Abstract
To assess whether Patients who are clinically Obese are more likely to require further or revision Surgery following One-Level simple Microdiscectomy compared to Non-obese Patients.
Retrospective, single centre and single Surgeon review of Patients' Clinical notes of consecutive Patients who underwent primary One-Level Microdiscectomy between December 2007 and July 2009.
Background: Obesity in Surgery has become a topical subject given the increasing proportion of Surgical Patients being Obese. This study provides the largest single centre and single Surgeon comparative cohort.
All Patients had undergone One-level simple Primary Microdiscectomy Surgery. Data from the Clinical notes included Patient Demographics, level and side of operation, Length of stay and Re-Operation details. A total number of 71 Patients were eligible for inclusion of which 38 were Female and 33 Male with an average age of 41 years. 25 Patients were Clinically Obese (35%). Average LOS was 1.1 days. 8% of the clinically Obese Patients required further Surgery compared to 8.7% in the Non-obese group.
Revision surgery for recurrent discs and Surgery for dural tear repair were the main reasons for return to theatre. Revision rates were comparable between the two Patient groups. LOS was no different for Obese Patients. This study concludes that Obese Patients undergoing One-Level simple Microdiscectomy do not face a significantly higher risk of requiring Revision Surgery in the future.
