 44).

The anterior offset and version of the humeral components were significantly affected by the anterior angulation of the humerus (p = 0.052 and p = 0.004, respectively). The anterior offset and version of the ulnar components were strongly significantly affected by the anterior angulation of the ulna (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001).

The closer the anterior angulation of the ulna was to the joint, the lower the ulnar anterior offset (p = 0.030) and version of the ulnar component (p = 0.010). The distance from the joint to the varus angulation also affected the lateral offset of the ulnar component (p = 0.046).

Anatomical variations at the distal humerus and proximal ulna affect the alignment of the components at TEA. This is explained by abutment of the stems of the components and is particularly severe when there are substantial deformities or the deformities are close to the joint.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1539–45.

We have investigated the anatomy of the proximal part of the ulna to assess its influence on the use of plates in the management of fractures at this site. We examined 54 specimens from cadavers. The mean varus angulation in the proximal third was 17.5° (11° to 23°) and the mean anterior deviation 4.5° (1° to 14°). These variations must be considered when applying plates to the dorsal surface of the ulna for Monteggia-type fractures. A pre-operative radiograph of the contralateral elbow may also be of value.

Proximal ulnar fractures may be difficult to treat and may result in chronic instability, non-union heterotrophic ossification, synostosis, stiffness and post-traumatic arthritis. The aim of this study is to study success of treatment in achieving stable reduction and early rehabilitation.

Between December 2003 and January 2007 fifty patients (fifty-one elbows) which had sustained 21.A3 and 21.C3 fractures were identified and retrospectively studied.

There were two broad groups of patients. Young males following high energy injuries (average age=38+/−16) and old females with osteoporotic fractures (average age=65+/−17). Twenty-two patients had associated monteggia and seven patients had trans-olacrenon dislocation. Twenty-three patients had radial sided injury. This included two capitelar fractures, nineteen radial head and neck fractures and one radial shaft fracture. Fortyfive patients were treated with plating and two patients were treated with tension band wiring. Five different plating techniques were used to stabilize the fractures.

Eighteen patients had incongruent reduction. Eighteen patients had complications of the treatment. There were seven cases of non-union, one case of loss of fixation, three cases of heterotrophic ossification, three cases of synostosis, one case of deep infection and five complications resulting from radial head fractures.

There was no relationship between loss of fixation and plating techniques. There was a direct relation between comminution and post fixation incongruence. Heterotrophic ossification was associated with comminution, radial head fracture, monteggia fracture-dislocation and non-union. Radio-ulnar synostosis was associated with comminution of the ulnar fracture.

In conclusion, the main predictor of poor outcome is the comminution of proximal ulnar fracture and the ability to achieve congruous fracture fixation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of custom-made endoprosthetic reconstruction for both tumourous and non-tumourous conditions around the elbow joint. 28 consecutive cases of endoprosthetic elbow reconstruction, performed between 1989 and 2003, were identified using the unit database. There were 12 males and 16 females, with a mean age 48.9 years, (range 14–84). There were 16 cases of malignant tumour (10 primary, 6 secondary), 3 cases of benign tumour (one each of giant cell tumour, osteoblastoma and pigmented villonodular synovitis) and 10 non-oncological cases, (5 cases of fracture, 3 failed total elbow replacements and 1 infected synostosis). A distal humeral prosthesis was used in 16 patients, distal humeral and proximal ulna in 10 patients, proximal ulna with a humeral component in one patient and proximal radial replacement in one patient. Clinical and radiographic review of all available patients, including a functional assessment with The Toronto Extremity Salvage score (TESS) was undertaken. 28 consecutive cases of endoprosthetic elbow reconstruction, performed between 1989 and 2003, were identified using the unit database. There were 12 males and 16 females, with a mean age 48.9 years, (range 14–84). There were 16 cases of malignant tumour (10 primary, 6 secondary), 3 cases of benign tumour (one each of giant cell tumour, osteoblastoma and pigmented villonodular synovitis) and 10 non-oncological cases, (5 cases of fracture, 3 failed total elbow replacements and 1 infected synostosis). A distal humeral prosthesis was used in 16 patients, distal humeral and proximal ulna in 10 patients, proximal ulna with a humeral component in one patient and proximal radial replacement in one patient. Clinical and radiographic review of all available patients, including a functional assessment with The Toronto Extremity Salvage score (TESS) was undertaken. Endoprosthetic reconstruction around the elbow joint is effective in a wide range of pathologies, allowing in most cases a reasonable level of function, even following two-stage revision for infection

Coronoid fractures account for 2 to 15% of the cases with elbow dislocations and usually occur as part of complex injuries. Comminuted fractures and non-unions necessitate coronoid fixation, reconstruction or replacement. The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare the axial stability achieved via an individualized 3D printed prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem to both radial head grafted reconstruction and coronoid fixation with 2 screws. It was hypothesized that the prosthetic replacement will provide superior stability over the grafted reconstruction and screw fixation. Following CT scanning, 18 human cadaveric proximal ulnas were osteotomized at 40% of the coronoid height and randomized to 3 groups (n = 6). The specimens in Group 1 were treated with an individually designed 3D printed stainless steel coronoid prosthesis with curved cemented intramedullary stem, individually designed based on the contralateral coronoid scan. The ulnas in Group 2 were reconstructed with an ipsilateral radial head autograft fixed with two anteroposterior screws, whereas the osteotomized coronoids in Group 3 were fixed in situ with two anteroposterior screws. All specimens were biomechanically tested under ramped quasi-static axial loading to failure at a rate of 10 mm/min. Construct stiffness and failure load were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed at a level of significance set at 0.05. Prosthetic treatment (Group 1) resulted in significantly higher stiffness and failure load compared to both radial head autograft reconstruction (Group 2) and coronoid screw fixation, p ≤ 0.002. Stiffness and failure load did not reveal any significant differences between Group 2 and Group 3, p ≥ 0.846. In cases of coronoid deficiency, replacement of the coronoid process with an anatomically shaped individually designed 3D printed prosthesis with a curved cemented intramedullary stem seems to be an effective method to restore the buttress function of the coronoid under axial loading. This method provides superior stability over both radial head graft reconstruction and coronoid screw fixation, while achieving anatomical articular congruity. Therefore, better load distribution with less stress at the bone-implant interface can be anticipated. In the clinical practice, implementation of this prosthesis type could allow for early patient mobilization with better short- and long-term treatment outcomes and may be beneficial for patients with irreparable comminuted coronoid fractures, severe arthritic changes or non-unions

Purpose: Recognition of the proximal ulna dorsal angulation (PUDA) is important for anatomic reduction of proximal ulnar fractures or osteotomies, especially when using newer straight precontoured proximal ulnar plates. The purpose of this study was to characterize the PUDA in 50 patients with bilateral elbow radiographs. Method: Bilateral elbow radiographs (100 radiographs) were magnified four times using commercial software. The PUDA was measured from the intersection of lines tangent to the subcutaneous border of the olecranon and the proximal ulnar shaft. The olecranon tip-to-apex distance of the PUDA was also measured. Three orthopaedic surgeons independently examined the radiographs and intra/inter-observer reliability was calculated using Intra-Class-Correlation (ICC). Results: A PUDA was present in 96% of radiographs. The average PUDA was 5.7° (range, 0°to14°). The Pearson Correlation coefficient for a side-to-side comparison was 0.86(p< 0.001). The average tip-to-apex distance was 47 mm (34 mm–78mm). No correlation was identified with sex or age. Intra-observer reliability was excellent for the PUDA (ICC 0.892 and 0.863) and good for tip-to-apex distance (ICC 0.762 and 0.827). Inter-observer reliability was good for PUDA (ICC 0.784 and 0.925) and for tip-to-apex distance (ICC 0.711 and 0.769). Conclusion: A mean proximal ulna dorsal angulation of 5.7° is present in 96% of patients at an average of 47 mm distal to the olecranon tip. Measurement of the PUDA has good/excellent inter/intra-observer reliability. Recognition of the PUDA may be helpful in anatomic plating of the ulna. Contralateral PUDA measurements are useful for surgical planning in cases with comminution or distorted anatomy

Anterior elbow dislocations often occur as a fracture-dislocation in which the distal humerus is driven through the olecranon, causing either a simple oblique fracture of the olecranon or a complex, comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. The purpose of this study was to characterise the morphology and to evaluate the surgical treatment of this injury. Thirteen patients (8 women and 5 men) with a mean age of 42 years were included in this study. Four patients had a simple, oblique fracture of the olecranon and 9 a complex, comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. Six patients had an associated fracture of the coronoid process which was detached as a large fragment and 7 an additional fracture of the radial head. In all cases the collateral ligaments were found intact. All fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation through a midline dorsal approach. Simple fractures of the olecranon were treated with tension-band wiring while comminuted fractures were fixed with a plate and screws. Fractures of the coronoid process were stabilised by interfragmentary screws or small plates. The concomitant radial head fractures were treated by excision of small fragments, internal fixation or radial head replacement. The average follow up was 71 months. According to the functional scale of Broberg and Morrey, the results were excellent in 8 patients, good in 2, and poor in 3. Mild arthritis was observed in one patient. Transolecranon fracture –dislocation of the elbow is often misidentified as an anterior Monteggia lesion or a simple fracture of the olecranon. Differential diagnosis between these lesions is imperative. Consequently, anatomical restoration of the trochlear notch in cases of transolecranon fracture –dislocations can be achieved leading to good long-term results

Purpose. In total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), especially for elbows with condyle defect due to rheumatoid arthritis or trauma, determination of rotation alignment of implants is often difficult. To develop a navigation system for TEA, selecting bony landmarks that can be identified intraoperatively is important. Therefore, we developed a new roentgen free navigation system such as special alignment jigs for TEA based on CT data of normal elbows. The aim of this study was to evaluate alignments of implants after MIS-TEA using the new systems. And also, we reported that 6 bony landmarks on the elbow showed small variability in normal elbows by CT examinations and were considered to be usable as intraoperative landmarks for determining rotational position of implants last year. Especially in RA elbow, posterior aspect of humerus and ulnar aspect of proximal part of ulna were able to be identified even if there is a large bone defect that extends to the lateral or/and medial epicondyle. We used a new roentgen free navigation system in TEA with using Solar elbow from 2009. The aim of this study was to evaluate alignments of implants after MIS-TEA using the new systems by CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For determination of alignment and anatomical landmarks to develop the jigs, 3D-CT data of 11 normal elbows was investigated. The posterior aspect of humeral shaft and ulnar aspect of proximal ulna were selected as bony landmarks. Because these can be identified intraoperatively and remain in elbows with extensive bone loss. MIS-TEA with Solar Elbow (Stryker) using these new systems were investigated with postoperative 3D-CT in 14 elbows of 13 patients. Their average age was 68.8 years old. Basic diseases were 10 rheumatoid arthritis and 4 distal humerus injuries. The alignments of humeral and ulnar component were measured on postoperative 3D-CT. RESULTS. Rotational alignment (humerus / ulna) was pronation 6.8° ± 5.7° / pronation 4.6° ± 9.1°; frontal alignment was valgus 0.1° ± 2.7° / valgus 0.1° ± 3.7°; and sagittal alignment was extension 0.6° ± 3.0° / extension 8.9° ± 2.5°. In condyle-defect group (n=5), comparable alignment with condyle-preserved group was obtained. DISCUSSION. The new systems were effective in determining intraoperative alignment even in elbows with extensive bone defect. Extension alignment of the ulna component is because the short component of Solar Elbow was placed along the center axis of the proximal ulna, which inclines in the extension direction relative to the axis of distal ulna

Previous biomechanical studies of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries and their surgical repair, reconstruction and rehabilitation have primarily relied on gravity effects with the arm in the varus position. The application of torsional moments to the forearm manually in the laboratory is not reproducible, hence studies to date likely do not represent forces encountered clinically. The aim of this investigation was to develop a new biomechanical testing model to quantify posterolateral stability of the elbow using an in vitro elbow motion simulator. Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. A threaded screw was then inserted on the dorsal aspect of the proximal ulna and a weight hanger was used to suspend 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight from the screw head to allow torsional moments to be applied to the ulna. An LCL injured (LCLI) model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. Ulnohumeral rotation was recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active and passive elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. A repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to compare elbow states (intact, LCLI, and LCLI with 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight). During active motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of weights did not significantly increase the external rotation (ER) of the ulnohumeral articulation (10°±7°, P=.268 400g, 10.5°±7.1°, P=.156 600g, 11°±7.2°, P=.111 800g) compared to the LCLI state (8.4°±6.4°) with the forearm pronated. However, with the forearm supinated, the addition of 800g of weight significantly increased the ER (9.2°±5.9°, P=.038) compared to the LCLI state (5.9°±5.5°) and the addition of 400g and 600g of weights approached significance (8.2°±5.7°, P=.083 400g, 8.7°±5.9°, P=.054 600g). During passive motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.0001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of 600g and 800g but not 400g resulted in a significant increase in ER of the ulnohumeral articulation (9.3°±7.8°, P=.103 400g, 11.2°±6.2°, P=.004 600g, 12.7°±6.8°, P=.006 800g) compared to the LCLI state (3.7°±5.4°) with the forearm pronated. With the forearm supinated, the addition of 400g, 600g, and 800g significantly increased the ER (11.7°±6.7°, P=.031 400g, 13.5°±6.8°, P=.019 600g, 14.9°±6.9°, P=.024 800g) compared to the LCLI state (4.3°±6.6°). This investigation confirms a novel biomechanical testing model for studying PLRI. Moreover, it demonstrates that the application of even small amounts of torsional moment on the forearm with the arm in the varus position exacerbates the rotational instability seen with the LCL deficient elbow. The effect of torsional loading was significantly worse with the forearm supinated and during passive elbow motion. This new model allows for a more provocative testing of elbow stability after LCL repair or reconstruction. Furthermore, this model will allow for smaller sample sizes to be used while still demonstrating clinically significant differences. Future biomechanical studies evaluating LCL injuries and their repair and rehabilitation should consider using this testing protocol

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of custom-made endoprosthetic reconstruction for both tumourous and non-tumourous conditions around the elbow joint. Methods and Results: 28 consecutive cases of endoprosthetic elbow reconstruction, performed between 1989 and 2003, were identified using the unit database. There were 12 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 48.9 years, (range 14–84). There were 16 cases of malignant tumour (10 primary, 6 secondary), 3 cases of benign tumour (one each of giant cell tumour, osteoblastoma and pigmented villonodular synovitis) and 10 non-oncological cases, (5 cases of fracture, 3 failed total elbow replacements and 1 infected synostosis). A distal humeral prosthesis was used in 16 patients, distal humeral and proximal ulna in 10 patients, proximal ulna with a humeral component in one patient and proximal radial replacement in one patient. Clinical and radiographic review of all available patients, including a functional assessment with The Toronto Extremity Salvage (TES) score was undertaken. The average follow-up was 54.9 months (range 5–144). 5 patients with malignancy died of their disease. One patient required amputation for local recurrence at 5 months. There were two revisions at 4 and 7 years for aseptic loosening of the humeral component. Six patients developed deep prosthetic infection at an average of 21 months (range 6–31), necessitating two-stage revision, of which one patient required subsequent excision arthroplasty. There were no cases of permanent nerve palsy. 18 patients (64.3%) were available for functional follow-up. Average flexion deformity was 33 degrees (7–80) and average flexion was 85 degrees (30–133). The mean TES score was 67.8 (range 36.6–96.6). The mean TES score following two-stage revision for infection, (available in 4/5 patients) was 73.9 (range 54.8–91.6). Conclusion: Custom-made endoprosthetic reconstruction around the elbow joint is effective in a wide range of pathologies, allowing in most cases a reasonable level of function, even following two-stage revision for infection

Periprosthetic joint infection represents a devastating complication after total elbow arthroplasty. Several measures can be implemented before, during, and after surgery to decrease infection rates, which exceed 5%. Debridement with antibiotics and implant retention has been reported to be successful in less than one-third of acute infections, but still plays a role. For elbows with well-fixed implants, staged retention seems to be equally successful as the more commonly performed two-stage reimplantation, both with a success rate of 70% to 80%. Permanent resection or even amputation are occasionally considered. Not uncommonly, a second-stage reimplantation requires complex reconstruction of the skeleton with allografts, and the extensor mechanism may also be deficient. Further developments are needed to improve our management of infection after elbow arthroplasty.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(11):1321–1326.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of complex radial head fractures at mid-term follow-up, and determine whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or radial head arthroplasty (RHA) should be recommended for surgical treatment.

Aims

Low-grade central osteosarcoma (LGCOS), a rare type of osteosarcoma, often has misleading radiological and pathological features that overlap with those of other bone tumours, thereby complicating diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to analyze the clinical, radiological, and pathological features of patients with LGCOS, with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

Aims

To investigate the risk factors for unsuccessful radial head reduction (RHR) in children with chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated surgically.

Fracture or resection of the radial head can cause unbalance and long-term functional complications in the elbow. Studies have shown that a radial head excision can change elbow kinematics and decrease elbow stability. The radial head is also important in both valgus and varus laxity and displacement. However, the effect of radial head on ulnohumeral joint load is not known. The objective of this experimental study was to compare the axial loading produced at the ulnohumeral joint during active flexion with and without a radial head resection. Ten cadaveric arms were used. Each specimen was prepared and secured in an elbow motion simulator. To simulate active flexion, the tendons of the biceps, brachialis, brachioradialis, and triceps were attached to servo motors. The elbow was moved through a full range of flexion. To quantify loads at the ulnohumeral joint, a load cell was implanted in the proximal ulna. Testing was conducted in the intact then radial head resected case, in supination in the horizontal, vertical, varus and valgus positions. When comparing the average loads during flexion, the axial ulnar load in the horizontal position was 89±29N in an intact state compared to 122±46N during radial head resection. In the vertical position, the intact state produced a 67±16N load while the resected state was 78±23N. In the varus and valgus positions, intact state resulted in loads of 57±26N and 18±3N, respectively. Conversely, with a radial head resection, varus and valus positions measured 56±23N and 54±23N loads, respectively. For both joint configurations, statistical differences were observed for all flexion angles in all arm positions during active flexion (p=0.0001). When comparing arm positions and flexion angle, statistical differences were measured between valgus, horizontal and vertical (p<0.005) except for varus position (p=0.64). Active flexion caused a variation in loads throughout flexion when comparing intact versus radial head resection. The most significant variation in ulnar loading occurred during valgus and horizontal flexion. The vertical and varus position showed little variation because the position of the arm is not affected by the loss of the radial head. However, in valgus position, the resected radial head creates a void in the joint space and, with gravity, causes greater compensatory ulnar loading. In the horizontal position, the forearm is not directly affected by gravitational pull and cannot adjust to counterbalance the resected radial head, therefore loads are localised in the ulnohumeral joint. These findings prove the importance of the radial head and that a radial head resection can overload the ulnohumeral side