Aims. Lumbar disc prolapse is a frequent indication for surgery. The few available long-term follow-up studies focus mainly on repeated surgery for recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to analyze all reasons for additional surgery for patients operated on for a primary lumbar disc prolapse. Methods. We retrieved data from the Swedish spine register about 3,291 patients who underwent primary surgery for a lumbar disc prolapse between January 2007 and December 2008. These patients were followed until December 2020 to record all additional lumbar spine operations and the reason for them. Results. In total, 681 of the 3,291 patients (21%) needed one or more additional operations. More than three additional operations was uncommon (2%; 15/906). Overall, 906 additional operations were identified during the time period, with a mean time to the first of these of 3.7 years (SD 3.6). The most common reason for an additional operation was recurrent disc prolapse (47%; 426/906), followed by spinal stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis (19%; 176/906), and segmental pain (16%; 145/906). The most common surgical procedures were revision discectomy (43%; 385/906) and instrumented fusion (22%; 200/906). Degenerative spinal conditions other than disc prolapse became a more common reason for additional surgery with increasing length of follow-up. Most patients achieved the minimally important change (MIC) for the patient-reported outcomes after the index surgery. After the third additional spinal operation, only 20% (5/25) achieved the MIC in terms of leg pain, and 29% (7/24) in terms of the EuroQol five-dimension index questionnaire visual analogue scale. Conclusion. More than one in five patients operated on for a lumbar disc prolapse underwent further surgery during the 13-year follow-up period. Recurrent disc prolapse was the most common reason for additional surgery, followed by spinal stenosis and segmental pain. This study shows that additional operations after primary disc surgery are needed more frequently than previously reported, and that the outcome profoundly deteriorates after the second additional operation. The findings from this study can be used in the shared decision-making process. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):627–632

Aims. To determine the value of scoliosis surgery, it is necessary to evaluate outcomes in domains that matter to patients. Since randomized trials on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are scarce, prospective cohort studies with comparable outcome measures are important. To enhance comparison, a core set of patient-related outcome measures is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AIS fusion surgery at two-year follow-up using the core outcomes set. Methods. AIS patients were systematically enrolled in an institutional registry. In all, 144 AIS patients aged ≤ 25 years undergoing primary surgery (median age 15 years (interquartile range 14 to 17) were included. Patient-reported (condition-specific and health-related quality of life (QoL); functional status; back and leg pain intensity) and clinician-reported outcomes (complications, revision surgery) were recorded. Changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed using Friedman’s analysis of variance. Clinical relevancy was determined using minimally important changes (Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r), cut-off values for relevant effect on functioning (pain scores) and a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS; Oswestry Disability Index). Results. At baseline, 65 out of 144 patients (45%) reported numerical rating scale (NRS) back pain scores > 5. All PROMs significantly improved at two-year follow-up. Mean improvements in SRS-22r function (+ 1.2 (SD 0.6)), pain (+ 0.6 (SD 0.8)), and self-image (+ 1.1 (SD 0.7)) domain scores, and the SRS-22r total score (+ 0.5 (SD 0.5)), were clinically relevant. At two-year follow-up, 14 out of 144 patients (10%) reported NRS back pain > 5. Surgical site infections did not occur. Only one patient (0.7%) underwent revision surgery. Conclusion. Relevant improvement in functioning, condition-specific and health-related QoL, self-image, and a relevant decrease in pain is shown at two-year follow-up after fusion surgery for AIS, with few adverse events. Contrary to the general perception that AIS is a largely asymptomatic condition, nearly half of patients report significant preoperative back pain, which reduced to 10% at two-year follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):265–273

Aims

To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation.

Aims. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for adverse events following the surgical correction of cervical spinal deformities in adults. Methods. We identified adult patients who underwent corrective cervical spinal surgery between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2015 from the MarketScan database. The baseline comorbidities and characteristics of the operation were recorded. Adverse events were defined as the development of a complication, an unanticipated deleterious postoperative event, or further surgery. Patients aged < 18 years and those with a previous history of tumour or trauma were excluded from the study. Results. A total of 13,549 adults in the database underwent primary corrective surgery for a cervical spinal deformity during the study period. A total of 3,785 (27.9%) had a complication within 90 days of the procedure, and 3,893 (28.7%) required further surgery within two years. In multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio (OR) 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8 to 0.9); p = 0.019) and a posterior approach (compared with a combined surgical approach, OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.8); p < 0.001) significantly decreased the risk of complications. Osteoporosis (OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6); p < 0.001), dyspnoea (OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6); p < 0.001), cerebrovascular accident (OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.0); p < 0.001), a posterior approach (compared with an anterior approach, OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.4); p < 0.001), and the use of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) (OR 1.22 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.4); p = 0.003) significantly increased the risks of 90-day complications. In multivariate regression analysis, preoperative dyspnoea (OR 1.50 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.7); p < 0.001), a posterior approach (compared with an anterior approach, OR 2.80 (95% CI 2.4 to 3.2; p < 0.001), and postoperative dysphagia (OR 2.50 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.4); p < 0.001) were associated with a significantly increased risk of further surgery two years postoperatively. A posterior approach (compared with a combined approach, OR 0.32 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.4); p < 0.001), the use of BMP (OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.5); p < 0.001) were associated with a significantly decreased risk of further surgery at this time. Conclusion. The surgical approach and intraoperative use of BMP strongly influence the risk of further surgery, whereas the comorbidity burden and the characteristics of the operation influence the rates of early complications in adult patients undergoing corrective cervical spinal surgery. These data may aid surgeons in patient selection and surgical planning. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):734–738

Aims

People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial).

The outcome of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation is debatable. Some studies show results that are comparable with those of primary discectomy, whereas others report worse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of revision lumbar discectomy with that of primary discectomy in the same cohort of patients who had both the primary and the recurrent herniation at the same level and side. A retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data was undertaken in 30 patients who had undergone both primary and revision surgery for late recurrent lumbar disc herniation. The outcome measures used were visual analogue scales for lower limb (VAL) and back (VAB) pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). There was a significant improvement in the mean VAL and ODI scores (both p < 0.001) after primary discectomy. Revision surgery also resulted in improvements in the mean VAL (p < 0.001), VAB (p = 0.030) and ODI scores (p < 0.001). The changes were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05). Revision discectomy can give results that are as good as those seen after primary surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:90–4

Aims

To determine the effectiveness of prone traction radiographs in predicting postoperative slip distance, slip angle, changes in disc height, and lordosis after surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine.

To describe complications and reoperation rates associated with degenerative spinal deformity surgery. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single spinal surgeon in the United Kingdom. A total of 107 patients who underwent surgery, of 5 or more levels, for primary degenerative kyphoscoliosis between 2006 and 2012 were identified. Clinical notes were reviewed and post-operative complications, reoperation rates, length of follow up and mortality were analysed. A total of 107 patients, average aged 66.5 years (range 52 – 85), with 80% women. 105 patients underwent posterior surgery, two patients required both anterior and posterior surgery. The average number of instrumented levels was 8.3; 10% 5 levels, 15% 6 levels, 11% 7 levels, 14% 8 levels, 15% 9 levels and 35% had fusions of 10 levels and above. 58% included fixation to sacrum or pelvis. 93% had a decompression performed and 30% had an osteotomy. There were 40 complications recorded within the follow-up period. Infection occurred in 7 patients (6.5%). All were successfully managed with debridement, antibiotic therapy and retention of implants. There were 4 dural tears (3.7%). One patient developed a post-operative DVT (0.9%). No patients sustained cord level deficits. Prevalence of mechanical complications requiring re-operation was 26% (28 patients). 5 patients (4.7) required revision surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis, 7 patients (6.5%) underwent revision fixation for metal work failure (broken rods/screw pull-out) and 16 patients (14.9%) underwent revision surgery to extend fixation proximally or distally due to adjacent segment disease (symptomatic proximal junction kyphosis 4.7%; osteoporotic fracture 3.7% and junctional/nerve root pain 6.5%). Overall reoperation rate was 32.5% at an average of 1.9 years following primary surgery (range 1 week–6 years). 37% patients remain on regular outpatient review (average 3.8 years following first surgery; range 2–6 years). 52% have been discharged after a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. 11 patients had died since their surgery (10.2%) at an average 4.1 years following their spinal surgery (range 1 –5.9 years). Overall complication rate was 37.3%. 32.5% of patients were re-operated for infective or mechanical complications. 52% of patients had been discharged at an average of 2.3 years following their surgery. 10.2% of patients had died within 6 years of surgery

PURPOSE. This study aims to identify the incidence and factors influencing readmissions following scoliosis surgery over a period of 19 years. METHODS. A search was conducted in the hospital database between 7. th. January 1992 and 29. th. December 2010. 73 diagnostic codes were used to identify all scoliosis patients within this period. Repetitions of hospital codes were identified and these represent readmission episodes. Each readmission episode was manually classified using hospital diagnostic/procedural codes, clinic letters, or radiographs. The average costs of the implants used were calculated using the hospital costing database. RESULTS. 4528 primary scoliosis operations were identified. In the 19 year period, 596 readmissions episodes were recorded. 101 (2.2% of all primary operations) were metalwork revisions for pseudarthrosis, further/residual deformity, and adjacent level degeneration. 193 (4.2%) were removal or trimming of prominent metalwork. Other reasons for readmissions were: infection (2%), costoplasty (2.1%) injection (2.4%), scar revision (0.1%). There were no clear correlations with the year of the primary surgery, or the cost of the implants used. CONCLUSION. The recorded complication rate remained constant over a 19 year period, despite changes in surgical techniques, peri-operative care, implant types and cost. A national spinal implant registry is called for

Modern techniques facilitate the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Decision making is a challenge because of potential complications relating to the surgery itself and medical problems. This study aims to provide useful data in facilitating the decision making process. Retrospective analysis of consecutive single surgeon series of patients aged >50 between 2006-2009 undergoing multi-level spinal deformity surgery with concomitant decompression. Medical co-morbidities, age and ASA were recorded. 71 patients (57 female) mean age 66 (50-83). 29 (12 multiple) failed previous stenosis surgery. 14(19.7%) in hospital complications in 11(15.5%) patients. 4 were ‘medical’. 8/11 patients were revision cases versus 3/11 primary. 4 patients (5.6%) needed further surgery. 13(18.3%) outpatient complications in 12(16.9%)patients. 7/12 occurred in revision cases versus 5/12 in primary. 11(15.5%) needed further surgery. Revisional surgery in adult deformity presents a significantly higher overall complication rate than primary surgery (p= 0.0084), but both revisional and primary cases have a relatively high re-operation rate once initially discharged. The results indicate that complex medical and surgical factors contribute to the decision making challenge in patients with adult spinal deformity and stenosis

Reviewing our experience of scoliosis in children with a Cavopulmonary Shunt or Fontan circulation and the cardiovascular challenges that this presents. A notes and x ray review was performed. Special attention was paid to the changes in cardiovascular status whilst prone. The review was from first presentation to latest follow up. There were 6 patients who underwent 7 major procedures between 2001 and 2009. All had cardiac procedures in early life. Both definitive fusion and growing instrumentation was used. All procedures were successful. Growing instrumentation allowed earlier primary surgery before completion of the Fontan circulation. All have been subsequently lengthened in a lateral position. The mean follow up is 56 months. There was one death 40 months following last surgery, cause unrelated to spinal surgery. In the older patients with a completed Fontan significant blood loss was seen, due to the raised venous pressure required to run the Fontan, and occult hypotension seen as a climbing difference between Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure and Central Venous Pressure were common when prone. We recommend early intervention, using instrumentation without fusion to correct the deformity over time and allow intervention prior to completing the Fontan circulation. As haemodynamic instability increases with increasing time in the prone position, surgery should be expedited rapidly

Spinal Deformity Service, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK. To describe the technique of nonfusion annulotomy and nuclectomy with posterior growing rod instrumentation for the treatment of non-congenital early onset scoliosis. To present our results of the application of this technique in a consecutive series of nine patients with mean follow up of 76 months (range 16 to 123 months). We undertook retrospective observational casenote and radiograph study of patients with noncongenital early onset scoliosis having annulotomy and nuclectomy at the apex of their respective curves with standard posterior growing rod instrumentation between 1998 and 2009. 10 patients were identified with one excluded due to short follow up period. Of the nine patients included mean follow up was 76 months. Mean age at primary surgery was 71.7 months (range 29- 97 months). We measured pre and post operative Cobb angle, T1-S1 height change and change in height over the apical segments. Mean pre op cobb angle was 74° (range 62- 81°). Mean post op cobb angle was 38°. Three patients have completed their treatment programme with a mean number of 9 lengthenings achieved. Six patients are still undergoing lengthenings. CT demonstrates that the annulotmized segment does not fuse at a mean 3.5 years postoperatively. All patients demonstrated growth over total spinal height and also over apical segments which had undergone annultomy/ nuclectomy. We also report complications. We have demonstrated that anterior annulotomy and nuclectomy with posterior growing rod construct does allow for spinal growth over released segments without autofusion

Aim. To compare outcomes of revision lumbar discectomy to primary surgery in the same patient cohort. Methods. Prospective outcome data in 36 patients who underwent primary and subsequent revision surgery for lumbar disc herniation between 1995 and 2009. Outcome measures used were Visual Analogue Scores for back (VAB) and leg pain (VAL), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Low Back Outcome Score (LBO). 5 early recurrences within 3 months were excluded. Results. Complete data was available in 31 patients 13F;18M. The average age was 39 years at index and 45 years at revision. Average interval between surgery of 39 months (range 6-122). Mean Pre op ODI 54 and VAL 73 primary procedure, final follow up of primary procedure ODI 33, VAL 43; prior to revision ODI 57, VAL 75; at last FU ODI 32 and VAL 40. There was no statistical difference between outcomes. In the primary discectomy group there was a statistically significant improvement in the VAL, ODI and LBO scores (P<0.05), with no significant improvement in the VAB (P=0.67). In the revision group there was a statistical significant improvement in all the outcomes (P<0.05). Overall, 45% of patients felt their outcome from revision discectomy was better/much better with 54% of patients rating their treatment as either good/excellent. Conclusion. Primary discectomy produced significant improvement in leg pain, ODI and LBO. Revision discectomy did the same, but also a significant improvement in VAB scores. There was no statistically significant difference in comparing the preoperative and postoperative scores for both procedures. Revision discectomy is a procedure which yields clinically significant and patient perceived improvements in spinal outcome measures with an unexplained improvement in VAB scores as compared to the primary procedure. This may challenge the belief of some surgeons in the need for fusion at the time of revision

Introduction. Sparing of the spinal growth and scoliotic deformity control in patients with early-onset scoliosis is a challenge in spinal surgery. Loss of the surgical correction, implant breakage, and revision surgeries are the main disadvantages of present treatment methods. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether growing transpedicular instrumentation spares achieved surgical correction during patient's growth. Methods. This is a prospective study of 12 consecutive patients with early-onset scoliosis from one clinical centre. All patients underwent anterior convex growth arrest and posterior transpedicular instrumentation with growing construct. Spinal derotation was used for the correction of the deformity. The diagnoses were infantile idiopathic (n=10) and congenital (n=2) scoliosis (formation failure). Follow-up was 3 years. Mean age at the time of surgery was 9·1 years. Results. Preoperative major Cobb angle was 74·3° (range 52–100°), minor Cobb angle was 32·2° (5–50°), and average preoperative thoracic kyphosis was 27·2° (0–63°). Mean number of the instrumented levels was 12·2. Postoperative major Cobb angle was 22·4° (0–40°), minor Cobb angle was 5·7° (0–23·5°), and postoperative thoracic kyphosis was 26·2° (6–41°). After 3 years of follow-up, primary curve was an average of 22·7° (10–40°), secondary curve was 5·4° (0–25°), and mean thoracic kyphosis was 28° (12–40°). Mean growth of the instrumented spine was 18 mm. We did not observe any gross complications in the patients. Two patients had pleural effusion, and one needed rod exchange 15 months after primary surgery because of insufficient length. Conclusions. The results of this study show that anterior convex growth arrest and polysegmental transpedicular spinal instrumentation with growing construct save spinal growth and anatomical values achieved after surgical correction. Rod derotation for the deformity correction favours spinal growth in skeletally immature patients

Aims

Chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF).

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for complications associated with dural tear (DT), including the types of DT, and the intra- and postoperative management of DT.

Aims

Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) systems use non-invasive spinal lengthening for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these devices in the prevention of progression of the deformity. A secondary aim was to record the rate of complications.

To assess whether Patients who are clinically Obese are more likely to require further or revision Surgery following One-Level simple Microdiscectomy compared to Non-obese Patients. Retrospective, single centre and single Surgeon review of Patients' Clinical notes of consecutive Patients who underwent primary One-Level Microdiscectomy between December 2007 and July 2009. Background: Obesity in Surgery has become a topical subject given the increasing proportion of Surgical Patients being Obese. This study provides the largest single centre and single Surgeon comparative cohort. All Patients had undergone One-level simple Primary Microdiscectomy Surgery. Data from the Clinical notes included Patient Demographics, level and side of operation, Length of stay and Re-Operation details. A total number of 71 Patients were eligible for inclusion of which 38 were Female and 33 Male with an average age of 41 years. 25 Patients were Clinically Obese (35%). Average LOS was 1.1 days. 8% of the clinically Obese Patients required further Surgery compared to 8.7% in the Non-obese group. Revision surgery for recurrent discs and Surgery for dural tear repair were the main reasons for return to theatre. Revision rates were comparable between the two Patient groups. LOS was no different for Obese Patients. This study concludes that Obese Patients undergoing One-Level simple Microdiscectomy do not face a significantly higher risk of requiring Revision Surgery in the future

Aims

There is little information about the optimum number of implants to be used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish spine register was undertaken to discover whether more implants per operated vertebra (implant density) leads to a better outcome in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. The hypothesis was that implant density is not associated with patient-reported outcomes, the correction of the curve or the rate of reoperation.

Aims

We aimed to retrospectively assess the accuracy and safety of CT navigated pedicle screws and to compare accuracy in the cervical and thoracic spine (C2-T8) with (COMB) and without (POST) prior anterior surgery (anterior cervical discectomy or corpectomy and fusion with ventral plating: ACDF/ACCF).