Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a long history that extends back nearly as far as the first tricompartmental designs. While initial results were erratic, with a greater understanding of patient selection and surgical techniques, more consistent and favorable results have been reported. While there has been somewhat of a resurgence in interest in UKA, the percentage of primary knee arthroplasties that are unicompartmental hovers around 6–8%. It is my belief that you should be doing more!. Several peer review studies suggest that with both fixed and mobile bearing designs, survivorship exceeds 90% at ten year. In our own initial series of 62 fixed bearing medial UKA, survivorship was 90% at 20 years. UKA is an outstanding option for younger patients, who are amongst the most challenging to satisfy with a TKA. In a cohort of patients < 55 years old, Biswas et al. reported a mean KSS of just over 95 points and a mean UCLA activity score of 7.5. This is opposed to the report by Parvizi et al. who suggested 1/3 of young, active patients reported residual symptoms and limitations following modern TKA. Most data suggests that UKA is a less morbid procedure than TKA. In a retrospective review of 605 UKA compared to 2235 TKA, Brown et al. found the risk of complications was 11% vs. 4.3% favoring UKA with a shorter length of stay and risk of discharge to an extended care facility, which also translates into lower costs for our health care system. Finally, in the only randomised study that I am aware of that has compared UKA and TKA, UKA was associated with significantly better survivorship (90% vs. 79%). Further, UKA was associated with better ROM and functional scores at 5 and 15 years. Finally, recovery with UKA was faster and the risk of peri-operative complications was lower

Quality Improvement (QI) is of increasing importance with its inclusion on training curricula and requirement for it in revalidation. Junior Doctors are a valuable, yet under utilised resource for NHS Trusts in patient safety/Quality Improvement activity. A Trainee led QI Academy, supported and administered by Medical Education was launched in our Trust. It offered education on Leadership and Management and support for projects from the Trust Service and Development teams. The QI Academy launch evening attracted over 60 Trainees and 17 QI projects were adopted. Subsequently a further 9 projects have been started and a number published in peer reviewed journals and presented internationally. The Academy was an attractive and supportive method of engaging new groups of doctors. QI is not as constrained as simple audit, and as such, engaging trainees has proven to be easier. Collaboration between a Core Faculty, Trainees and Trust Management ensured adequate and sustainable support for all projects, avoided duplication and fostered a closer relationship. We highly recommend Trust support of QI in junior doctors through Medical Education. Trusts benefit from improvements in patient care and quality whilst trainees learn valuable skills and benefit from presentations and publications

Why are total knees being revised? Aseptic loosening, poly wear, and instability account for up to 59% of revision TKA procedures. Younger and more active patients are placing greater demands on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants and international registries have documented a much higher rate of TKA failure in this population. Implant designs utilised in the active patient population should focus on optimisation of long term wear properties and minimising interface stress. Instability after TKA, often related to technical concerns at the time of the index procedure, accounts for by far the greatest subset of failures, excluding infection, in the early revision TKA patients (<5 years). The inability to achieve a rectangular flexion gap with certain TKA techniques for certain deformities has been documented. The adverse clinical consequence of flexion gap asymmetry has also been published in peer reviewed manuscripts. Techniques should be considered that optimise flexion space balance and enhance mid-flexion stability in active, physically demanding patients. This surgical demonstration will highlight gap balancing techniques and a new rotating platform TKA system as an option for the active patient population

Several attempts have been made to treat medial compartment OA of the knee with mobile spacers. All have met with dismal failure. This presentation explores the history of attempts to treat OA in the younger knee with mobile spacers and explains why they were all doomed to fail. Sources of information for this presentation include the published peer reviewed literature, publically available documents, and an insiders view of some of the failed attempts to solve the problem of medial compartment OA with mobile spacers. All attempts to treat medial compartment OA of the knee with mobile spacers have failed. The unispacer has been a failure with a 60% revision rate at three years. The ABS intercushion had a 100% revision rate at one year and in many cases caused permanent damage to the host knees. The Salucartilage spacer was implanted in one patient only and failed within 48 hours. Mobile spacers do not work, are never likely to work, and are not indicated for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee

Introduction. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a powerful technique for correcting sagittal imbalance in ankylosing spondylitis. There has been significant perioperative morbidity associated with this technique in the peer review literature. We present the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital experience with a single surgeon retrospective study that was conducted to evaluate the outcomes in patients who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Method. Twenty seven patients underwent a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy and adjacent level posterior instrumentation between 1995 and 2010. There were 18 males and 9 females in the study. Events during the peri-operative course and post-operative complications were recorded. The radiological outcome and patient satisfaction were analysed with mean follow-up of one and a half years. Results. The mean operative time was three and half hours and the mean blood loss was 2290mls. Final follow-up radiograph showed an increase in lumbar lordosis angle from 17 degrees to 45 degrees. The sagittal imbalance improved by 85mm with the operation. Complications included loosening in two patients, one transient neurologic deficit and one infective non-union occurred overall. There were no mortalities from the surgery. Two patients developed junctional kyphosis and required a repeat operation. There was an improvement in the Oswestry Disability Score from a mean of 29 to 16 after the surgey. All (100%) of the patients were satisfied with the results of the procedure and would recommend the surgey to others. Conclusion. The study shows that pedicle subtraction extension osteotomy is effective for the correction of kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis

The goals of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in medicine are to promote best practices and reduce variations. Ideally they should improve physician performance and patient outcomes. Although controversy exists about the definition of a high quality guideline and how guidelines will be used in our health care system, there is a call for their use to help improve quality patient care. Guidelines related to musculoskeletal topics should be developed by national orthopaedic organisations and subspecialty societies using the best available clinical evidence. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has, since 2007, developed nine evidence-based guidelines in the areas of hand, sports, foot/ankle, shoulder, paediatrics and total joint replacement. The keys to successful guideline development include an expert methodologist, an experienced evidence analysis staff, strict adherence to established rules to minimise bias, and strong communication with relevant subspecialty societies. The AAOS process allows any individual or group to submit a potential topic for consideration. A physician workgroup of 5-8 members is selected after wide advertisement of the topic. Workgroup members must have no relevant financial conflicts of interest to the topic and are required to fill out an enhanced disclosure form. The workgroup is comprised of orthopaedic surgeons and other specialists with expertise in the topic. There are two in-person meetings between which the staff finds and analyses the data to support the specific initial questions. The final document is 300-350 pages. There is a period of peer review by relevant societies as well as a period of public commentary followed by the formal committee and Board approval. The final guideline is disseminated widely via press releases, subspecialty societies, AAOS meetings, webinars, JBJS, JAAOS, and related questions on resident and member national examinations. These guidelines now form the basis for future AAOS quality initiatives

Background. Presentations at national meetings provide an important forum to relay research findings in all areas of Orthopaedic surgery. Orthopaedic surgical trainees are encouraged throughout the training process to participate, present and ultimately publish their research. Indeed the well known mantra ‘Publish or Perish’ signifies the pressure trainees are sometimes placed under in order to achieve professional success. The number of original published papers is often the yardstick by which professional appointments are made. We aimed to determine the overall publication rates of presentations from the 2001 and 2002 Irish Orthopaedic Association meetings and to determine whether publication rates differed among other national Orthopaedic meetings and amongst the subspecialties. Methods. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the proceedings of the 2002 & 2003 IOA meetings using Pubmed and Medline. Time to publication, orthopaedic subspecialty and journal was analysed. Rates were compared to other similar studies documenting rates of publication in the AAOS and data compared using Pearsons chi square test. Results. In 2002 and 2003 there were 63 and 49 presentations respectively. The overall publication rate was 26.98% for 2003 and 24.4% for 2002. All 29 presentations were published in a selection of 20 journals, the most common being the JBJS (Br) and Injury. The most published topics were Basic Science (n=12) followed by Hip/Knee Arthroplasty (n=5). Seventy eight percent of published papers were published within 2 years of presentation. Other recent papers report a presentation to publishing presentation of 36% to 66%. Conclusions. The rate of publication from presentation in Irish Orthopaedics is poor by international standards (p<0.05). As many presented studies will not pass peer review examination the IOA meeting should not be used as the sole guide to clinical practice

Introduction. Bearing surfaces of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing devices and total hip replacements (THRs) are a known source of metallic debris. Further, large diameter heads and the high friction of a MoM joint are thought to lead to fretting and corrosion at the taper interface between modular components. 1. The metal debris generated can cause significant problems on the joint area. 2. This paper investigated fretting and corrosion of femoral head-neck junctions. Variables of the head-neck junction which may have an effect on fretting and corrosion were identified with the aim of determining the key drivers so that their risk on fretting and corrosion could be reduced through design. Additionally, a Chromium Nitride (CrN) coating was assessed to determine the effect on fretting and corrosion of coating the stem (male), head (female) or both trunnion interfaces. As there is currently no standard specification for a head-neck trunnion interface and trunnion designs vary significantly across the market, this work may lead to a positive change in the design and materials used in head-neck taper interfaces for all THR devices. Methods. Suitable head and stem combinations were identified to enable individual variables such as; coating, medial-lateral (M-L) offset, head offset and taper angle to be isolated (Figure 1 and Figure 2). For the coated components a 3 μm CrN coating was applied to trunnion using electron beam physical vapour deposition (Tecvac, Cambridge, UK). Fretting and corrosion testing was carried out in accordance with ASTM F1875-98 (2009) method II procedure B. 3. following assembly of the components under a 2 kN load. Results. For the majority of the testing the CrN coating reduced the fretting and corrosion. Tests showed that increasing the M-L offset decreased the dynamic current but increased the static current. The results also demonstrated that increasing the head offset increases the fretting and corrosion. Taper angle did not appear to significantly alter either fretting or corrosion. Discussion. There are many peer reviewed papers regarding fretting and corrosion observed in vivo and the consequence of this on the patient. 4,5,6. To the author's knowledge this systematic identification of individual variables accountable for damaged caused to the taper junction is the first of its kind. Previous issues have been identified with CrN coatings. 7. , however the coating used here has already been shown to be very durable as a bearing surface coating under long term tests. 8. The results presented here are therefore encouraging as they also demonstrate that both fretting and corrosion can be reduced by the addition of a CrN coating to trunnion surfaces. The M-L offset results indicated that fretting may have different root causes to corrosion, as different trends were seen for dynamic and static currents. Increasing the head length increased fretting and corrosion, while altering the taper angle had no significant effect. Further work is therefore required to establish additional trends to enable design optimisation

High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical therapies are fundamental to the delivery of evidence-based orthopaedics. Orthopaedic clinical trials have unique challenges; however, when these challenges are overcome, evidence from trials can be definitive in its impact on surgical practice. In this review, we highlight several issues that pose potential challenges to orthopaedic investigators aiming to perform surgical randomised controlled trials. We begin with a discussion on trial design issues, including the ethics of sham surgery, the importance of sample size, the need for patient-important outcomes, and overcoming expertise bias. We then explore features surrounding the execution of surgical randomised trials, including ethics review boards, the importance of organisational frameworks, and obtaining adequate funding.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:161–8.

The poor reporting and use of statistical methods in orthopaedic papers has been widely discussed by both clinicians and statisticians. A detailed review of research published in general orthopaedic journals was undertaken to assess the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting. A representative sample of 100 papers was assessed for compliance to CONSORT and STROBE guidelines and the quality of the statistical reporting was assessed using a validated questionnaire. Overall compliance with CONSORT and STROBE guidelines in our study was 59% and 58% respectively, with very few papers fulfilling all criteria. In 37% of papers patient numbers were inadequately reported; 20% of papers introduced new statistical methods in the ‘results’ section not previously reported in the ‘methods’ section, and 23% of papers reported no measurement of error with the main outcome measure. Taken together, these issues indicate a general lack of statistical rigour and are consistent with similar reviews undertaken in a number of other scientific and clinical research disciplines. It is imperative that the orthopaedic research community strives to improve the quality of reporting; a failure to do so could seriously limit the development of future research.