Abstract
Background
Despite the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) restoration of normal function is often not achieved. Soft-tissue balance is a major factor leading to poor outcomes including malalignment, instability, excessive wear, and subluxation. Mechanical ligament balancers only measure the joint space in full extension and at 90° flexion. This study uses a novel electronic ligament balancer to measure the ligament balance in normal knees and in knees after TKA to determine the impact on passive and active kinematics.
Methods
Fresh-frozen cadaver legs (N = 6) were obtained. A standard cruciate-retaining TKA was performed using measured resection approach and computer navigation (Stryker Navigation, Kalamazoo, MI).
Ligament balance was measured using a novel electronic balancer (Fig 1, XO1, XpandOrtho, Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA). The XO1 balancer generates controlled femorotibial distraction of up to 120N. The balancer only requires a tibial cut and can be used before or after femoral cuts, or after trial implants have been mounted. The balancer monitors the distraction gap and the medial and lateral gaps in real time, and graphically displays gap measurements over the entire range of knee flexion. Gap measurements can be monitored during soft-tissue releases without removing the balancer.
Knee kinematics were measured during active knee extension (Oxford knee rig) and during passive knee extension under varus and valgus external moment of 10Nm in a passive test rig.
Sequence of testing and measurement:
-
Ligament balance was recorded with the XO1 balancer after the tibial cut, after measured resection of the femur, and after soft-tissue release and/or bone resection to balance flexion-extension and mediolateral gaps.
-
Passive and active kinematics were measured in the normal knee before TKA, after measured resection TKA, and after soft-tissue release and/or bone resection to balance flexion-extension and mediolateral gaps.
Results & Discussion
Overall the changes in knee balance affected passive kinematics more than active kinematics. Correcting a tight extension gap by resecting 4 mm from the distal femur had a significant effect on femoral rollback and tibial rotation and increased the varus-valgus laxity of the knee (Fig 2). Sequential release of the MCL increased active femoral rollback and tibial internal rotation primarily in flexion (Fig 3). Combinations of bone resections with ligament release had an additive effect. For example, MCL release combined with 2 mm resection of bone at the distal femoral cut increased total valgus laxity by 8° during passive testing. However, even after balancing the flexion-extension gap and the mediolateral gap knee kinematics were significantly different from the normal knee before TKA.
Conclusions
The XO1 electronic balancer was very sensitive to changes in bone resection and sequential soft-tissue releases. Intraoperative ligament balance had a significant effect on active and passive kinematics. However, balancing the flexion-extension gap and the mediolateral gap did not restore kinematics to that of the normal knee. Ligament balance can have a profound impact on postoperative function, and that current recommendations for balancing the knee likely have to be reconsidered.
