The posterior compartments of the knee are currently accessed arthroscopically through anterior, posteromedial or posterolateral portals. A direct posterior portal to access the posterior compartments has been overlooked due to a perceived high-risk of injury to the popliteal neurovascular structures. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and accessibility of a direct posterior portal into the knee. This cross-sectional study comprised a sample of 95 formalin-embalmed cadaveric knees and 9 fresh-frozen knees. Cannulas were inserted into the knees, 16mm from the vertical plane between the medial epicondyle of the femur and medial condyle of the tibia and 8 and 14mm (females and males respectively) from the vertical plane connecting the lateral femoral epicondyle and lateral tibial condyle. Landmarks were identified in full extension and cannula insertion was completed with the formalin-embalmed knees in full extension and the fresh-frozen in 90-degree flexion. Posterior aspects of the knees were dissected from superficial to deep, to assess potential damage caused by cannula insertion. Incidence of neurovascular damage was 9.6% (n=10); 0.96% medial cannula and 8.7% lateral cannula. The medial cannula damaged one small saphenous vein (SSV) in a male specimen. The lateral cannula damaged one SSV, 7 common fibular nerves (CFN) and both CFN and lateral cutaneous sural nerve in one specimen. All incidences of damage occurred in formalin-embalmed knees. The posterior horns of the menisci were accessible in all specimens. A medial-lying direct posterior portal into the knee is safe in 99% of occurrences. The lateral-lying direct posterior portal is of high risk to the CFN

Introduction. Several studies have described the relationship between the joint line and bony landmarks around the knee. However, high inter-patient variation makes these absolute values difficult in use. This study was set up to validate the previously described distances and ratios on calibrated full limb standing X-rays and to investigate the accuracy and reliability of these ratios as a tool for joint line reconstruction. Methods:. One hundred calibrated full-leg standing radiographs obtained from healthy volunteers were reviewed (fig 1). Distances from the medial epicondyle, the lateral epicondyle, the adductor tubercle, the fibular head and the proximal center of the knee (CJD) to the virtual prosthetic joint line were determined (fig 3). This prosthetic joint line was created by introducing a virtual distal femoral cutting block with a valgus angle of 6° on the full-leg radiographs. The adductor ratio was defined as the distance from adductor tubercle to the joint line divided by the femoral width. The correlation with the femoral width, the CJD and the limb alignment was analysed using linear regression analysis. The accuracy and reliability of the use of the ratio of the distance of the adductor tubercle, the medial epicondyle and the CJD relative to the femoral width to reconstruct the joint line was calculated. Results:. The average distance to the joint line from the medial epicondyle, the lateral epicondyle, the adductor tubercle and the fibular head was 28 mm (SD 2.97), 27 mm (SD 2.67), 44 mm (SD 4,27) and 15 mm (SD 3.69) respectively. The distance from the adductor tubercle (R = 0,82) and the CJD (R = 0,96) to the joint line showed a strong and significant linear correlation with the femoral width. The medial epicondyle, the lateral epicondyle and the fibular head showed less strong correlations. There was no significant correlation with the limb alignment. The adductor ratio was found to be 0.52 (SD 0.027) with only small inter-individual variation. The use of the adductor ratio reconstructed the joint line within 4 mm of its original level in 92% of the cases. Discussion. The absolute distances and ratios for determining joint line position as previously described, were confirmed on calibrated full-limb standing radiographs. Recently, the adductor tubercle has been described as a reliable landmark for determining joint line position. As a rule of thumb, the femoral width as measured on the preoperative radiograph or intra-operative, is divided by 2. Intra-operative, the distance from the adductor tubercle to the distal cutting block that has been inserted with a 6° distal cutting angle, is adjusted to equal the calculated value. Fixation of the cutting block at this level will automatically reconstruct the joint line at its original level (fig 2). Modern instrumentation techniques will allow you to immediately select the appropriate size distal femoral augment to reconstruct this joint level. Conclusion. The adductor ratio was found to be the most useful and accurate tool to restore the joint line to its original level in revision TKA

Surgeon-performed periarticular injection and anesthesiologist-performed femoral nerve or adductor canal block with local anesthetic have been used in multimodal pain management for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Anesthesiologist-performed adductor canal blocks are costly, time consuming, and may be unreliable. We investigated the feasibility of a surgeon-performed saphenous nerve (“adductor-canal”) block from within the knee joint. A retrospective analysis of 94 thigh-knee MRI studies was performed to determine the relationship between the width of the distal femur at the epicondylar axis and the proximal location of the saphenous nerve after its exit from the adductor canal and separation from the superficial femoral artery. After obtaining these data, TKA resections and trial component implantation were performed, using a medial parapatellar approach, in 11 fresh cadaveric lower extremity specimens. Using a blunt tip 1.5cm needle, we injected 10 ml each of two different colored solutions at two different intra-articular medial injection locations, and after 30 minutes, dissected the femoral and saphenous nerve and femoral artery from the hip to the knee to determine the location of the injections. Based upon the MRI analysis, the saphenous nerve was located (and had exited the adductor canal) at a mean of 1.5 times the epicondylar width in females, and mean 1.3 times the epicondylar width in males, proximal to the medial epicondyle. After placement of TKA trial components and injection, the proximal injection site solution bathed the saphenous nerve in 8 of 11 specimens. The proximal blunt needle and solution was adjacent, but did not puncture, the femoral artery and vein in only one specimen. This study suggests that a surgeon-performed injection of the saphenous nerve from within the knee is a feasible procedure. This technique may be a useful alternative to ultrasound guided block. A trial comparing surgeon and anesthesiologist-performed nerve block should be considered to determine the clinical efficacy of this procedure. Our anecdotal use of this intra-articular injection over the past year has been favorable. Newer, extended release anesthetic agents should be investigated with this technique

Introduction. Component position and overall limb alignment following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to influence device survivorship and clinical outcomes. However current methods for measuring post-operative alignment through 2D radiographs and CTs may be prone to inaccuracies due to variations in patient positioning, and certain anatomical configurations such as rotation and flexion contractures. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new vector based method for overall limb alignment and component position measurements using CT. The technique utilizes a new mathematical model to calculate prosthesis alignment from the coordinates of anatomical landmarks. The hypothesis is that the proposed technique demonstrated good accuracy to surgical plan, as well as low intra and inter-observer variability. Methods. This study received institutional review board approval. A total of 30 patients who underwent robotic assisted TKA (RATKA) at four different sites between March 2017 and January 2018 were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, non-randomized clinical study. CT scans were performed prior to and 4–6 weeks post-operatively. Each subject was positioned headfirst supine with the legs in a neutral position and the knees at full extension. Three separate CT scans were performed at the anatomical location of the hip, knee, and ankle joint. Hip, knee, and ankle images were viewed in 3D software and the following vertices were generated using anatomical landmarks: Hip Center (HC), Medial Epicondyle Sulcus (MES), Lateral Epicondyle (LE), Femur Center (FC), Tibia Center (TC), Medial Malleolus (MM), Lateral Malleolus (LM), Femur Component Superior (FCS), Femur Component Inferior (FCI), Coronal Femoral Lateral (CFL), Coronal Femoral Medial (CFM), Coronal Tibia Lateral (CTL), and Coronal Tibia Medial (CTM). Limb alignment and component positions were calculated from these vertices using a new mathematical model. The measurements were compared to the surgeons’ operative plan and component targeted positions for accuracy analysis. Two analysts performed the same measurements separately for inter-observer variability analysis. One of the two analysts repeated the measurements at least 30 days apart to assess intra-observer variability. Correlation analysis was performed on the intra-observer analysis, while Bland Altman analysis was performed on the inter-observer analysis. Results. Average measurement errors of overall limb alignments, femoral and tibial component position were less than 1 degree. Bland Altman plots for inter-observer analysis demonstrate great reproducibility in limb and component alignment measurements between surgeons with no bias. Correlation plots for intra-observer analysis demonstrate low variability with slopes ranging between 0.86 to 1.00 and R value greater than 0.88. Discussion. The proposed method demonstrated good accuracy to plan and low intra- and inter observer variability. This technique may be considered for assessing component position accuracy with post-operative CTs. Further studies are needed to investigate the robustness of the method in a larger cohort. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

It is unusual to require the use of a total knee implant with more constraint than a posterior-stabilised post in primary knee arthroplasty. The most common indication is a knee with a severe deformity, usually fixed valgus with an incompetent medial collateral ligament, and an inability to correctly balance the knee in both flexion and extension. The pre-operative deformity is usually greater than 15–20 degrees fixed valgus and may be associated with a severe flexion contracture. This is usually seen in an elderly female patient with advanced osteoarthritis. Those pre-operative diagnoses more likely to require a constrained design include advanced rheumatoid arthritis, true neuropathic joint, and the “Charcot-like” joint due to bone loss or crystalline arthritis. Rarely, patients with periarticular knee Paget's disease of bone may require more constraint following correction of a severe deformity through the knee joint. Beware those patients with a staple or screw at the medial epicondyle or those with severe heterotopic ossification at the medial joint line, as this may signify a serious prior injury to the medial collateral ligament. Finally, there is a possibility of inadvertent division of the medial collateral ligament intra-operatively. Although this situation may be treated with suture repair and bracing, my choice is to switch to more constraint and early unbraced motion. There are over 20 designs of varus-valgus constrained components, with a variety of tibial post designs with specific rotary and angular biomechanics, and many have the option of adding modular stems. Our experience with constrained, non-linked designs has been favorable with both the use of nonmodular and modular stem extensions. Longer-term survival analysis has shown a 96% survival at 10 years with these constrained components. However, the older designs frequently required a lateral retinacular release for proper patella tracking, and there were patella complications (fracture and osteonecrosis) in 16%. With a more modern design, over the past 12 years, the need for a lateral retinacular release and patella complications have been notably decreased. Varus-valgus constrained components have a small but important role in primary total knee arthroplasty for patients with severe deformity or an incompetent medial collateral ligament

A prospective study was done to assess the outcome of MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability using quadriceps graft. MPFL reconstruction was done using superficial strip of quadriceps by an anteromedial incision and attached close to medial epicondyle of femur. There were 15 knees in thirteen patients with a mean age of 23.4 years. All patients had MPFL reconstruction and 5 had tibial tuberosity transfers. With a mean follow-up of 39.4 (12–57) months, the mean pre-op Kujala scores improved from 47.8 to 87.2. The mean Lysholm scores improved from 54.2 to 86.8. None of the patients had patella re-dislocations. MPFL reconstruction with quadriceps graft appears to be effective producing good results in patients with patellar instability

Both gap balancing and measured resection for TKA will work and these techniques are often combined in TKA. The only difference is really the workflow. The essential difference in gap balancing is that you determine femoral component rotation by cutting the distal femur and the proximal tibia, and then using a spacer to determine femoral rotation. I prefer measured resection because I am, for most cases, a cruciate retaining surgeon. It is not ideal to determine femoral rotation based upon a gap balancing if you retain the cruciate. It is also important to maintain the joint line, especially in cruciate retention, in order to reproduce more normal kinematics and balance the knee throughout the range of flexion and extension. It is my opinion that the soft tissue balancing is easier to do with measured resection and the workflow is easier. The sequence of cuts and soft tissue balance is different if one is a gap balancing surgeon. This is more conducive for people who are cruciate substituters, but more difficult in a varus cruciate retaining knee. In that situation, if you determine femoral rotation by gap balancing with the tibia before you have cleared the posterior medial osteophytes in the varus knee, and remove the last bit of meniscus, you could artificially over rotate the femoral component causing posteromedial laxity. The major difference is that cutting the posterior cruciate will open the flexion space and allow the surgeon easier access to the posteromedial corner of the knee before the posterior femoral cut is made. It is also important to remember that in most cases cruciate substitution surgeons will make the flexion space 2 mm smaller than the extension space to compensate for the flexion space opening when the posterior cruciate is cut. The extensor mechanism plays an important role in flexion balance and should only be tested once the patella is prepared and the patella is back in the trochlear groove. I prefer gap balancing in most revision knees as I am virtually always substituting for the posterior cruciate in that case. My technique for measured resection is to assess the character of the knee prior to surgery. Is it varus? Is it valgus? Does it hyperextend? Does it have a flexion contracture? Would the knee be considered tight or loose? I cut the distal femur first, based upon measured resection. I use anatomic landmarks to determine femoral rotation. My most consistent landmark is the transtrochlear line, which is not always from the top of the notch to the bottom of the trochlea. I will use the medial epicondyle and the posterior reference in a varus knee, but not in a valgus knee. The tibial cut, also by measured resection, is easier once the femur has been prepared. The patellar cut is also a measured resection. Having done a preliminary soft tissue balance based upon the deformity, I will then use trial components to finish the soft tissue balance. In summary, both techniques can be used successfully in a cruciate substituting knee, but measured resection, in my opinion, is preferable especially in varus arthritis when the posterior cruciate is retained

The use of constrained condylar components (CCK) in primary total knee arthroplasty is infrequent and unusual. The usual indications are a severe fixed valgus deformity with a stretched or incompetent medial collateral ligament (MCL). This may occur in an elderly female patient with valgus osteoarthritis, advanced rheumatoid arthritis, or other less common disorders: polio, Parkinson's disease, and Paget's disease involving the knee. It may also be seen in younger patients with post-traumatic arthritis. Beware of the patient with a prior history of a knee injury in which staples were placed at the medial epicondyle of the femur or proximal tibia, indicating likely MCL injury, or a knee with extensive medial joint heterotopic ossification. An unusual indication for a primary CCK component is inadvertent injury or sectioning of the MCL during the procedure. This can occur with over-zealous medial ligament release or division with the saw during the posterior femoral condylar or proximal tibial resection. This has been reported to occur in <1% to 2.7% of knees. Treatment alternatives are to attempt repair and brace the knee or perform “internal bracing” with a CCK component. The author strongly favors the use of CCK components in this situation. We permit early full-weightbearing and range of motion, without restrictions. Careful intraoperative attention to component rotation is crucial to avoid patellar complications. The results of CCK components by the author and others have demonstrated a high rate of survival at 10 years, even in younger patients

Introduction. A femoral rotational alignment is one of the essential factors, affecting the postoperative knee balance and patellofemoral tracking in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To obtain an adequate alignment, the femoral component must be implanted parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA). We have developed “a superimposable Computed Tomography (CT) scan-based template”, in which the SEA is drawn on a distal femoral cross section of the CT image at the assumed bone resection level, to determine the precise SEA. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the rotational alignment of the femoral component positioned with the superimposed template in TKA. Patients and methods. Twenty-six consecutive TKA patients, including 4 females with bilateral TKAs were enrolled. To prepare a template, all knees received CT scans with a 2.5 mm slice thickness preoperatively. Serial three slices of the CT images, in which the medial epicondyle and/or lateral epicondyle were visible, were selected. Then, these images were merged into a single image onto which the SEA was drawn. Thereafter, another serial two CT images, which were taken at approximately 9 mm proximal from the femoral condyles, were also selected, and the earlier drawn SEA was traced onto each of these pictures. These pictures with the SEA were then printed out onto transparent sheets to be used as potential “templates” (Fig. 1-a). In the TKA, the distal femur was resected with the modified measured resection technique. Then, one template, whichever of the two potential templates, was closer to the actual shape, was selected and its SEA was duplicated onto the distal femoral surface (Fig. 1-b). Following that, the distal femur was resected parallel to this SEA. The rotational alignment of the femoral component was evaluated with CT scan postoperatively. For convention, an external rotation of the femoral component from the SEA was given a positive numerical value, and an internal rotation was given a negative numerical value. Results. The subjects were 4 knees in 4 males and 26 knees in 22 females. A mean age (for 30 knees) at the operation was 76.7 ± 6.1 years (range from 66.4 to 88.3). The posterior condylar angle was −0.27 ± 1.43, and the outlier, more than 3 degrees, was 1 case. Discussion. Conventionally, the SEA is palpated intraoperatively, however, the sulcus of the medial condyle sometimes cannot be identified precisely in osteoarthritic degeneration at the medial condyle. Also, the SEA is determined from the posterior condylar axis (PCA) by calculating the posterior condylar angle, which is between the SEA and the PCA, with the measurements from the preoperative CT scan. However, the residual cartilage thickness is not considered in this method, and thus, the SEA is possible to be inaccurate. The simple technology of our template allowed us to determine the SEA directly on the femoral surface, without any influence from bone degeneration. The femoral components could be implanted accurately, and therefore, the superimposed template was considered to improve TKA outcomes with the accurate SEA

Purpose. To validate accuracy of transepicondylar axis as a reference for femoral component rotation in primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods. A prospective study done from dec 2010 to dec 2011 at tertiary centre. 80 knees were included (43 females and 21 males). All surgeries were carried out by one senior arthroplasty surgeon. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included and all revision cases were excluded. Intraoperative assessment of TEA was done by palpating most prominent point on lateral epicondyle and sulcus on medial epicondyle and passing a k wire through it. Confirmation is done under image intensifier C arm with epicondylar view. Postoperative TEA was assessed by taking CT scan, measuring condylar twist angle and posterior condylar angle. Also correlation of femoral component rotation with postoperative anterior knee pain was assessed. Results. The mean PCA was around 4° with TEA as reference and only 10% patients required an additional lateral release of which 2% patient had preop patellar maltracking. No postoperative patellar maltracking was seen. Anterior knee pain was present in 8% patients. No postop infection is noted. Alignment ranging from 3° to 9° external rotation. Conclusion. TEA is most accurate reference for femoral component rotation even in severely deformed arthritic knees. Key words – Transepicondylar axis, total knee arthroplasty, femoral component rotation,

Purpose:. To compare accuracy of transepicondylar axis as a reference for femoral component rotation in primary navigated versus non navigated total knee arthroplasty in severely deformed knees. Methods:. A prospective study done from dec 2009 to dec 2011 at tertiary centre. 180 knees were included (124 females and 56 males). All cases were randomly allocated into 2 groups: navigated and non navigated. All surgeries were carried out by two senior arthroplasty surgeons. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included and all revision cases were excluded. Intraoperative assessment of TEA was done by palpating most prominent point on lateral epicondyle and sulcus on medial epicondyle and passing a k wire through it. Confirmation is done under image intensifier C arm with epicondylar view in Non navigated knees. Postoperative TEA was assessed by taking CT scan, measuring condylar twist angle and posterior condylar angle (PCA). Results:. The mean PCA was around 4° with TEA as reference in Navigated and 6° in Non navigated knees and only 7% patients required an additional lateral release of which 2% patient had preop patellar maltracking. No postoperative patellar maltracking was seen. Anterior knee pain was present in 10% patients. No postop infection is noted. Alignment ranging from 4° to 8° external rotation. Conclusion:. Navigation is most accurate measure for TEA as reference, as compared to non navigated TKA, which can lead to excessive external rotation especially in severely deformed knees

Aim. To investigate the effectiveness of a decision-based protocol designed to minimise the use of medial incisions when performing crossed-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus whilst minimising ulnar nerve injury. Method. We have employed a protocol for placing the medial wire during crossed k-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures dependent upon the medial epicondyle. When this is palpable, the wire is introduced percutaneously; when it is not, a mini-incision is made. All cases of closed reduction and crossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture over a three year period (2008–2011) were identified from our department database. Cases with a neurological injury identified pre-operatively, and those in which the protocol had not been followed were excluded. Casenotes were reviewed to determine the incidence and outcomes of post-operative ulnar nerve deficit. Results. A total of 106 cases were identified, from which 36 cases were excluded, leaving 70 cases in the study. The mean age was 5 (range 1–11). 68 were extension-type injuries, of which 29 (41%) were type 2 and 39 (56%) type 3 according to the classification of Gartland. 2 were flexion-type. A mini-incision for placement of the medial K-wire was required in only 3 cases (4.3%), with percutaneous placement in all other cases. There was clinical evidence of partial ulnar nerve injury in 1 case (1.4%) which recovered spontaneously within 11 months. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrate our protocol to be effective. Careful percutaneous placement of the medial wire can be performed in the majority of cases with little risk of significant or permanent injury to the ulnar nerve. Open placement of the medial wire is indicated in only a small proportion of cases. We suggest that the routine use of a medial mini-incision should be re-considered

Purpose. In total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), especially for elbows with condyle defect due to rheumatoid arthritis or trauma, determination of rotation alignment of implants is often difficult. To develop a navigation system for TEA, selecting bony landmarks that can be identified intraoperatively is important. Therefore, we developed a new roentgen free navigation system such as special alignment jigs for TEA based on CT data of normal elbows. The aim of this study was to evaluate alignments of implants after MIS-TEA using the new systems. And also, we reported that 6 bony landmarks on the elbow showed small variability in normal elbows by CT examinations and were considered to be usable as intraoperative landmarks for determining rotational position of implants last year. Especially in RA elbow, posterior aspect of humerus and ulnar aspect of proximal part of ulna were able to be identified even if there is a large bone defect that extends to the lateral or/and medial epicondyle. We used a new roentgen free navigation system in TEA with using Solar elbow from 2009. The aim of this study was to evaluate alignments of implants after MIS-TEA using the new systems by CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For determination of alignment and anatomical landmarks to develop the jigs, 3D-CT data of 11 normal elbows was investigated. The posterior aspect of humeral shaft and ulnar aspect of proximal ulna were selected as bony landmarks. Because these can be identified intraoperatively and remain in elbows with extensive bone loss. MIS-TEA with Solar Elbow (Stryker) using these new systems were investigated with postoperative 3D-CT in 14 elbows of 13 patients. Their average age was 68.8 years old. Basic diseases were 10 rheumatoid arthritis and 4 distal humerus injuries. The alignments of humeral and ulnar component were measured on postoperative 3D-CT. RESULTS. Rotational alignment (humerus / ulna) was pronation 6.8° ± 5.7° / pronation 4.6° ± 9.1°; frontal alignment was valgus 0.1° ± 2.7° / valgus 0.1° ± 3.7°; and sagittal alignment was extension 0.6° ± 3.0° / extension 8.9° ± 2.5°. In condyle-defect group (n=5), comparable alignment with condyle-preserved group was obtained. DISCUSSION. The new systems were effective in determining intraoperative alignment even in elbows with extensive bone defect. Extension alignment of the ulna component is because the short component of Solar Elbow was placed along the center axis of the proximal ulna, which inclines in the extension direction relative to the axis of distal ulna

Accurate comparison of outcomes regarding various surgical options in knee arthroplasty calls for an improved method of joint line analysis that takes into account the preoperative cartilage thickness. Current methods for measuring joint lines have limitations. This is commonly done on anteroposterior or lateral radiographs, by measuring landmarks defining the joint line with reference to a common landmark such as the fibular head, the medial femoral epicondyle or the tibial tuberosity. These radiographic methods are unable to measure important differences between the medial and lateral joint lines. Furthermore, poor accuracies due to sensitivity to patient and X-ray beam positions have been reported for these methods. The aim of this study was to introduce a method to measure the joint line shift for any desired flexion angle of the joint by taking into account the cartilage thickness on both the medial and lateral sides and under weightbearing conditions. The suggested method inludes four steps (Figure 1): a) preoperative joint imaging and 3D-2D matching between pre-operative 3D models and bi-planar 2D images; b) postoperative joint imaging and 3D-2D matching between implant 3D models and 3D models of the bones to bi-planar 2D images; c) superimposition of the locations of the implant components on the preoperative joint positions to determine changes in the joint line on the medial and lateral sides of the joint for both extension and flexion positions. To determine the tibial joint line, the three-dimensional model of the polyethylene inlay was added to the metal tray according to the design of its locking mechanism. Two-dimensional cross-sectional slices of the combined bone and implant models were obtained perpendicular to the tibial tray and passed through the most distal points of the medial and lateral condyles of the femoral component. Joint line shift was measured as the distance between the most distal point on the condyle of the femoral component and the most proximal point on the articular surface of the tibial polyethylene in the direction normal to the mediolateral edge of the tibial tray in the cross-sectional slice. The method was tested on six cadaveric specimens. The joint line shift, measured using the new method, was in the range of −0.2 to 1.3 mm on average (SD=1.3 to 3.8 mm for medial and lateral, flexion and extension). This was significantly different (p≤0.01) from the results of a previously post-op based registration method which did not account for the cartilage thickness. These results demonstrate the importance of the preoperative joint space when analyzing the joint line, and highlight the utility of the newly introduced method. The method introduced in this study combines the preoperative and postoperative images to provide accurate 3D measures of joint line shifts. The method incorporates cartilage thickness in the analysis and is insensitive to patient and X-ray beam position, and can be applied at any flexion angle of the knee. The method yields much smaller measures of joint line shift than a previous approach, which suggests that the previous method may have overestimated joint line shift substantially

Background. Recent anthropometric studies have suggested that current design of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) does not cater to racial anthropometric differences. The purpose of this study was to investigate the exact sizing and rotational landmarks of the distal femur collected and its gender differences from a large group of healthy Southern Chinese using 3D-CT measurements, and then compare these measurements to the five total knee prostheses conventionally used in China. Methods. This study evaluated distal femoral geometry in 85 healthy Southern Chinese, included 39 females (78 knees) and 46 males (92 knees) with a mean age of 33.9 years，a mean height of 164.7 cm and a mean weight of 59.9 kg. The width of the articular surface as projected onto the transepicondylar line(ML), anteroposterior dimension (AP), the dimensions from medial/lateral epicondyle to posterior condylar (MEP/LEP) were measured. A characterization of the aspect ratio (ML/AP) was made for distal femur. The angles between the tangent line of the posterior condylar surfaces, the Whiteside line, the transepicondylar line, and the trochlear line were measured. The sulcus angle and hip center-femoral shaft angle were also measured [Fig. 1]. The data were compared with the five total knee prostheses conventionally used in China. In analyzing the data, best-fit lines were calculated with use of least-squares regression. The dimensions are summarized as the mean and standard deviation. Comparisons of dimensions between males and females were made with use of the two-sample t test. A p value of <0.05 indicated a significant effect. Results. Within the population, males had larger ML, AP values and aspect ratio than females (ML: 70.44±3.04 vs. 61.40±2.62 mm, P<0.001; AP: 62.26±2.93 vs. 56.49±2.88 mm, P<0.001; 1.06±0.05 vs. 1.11±0.03, P<0.001). In addition, we found a gradual decrease in the aspect ratio corresponding to an increase in AP dimension, as seen in other studies. The transepicondylar axis was a reliable landmark to properly rotate the femoral component, so we used the MEP and LEP evaluate posterior condylar offset, the values were respectively 28.90±3.00 mm and 22.73±2.67 mm. However, most angles were almost the same between males and females. To evaluate the suitability shape of the femoral components currently used in China, we drawed and calculated best-fit lines for the AP, ML dimensions and aspect ratios of the femur and the five prostheses. For females, there was a significant association between the prostheses size and the amount of overhang, the femoral prostheses for females tended to be too large for a given AP dimension, with larger sizes having more overhang, especially in ML dimensions. In males, the morphologic data tended to be bigger than the prosthetic designs in the ML dimension for a given AP dimension, the femoral aspect ratio was higher for smaller knees and proportionally lower for larger knees[Fig. 2, 3]. Conclusion. Because dimensions of the distal femur and the aspect ratio tend to be smaller in Southern Chinese populations, whereas sulcus angles tend to be larger, designs for knee implants should be modified to improve the outcome of surgical treatment in this population

Background. Recent anthropometric studies have suggested that current design of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) does not cater to racial anthropometric differences. The purpose of this study was to investigate the exact sizing and rotational landmarks of the distal femur collected from a large group of healthy Southern Chinese using three dimensional computer tomographic measurements, and then compare these measurements to the known dimensions from Caucasian populations. Methods. This study evaluated distal femoral geometry in 125 healthy Southern Chinese, included 58 women (106 knees) and 67 men (134 knees) with a mean age of 35.2±8.11 years, a mean height of 165.5±7.94 cm, and a mean weight of 61.7±9.56 kg. The width of the articular surface as projected onto the transepicondylar line(ML), anteroposterior dimension (AP), the dimensions from medial/lateral epicondyle to posterior condylar (MEP/LEP)were measured. A characterization of the aspect ratio (ML/AP) was made for distal femur[Fig. 1]. The angles between the tangent line of the posterior condylar surfaces, the Whiteside line, the transepicondylar line, and the trochlear line were measured. The sulcus angle and hip center-femoral shaft angle were also measured. Known dimensions from Caucasian populations were compared with the morphologic data collected in this study[Fig. 2]. In analyzing the data, best-fit lines were calculated with use of least-squares regression. The dimensions are summarized as the mean and standard deviation. The differences of rotational landmarks and sizing between the Southern Chinese and Caucasians were assessed with use of the Student t test. A p value of <0.05 indicated a significant effect. Results. Within the Southern Chineses population, males had larger ML and AP values than females (ML: 70.38±3.09 vs. 62.09±2.52mm, P<0.001; AP: 63.68±2.82 vs. 57.83±2.91mm, P<0.001). The results also showed that Southern Chinese knees were generally smaller than Caucasian (ML: 67.27±4.95 vs. 76.8±7.2mm, P<0.001). The femoral aspect ratio of Southern Chinese was significantly smaller than Caucasian (1.09±0.04 vs. 1.28±0.06, P<0.001). In addition, we found a gradual decrease in the aspect ratio corresponding to an increase in anteroposterior dimension in the distal femur of Southern Chinese, as seen in most other studies. The transepicondylar axis was found to be a reliable landmark to properly rotate the femoral component, so we used the femoral condylar MEP and LEP evaluate posterior condylar offset, the values were respectively 28.62±2.18mm and 22.50±2.19mm. From this study, most of the angles were different from Caucasian. Anteroposterior line minus epicondylar line angle was 90.14±1.30° (Caucasian 90.33±2.44°, P>0.05), anteroposterior line minus posterior condylar line angle was 83.18±1.94° (Caucasian 86.82±2.71°, P<0.001), epicondylar line minus posterior condylar line angle was 7.00±1.70° (Caucasian 3.60±2.02°, P<0.001), trochleoepicondylar angle was 12.45±2.34°(Caucasian 4.95±2.15°, P<0.001), sulcus angle was 147.40±4.69° (Caucasian 139.6±6.96°, P<0.001). The angle between mechanical and anatomic axis of the femur was 5.92±0.47°(Caucasian 6.33±2.42°, P<0.001). Conclusion. Because dimensions of the distal femur and the aspect ratio tend to be smaller in Southern Chinese populations, whereas sulcus angles tend to be larger, designs for knee implants should be modified to improve the outcome of surgical treatment in this population. The Larger epicondylar line minus posterior condylar line angles, and the smaller angle between mechanical and anatomic axis seen in Southern Chinese populations also requires us to pay particular attention to surgical technique, in order to ensure patient safety