Abstract. Background. ‘Free From Pain’ is a drug-free, injection injection-free, lifestyle-based musculoskeletal pain management programme for seniors. The programme empowers Seniors with relevant information and inspirational metaphors whilst providing them with validated exercises. The programme is also available as a published book (ISBN-0995676941). This pilot study aimed to assess the suitability and safety of the programme's exercises and the usefulness of the book before considering a larger study. Methods. Participants used 5-point Likert scales to evaluate the exercises. A rating of three or below on a Likert scale denoted non-agreement to a positive statement regarding the exercises. A rating of four or above denoted agreement. The Usefulness Scale for Patient Information Material (USE) was utilised to assess the book. Results. Of 30 participants who attended the programme, 25 completed the questionnaire (19 females and six males), with a mean age of 76 years. All the 25 participants were in agreement that the exercises were suitable, (x? = 4.6) and safe (x? = 4.56). 23 participants would also recommend the programme to family and friends? (x? = 4.48). The USE scale is divided into three, sub-domains: cognition (knowledge obtained); emotional (individual's ability to cope with the illness); and behavioural (ability to self-manage). The mean scores for the book on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural sub-domains were 25.48, 24.08 and 24.04, respectively. Conclusion. Results indicate that the ‘Free From Pain’ exercises are suitable and safe. The book provides educational information that empowers participants to better their musculoskeletal health

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and re-injury rates are high and continue to rise in adolescents. After surgical reconstruction, less than 50% of patients return to their pre-injury level of physical activity. Clearance for return-to-play and rehabilitation progression typically requires assessment of performance during functional tests. Pain may impact this performance. However, the patient's level of pain is often overlooked during these assessments. Purpose: To investigate the level of pain during functional tests in adolescents with ACL injury. Fifty-nine adolescents with ACL injury (ACLi; female n=43; 15 ± 1 yrs; 167.6 ± 8.4 cm; 67.8 ± 19.9 kg) and sixty-nine uninjured (CON; female n=38; 14 ± 2 yrs; 165.0 ± 10.8 cm; 54.2 ± 11.5 kg) performed a series of functional tests. These tests included: maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and isokinetic knee flexion-extension strength tests, single-limb hop tests, double-limb squats, countermovement jumps (CMJ), lunges, drop-vertical jumps (DVJ), and side-cuts. Pain was reported on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating no pain and 5 indicating extreme pain for the injured limb of the ACLi group and non-dominant limb for the CON group, after completion of each test. Chi-Square test was used to compare groups for the level of pain in each test. Analysis of the level of pain within and between groups was performed using descriptive statistics. The distribution of the level of pain was different between groups for all functional tests (p≤0.008), except for ankle plantar flexion and hip abduction MVICs (Table 1). The percentage of participants reporting pain was higher in the ACLi group in all tests compared to the CON group (Figure 1). Participants most often reported pain during the strength tests involving the knee joint, followed by the hop tests and dynamic tasks, respectively. More specifically, the knee extension MVIC was the test most frequently reported as painful (70% of the ACLi group), followed by the isokinetic knee flexion-extension test, with 65% of ACLi group. In addition, among all hop tests, pain was most often reported during the timed 6m hop (53% of ACLi), and, among all dynamic tasks, during the side-cut (40% of ACLi) test (Figure 1). Furthermore, the tests that led to the higher levels of pain (severe or extreme) were the cross-hop (9.8% of ACLi), CMJ (7.1% of ACLi), and the isokinetic knee flexion-extension test (11.5% of ACLi) (Table 1). Adolescents with and without ACL injury reported different levels of pain for all functional tasks, except for ankle and hip MVICs. The isokinetic knee flexion-extension test resulted in greater rates of severe or extreme pain and was also the test most frequently reported as painful. Functional tests that frequently cause pain or severe level of pain (e.g., timed 6m and cross hops, side-cut, knee flexion/extension MVICs and isokinetic tests) might not be the first test choices to assess function in patients after ACL injury/reconstruction. Reported pain during functional tests should be considered by clinicians and rehabilitation team members when evaluating a patient's readiness to return-to-play. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have been increasing, especially amongst adolescents. These injuries can increase the risk for early-onset knee osteoarthritis (OA). The consequences of late-stage knee OA include structural joint change, functional limitations and persistent pain. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pro-inflammatory biomarker reflecting knee joint healing, and increasing evidence suggests that IL-6 may play a critical role in the development of pathological pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between subjective knee joint pain and function, and synovial fluid concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6, in adolescents undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Seven youth (12-17 yrs.) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery participated in this study. They completed the Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) questionnaire on knee joint pain and function. At the time of their ACL reconstruction surgery, synovial fluid samples were collected through aspiration to dryness with a syringe without saline flushing. IL-6 levels in synovial fluid (sf) were measured using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between IL-6 levels and scores from the Pedi-IKDC questionnaire. There was a statistically significant correlation between sfIL-6 levels and the Pedi-IKDC Symptoms score (-.929, p=0.003). The correlations between sfIL-6 and Pedi-IKDC activity score (.546, p = .234) and between sfIL-6 and total Pedi-IKDC score (-.536, p = .215) were not statistically significant. This is the first study to evaluate IL-6 as a biomarker of knee joint healing in an adolescent population, reported a very strong correlation (-.929, p=0.003) between IL-6 in knee joint synovial fluid and a subjective questionnaire on knee joint pain. These findings provide preliminary scientific evidence regarding the relationship between knee joint pain, as determined by a validated questionnaire and the inflammatory and healing status of the patient's knee. This study provides a basis and justification for future longitudinal research on biomarkers of knee joint healing in patients throughout their recovery and rehabilitation process. Incorporating physiological and psychosocial variables to current return-to-activity (RTA) criteria has the potential to improve decision making for adolescents following ACL reconstruction to reduce premature RTA thereby reducing the risk of re-injury and risk of early-onset knee OA in adolescents

Psoas tendinopathy is a potential cause of groin pain after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The direct anterior approach (DAA) is becoming increasingly popular as the standard approach for primary THA due to being a muscle preserving technique. It is unclear what the prevalence is for the development of psoas-related pain after DAA THA, how this can influence patient reported outcome, and which risk factors can be identified. This retrospective case control study of prospectively recorded data evaluated 1784 patients who underwent 2087 primary DAA THA procedures between January 2017 and September 2019. Psoas tendinopathy was defined as (1) persistence of groin pain after DAA THA and was triggered by active hip flexion, (2) exclusion of other causes such as dislocation, infection, implant loosening or (occult) fractures, and (3) a positive response to an image-guided injection with xylocaine and steroid into the psoas tendon sheath. Complication-, re-operation rates, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were measured. Forty-three patients (45 hips; 2.2%) were diagnosed with psoas tendinopathy according to the above-described criteria. The mean age of patients who developed psoas tendinopathy was 50.8±11.7 years, which was significantly lower than the mean age of patients without psoas pain (62.4±12.7y; p<0.001). Patients with primary hip osteoarthritis were significantly less likely to develop psoas tendinopathy (14/1207; 1.2%) in comparison to patients with secondary hip osteoarthritis to dysplasia (18/501; 3.6%) (p<0.001) or FAI (12/305; 3.9%) (p<0.001). Patients with psoas tendinopathy had significantly lower PROM scores at 6 weeks and 1 year follow-up. Psoas tendinopathy was present in 2.2% after DAA THA. Younger age and secondary osteoarthritis due to dysplasia or FAI were risk factors for the development of psoas tendinopathy. Post-operatively, patients with psoas tendinopathy often also presented with low back pain and lateral trochanteric pain. Psoas tendinopathy had an important influence on the evolution of PROM scores

Introduction. The regionalisation of major trauma in the UK has significantly improved outcomes for patients with severe, lower limb injuries. Chronic pain after complex lower limb injuries is well documented, but seems to remain a problem despite better clinical and radiological outcomes. We hypothesised that pain was mediated through the saphenous nerve, especially as most tibial injuries affected the soft tissues medially. As a proof of concept, we undertook adductor canal blocks to understand pain aetiology. Materials & Methods. Patients with chronic pain following complex lower limb trauma or congenital deformity correction have been selected and underwent an adductor canal block by one of our trauma anaesthetist that specialises in this procedure. Their outcomes were recorded in their clinical records and patients were contacted by phone to document their experiences. Results. 14 patients with chronic, treatment refractory lower limb pain who were being managed in our orthoplastics clinic following complex, lower limb trauma were identified. Six of those patients had required plastic coverage. Of these 14 patients, all stated their pain completely resolved after the procedure and then returned between 24 hours and 4 weeks after the procedure. Two patients underwent a saphenous nerve diversion after conduction of the blocks, reporting subsequent resolution of their complaints. Conclusions. As a proof of concept, we report that the saphenous nerve underlies chronic pain in patients with complex lower limb injuries. An adductor canal block is an effective diagnostic tool for these patients. Saphenous diversion may offer a permanent solution in patients who respond well to saphenous nerve block. A prospective study is planned to objectively measure pain and quality of life scores after treatment of complex injuries and pre and post adductor canal block

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful treatment for end stage osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, post-operative pain can lead to patient dissatisfaction and poorer outcomes. Cooled radiofrequency nerve ablation (CRNA) has reportedly been effective at treating pain osteoarthritic knee pain by targeting the periarticular nerves of the knee. We undertook a prospective, controlled pilot study to determine if CRNA provides effective post-operative analgesia when utilised intra-operatively during total knee arthroplasty. Participants were recruited from January 2019 to February 2020. Those meeting inclusion criteria underwent TKA with intraoperative CRNA to 6 target sites prior to the cementing of implants. The primary outcomes were pain scores and opiate usage in the first 4 days post-operatively, then weekly up to 6 weeks. A total of 62 patients were screened and allocated sequentially; 18 were recruited to the control group and 12 recruited to the study group. The two groups did not have any significant difference in demographics. There were no clinically significant differences between the two groups in terms of pain scores nor opiate usage. There were complications as a result of the intervention. This study demonstrated no benefit of using intraoperative CRNA for improving post-operative pain scores or reducing opiate use after TKA

Introduction. Pain after trauma has received relatively little research attention compared with surgical techniques and functional outcomes, but is important to patients. We aimed to describe nerve dysfunction and pain characteristics using tibial fractures as a model. We hypothesized that early nerve dysfunction was associated with neuropathic and chronic pain. Materials and Methods. Adult patients with isolated open or closed tibial diaphyseal fractures were prospectively observed for 1-year in 5 Major Trauma Centres. Nerve dysfunction was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, acute pain with the visual numerical rating scale (VNRS), neuropathic pain with the doleur neuropathique-4 score and quality of life (QOL) using the EQ-5D score. Results. Of 77 included patients, twenty-six (33.8%) had Gustilo-Anderson grade II or worse injuries. Forty-six (63.0%) had operative repair; 0 operation notes reported nerve injury. Mean VNRS pain scores one week post-injury were 4.6/10 (SD 2.4). Seventeen patients (23.3%) presented with impaired sensation, persisting in 11 (15.1%) at 3-months. Neuropathic pain affected 16 (20.8%) patients one week post-injury; a further 20 (26.0%) had >2 symptoms of nerve pain. Only four (11.1%) received anti-neuropathic drugs. At 6-months, twenty-three (31.5%) reported mobility problems, 21 (28.8%) difficulty completing normal activities, 25 (34.2%) pain and 15 (20.5%) anxiety and depression. Conclusions. Nerve dysfunction and neuropathic pain are common early features in patients with tibial fractures, but are poorly recognised and inadequately treated. Pain has long-term effects on patients’ QOL. Future work should aim to improve identification and management of neuropathic pain

To determine the demographic, pre-operative, operative, post-operative, and outcome in seven patients who presented to our unit over a 5-year period and underwent a coccydectomy for coccydynia unresponsive to conservative measures. We performed a retrospective chart review of seven patients who presented to the Department of Orthopaedics at Helen Joseph hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, with coccidia unresponsive to a trial of adequate conservative measures, and underwent operative intervention. The study period was from 01 January 2014 to 31 December 2018. The mean age of subjects in our study was 53 years. The average length of conservative treatment prior to presentation to our unit was 8 months. All patients were taken to surgery and the mean length of surgery was 49 min and the mean volume of intra-operative blood loss was 63.4 ml. In all 7 (100%) of subjects a total coccygectomy was performed. At our 1-year end point all 7 (100%) subjects reported a favourable outcome and were satisfied – extremely satisfied with the procedure. In our study a total coccygectomy resulted in a significant reduction in coccygeal pain and subjects a 1-year follow-up end point. We recommend that in patients who fail an adequate recognized trial of conservative measures for coccydynia, a total coccygectomy should be performed

There have been no studies assessing the acceptability of opioid tapering in the pre-arthroplasty setting. This qualitative study aimed to (1) explore barriers and facilitators to opioid tapering amongst patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), and (2) explore the similarities and differences in acceptability of opioid tapering between pre-arthroplasty patients and those participating in a biopsychosocial pain management program. From January 2021, adult participants diagnosed with CNCP and taking opioids daily (any dose at time of screening for a period of 3 months) were recruited from either Fairfield Orthopaedic Hip and Knee Service (FOHKS) or Liverpool Hospital Pain Clinic (LHPC). Semi-structured interviews underwent thematic analysis using the framework method. 17 participants were recruited (FOHKS, n=9, mean age 67, female 77%, LHPC, n=8, mean age 54, female 63%). Both groups had participants who; (i) were reluctant to use opioid medications and used them out of “necessity”, (ii) were reluctant to taper due to concerns of worsening pain, quality of life, (iii) believed opioids were “toxins” causing bodily harm. Some FOHKS participants believed tapering should be a post-operative focus, whilst others believed tapering opioids pre-operatively will assist in post-op pain management. Few LHPC participants felt dependent/addicted to opioids, thus driving their intention to taper opioids. The belief of tapering opioids causing worse pain was based on either previous experiences or concerns alone. Some FOHKS participants were more inclined to taper opioids if they were educated on the chronic and peri-operative risks associated with using opioids at time of arthroplasty. Opioid users recognise the harms associated with chronic opioid use and believe they are used out of desperation for adequate analgesia, function, and quality of life. Tapering opioids in the pre-arthroplasty context may need coupling with patient education highlighting the importance of opioid tapering pre-operatively

Background. Digital injuries are among the most common presentations to the emergency department. In order to sufficiently examine and manage these injuries, adequate, prompt, and predictable anaesthesia is essential. In this trial, we aim to primarily compare the degree of pain and anaesthesia onset time between the two-injection dorsal block technique (TD) and the single-injection volar subcutaneous block technique (SV). Further, we describe the temporal and anatomical effects of both techniques for an accurate delineation of the anesthetized regions. Methods. A single-centre prospective randomized controlled trial involving patients presenting with isolated wounds to the fingers requiring primary repair under local anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to either the SV or TD blocks. The primary outcome was procedure-related pain (Numerical Rating Scale). Further, we assessed the extent of anaesthesia along with the anaesthesia onset time. Results. A total of 100 patients were included in the final analysis, 50 on each arm of the study. The median pain score during injection was significantly higher in patients who received TD block than patients who received SV block (median [interquartile range] = 4 [2.25, 5] vs. 3 [2, 4], respectively, P = 0.006). However, anaesthesia onset time was not statistically different among the groups (P = 0.39). The extent of anaesthesia was more predictable in the dorsal block compared to the volar block. Conclusion. The single-injection volar subcutaneous blocks are less painful with a similar anaesthesia onset time. Injuries presenting in the proximal dorsal region may benefit from the two-injection dorsal blocks, given the anatomical differences and timely anaesthesia of the region

Despite total knee arthroplasty demonstrating high levels of success, 20% of patients report dissatisfaction with their result. Wellness Stasis Socks are embedded with a proprietary pattern of neuro-receptor activation points that have been proven to activate a precise neuro-response, as according to the pattern theory of haptic perception, which stimulates improvements in pain and function. Technologies that manipulate this sensory environment, such as textured insoles, have proven to be effective in improving gait patterns in patients with knee osteoarthritis. In regard to patients undergoing TKA using this new technology may prove beneficial as an adjunct to recovery as many patients suffer from further deficits to their proprioceptive system caused by ligamentous damage and alterations to mechanoreceptors during procedure. We hypothesized that the Wellness Stasis Socks are a safe, cost-effective and easily scalable strategy to support TKA patients through their recovery. Double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Randomization using a computer-generated program . All study coordinators, healthcare personel and patients were blinded to patient groups. All surgical procedures were conducted by the same technique and orthopaedic surgeon. Intervention group: Wellness Stasis socks containing receptor point-activation technology. Control group: indentical appearing Wellness Stasis socks without receptor point-activation technology. Sock use during the waking hours . All additional post-operative protocols remained consistent between groups including same facility physiotherapy . Additional modalities (ice machines, soft-tissue massages, acupuncture) were prohibited. WOMAC questionnaire completed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks to assess pain, stiffness and physical function. G. *. Power software to determine minimum sample of 50 in each group. No patients were lost to follow up and all followed study protocol. Data analysis using SPSS software. P-values, effect sizes, and confidence intervals are reported to assess clinical relevance of the finding. Physical status classifications were compared using t-test. Within-subject and between-subject differences in the mean WOMAC were analyzed by ANOVA. Cramer's V statistical analysis noted that other variables of Sex, BMI, ASA classification and Age were not statistically different between the control and intervention groups. No statistical difference between groups in Preop Womac scores. The data showed a consistent improvement in Womac scores for pain and stiffness at 2 weeks post op in the interventional group over the control group. The womac scores assessing physical function showed a consistent improvement at both 2 and 6 weeks post op in the intervention group compared to the control group. There were no complications in either group associated the sock use. The intervention proved to be a low cost and safe additional intervention post operatively from TKA to help patients improve with regard to pain, stiffness and physical function. This study suggests this modality can be added to the list of other commonly used post op interventions such as cryocuffs, physiotherapy, and relaxation techniques as safe post op interventions to help patients improve post op TKA and can act as an adjunct in providing non narcotic pain control

Interscalene brachial plexus block is the standard regional analgesic technique for shoulder surgery. Given its adverse effects, alternative techniques have been explored. Reports suggest that the erector spinae plane block may potentially provide effective analgesia following shoulder surgery. However, its analgesic efficacy for shoulder surgery compared with placebo or local anaesthetic infiltration has never been established. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of pre-operative T2 erector spinae plane block with peri-articular infiltration at the end of surgery. Sixty-two patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder repair were randomly assigned to receive active erector spinae plane block with saline peri-articular injection (n = 31) or active peri-articular injection with saline erector spinae plane block (n = 31) in a blinded double-dummy design. Primary outcome was resting pain score in recovery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores with movement; opioid use; patient satisfaction; adverse effects in hospital; and outcomes at 24 h and 1 month. There was no difference in pain scores in recovery, with a median difference (95%CI) of 0.6 (-1.9-3.1), p = 0.65. Median postoperative oral morphine equivalent utilisation was significantly higher in the erector spinae plane group (21 mg vs. 12 mg; p = 0.028). Itching was observed in 10% of patients who received erector spinae plane block and there was no difference in the incidence of significant nausea and vomiting. Patient satisfaction scores, and pain scores and opioid use at 24 h were similar. At 1 month, six (peri-articular injection) and eight (erector spinae plane block) patients reported persistent pain. Erector spinae plane block was not superior to peri-articular injection for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Introduction. There is no consensus on the ideal pain management strategy following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study sought to identify immediate changes in the hospital course of patients undergoing primary THA following implementation of a rapid recovery anesthesia and multimodal management of pain (RAMP) protocol. For this study, rapid recovery anesthesia describes the use of preoperative non-narcotic medication in conjunction with neuraxial anesthesia techniques confined to the operating room only. The multimodal pain regimen consists of pre- and post-operative high dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), gabapentin, and antiemetics with or without intraoperative periarticular anesthetic injection. We hypothesized that the implementation of a RAMP protocol would lead to decreased reported pain scores, decreased narcotic use, and a shorter hospital stay in patients undergoing primary THA. Methods. This retrospective cohort study performed at a multi-surgeon high-volume institution reviewed the records of 81 consecutive patients who underwent primary THA utilizing traditional anesthesia and an opioid-dependentpain management techniques between June to September 2014 compared to 78 patients who underwent primary THA after implementation of the RAMP protocol between November 2014 to February 2015. The length of stay (LOS), pain scores, narcotic use, and other clinical data were recorded for each study group. Equality of variance was confirmed prior to statistical analysis using t-test for equality of means. Results. There was no significant difference in the demographics, body mass index, ASA classification, or Charleson Comorbidity Index between the two cohorts. The average LOS was significantly shorter after implementation of the RAMP protocol with a mean of 2.10 ± 1.1 days versus 2.89 ± 1.0 days. Total amount of narcotics used was significantly less with the RAMP protocol (Fig 1). Patient reported pain scores were improved throughout the hospital stay with patients receiving the RAMP protocol reporting significantly less pain beginning the morning of POD 1 (Fig 2). No significant decrease in kidney function was seen following the use of high dose NSAIDs (p=0.18). Conclusions. The implementation of a RAMP protocol in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty has resulted in an immediate shorter length of stay with less narcotics use and improved reported pain scores. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating a statistically significantly shorter length of stay associated with a multimodal pain protocol. This study supports the benefits of broad implementation a RAMP protocol for total hip arthroplasty

Worldwide, most spine imaging is either “inappropriate” or “probably inappropriate”. The Choosing Wisely recommendation is “Do not perform imaging for lower back pain unless red flags are present.” There is currently no detailed breakdown of lower back pain diagnostic imaging performed in New Brunswick (NB) to inform future directions. A registry of spine imaging performed in NB from 2011-2019 inclusive (n=410,000) was transferred to the secure platform of the NB Institute for Data, Training and Research (NB-IRDT). The pseudonymized data included linkable institute identifiers derived from an obfuscated Medicare number, as well as information on type of imaging, location of imaging, and date of imaging. The transferred data did not include the radiology report or the test requisition. We included all lumbar, thoracic, and complete spine images. We excluded imaging related to the cervical spine, surgical or other procedures, out-of-province patients and imaging of patients under 19 years. We verified categories of X-ray, Computed Tomography (CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Red flags were identified by ICD-10 code-related criteria set out by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. We derived annual age- and sex-standardized rates of spine imaging per 100,000 population and examined regional variations in these rates in NB's two Regional Health Authorities (RHA-A and RHA-B). Age- and sex-standardized rates were derived for individuals with/without red flag conditions and by type of imaging. Healthcare utilization trends were reflected in hospital admissions and physician visits 2 years pre- and post-imaging. Rurality and socioeconomic status were derived using patients’ residences and income quintiles, respectively. Overall spine imaging rates in NB decreased between 2012 and 2019 by about 20% to 7,885 images per 100,000 people per year. This value may be higher than the Canadian average. Females had 23% higher average imaging rate than males. RHA-A had a 45% higher imaging rate than RHA-B. Imaging for red flag conditions accounted for about 20% of all imaging. X-rays imaging accounted for 67% and 75% of all imaging for RHA-A and RHA-B respectively. The proportions were 20% and 8% for CT and 13% and 17% for MRI. Two-year hospitalization rates and rates of physician visits were higher post-imaging. Females had higher age-standardized hospitalization and physician-visit rates, but the magnitude of increase was higher for males. Individuals with red flag conditions were associated with increased physician visits, regardless of the actual reason for the visit. Imaging rates were higher for rural than urban patients by about 26%. Individuals in the lowest income quintiles had higher imaging rates than those in the highest income quintiles. Physicians in RHA-A consistently ordered more images than their counterparts at RHA-B. We linked spine imaging data with population demographic data to look for variations in lumbar spine imaging patterns. In NB, as in other jurisdictions, imaging tests of the spine are occurring in large numbers. We determined that patterns of imaging far exceed the numbers expected for ‘red flag’ situations. Our findings will inform a focused approach in groups of interest. Implementing high value care recommendations pre-imaging ought to replace low-value routine imaging

Os acromiale is a developmental defect caused by failure of fusion of the anterior epiphysis of the acromion between the ages of 22 and 25. The prevalence of os acromiale in the general population ranges from 1.4% to 15%. Os acromiale has been reported as a contributory factor to shoulder impingement symptoms and rotator cuff injuries, despite being a common incidental observation. In this retrospective study, we examined the prevalence of os acromiale in black African patients with shoulder pain. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 119 patients who presented with atraumatic and minor traumatic shoulder pain at a single institution over a one-year period. Anteroposterior, scapula Y-view, and axillary view plain images were initially evaluated for the presence of os acromiale, and this was corroborated with axial MRI image findings. Patients with verified os acromiale had their medical records reviewed to determine their first complaint and the results of their clinical examination and imaging examination. Radiographs and MRI on 24 patients (20%) revealed an osacromiale. This cohort had a mean age of 59.2 years, and there were significantly more females (65%) than males. Meso-acromion was identified as the most prevalent type (n=11), followed by pre-os acromion (n=7). All patients underwent bilateral shoulder x-rays, and 45 percent of patients were found to have bilateral meso- acromion. Most patients (70%) were reported to have unstable os acromiale with subacromial impingement symptoms, and nine patients (36%) had confirmed rotator cuff tears based on clinical and Mri findings. Surgery was necessary for 47% of the 24 patients with confirmed Os acromiale (arthroscopic surgery, n=7; open surgery, n=1) in order to treat their symptoms. The prevalence of os acromiale in our African patients with atraumatic shoulder symptoms is greater than that reported in the general population. Os acromiale is a rare condition that should always be considered when evaluating shoulder pain patients

Individuals with multi-compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA) frequently experience challenges in activities of daily living (ADL) such as stair ambulation. The Levitation “Tri-Compartment Offloader” (TCO) knee brace was designed to reduce pain in individuals with multicompartment KOA. This brace uses novel spring technology to reduce tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces via reduced quadriceps forces. Information on brace utility during stair ambulation is limited. This study evaluated the effect of the TCO during stair descent in patients with multicompartment KOA by assessing knee flexion moments (KFM), quadriceps activity and pain. Nine participants (6 male, age 61.4±8.1 yrs; BMI 30.4±4.0 kg/m2) were tested following informed consent. Participants had medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades two to four) diagnosed by an orthopaedic surgeon. Joint kinetics and muscle activity were evaluated during stair descent to compare three bracing conditions: 1) without brace (OFF); 2) brace in low power (LOW); and 3) brace in high power (HIGH). The brace spring engages from 60° to 120° and 15° to 120° knee flexion in LOW and HIGH, respectively. Individual brace size and fit were adjusted by a trained researcher. Participants performed three trials of step-over-step stair descent for each bracing condition. Three-dimensional kinematics were acquired using an 8-camera motion capture system. Forty-one spherical reflective markers were attached to the skin (on each leg and pelvis segment) and 8 markers on the brace. Ground reaction forces and surface EMG from the vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL) were collected for the braced leg. Participants rated knee pain intensity performing the task following each bracing condition on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale ranging from “no pain” (0) to “worst imaginable pain” (100). Resultant brace and knee flexion angles and KFM were analysed during stair contact for the braced leg. The brace moment was determined using brace torque-angle curves and was subtracted from the calculated KFM. Resultant moments were normalized to bodyweight and height. Peak KFMs were calculated for the loading response (Peak1) and push-off (Peak2) phases of support. EMG signals were normalized and analysed during stair contact using wavelet analysis. Signal intensities were summed across wavelets and time to determine muscle power. Results were averaged across all 3 trials for each participant. Paired T-tests were used to determine differences between bracing conditions with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (α=0.025). Peak KFM was significantly lower compared to OFF with the brace worn in HIGH during the push-off phase (p Table 1: Average peak knee flexion moments, quadriceps muscle power and knee pain during stair descent in 3 brace conditions (n=9). Quadriceps activity, knee flexion moments and pain were significantly reduced with TCO brace wear during stair descent in KOA patients. These findings suggest that the TCO assists the quadriceps to reduce KFM and knee pain during stair descent. This is the first biomechanical evidence to support use of the TCO to reduce pain during an ADL that produces especially high knee forces and flexion moments. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Abstract. Objectives. To determine the effectiveness of LIA compared to ACB in providing pain relief and reducing opiates usage in hamstring graft ACL reconstructions. Materials and Methods. In a consecutive series of hamstring graft ACL reconstructions, patients received three different regional and/or anaesthetic techniques for pain relief. Three groups were studied: group 1: general anaesthetic (GA)+ ACB (n=38); group 2: GA + ACB + LIA (n=31) and group 3: GA+LIA (n=36). ACB was given under ultrasound guidance. LIA involved infiltration at skin incision site, capsule, periosteum and in the hamstring harvest tunnel. Analgesic medications were similar between the three groups as per standard multimodal analgesia (MMA). Patients were similar in demographics distribution and surgical technique. The postoperative pain and total morphine requirements were evaluated and recorded. The postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analogue scores (VAS) at 0hrs, 2hrs, 4hrs, weight bearing (WB) and discharge (DC). Results. There was no statistically significant difference in opiates intake amongst the three groups. When comparing VAS scores; there were no statistical difference between the groups at any of the time intervals that VAS was measured. However, the GA+LIA group hospital's LOS (m=2.31hrs, SD=0.75) was almost half that of GA+ACB group (m=4.24hrs, SD=1.08); (conditions t(72)=8.88; p=0.000). There was no statistical significance in the incidence of adverse effects amongst the groups. Conclusion. The LIA technique provided equally good pain relief following hamstring graft ACL reconstructions when compared to ACB, while allowing for earlier rehabilitation, mobilisation and discharge

The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) is a patient-reported disease-specific quality of life (QOL) outcome measure used to assess patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability (LPI) both pre- and post-operatively. The purpose of this study was to compare the BPII 2.0 to four other relevant patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): the Tampa Scale-11 for kinesiophobia (TSK-11), the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), a general QOL (EQ-5D-5L), and a return to sport index (ACL-RSI). This concurrent validation sought to compare and correlate the BPII 2.0 with these other measures of physical, psychological, and emotional health. The psychological and emotional status of patients can impact recovery and rehabilitation, and therefore a disease-specific PROM may be unable to consistently identify patients who would benefit from interventions encompassing a holistic and person-focused approach in addition to disease-specific treatment. One hundred and ten patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability (LPI) were assessed at a tertiary orthopaedic practice between January and October 2021. Patients were consented into the study and asked to complete five questionnaires: the BPII 2.0, TSK-11, PCS, EQ-5D-5L, and the ACL-RSI at their initial orthopaedic consultation. Descriptive demographic statistics were collected for all patients. A Pearson's r correlation coefficient was employed to examine the relationships between the five PROMs. These analyses were computed using SPSS 28.0 © (IBM Corporation, 2021). One hundred and ten patients with a mean age of 25.7 (SD = 9.8) completed the five PROMs. There were 29 males (26.3%) and 81 females (73.6%) involving 50% symptomatic left knees and 50% symptomatic right knees. The mean age of the first dislocation was 15.4 years (SD = 7.3; 1-6) and the mean BMI was 26.5 (SD = 7.3; range = 12.5-52.6) The results of the Pearson's r correlation coefficient demonstrated that the BPII 2.0 was statistically significantly related to all of the assessed PROM's (p. There was significant correlation evident between the BPII 2.0 and the four other PROMs assessed in this study. The BPII 2.0 does not explicitly measure kinesiophobia or pain catastrophizing, however, the significant statistical relationship of the TSK-11 and PCS to the BPII 2.0 suggests that this information is being captured and reflected. The preliminary results of this concurrent validation suggest that the pre-operative data may offer predictive validity. Future research will explore the ability of the BPII 2.0 to predict patient quality of life following surgery

Autologous bone has been the gold standard for grafting material in foot and ankle arthrodesis. While autograft use has been effective, the harvest procedure does present risks to the patient including readmission, infection, and persistent graft harvest site pain. Previous studies have examined graft harvest site pain, but most have focused on the iliac crest and none have long term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term (7–10 year) harvest site pain in subjects undergoing autograft harvest from multiple sites for hindfoot and/or ankle arthrodesis. Sixty (60) subjects underwent hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis supplemented with autograft as part of the control arm of a prospective, randomized trial. The mean subject age was 59.4 years (range, 24.7–76.8) and mean body mass index was 30.6 kg/m2 (range, 22.0–44.0). There were 29 males and 31 female subjects. Subjects had the tibiotalar (37.9%), subtalar (24.1%), talonavicular (10.3%), subtalar/talonavicular (5.1%), or subtalar/calcaneocuboid/talonavicular (22.4%) joints arthrodesed. Autograft was harvested from either the proximal tibia (51.7%), iliac crest (17.2%), calcaneous (15.5%), distal tibia (6.8%), or other location (8.6%). Graft harvest site pain was evaluated using a 100-point visual analog score (VAS), with clinically significant pain being any score greater than 20. Subjects were followed a mean of 9.0 years (range, 7.8–10.5). The percentage of subjects who reported clinically significant pain was 35.7%, 21.4%, 18.2%, 10.5%, 8.9%, and 5.2% at 2, 6, 12, 24, 52 weeks, and final follow-up (7.8–10.5 years), respectively. The mean VAS autograft harvest site pain at final follow-up was 4.4 (range, 0.0–97.0), with 37.9% of subjects reporting at least some pain. For three subjects (5%) with clinically significant pain (VAS >20) at final follow-up, two had proximal tibial harvest sites and one had an iliac crest harvest site. There was no correlation between graft volume and harvest site pain. This study is the first to examine long-term pain following autologous bone graft harvest for hindfoot and/or ankle arthrodesis. Over a third of patients reported having some pain at an average follow-up of nine years, with 5% experiencing clinically significant pain. The results of this study suggest that harvesting autograft bone carries a risk of persistent, long-term pain regardless of the volume of graft that is harvested. This potential for persistent pain should be considered when informing patients of procedure risks and when deciding to use autograft or a bone graft substitute material