Abstract
Aim
To investigate the effectiveness of a decision-based protocol designed to minimise the use of medial incisions when performing crossed-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus whilst minimising ulnar nerve injury.
Method
We have employed a protocol for placing the medial wire during crossed k-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures dependent upon the medial epicondyle. When this is palpable, the wire is introduced percutaneously; when it is not, a mini-incision is made.
All cases of closed reduction and crossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture over a three year period (2008–2011) were identified from our department database. Cases with a neurological injury identified pre-operatively, and those in which the protocol had not been followed were excluded. Casenotes were reviewed to determine the incidence and outcomes of post-operative ulnar nerve deficit.
Results
A total of 106 cases were identified, from which 36 cases were excluded, leaving 70 cases in the study. The mean age was 5 (range 1–11). 68 were extension-type injuries, of which 29 (41%) were type 2 and 39 (56%) type 3 according to the classification of Gartland. 2 were flexion-type.
A mini-incision for placement of the medial K-wire was required in only 3 cases (4.3%), with percutaneous placement in all other cases.
There was clinical evidence of partial ulnar nerve injury in 1 case (1.4%) which recovered spontaneously within 11 months.
Conclusion
The results of this study demonstrate our protocol to be effective. Careful percutaneous placement of the medial wire can be performed in the majority of cases with little risk of significant or permanent injury to the ulnar nerve. Open placement of the medial wire is indicated in only a small proportion of cases. We suggest that the routine use of a medial mini-incision should be re-considered.
