Abstract
Worldwide, most spine imaging is either “inappropriate” or “probably inappropriate”. The Choosing Wisely recommendation is “Do not perform imaging for lower back pain unless red flags are present.” There is currently no detailed breakdown of lower back pain diagnostic imaging performed in New Brunswick (NB) to inform future directions.
A registry of spine imaging performed in NB from 2011-2019 inclusive (n=410,000) was transferred to the secure platform of the NB Institute for Data, Training and Research (NB-IRDT). The pseudonymized data included linkable institute identifiers derived from an obfuscated Medicare number, as well as information on type of imaging, location of imaging, and date of imaging. The transferred data did not include the radiology report or the test requisition.
We included all lumbar, thoracic, and complete spine images. We excluded imaging related to the cervical spine, surgical or other procedures, out-of-province patients and imaging of patients under 19 years.
We verified categories of X-ray, Computed Tomography (CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Red flags were identified by ICD-10 code-related criteria set out by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.
We derived annual age- and sex-standardized rates of spine imaging per 100,000 population and examined regional variations in these rates in NB's two Regional Health Authorities (RHA-A and RHA-B). Age- and sex-standardized rates were derived for individuals with/without red flag conditions and by type of imaging. Healthcare utilization trends were reflected in hospital admissions and physician visits 2 years pre- and post-imaging. Rurality and socioeconomic status were derived using patients’ residences and income quintiles, respectively.
Overall spine imaging rates in NB decreased between 2012 and 2019 by about 20% to 7,885 images per 100,000 people per year. This value may be higher than the Canadian average.
Females had 23% higher average imaging rate than males. RHA-A had a 45% higher imaging rate than RHA-B. Imaging for red flag conditions accounted for about 20% of all imaging.
X-rays imaging accounted for 67% and 75% of all imaging for RHA-A and RHA-B respectively. The proportions were 20% and 8% for CT and 13% and 17% for MRI.
Two-year hospitalization rates and rates of physician visits were higher post-imaging. Females had higher age-standardized hospitalization and physician-visit rates, but the magnitude of increase was higher for males. Individuals with red flag conditions were associated with increased physician visits, regardless of the actual reason for the visit.
Imaging rates were higher for rural than urban patients by about 26%. Individuals in the lowest income quintiles had higher imaging rates than those in the highest income quintiles. Physicians in RHA-A consistently ordered more images than their counterparts at RHA-B.
We linked spine imaging data with population demographic data to look for variations in lumbar spine imaging patterns. In NB, as in other jurisdictions, imaging tests of the spine are occurring in large numbers. We determined that patterns of imaging far exceed the numbers expected for ‘red flag’ situations. Our findings will inform a focused approach in groups of interest. Implementing high value care recommendations pre-imaging ought to replace low-value routine imaging.
