Introduction. Many fluoroscopic studies on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have identified kinematic variabilities compared to the normal knee, with many subjects experiencing paradoxical motion patterns. The intent of this study was to investigate the results of a newly designed PCR TKA to determine kinematic variabilities and assess these kinematic patterns with those previously documented for the normal knee. Methods. The study involves determining the in vivo kinematics for 80 subjects compared to the normal knee. 10 subjects have a normal knee, 40 have a Journey II PCR TKA and 40 subjects with the Journey II XR TKA (BCR). Although all PCR subjects have been evaluated, we are continuing to evaluate subjects with a BCR TKA. All TKAs were performed by a single surgeon and deemed clinically successful. All subjects performed a deep knee bend from full extension to maximum flexion while under fluoroscopic surveillance. Kinematics were calculated via 3D-to-2D registration at 30° increments from full extension to maximum flexion. Anterior/posterior translation of the medial (MAP) and lateral (LAP) femoral condyles and femorotibial axial rotation were compared during ranges of motion in relation to the function of the cruciate ligaments. Results. Of the 40 PCR TKAs, the average overall flexion was 112.6°, while the average for normal subjects was 139.0°. Initial BCR subjects revealed a higher than expected 128.0°. From 0=30° knee flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated −4.74±4.94 mm of posterior LAP movement, −2.04±4.07 mm of MAP movement and 3.61±8.13° of external axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −8.80±3.32 mm of LAP movement, −3.81±1.03 mm of MAP movement and an axial rotation of 11.34±3.78°. From 30=90° knee flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated 4.37±8.26 mm of LAP movement, 0.12±7.95 mm of MAP movement and 0.79±11.43° of axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −4.28±3.13 mm of LAP movement, −1.11±2.76 mm of MAP movement and axial rotation of 6.54±4.33°. From 0°-maximum flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated −2.71±5.37 mm of LAP movement, 1.79±4.88 mm of MAP movement and 5.99±5.26° of axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −17.83±6.04 mm of LAP movement, −9.11±4.93 mm of MAP movement and axial rotation of 23.66±7.81°. Overall, the BCR subject displayed kinematic patterns similar to those of a normal knee; more detailed numbers will be presented in the presentation. Discussion. Subjects having a PCR TKA experienced excellent weight-bearing flexion and kinematic patterns similar to the normal knee, but less in magnitude. These subjects experienced posterior femoral rollback in early and late flexion. During mid-flexion, subjects having a PCR TKA did experience some variable motion patterns, which may be due to the absence of the ACL. Subjects having a BCR TKA experienced more continuous rollback throughout flexion, more similar to the normal knee. Similar to the normal knee, subjects having a PCR TKA did experience progressive axial rotation throughout knee flexion (Figures). Significance. While they still experience normal-like rollback during early (0°–30°) and late flexion (90°-120°), subjects with a PCR TKA consistently demonstrated Anteriorization of the joint in mid-flexion

Background. The Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) incorporates two cam-post mechanisms in order to replicate the functionality and stability provided by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the native knee. Recently (2012), a second generation BCS design has introduced femur and tibial bearing modifications that are intended to delay lateral femoral condyle rollback and encourage more stable positioning of the medial femoral condyle to more closely replicate normal knee kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics of this TKA to the normal knee during a weight bearing flexion activity. Methods. In vivo kinematics were derived for 10 normal non-implanted knees and 40 second generation BCS TKAs all implanted by a single surgeon. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for each normal patient, and 3D reconstruction of the femur, tibia/fibula, and patella was performed. Fluoroscopic images were captured at 60 Hz using a mobile fluoroscopic unit that tracked the knee while patients performed a deep knee bend (DKB) from full extension to maximum flexion. A 3D-to-2D image registration technique was used at 30° increments to determine the transformations of the segmented bones or TKA components. The anterior-posterior motion of the lateral femoral condyle contact point (LAP) and the medial femoral condyle contact point (MAP), as well as tibio-femoral axial rotation, were measured at 30° increments from full extension to maximum flexion. Statistical analysis was conducted at the 95% confidence level. Results. From full extension to 120° of knee flexion the lateral condyle contact point translated posteriorly by 14.55 mm ± 5.11 mm and 10.47 mm ± 3.14 mm in the Normal and BCS groups respectively (p=0.1984). Over the same range of motion, the anterior-posterior motion of the medial condyle contact point in the Normal and BCS groups was −5.05 mm ± 2.91 mm and −10.66 mm ± 4.46 mm respectively (p=0.0433). Significant differences in LAP and/or MAP position existed at each flexion increment from 0–120° of flexion (Figure 1). The Normal group exhibited 19.85° ± 6.92° of axial rotation from full extension to 120° of flexion, while the BCS rotated 7.36° ± 4.31° (p=0.0085). Significant differences in femoral rotation with respect to the tibia existed at full extension as well as at 30° and 60° of knee flexion (Figure 2). Conclusions. Like the normal knee, the BCS experiences larger amounts of posterior motion in the first 30 degrees of knee flexion, compared to its mid-flexion phases (30°–90°). After 90 degrees the posterior motion in the BCS continues to increase, likely in part due to posterior cam-post engagement as intended. In this sample of normal knee subjects, very little posterior motion of either femoral condyle happens between 90 and 120 degrees of knee flexion although significant amounts of rollback are expected thereafter as reported in the literature. The axial rotation experienced by the BCS group is quite less than that experienced by the Normal group, however it is quite comparable to other TKAs, if not greater

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), has now become a reliable, successful, and widely used treatment for osteoarthritis. Numerous reports indicate that for the majority of patients, the TKA lasts a lifetime with pain relief and the ability to perform most everyday activities. However there are a number of ways in which the procedure can be further improved, the focus here being on function. One of the problems in evaluating function is that it depends upon the inherent ability, motivation, and expectation of the patients. There are several well-used questionnaire systems which capture functional ability objectively. In the effort to simplify evaluation, a ‘forgotten knee’ evaluation has been introduced, the concept being that ‘the ideal TKA design’ would feel and function like a normal knee. Such a measure would include factors such as surgical technique, alignment, and rehabilitation, as well as the TKA design itself. Another approach to evaluation is to measure biomechanical parameters, such as in gait analysis and fluoroscopy, which evaluate kinematic or kinematic parameters, using normal controls for comparison. Nevertheless, such evaluations still include factors other than the TKA design itself, and do not apply to new designs. The approach taken here for the evaluation of a new TKA design independent of other factors, is to measure the neutral path of motion and the laxity boundaries of the loaded knee on the application of shear and torque over a full range of flexion. The benchmark is the same kinematic data from the normal intact knee. The rationale has some analogy to the ‘forgotten knee’ in that if the laxity response of a design of TKA is the same as that of the anatomic knee itself, the behavior of that implanted knee in any functional condition will be indistinguishable from that of the anatomic knee itself. Such a testing concept has some similarities to the constraint test described in the ASTM standard. In this paper, a novel design algorithm is proposed for creating different design concepts. First, a general morphological form is formulated for each design concept, a Cam-Post PS, a Saddle-Ramp, and a Converging Condyle, all with overall anatomic-like surfaces. Each femoral component is then designed, which is then moved through the normal neutral path and laxity paths, which creates the tibial surface. The concepts are evaluated using a Desktop Knee Machine configured to move the knee dynamically through full flexion while applying combinations of compression, shear and torque; kinematic data being captured optically and plotted using custom software. The normal benchmark was obtained from 10 normal knee specimens, which showed the restraint of the medial femoral condyle to anterior displacement and the overall rollback and laxity laterally. Compared with standard CR and PS designs, the Guided Motion designs were seen to more closely resemble normal. It is proposed that this approach can result in designs which will more likely reproduce a ‘forgotten knee’ and achieve the optimal function for a given patient

Introduction. It is well known that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) does not preserve normal knee kinematics. This outcome has been attributed to alteration of soft-tissue balance and differences between the geometry of the implant design and the normal articular surfaces. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) has been developed to replace the medial and anterior compartments, while preserving the lateral compartment, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). In a previous study, we reported that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty did not significantly change knee kinematics and attributed that finding to a combination of preservation of soft-tissue balance and minimal alteration of joint articular geometry (Patil, JBJS, 2007). In the present study, we analyzed the effect of replacing trochlear surface in addition to the medial compartment by implanting cadaver knees with a bicompartmental arthroplasty design. Our hypothesis was that kinematics after BCKA will more closely replicate normal kinematics than kinematics after TKA. Methods. Eight human cadaveric knees underwent kinematic analysis with a surgical navigation system. Each knee was evaluated in its normal intact state, then after BKA with the Deuce design (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN), then after ACL sacrifice, and finally after implanting a PCL-retaining TKA (Legion, Smith & Nephew). Knees were tested on the Oxford knee rig, which simulates a quadriceps-driven dynamic deep knee bend. Tibiofemoral rollback and rotation and patellofemoral shift and tilt were recorded for each condition and compared using repeated measures ANOVA for significance. Results. Statistically significant differences were noted in femoral rollback between TKA and Intact conditions but not between Intact and BKA or between Intact and BKA without ACL. Statistically significant differences were noted in tibiofemoral rotation between TKA and Intact conditions but not between Intact and BKA or between Intact and BKA without ACL. No significant differences in patellar lateral shift or lateral tilt were found among the four conditions tested. Discussion & Conclusion. BKA prostheses that preserve the ACL and PCL allow for more normal knee kinematics than does conventional TKA. Our results supported our primary hypothesis that a bicompartmental approach would not significantly alter knee kinematics. These results also imply that replacement of the medial compartment and trochlear surface are not major factors contributing to altered knee function. The results that we observed may not necessarily apply to other BKA designs and should therefore not be extrapolated beyond the prosthesis designs in this study. Additionally, the current study was designed to only evaluate kinematics, and we can not make conclusions regarding implant wear, fixation, durability, ideal patient selection, and reproducibility of successful clinical outcomes. Lastly, the current study was undertaken using relatively normal cadaveric knees whereas in vivo arthroplasty is typically reserved for arthritic knees that are often affected by contracture and/or deformity. We therefore believe that clinical studies with well-defined measures of success need to be conducted before far-reaching conclusions can be drawn regarding the utility of these implants in clinical practice

The natural knee allows multi-planar freedoms of rotation and translation, while retaining stability in the antero-posterior direction. It allows flexion with roll back, and medial, lateral and central rotation movements. The natural femoral condyles of the knee are spiral, therefore inducing a side to side translatory movement during flexion and extension. Incorporating all these features is vital in successful knee replacement design. The different knee designs currently in use demonstrate different deficiencies in knee function. A study of 150 Posterior Cruciate (PCL) Retaining Total Knee Replacements [1] has shown that in 72% of knees direct impingement of the tibial insert posteriorly against the back of the femur was responsible for blocking further flexion. The mean pre-operative range of flexion was 105° and post-operative was 105.9°. For every 2mm decrease in posterior condylar offset, the maximum flexion was reduced by 12.2°. The major disadvantage of the Posterior Stabilised (PS) Total Knee Replacement is gross anterior to posterior mid-flexion instability [2]. The Medial Rotation Total Knee Replacement is good in mid-flexion but not in high flexion where the femur slides forward on the tibia leading to impingement. The Birmingham Knee Replacement (BKR) is a rotating platform knee design which is stable throughout the range of flexion. In high flexion, the BKR brings the femur to the back of the tibia. The BKR also has spiral femoral condyles, matching the natural kinematics of the knee. The combined static and dynamic effect is 10mm lateral translation of the femur in flexion and vice versa in extension. Results for seventy nine BKRs (in seventy two patients) show the best Oxford Knee Score of 12 at follow up – excluding ten patients whose inferior scores were due to other pathologies. Knee flexion results show a 21° post-operative improvement in range of flexion. On objective independent testing, maximum walking speed is slower for patients with a standard knee replacement (6.5km/h) and the loading through the replaced side does not match the normal side. Comparatively, patients with a BKR have a faster maximum walking speed of 11km/h and the loading closely matches that of the normal knee. Studies based on the National Joint Register PROMs data [2] show that nearly thirty percent of Total Knee Replacement patients are not much better since their operation. A lot of improvement is needed in the design of knee replacements in order to achieve better function for knee replacement patients

Background. The overall goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to facilitate the restoration of native function following late stage osteoarthritis and for this reason it is important to develop a thorough understanding of the mechanics of a normal healthy knee. While there are several methods for assessing TKA mechanics, these methods have limitations that make them prohibitive to both replicating physiological systems and evaluating non-implanted knees. These limitations can be circumvented through the development of mathematical models that use anatomical and physiological inputs to computationally simulate joint mechanics. This can be done in an inverse or forward manner to solve for either joint forces or motions respectively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate one such forward model and determine the accuracy of the predicted motions using fluoroscopy. Methods. In vivo kinematics were determined during flexion from full extension to 120 degrees for ten normal, healthy, subjects using fluoroscopy and a 3D-to-2D registration method. All ten subjects had previously undergone CT scans allowing for the digital reconstruction of native femur and tibia geometries. These geometries were then input into a ridged body forward model based on Kane's system of dynamics. The resulting kinematics determined through fluoroscopy and the mathematical model were compared for all of the ten subjects. Results. The three kinematic parameters evaluated for this study were the initial positioning and translation of the medial and lateral condylar contact point in addition to the axial position and rotation of the femur with respect to the tibia. The model simulations demonstrated an average of −2.16mm of medial condyle translation, −14.03mm of lateral condyle translation, and 20.09°of axial rotation. Through fluoroscopy, subjects demonstrated an average of −3.63mm of medial condyle translation, −16.02mm of lateral condyle translation, and 15.65°of axial rotation. Comparing these two methods the model predicted on average an additional 1.47mm of medial condyle translation, 1.98mm of lateral condyle translation, and 4.44° less axial rotation compared to the fluoroscopic analysis of the same ten subjects. Conclusion. In comparing the simulation kinematics to the that of the fluoroscopic assessment, the results are comparably similar demonstrating a forward model can be a viable assessment of knee kinematics in the future. By validating mathematical simulation as a feasible means of mechanical assessment, it becomes possible to evaluate mechanics using inputs to reflect extraordinary and theoretical instances such as trauma patients and congenital deformities unable to be assessed by other methods. The nature of the model also allows for a seamless transition to assess TKA mechanics, creating a more efficient means of evaluating both device design and surgical technique

Background:. The literature is unclear about the optimal rotation of the femoral component during TKR. Measured resection techniques rely on the use of bony landmarks, while the balanced gap technique relies on soft tissue tensioning to guide the surgeon in rotating the femoral component. All these techniques still result in a wide range of component rotation. We compared the functional flexion axis (FFA) of 20 replaced knees to that of the contralateral normal knee to determine whether a balanced gap technique allowed us to recreate this normal anatomy. Methods:. We reviewed the records of our TKR's from Jan 2008 to Dec 2010 and included all patients who had a normally functioning contralateral knee, tibial cut <3° from perpendicular to the mechanical axis performed by/under supervision of a single surgeon. These patients were contacted for follow up and axial flexed knee x-rays to measure femoral rotation and FFA (angle between clinical transepicondylar line and mechanical axis of tibia). These values were compared between replaced and normal knees using Students T-test. Results:. 20 patients were eligible for the study. Femoral component rotation ranged from 4° internal to 5° external rotation (mean of 0.6° external). Mean difference in functional flexion axis was 3.7°, ranging from 0 to 6° (p<0.05). Conclusion:. The balanced gap technique is effective to restore the functional flexion axis of the replaced knee to that of the normal contralateral side

Background. While posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) implants are a more common total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, newer bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKAs are now being considered as an option for many patients, especially those that are younger. While PCR TKAs remove the ACL, the BCR TKA designs keep both cruciate ligaments intact, as it is believed that the resection of the ACL greatly affects the overall kinematic patterns of TKA designs. Various fluoroscopic studies have focused on determination of kinematics but haven't defined differentiators that affect motion patterns. This research study assesses the importance of the cruciate ligaments and femoral geometry for Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR) and Posterior Cruciate Retaining (PCR) TKAs having the same femoral component, compared to the normal knee. Methods. The in vivo 3D kinematics were determined for 40 subjects having a PCR TKA, 10 having a BCR TKA, and 10 having a normal knee, in a retrospective study. All TKA subjects had the same femoral component. All subjects performed a deep knee bend under fluoroscopic surveillance. The kinematics were determined during early flexion (ACL dominant), mid flexion (ACL/PCL transition) and deep flexion (PCL dominant). Results. During the first 30 degrees of flexion, the ACL played an important role, as subjects having a BCR TKA experienced kinematic patterns more similar to the normal knee. During mid flexion, both TKAs experienced random kinematic patterns, which could be due to the ACL and PCL being less active or resected in PCR TKA. In deeper flexion, both TKAs experienced kinematic patterns similar to the normal knee, thus supporting the assumption that the PCL played a dominant role [Fig. 1, Fig. 2]. All three groups generally experienced progressive axial rotation throughout flexion [Fig. 3]. On average, subjects having a PCR TKA experienced 112.3° of flexion, which was greater than the BCR subjects. Conclusions. Both the BCR TKA and normal groups experienced similar kinematic patterns, but the femoral geometrical differences from the anatomical condition may have influenced decreased motion compared to the normal knee. Both TKAs experienced similar kinematic patterns in deeper flexion, with the PCR TKA experiencing excellent weight-bearing flexion. Results from this study suggest that the cruciate ligaments can play a role in kinematics, but femoral geometry working with the ligaments may be an option to consider

Introduction. A common goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to restore normal knee kinematics. While substantial data is available on TKA kinematics, information regarding non-implanted knee kinematics is less well studied especially in larger patient populations. The objectives of this study were to determine normal femorotibial kinematics in a large number of non-implanted knees and to investigate parameters that yield higher knee flexion with weight-bearing activities. Methods. Femorotibial kinematics of 104 non-implanted healthy subjects performing a deep knee bend (DKB) activity were analyzed using 3D to 2D fluoroscopy. The average age and BMI were 38.1±18.2 years and 25.2±4.6, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine statistical correlations. Results. On average, subjects experienced 21.5±7.2 mm, 13.8±8.9 mm, and 27.1°±12.1° of lateral rollback, medial rollback, and external femorotibial axial rotation, respectively (Figure 1). Most rollback occurred in early flexion, with 10.2±6.4 mm and 5.3±6.3 mm of rollback for the lateral and medial condyles, respectively. While the lateral condyle consistently moved posteriorly, the medial condyle experienced 1.8±4.8 mm of anterior sliding between 90° to 120° of flexion. There was a positive correlation between higher weight-bearing flexion and lateral condylar rollback (r=0.5480, p<.0001) (Figure 2), medial condylar rollback (r=0.3188, p=0.001) (Figure 3), and external axial rotation (r=0.5505, p<.0001) (Figure 4). There was an inverse correlation between advancing age and knee flexion (r=-0.7358, p<.0001) as well as higher BMI and flexion (r=-0.3332, p=0.0007), indicating that multiple factors contribute to postoperative range-of-motion. Conclusion. This represents one of the largest studies on normal knee femorotibial kinematics in non-implanted healthy subjects. These results indicate that increased condylar rollback and external axial rotation correlate with increased weight-bearing knee flexion, while increased age and BMI yield decreased flexion. Therefore, in order to achieve higher weight-bearing flexion following TKA, normal-like kinematics such as high rollback and external axial rotation should be incorporated into TKA design. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

INTRODUCTION. In living normal knee the lateral femoral condyle rolls posteriorly more than the medial side to the extent that in deep flexion the lateral femoral condyle sublux from the tibial surface (Nakagawa et al). The purpose of this presentation is to study the tibiofemoral movement in patients who had full flexion after total knee replacements and to compare it with that of normal knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 23 knees were scanned using SIEMENS SIREMOBILE Iso-C with 3D Extension C-arm. The system is able reconstruct 3D images that can be viewed from deferent angle and precise measurements of distances between the deferent components of the implant can be made. The knee was scanned while the patient is sitting in kneeling position with the calf touching the thigh (flexion of over 150 degree). RESULTS. All the cases studied showed a variable roll back between the medial and lateral femoral condyle. In all cases the lateral roll back was much more than the medial. In 14 cases we confirmed lateral condyle subluxation similar to what is seen in normal knee. The position of the foot (internal or external rotation) during scanning did not affect the lateral femoral condyle role back. DISCUSSION. Although previous studies have shown paradoxical types of tibiofemoral movement in patients who have total knee replacements throughout the range of movement, the knees in patients who had full flexion after TKA tend to have the same tibiofemoral movement as the normal knee in deep flexion. The lateral femoral condyles spin off or subluxation could adversely affect the implant components especially if the design does not accommodate this movement. CONCLUSION. The lateral femoral condyle may sublux from the tibia during kneeling in patients who had full flexion after TKA. These findings should call for changes in the implant design to accommodate the lateral condyle roll back

Introduction. Many fluoroscopic studies on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have identified kinematic variabilities compared to the normal knee, with many subjects experiencing paradoxical motion patterns. The intent of this research study was to investigate the results of customized-individual-made (CIM) and off-the-shelf (OTS) PS and PCR TKA to determine kinematic variabilities and to assess these kinematic patterns with those previously documented for the normal knee. Methods. In vivo kinematics were assessed for 151 subjects – 44 with CIM-PCR, 75 with OTS-PCR, 14 with CIM-PS, and 18 with OTS-PS TKA – using a mobile fluoroscopic system and then evaluated using a 3D-2D registration technique. This was a multicenter evaluation so the group of implants were implanted by two surgeons and selected based on recruitment criteria. Each subject performed a deep knee bend activity (DKB) while under fluoroscopy. The kinematics assessed for each subject were condyle translation (LAP/MAP) and rotation (axial rotation). Results. During the DKB, the average LAP of the CIM-PCR was −2.0 mm (s = 4.0), the OTS-PCR was −2.1 mm (s = 3.0), the CIM-PS was −9.0 mm (s = 6.0), and the OTS-PS was −4.3 mm (s = 3.3) (Figure 1). The average MAP of the CIM-PCR was 2.0 mm (s = 2.9), the OTS-PCR was 2.4 mm (s = 3.3), the CIM-PS was −1.2 mm (s = 5.2), and the OTS-PS was 1.1 mm (s = 1.7) (Figure 2). The average axial rotation of the CIM-PCR was 4.6° (s = 5.8), the OTS-PCR was 5.7° (s = 4.8), the CIM-PS was 9.3° (s = 4.8), and the OTS-PS was 7.5° (s = 3.5) (Figure 3). Eleven of 44 (25%) subjects having a CIM-PCR TKA, 16/75 (21.3%) subjects having an OTS-PCR TKA experienced an anterior slide of their lateral condyle, while no subjects having a CIM-PS TKA and 3/18 (16.6%) of OTS-PS subjects experienced this slide. Nine of 44 (20.5%) CIM- PCR, 8/75 (10.6%) OTS-PCR experienced a reverse axial rotation pattern, while only one subject having a CIM-PS and not OTS-PS subjects experienced this non-normal rotation pattern. Discussion. Subjects having a CIM-PS TKA experienced the greatest amount of lateral condyle posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation, although less in magnitude to the normal knee seen in previous fluoroscopic studies. This was the only group to experience posterior motion of their medial condyle during flexion. More subjects having a PCR TKA experienced a paradoxical anterior lateral condyle sliding pattern and reverse axial rotation pattern, which was not commonly seen in the subjects having a PS TKA. Significance. Subjects that had a CIM-PS TKA demonstrated greater magnitudes of lateral condyle rollback and subjects having a PS TKA experienced more normal axial rotation patterns

Background. Although early TKA designs were symmetrical, during the past two decades TKA have been designed to include asymmetry, pertaining to either the trochlear groove, femoral condylar shapes or the tibial component. More recently, a new TKA was designed to include symmetry in all areas of the design, in the hopes of reducing design and inventory costs. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo kinematics for subjects implanted with this symmetrical TKA during a weight-bearing deep knee bend activity. Methods. In vivo deep knee bend (DKB) kinematics for 21 subjects implanted with symmetrical posterior cruciate sacrificing (PCS) fixed bearing TKA were obtained using fluoroscopy. A 3D-to-2D registration technique was used to determine each subjects anteroposterior translation of lateral (LAP) and medial (MAP) femoral condyles and tibiofemoral axial rotation and their weight-bearing knee flexion. Results. During the DKB, the average maximum weight-bearing flexion was 111.7° ± 13.3°. On average, from full extension to maximum knee flexion, subjects experienced 2.5 mm ± 2.0 mm femoral rollback on lateral condyle −2.5 mm ± 2.2 mm of medial condyle motion in the anterior direction (Figure 1). This medial condyle motion was consistent for the majority of the subjects with the lateral condyle exhibiting rollback from 0° to 60° of flexion and then an average anterior slide of 0.3 mm from 60° to 90° of flexion. On average, the subjects in this study experienced 6.6° ± 3.3° of axial rotation, with most of rotation occurring in early flexion, averaging 4.9° (Figure 2). Discussion. Although subjects in this study were implanted with a symmetrical TKA, they did experience femoral rollback of the lateral condyle and positive axial rotation. Both of these kinematic parameters were normal-like in pattern, compared to the normal knee in early flexion, but in deeper flexion the pattern of motion varied from the normal knee. Also, the magnitude of posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation revealed similarities to previous fluoroscopy studies on subjects implanted with an asymmetrical TKA design. This was only a single surgeon study, so it is unclear if the results are TKA or surgeon influenced. Therefore, it is proposed that more patients be analyzed having this TKA implanted by other surgeons. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Previous fluoroscopic studies of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have revealed significant kinematic differences compared to the normal knee. Often, subjects having a TKA experienced kinematic patterns opposite of the normal knee. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the in vivo kinematics of subjects implanted with either a customized-individual-made (CIM) or the traditional (OTS) PS TKA to determine if customization offers a distinct advantage to the patient. Methods. In-vivo kinematics were determined for 33 subjects, 15 having a CIM-TKA and 18 having OTS-TKA using a mobile fluoroscopic system and a 3D–2D registration technique. All of the subjects were implanted by a single surgeon and were scored to be clinically successful. Each subject underwent fluoroscopic observation while performing a weight-bearing (WB) deep knee bend (DKB) and chair rise (CR). The two groups were then compared for the range of motion, condyle translation, and axial rotation. Results. During the DKB, subjects having CIM-TKA demonstrated on average 112° of WB flexion compared to 94° of WB flexion for subjects having the OTS-TKA design. The CIM-TKA subjects experienced an average −11.7mm (s = 7.1) of lateral condyle posterior femoral rollback (PFR) compared to −4.69mm (s = 3.1) for OST-TKA subjects (Figure 1). All the CIM-TKAs and in 89% of the OTS-TKAs demonstrated PFR. The CIM subjects demonstrated 10.9° (s = 5.1) of axial rotation compared to 7.6° (s = 4.1) for OTS subjects (Figure 2). During extension, The CIM-TKA subjects demonstrated 5.1mm (s = 4.8) of the lateral condyle translation compared to 4.3mm (s = 2.7) for OTS subjects and all CIM-TKA subjects demonstrated anterior roll forward (ARF) versus 83% of OTS subjects. CIM-TKA subjects experienced −7.9° (s = 6.1) axial rotation compared to 8.2° (s = 6.0) for the subjects having OTS-TKA during extension. Discussion. During both activities, subjects with a CIM-TKA demonstrated a greater average range of motion and higher magnitudes of lateral condyle translation and axial rotation during both flexion and extension compared to OTS-TKA subjects. In addition to greater magnitudes of translation and rotation, the CIM subjects also demonstrated greater percentages of subjects with normal kinematic patterns, although less in magnitude compared to the normal knee. Further studies need be conducted and more subjects added to determine if the trends seen in this study are representative of a larger patient cohort. Significance. Subjects in this study, having a CIM-TKA demonstrated kinematic patterns and greater magnitudes of motion compared to subjects with an OTS-TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the fastest growing global health problem, with a total joint replacement being the only effective treatment for patients with end stage OA. Many groups are examining the use of bone marrow or adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to repair cartilage, or modulate inflammation to promote healing, however, little efficacy in promoting cartilage repair, or reducing patient symptoms over temporary treatments such as micro-fracture has been observed. There is a growing body of literature demonstrating that MSCs derived from the synovial lining of the joint are superior in terms of chondrogenic differentiation and while improvements in clinical outcome measures have been observed with synovial MSCs, results from clinical studies are still highly variable. Based on our results, we believe this variability in clinical studies with MSCs results in part from the isolation, expansion and re-injection of distinct MSCs subtypes in normal vs. OA tissues, each with differing regenerating potential. However, it remains unknown if this heterogeneity is natural (e.g. multiple MSC subtypes present) or if MSCs are influenced by factors in vivo (disease state/stage). Therefore, in this study, we undertook an ‘omics’ screening approach on MSCs from normal and OA knee synovial tissue. Specifically, we characterized their global proteome and genomic expression patterns to determine if multiple MSC from normal and OA joints are distinct at the protein/gene expression level and/if so, what proteins/genes are differentially expressed between MSCs derived from normal and OA synovial tissue. Synovium tissue was collected from OA patients undergoing joint replacement and normal cadaveric knees. The in vitro adipogenic, chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential of the MSCs was analyzed via qPCR and histology. Fully characterized MSC populations where then analyzed through an unbiased shotgun proteomics, and microarray analysis. Synovial MSCs isolated from both OA and normal knees demonstrated similar multipotent differentiation capacity. Likewise, both OA and normal MSCs display the typical MSCs cell surface marker profile in vitro (CD90+, CD44+, CD73+, CD105+). Using shotgun proteomics, 7720 unique peptides corresponding to 2183 proteins were identified and quantified between normal and OA MSCs. Of these 2183 proteins, 994 were equally expressed in normal and OA, MSCs, 324 were upregulated in OA MSCs (with 50 proteins exclusively expressed in OA MSCs), 630 proteins were upregulated in normal MSCs (with 16 proteins exclusively expressed in normal MSCs). Microarray analysis of normal and OA MSCs demonstrated a similar result in where, 967 genes were differentially expressed between normal and OA MSCs, with 423 genes upregulated in OA, and 544 genes upregulated in normal MSCs. In this project, we have demonstrated that although normal and OA synovial derived MSCs demonstrate similar multipotent differentiation potential and cell surface markers expression, these cells demonstrated significant differences at the molecular level (protein and gene expression). Further research is required to determine if these differences influence functional differences in vitro and/or in vivo and what drives this dramatic change in the regulatory pathways within normal vs. OA synovial MSCs

In replacing the human knee, we attempt to reproduce the stability of the normal knee so that the knee will feel as close to normal as possible to the patient. To answer the question, “Which features matter?” we must first examine the stability of the normal knee. Compliance and stiffness: Stability is measured as “force-displacement” behavior. That is, a force is applied to the knee and the relative motion is measured. Engineers refer to the curves generated by this type of experiment as “stiffness”. Because stiffness is not a term that orthopaedists like to hear when referring to a knee, the inverse term “compliance” often is used. Ligament stress-strain: The force-displacement test for ligaments is called a “stress-strain” curve and shows three regions of force-displacement response. Early in loading a small force causes considerable displacement. This is called the “toe region” of the curve. After a certain amount of displacement, the ligament enters the “elastic region” of the curve and becomes markedly more stiff. Finally, if enough force is applied, the ligament begins to fail at its “yield point”. Ligaments “live” in the toe region of the stress-strain curve. This can be seen clinically when, in response to varus-valgus and anteroposterior stress, the tibia moves relative to the femur until it is stopped by tension in the ligament. This is the ligament moving from the toe region into the elastic region. Compliance of the knee: In a number of studies done in the 1970s, the compliance of the knee was found to be least to both varus-valgus and anteroposterior loads in full extension. In flexion, compliance increases particularly to varus-valgus stress. This implies that the ligamentous structures about the knee are most tight in extension and become more lax in flexion. When external load is applied to the knee, either in the form of muscle contraction or bearing weight, the compliance of the knee decreases (i.e., it becomes more stiff and more stable). Loading will decrease the tension in the ligaments, yet the knee is less compliant. The only way this can happen is by the geometry of the surfaces imparting the stability. The conclusion from these studies is that the human knee, when moving in the usual plane of motion, is stabilised by the geometry of the surfaces, or the congruency of the femur and tibia. Ligaments are recruited to limit motion when forces outside the plane of motion (“out-of-plane” loads) are applied to the knee. These loads move the knee ligaments from the toe region into the elastic region of their stress-strain curve. Two kinds of total knee prosthesis design: Most total knees are designed to have little or no congruence between the femur and tibia, likely because of the worry about “kinematic conflict” that dates to the four-bar-linkage model of knee motion first proposed by Zuppinger in 1907. In these types of total knees, the ligaments are tensioned (i.e., “balanced”) so that they do the job done in the normal knee by congruence. A few total knees are designed for congruence between the femur and tibia, either in just the medial compartment or in both compartments. The answer to the question, “What is needed for total knee stability?” For non-congruent knee prostheses, the ligaments must be balanced or tensioned into the elastic portion of the stress-strain curve so that the knee is stable. The ligaments must remain in the elastic region indefinitely or the knee will be unstable. For congruent knee prostheses, the ligaments can be left in the toe region and rely, similar to the normal knee, on the geometry of the surfaces to provide stability and allow the ligaments to be recruited for out-of-plane loads. The ligaments must not be left too loose, lest the knee be unstable to out-of-plane loads but must not be as tight as is done with ligament tensioning prostheses

INTRODUCTION. In native knees anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and asymmetric shape of the tibial articular surface with a convex lateral plateau are responsible for differential medial and lateral femoral rollback. Contemporary ACL retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves knee function over ACL sacrificing (CR) TKA; however, these implants do not restore the asymmetric tibial articular geometry. This may explain why ACL retention addresses paradoxical anterior sliding seen in CR TKA, but does not fully restore medial pivot motion. To address this, an ACL retaining biomimetic implant, was designed by moving the femoral component through healthy in vivo kinematics obtained from bi-planar fluoroscopy and sequentially removing material from a tibial template. We hypothesized that the biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation would better restore activity dependent kinematics of normal knees, than ACL retention alone. METHODS. Kinematic performance of the biomimetic BCR design (asymmetric tibia with convex lateral surface), a contemporary BCR implant (symmetric shallow dished tibia) and a contemporary CR implant (symmetric dished tibia) was analyzed using KneeSIM software. Chair-sit, deep knee bend, and walking were analyzed. Components were mounted on an average bone model created from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 40 normal knees. Soft-tissue insertions were defined on the average knee model based on MRI data, and mechanical properties were obtained from literature. Femoral condyle center motions relative to the tibia were tracked to compare different implant designs. RESULTS. During simulated chair-sit, the biomimetic BCR implant showed knee motion similar to that reported for healthy knees in vivo including medial pivot rotation with greater rollback of the lateral femoral condyle (5 mm medial vs. 11 mm lateral). The CR implant showed posterior femoral subluxation in extension, paradoxical anterior sliding until 60° flexion followed by limited rollback until 105° with no medial pivot rotation. The conventional BCR implant reduced initial posterior shift of the femur in extension, however, medial pivot rotation and steady posterior rollback was not achieved. Similar trends were also found for deep knee bend activity. During walking the CR implant showed posterior subluxation in extension followed by anterior motion similar to the chair-sit activity. Both BCR implants showed less femoral excursion without posterior subluxation similar to published in vivo kinematics data for bi-uni patients. CONCLUSION. By simulating a variety of daily activities with different ranges of knee motion we were able to show that the ACL preserving biomimetic TKA implant could restore activity dependent normal knee kinematics unlike contemporary ACL retaining and ACL sacrificing implants. For chair-sit activity there was a clear medial pivot pattern for the biomimetic BCR design (unlike any other implant), while for lower flexion activities there was no medial pivot apparent in our simulations. These activity dependent knee motions are consistent with published in vivo kinematics and confirmed our hypothesis that biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation may be required to restore normal knee function. The biomimetic BCR design with its anatomical articular surface together with ACL preservation may provide patients with a more normal feeling knee following TKA surgery

Introduction:. While kinematic abnormalities of contemporary TKA implants have been well established, a solution has not yet been achieved. We hypothesized that contemporary TKA implants are not compatible with normal soft-tissue function and normal knee motion. We propose a novel technique for reverse engineering advanced implant articular surfaces (biomimetic surface), by using accurate 3D kinematics of normal knees. This technique accounts for surgical placement of the implants, and allows design of tibial and femoral articular surfaces in conjunction. Methods:. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to create 3D knee models of 40 normal subjects (24 male, 16 female, age 29.9 ± 9.7 years), and bi-planar fluoroscopy was used to capture 3D knee motion during a deep knee bend. These data were combined to create a 3D virtual representation of an average normal knee and its motion pathway. A TKA femoral component was mounted on the average knee, and moved through its normal kinematic pathway to carve out an articular surface from a tibial template (Fig. 1 and 2). The geometry of the resulting biomimetic tibia was compared to that of the native tibia, and a contemporary TKA tibial insert that uses the same femoral component. Results:. The biomimetic tibia had a dished medial plateau and a convex lateral plateau similar to the native tibia, with anterior/posterior lips analogous to the native menisci (Fig. 3). The anterior/posterior lips were carved by the femoral component at its end points in extension and full flexion (Fig. 2). In contrast, while the medial geometry of the contemporary TKA tibia was similar to the biomimetic tibia, the lateral geometry was significantly different (Fig. 3). Anteriorly, the contemporary tibia was excessively proud. The resulting soft-tissue tightening would prevent anterior location of lateral femoral condyle in extension, and block screw home femoral rotation. Posteriorly, again the contemporary tibia was excessively proud. The resulting soft-tissue tightening would prevent posterior rollback of the lateral femoral condyle in flexion. Conclusion:. The non-anatomic geometry of the contemporary TKA tibia, especially on the lateral side, conflicted with normal knee motion. In contrast, a biomimetic tibia reverse engineered directly from normal knee motion, had an anatomic geometry, with anterior/posterior lips similar to the native menisci. Such a biomimetic surface would allow normal soft tissue function and normal knee motion. The reverse engineering technique described herein enables for the first time, the direct use of in vivo knee kinematics to generate advanced implant articular surfaces

Background. Artificial total knee designs have revolutionized over time, yet 20% of the population still report dissatisfaction. The standard implants fail to replicate native knee kinematic functionality due to mismatch of condylar surfaces and non-anatomically placed implantation. (Daggett et al 2016; Saigo et al 2017). It is essential that the implant surface matches the native knee to prevent Instability and soft tissue impingement. Our goal is to use computational modeling to determine the ideal shapes and orientations of anatomically-shaped components and test the accuracy of fit of component surfaces. Methods. One hundred MRI scans of knees with early osteoarthritis were obtained from the NIH Osteoarthritis Initiative, converted into 3D meshes, and aligned via an anatomic coordinate system algorithm. Geomagic Design X software was used to determine the average anterior-posterior (AP) length. Each knee was then scaled in three dimensions to match the average AP length. Geomagic's least-squares algorithm was used to create an average surface model. This method was validated by generating a statistical shaped model using principal component analysis (PCA) to compare to the least square's method. The averaged knee surface was used to design component system sizing schemes of 1, 3, 5, and 7 (fig 1). A further fifty arthritic knees were modeled to test the accuracy of fit for all component sizing schemes. Standard deviation maps were created using Geomagic to analyze the error of fit of the implant surface compared to the native femur surface. Results. The average shape model derived from Principal Component Analysis had a discrepancy of 0.01mm and a standard deviation of 0.05mm when compared to Geomagic least squares. The bearing surfaces showed a very close fit within both models with minimal errors at the sides of the epicondylar line (fig 2). The surface components were lined up posteriorly and distally on the 50 femurs. Statistical Analysis of the mesh deviation maps between the femoral condylar surface and the components showed a decrease in deviation with a larger number of sizes reducing from 1.5 mm for a 1-size system to 0.88 mm for a 7-size system (table 1). The femoral components of a 5 or 7-size system showed the best fit less than 1mm. The main mismatch was on the superior patella flange, with maximum projection or undercut of 2 millimeters. Discussion and Conclusion. The study showed an approach to total knee design and technique for a more accurate reproduction of a normal knee. A 5 to 7 size system was sufficient, but with two widths for each size to avoid overhang. Components based on the average anatomic shapes were an accurate fit on the bearing surfaces, but surgery to 1-millimeter accuracy was needed. The results showed that an accurate match of the femoral bearing surfaces could be achieved to better than 1 millimeter if the component geometry was based on that of the average femur. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Background. Despite the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) restoration of normal function is often not achieved. Soft-tissue balance is a major factor leading to poor outcomes including malalignment, instability, excessive wear, and subluxation. Mechanical ligament balancers only measure the joint space in full extension and at 90° flexion. This study uses a novel electronic ligament balancer to measure the ligament balance in normal knees and in knees after TKA to determine the impact on passive and active kinematics. Methods. Fresh-frozen cadaver legs (N = 6) were obtained. A standard cruciate-retaining TKA was performed using measured resection approach and computer navigation (Stryker Navigation, Kalamazoo, MI). Ligament balance was measured using a novel electronic balancer (Fig 1, XO1, XpandOrtho, Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA). The XO1 balancer generates controlled femorotibial distraction of up to 120N. The balancer only requires a tibial cut and can be used before or after femoral cuts, or after trial implants have been mounted. The balancer monitors the distraction gap and the medial and lateral gaps in real time, and graphically displays gap measurements over the entire range of knee flexion. Gap measurements can be monitored during soft-tissue releases without removing the balancer. Knee kinematics were measured during active knee extension (Oxford knee rig) and during passive knee extension under varus and valgus external moment of 10Nm in a passive test rig. Sequence of testing and measurement:. Ligament balance was recorded with the XO1 balancer after the tibial cut, after measured resection of the femur, and after soft-tissue release and/or bone resection to balance flexion-extension and mediolateral gaps. Passive and active kinematics were measured in the normal knee before TKA, after measured resection TKA, and after soft-tissue release and/or bone resection to balance flexion-extension and mediolateral gaps. Results & Discussion. Overall the changes in knee balance affected passive kinematics more than active kinematics. Correcting a tight extension gap by resecting 4 mm from the distal femur had a significant effect on femoral rollback and tibial rotation and increased the varus-valgus laxity of the knee (Fig 2). Sequential release of the MCL increased active femoral rollback and tibial internal rotation primarily in flexion (Fig 3). Combinations of bone resections with ligament release had an additive effect. For example, MCL release combined with 2 mm resection of bone at the distal femoral cut increased total valgus laxity by 8° during passive testing. However, even after balancing the flexion-extension gap and the mediolateral gap knee kinematics were significantly different from the normal knee before TKA. Conclusions. The XO1 electronic balancer was very sensitive to changes in bone resection and sequential soft-tissue releases. Intraoperative ligament balance had a significant effect on active and passive kinematics. However, balancing the flexion-extension gap and the mediolateral gap did not restore kinematics to that of the normal knee. Ligament balance can have a profound impact on postoperative function, and that current recommendations for balancing the knee likely have to be reconsidered

Background. Rotational alignment is important for the long-term success and good functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is the generally accepted landmark on the distal femur, a precise and easily identifiable anatomical landmark on the tibia has yet to be established. Our aim was to compare five axes on the proximal tibia in normal and osteoarthritic (OA) knees to determine the best landmark for determining rotational alignment during TKA. Methods. One hundred twenty patients with OA knees and 30 without knee OA were recruited for the study. Computed tomography (CT) images were obtained and converted through multiplanar reconstruction so the angles between the sTEA and the axes of the proximal tibia could be measured. Five AP axes were chosen: the line connecting the center of the posterior cruciate ligament(PCL) and the medial border of the patellar tendon at the cutting level of the tibia (PCL-PT), the line from the PCL to the medial border of the tibial tuberosity (PCL-TT1), the line from the PCL to the border of the medial third of the tibia (PCL-TT2), the line from the PCL to the apex of the tibia (PCL-TT3), and the AP axis of the tibial prosthesis along with the anterior cortex of the proximal tibia (anterior tibial curved cortex, ATCC). Results. In OA knees, the mean angles were less than those in normal knees for all 5 axes tested. In normal knees, the angle of the ATCC axis had the smallest mean value (1.6° ± 2.8°) and the narrowest range. In OA knees, the angle of the PCL-TT1 axis had the smallest mean value (0.3° ± 5.5°); however, the standard deviation (SD) and range were wider than that of the angle of the ATCC axis. The mean angle of the ATCC axis was larger (0.8° ± 2.7°) than the angle of the PCL-TT1 axis, but the difference was not statistically significant (P =0.461). The angle of the ATCC axis had the smallest SD and the narrowest range. Conclusion. In OA knees, the AP axis of the proximal tibia showed greater internal rotation compared with normal knees. In our study, the ATCC was found to be the most reliable and useful anatomical landmark for tibial rotational alignment in TKA