Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is effective for the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Conventional techniques utilizing manual instrumentation (MI) make use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. While MI techniques can achieve excellent results in the majority of patients, those with ipsilateral hardware, post-traumatic deformity or abnormal anatomy may be technically more challenging, resulting in poorer outcomes. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) is an alternative that utilizes fixed trackers and anatomic registration points, foregoing the need for intramedullary guides. This technique has been shown to yield excellent results including superior alignment outcomes compared to MI with fewer outliers. However, studies report a high learning curve, increased expenses and increased operative times. As a result, few surgeons are trained and comfortable utilizing CAN. Patient-specific instrumentation is an alternative innovation for total knee arthroplasty. Custom guide blocks are fabricated based on a patient's unique anatomy, allowing for the benefits of CAN but without the increased operative times or the high learning curve. In this study we sought to evaluate the accuracy of PSI techniques in patients with previous ipsilateral hardware of the femur. Methods. After reviewing our database of 300 PSI total knee arthroplasty patients, 16 were identified (10 male, 6 female) using the Zimmer NexGen Patient Specific Instrumentation System. Fourteen patients included in the study had a preexisting total hip arthroplasty on the ipsilateral side [Figure 1], 1 had a sliding hip screw, and 1 patient had a cephalomedullary nail. Postoperative mechanical axis alignment measurements were performed using plain long-standing radiographs [Figure 2]. The American Knee Society Score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes postoperatively. Results. Sixteen total knee arthroplasties were performed using PSI, all in the setting of previous ipsilateral hardware placement. The average age at the time of surgery was 72, with patients ranging from 56 to 85 years of age [Table 1]. 11 of the included knees had a preoperative varus alignment and 5 had valgus alignment. The average value of a deformity identified via the preoperative planning software was 7.9°(1.5°–15.7°). The average value of a deformity identified via preoperative radiographs was 10.1°(2.2°–14.7°). Average postoperative mechanical axis was 3.1° (1°–5.3°) measured from plain radiographs. Average angle between the FMA and femoral component was 90.0° (85.3°–94.1°). The average angle between the TMA and tibial component was 90.6°(87.6°–92.9°). The average difference between the femoral mechanical and anatomic axes was 5.9°(3.4°–7.0°). The average discrepancy between medial and lateral joint space on an anterior-posterior standing radiograph was 0.4mm(0.0mm–1.1mm). At an average of 4.5 months follow-up, American Knee Society knee scores show an aggregate average score of 82.94. Conclusions. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is an innovative technology in TKA that replaces the use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. This study demonstrates that PSI is capable of producing favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes despite preexisting ipsilateral hardware, which may otherwise preclude the use of customary manual instrumentation. We believe PSI is an accurate and effective tool for use in patients with preexisting ipsilateral hardware

Purpose. Use of theguide angle method using intramedullary guide angle for distal femoral cutting in total knee arthroplasty may cause error when rotation of the femur occurs or the insertion point of the intramedullary guide is incorrectly positioned in preoperative radiography. On the other hand, use of the measured cutting method, in which resection of distal femoral condyles is performed according to predicted measured thickness in a preoperative radiograph can allow for correction of these errors intraoperatively. Therefore, we compared these two distal femoral bone cutting methods for restoration of accurate coronal alignment. Methods. Between 2010 and 2012, 47 patients (70 knees) underwent total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis with varus deformity and flexion contracture less than 10 degrees. Bone resection depending on distal femur resection thickness measured before the operation was performed in 38 cases (Group I). Distal femoral cutting using the guide angle was performed in 32 cases (Group II). Radiographic evaluation, including mean value of lower leg mechanical axis angle and the frequency of errors of more than 3 degrees, was performed for comparison between the two groups. Results. In Group I, mechanical axis was corrected from 8.4 ± 4.9 degrees (−7.2 to 16.9) on average before the operation to 0.1 ± 2.4 degrees (−5.87 to 2.98) after the operation, and, in Group II, from 6.7 ± 3.6 degrees (0.4 to 14.7) on average before the operation to 0.5 ± 2.8 degrees (−5.4 to 6.9) after the operation. No statistically significant difference in mechanical axis (p = 0.554) was observed between the two groups after the operation, and no difference in errors of more than 3 degrees was observed between the two groups, with four of 38 cases (11 %) in Group I and six of 32 cases (19%) in Group II (p = 0.495). Conclusions. No significantly different results were observed between the measured resection technique and the existing guide angle technique. Therefore, predictive measurement of distal femoral cutting thickness is another useful method for restoration of accurate coronal alignment

It is very difficult to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for severe varus bowing deformity of femur. We performed simultaneous combined femoral supra-condyle valgus osteotomy and TKA for the case had bilateral varus knees with bowing deformity of femurs. Case presentation. A 62-year-old woman consulted our clinic with bilateral knee pain and walking distability. She was diagnosed rickets and had bilateral severe varus bowing deformity of femurs from an infant. Her height was 133 cm and body weight was 51 kg. Bilateral femur demonstrated severe bowing and her knee joint demonstrated varus deformity with medial joint line tenderness, no local heat, and no joint effusion. Bilateral knee ROM was 90 degrees with motion crepitus. Bilateral lower leg demonstrated mild internal rotation deformity. Bilateral JOA knee score was 40 Roentgenogram demonstrated knee osteoarthritis with incomplete development of femoral condyle. Mechanical FTA angles were 206 degree on the right and 201 on the left. She was received right simultaneous femoral supra-condyle valgus osteotomy with TKA was performed at age 63. Key points of surgical techniques were to use the intramedullary guide for valgus osteotomy as temporary reduction and fixation then performed mono-cortical locking plate fixation. Several mono cortical screws were exchanged to bi-cortical screws after implantation of the femoral component with long stem. Cast fixation performed during two weeks and full weight bearing permitted at 7 weeks after surgery. Her JOA score was slightly improved 50 due to other knee problems at 9 months after surgery, her right mechanical FTA was decreased to 173, and she received left simultaneous femoral supra-condyle valgus osteotomy with TKA as the same technique at April of this year. She has been receiving rehabilitation at now. Conclusions. Most causes of varus knee deformity are defect or deformity of medial tibial condyle and TKA for theses cases are not difficult to use tibial augment devices. However the cases like our presentation need supra-femoral condyle osteotomy before TKA. It was easy and useful to use intramedullary guide for valgus osteotomy as temporary reduction and fixation then performed mono-cortical locking plate fixation before TKA

Introduction. Stryker computer navigation system has been used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures since October 2008 at the Russian Ilizarov Scientific Centre for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics. Material and methods. There have been 126 computer assisted TKA that accounted for 11.5 % of primary TKA within this period (1096 procedures). Arthritis of the knee joints with evident pain syndrome was an indication to TKA surgery. Arthritis of the knee joint of 27 patients (21.4 %) was accompanied by femoral deformity of various etiology with debris found in the medullary canal in several cases. The rest 99 patients (78.6 %) were regular cases of primary TKA. Results. We compared the results of correction of lower limb biomechanical axis with TKA employing navigation and without computer assistance. Regular TKA procedures showed no substantial difference in the correction of biomechanical axis. Complete correction using computer navigation was achieved in 85 % of the cases versus 79 % of the patients without navigation. The deformity up to 3° developed in 14 % of navigated cases and in 17 % of the cases without computer assistance. An error of deformity correction was 3–5° in 4 % of the cases without computer navigation. Those were cases of challenging primary TKA. So the advantages of computer navigation have become evident with greater deformities, and in the cases when intramedullary guide can hardly be used due to severe deformities in the femoral metaphysis and diaphysis, after several operative procedures of osteosynthesis with deformed, obliterating bone marrow canal or presence of debris. Complete correction using computer navigation was achieved in 85.2 % cases versus 42.8 % patients without navigation. Postoperative varus of 2° was observed in 14.8 % cases (valgus or varus deformity of 3° developed in 28.6 % of the cases without computer assistance). Conclusion. What is better: special instrumentation or navigation?. Current instrumentation can provide regular mechanical control of the limb axis and is based on the principles of intramedullary, extramedullary and even double guide placement. Image-free navigation and standard surgical techniques can equally be used for simple cases of primary TKA. Same landmarks are used. These landmarks are determined by a surgeon quite subjectively and can lead to inadequate usage of special instrumentation and computer navigation. However, computer navigation should be used in the cases when intramedullary guide can hardly be used, not desirable or possible. Special instrumentation can fail in setting a valgus angle needed with extraarticular femoral deformity. Navigation allows determining rotation more precisely in the cases when posterior femoral condyles contour (posttraumatic condition, hypoplastic condyles) is distorted. Assessment of ligament balance can be rather subjective when special instrumentation is used. Application of computer navigation is helpful for measurements of flexion and extension gaps sixe and regularity. Computer navigation is contraindicated for contractures and ankyloses of the hip joint. For the rest of the cases the choice of instrumentation is a surgeon's decision

INTRODUCTION. Despite clear clinical advantages Unicompartimetal Knee Replacement (UKR) still remain a high demanding and less forgiving surgical procedure. Different Authors in literature pointed out how in coronal tibial malalignment beyond 3° as well as tibial slope beyond 7° increase the rate of aseptic failure. Likewise, overcorrection in the coronal plain is a well recognised cause of failure because of an overweighting on the controlateral compartment. Furthermore it has been shown how in UKR surgery even using short narrow intramedullary guide this can cause errors in both coronal planes. Computer assisted surgery has been proposed to improve implant positioning in joint replacement surgery with no need of intramedullary guide. Likewise more recently Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested as a new technology capable of new advantages such as shorter surgical times and lower blood losses maintaining at least the same accuracy. Aim of this prospective study is to present comparing 2 groups of UKRs using either a computer assisted technique or a CT based PSI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Since January 2010 54 patients undergoing UKR because of medial compartment arthritis were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before surgery patients were alternatively assigned to either computer-assisted alignment (group A) or PSI group (group B). In the group A (27 knees) the implant (Sigma, Depuy Orthopaedics Inc, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) was positioned using a CT-free computer assisted alignment system specifically created for UKR surgery (OrthoKey, Delaware, USA USA). In group B (27knees) the implant (GMK uni, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) was performed using a CT-Based PSI technology (MyKnee, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). In both the groups all the implants were cemented and using always a fixed metal backed tibial component. The duration of surgery and all the complications according to Kim classification were documented in all cases. Six months after surgery each patient had long-leg standing anterior-posterior radiographs and lateral radiographs of the knee. The radiographs were assessed to determine the Frontal Femoral Component angle (FFC), the Frontal Tibial Component angle (FTC), the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation (slope) of both tibial and femoral component. The number and percentage of outliners for each parameter was determined. In addition the percentage of patients from each group with all 5 parameters within the desired range was calculated. Furthermore at the latest follow-up the 2 groups were clinically assessed using KSS and Functional score. RESULTS. At the last assessments there were no differences in the clinical outcome. The mean surgical time was longer in the navigated group of a mean of 5.9 minutes without any statistical differences in complications. The mechanical axis, tibial slope the FTC angle were significantly better aligned in the navigated group. A statistically significant higher number of outliners was seen in the PSI group. The number of implants with all 5 radiological parameters aligned within the desired range was statistically higher in the navigated group. All the implants in the navigated group were correctly aligned in all the planned parameters. DISCUSSION. To our knowledge this is the first prospective study in literature assessing navigation compared to PSI technique in UKR surgery. Despite a slight not significant longer surgical time in the navigated group, at a short follow-up the results could not demonstrate any clinical diffences between the 2 technologies However according to their results the Authors indicate navigation as more helpful in UKR surgery compared to PSI technology in terms of accuracy

Introduction:. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective operation for the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Conventional technique utilizing manual instrumentation (MI) allows for reproducible and accurate execution of the procedure. The most common techniques make use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extrameduallary or intrameduallary tibial guides. While these methods can achieve excellent results in the majority of patients, those with ipsilateral hardware, post-traumatic deformity or abnormal anatomy may preclude the accurate use of these techniques. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is an alternative innovation for total knee arthroplasty. Utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), custom guide blocks are fabricated based on a patient's unique anatomy. This allows for the benefits of computer assisted navigation (CAN) but without the increased operative times or the high learning curve associated with it. Furthermore it allows the use of familiar cutting blocks and guides to check the accuracy of the PSI guide blocks. In this study we sought to evaluate the accuracy of PSI techniques in patients with previous ipsilateral hardware, which would make the use of MI technically challenging and possibly subject to inaccuracy. Methods:. After reviewing our database of 300 PSI total knee arthroplasty patients, 16 patients were identified (10 male, 6 female) using the Zimmer NexGen Patient Specific Instrumentation System. Fourteen patients included in the study had a preexisting total hip arthroplasty on the ipsilateral side, 1 had a preexisting sliding hip screw, and 1 patient had a preexisting cephalomedullary nail. Postoperative mechanical axis alignment measurements were performed using plain long-standing radiographs. The American Knee Society Score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes postoperatively. Results:. Sixteen total knee arthroplasties were performed using PSI, all in the setting of previous ipsilateral hardware placement. The average age at the time of surgery was 72, with patients ranging from 56 to 85 years of age. Eleven of the included knees had a preoperative varus alignment and 5 had valgus alignment. The average value of a deformity identified via the preoperative planning software was 7.85°. The average value of a deformity identified via preoperative radiographs was 10.1°. Average postoperative mechanical axis was 3.1° measured from plain radiographs. Average angle between the femoral mechanical axis and femoral component was 90.0°. The average angle between the tibial mechanical axis and tibial component was 90.6°. The average difference between the femoral mechanical and anatomic axes was 5.9°. The average discrepancy between medial and lateral joint space on an anterior-posterior standing radiograph was 0.4 mm. At an average of 4.5 months follow-up, American Knee Society knee scores show an aggregate average score of 82.94. Conclusion:. Patient specific instrumentation is an innovative technology in TKA that replaces the use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. This study demonstrates that PSI is capable of producing favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes despite preexisting ipsilateral hardware, which may preclude the use of customary manual instrumentation. We believe PSI is an accurate and effective tool for use in patients with preexisting ipsilateral hardware

Introduction. Intramedullary femoral alignment guide is mostly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Accurate preoperative plan is critical to get good alignments when we use intramedullary femoral guide, because the center of femoral head cannot be looked directly during operation. Commonly, the planning is carried out using preoperative anteroposterior radiographs of the femur. The angles formed between mechanical axes of the femur and distal femoral anatomic axes (AMA) are measured as reference angles of resection of distal femur, and the entry points of intramedullary femoral guide are also planned. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of femoral position on radiographic planning in TKA. Materials and Methods. We examined 20 knees of 20 female patients who received TKA. Fourteen patients suffered from primary osteoarthritis of the knees, and 6 suffered from rheumatoid arthritis. Fifteen patients have varus knee deformities and 5 patients have valgus knee deformities. Long leg computed topography scans were performed in all cases before operations, and all images were stored in DICOM file format. The analyses were performed with computer software (3D template, JMM, Osaka, Japan) using DICOM formatted data. The planes containing the center of femoral head and transepicondylar axes were defined as reference planes, and the reference planes were fixed all through analyses. At first, to assess the influence of femoral rotation, the femur was rotated from 30 degrees external rotation to 30 degrees internal rotation in 5 degrees increments in full extension. After that, to examine the influence of knee flexion, the knee was bended from full extension to 30 degrees flexion in 5 degrees increments in neutral rotation. Reconstructed coronal planes parallel to the reference planes were made, the angles between mechanical axes of the femur and distal femoral anatomic axes (AMA) and the distance from entry points to the center of femoral intercondylar notch were measured in each position. The distal anatomic axes were made by connecting the center of femoral canal at 8 centimeters proximal to joint line and that at 16 centimeters proximal to joint line. The entry points of intramedullary femoral guide were defined the points where distal anatomic axes meets intercondylar notch. Results. The mean AMA was 6.8 degrees in neutral position, 7.1 degrees in 10 degrees external rotation, 7.3 in 20 degrees external rotation, 7.2 in 30 degrees external rotation, 6.2 in 10 degrees internal rotation, 5.5 in 20 degrees internal rotation, 4.6 in 30 degrees internal rotation, 6.9 in 10 degrees flexion, 7.2 in 20 degrees flexion, 7.8 in 30 degrees flexion, respectively. The entry points moved 3.9 millimeters laterally in 20 degrees external rotation and 3.6 millimeters medially in 20 degrees internal rotation relative to neutral position. Discussion and Conclusion. Femoral position affected on preoperative planning using anteroposterior radiographs. It is important to get a correct anteroposerior view of total femur, because the femur was easy to rotate in knee disorders

Purpose. Most of revision TKA needs bone reconstruction. The success of revision TKA depends on how well the bone reconstruction can be done. The method of reconstruction includes bone cementing, metal augmentation, allogenic bone graft, APC and tumor prosthesis, etc. In moderate to severe bone defect, allograft is needed. However, allogenic bone graft is surgically demanding and needs long operation time, which is very risky to the elderly patients. The authors revised an alternative method of bone defect reconstruction using cementing method with multiple screws augmentation. Methods. There were 12 cases of patients with large defect which could not be reconstructed with metal augment from April 2012 to April 2014. The authors performed 3 to 5 screws fixation on the defect site. Sclerotic bone is prepared with burring for better cementing. 3 ∼ 5 screws according to the size of defect. The length of screw fixation was determined as deep to the bone until stable fixation just beneath the implant. When drilling for the screw insertion, intramedullary guide is put into the medullary canal so as not to interfere with implant insertion. The defect is filled with cement during prosthesis fixation. Weight bearing was permitted on postoperative 3rd day, as usual manner of primary TKA. Results. According to the AORI classification, there were 10 cases of 2A and 2 cases of 2B. Mean follow up period was average 15 months. The number of screw insertion was 4.3 ea (2∼8). Average operation time was 1 hour and 57 minutes. Mean ROM was 107.9. HSS score, KSS score ad WOMAC score were 86.3, 92.8 and 11, respectively. There were no case of infection and loosening at the last follow-up. Conclusion. Cementing with multiple screws augmentation technique is a good alternative of bone reconstruction

Introduction. Two aspects are very important for knee joint replacement – restoration of biomechanical limb axis and achieving ligaments balance. Computer navigation allows us to do all this. Material and methods. We analysed 94 knee joint replacement surgeries using computer navigation by “STRYKER”. Results. There is no substantial difference between results of correction of biomechanical axis with computer navigation and without it in case of uncomplicated joint replacement. So, completer correction of axis (varus/valgus zero degrees) with computer navigation was achieved in 84% of cases versus 79% without navigation. There was varus or valgus deformity up to two degrees in 12% after surgery (without navigation −17% of cases). Error in deformity correction without application of navigation was three-five degrees in 4% of cases (all were challenging joint replacement). Advantages of navigation are obvious in case of large deformities, and also when insertion of intramedullary guide is undesirable or impossible. Use of navigation requires good skills of joint replacement, because landmarks should be chosen precisely and possibility of error during determining the center of rotation for the femoral head should be taken into consideration. Duration of surgery without navigation is 82.6±16.4 minutes and is much longer in the beginning of the learning curve (one hour longer or more). After acquiring skills the surgery takes 118±15.6 minutes. Conclusion. We evaluate use of navigation system as a modern and in-demand trend. Use of navigation should be started after getting good skills of joint replacement. Violation of the technology of determining landmarks leads to wrong virtual modeling and serious errors in positioning components. Advantages of navigation are obvious in evident bone deformity, when it is impossible or undesirable to open a medullary canal

Introduction. The conventional bone resection technique in TKA is recognized as less accurate than computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and patient-matched instrumentation (PMI). However, these systems are not available to all surgeons performing TKAs. Furthermore, it was recently reported that PMI accuracy is not always better than that of the conventional bone resection technique. As such, most surgeons use the conventional technique for distal femur and proximal tibia resection, and efforts to improve bone resection accuracy with conventional technique are necessary. Here, we examined intraoperative X-rays after bone resection of the distal femur and proximal tibia with conventional bone resection technique. If the cutting angle was not good and the difference from preoperative planning was over 3º, we considered re-cutting the bone to correct the angle. Methods. We investigated 117 knees in this study. The cutting angle of the distal femur was preoperatively determined by whole-length femoral X-ray. The conventional technique with an intramedullary guide system was used for distal femoral perpendicular resection to the mechanical axis. Proximal tibial cutting was performed perpendicular to the tibial shaft with an extramedullary guide system. The cutting angles of the distal femur and proximal tibia were estimated by intraoperative X-ray with the lower limb in extension position. When the cutting angle was over 3º different from the preoperatively planned angle, re-cutting of distal femur or proximal tibia was considered. Results. On the intraoperative X-ray, the average femoral cutting angle difference from preoperative planning was 0.1º (SD: 2.6º) and the average tibial cutting angle was 1.1º varus (SD: 1.8º). Over 3º and 5º outlier cases were observed in 15 knees and 5 knees on the femoral side and in 15 knees and 3 knees on the tibial side respectively. Cutting angle correction was performed in 18 knees on the distal femur and 17 knees on the proximal tibia. On the postoperative X-ray, over 3º and 5º outliers were observed in 16 knees and only 1 knee on the femoral side and in 11 knees and no cases on the tibial side respectively. Cases with outliers over 3º were not different between intra- and postoperative estimation; however, the number of over 5º outliers was decreased from 8 knees (6.8%) to 1 knee (0.9%) including both the femoral and tibial sides (p < 0.05, Chi-square test). Discussion. Precise bone cutting technique is important for TKA; however, the bone resection accuracy of the conventional technique is far from satisfactory. CAS, PMI, and portable navigation have been developed for precise bone resection in TKA. However, these new technologies involve additional cost and have not been clearly shown to improve accuracy. Most surgeons currently use the conventional technique, and we think it is possible to improve bone resection accuracy with the conventional technique in TKA. Our method is simple and requires just one intraoperative X-ray. This is cost-effective and can be performed by most surgeons. Our results indicate that a single intraoperative X-ray can reduce the number of excessive bone resection angle outliers in TKA

Introduction. Functional outcomes of mechanically aligned (MA) total knee arthroplasty have plateaued. The aim of this study is to find an alternative technique for implant positioning that improves functional outcomes of TKA. Methods. We prospectively randomized 100 consecutive patients undergoing TKA into two groups: in the group A an intramedullary femoral guide and an extramedullary tibial guide were used with aim to obtain a neutral traditional mechanical alignment; in the group B an extramedullary femoral guide set on distal femoral condyles and an extramedullary tibial guide neutrally aligned were used to obtain an adaptation of the conventional MA technique. Patients were followed-up clinically with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) questionnaires pre-operatively and then at 1 year post-operatively. Mechanical alignment was calculated on standing weight bearing Xray pre- and post-operatively. T-test was used to compare the results between groups. Results. Both groups showed an improvement of clinical scores. At 1 year of follow-up OKS and SF-12 were significantly higher in group B: 47,6 ±0.75 and 46.5 ±0.76 respectively; VAS was similar in both groups. Values of mechanical alignment changed from 6.45 ±8.45 to 0.25 ±0.91 for group A and from 6.8 ±7.94 to 2.5 ±4.7 for group B. Conclusion. This study shows that adjusted mechanical alignment (AMA) with a small under-correction of frontal deformity lead to improved functional scores following total knee replacement compared to conventional technique of neutral alignment. These results are satisfactory at short follow-up but long-term studies are needed to evaluate the difference in the rate of wear of the prosthetic components

Introduction. There is a controversy with regard to the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients with considerable deformities of the femoral or tibial shafts. Some surgeons prefer to correct the deformity while performing TKA at the level of the knee joint. However, this technique requires accurate planning and execution of the planned cuts. In addition, the use of intramedullary guides in such cases may not be possible or desirable and may lead to complications. There is a strong indication for using navigation in such cases. Methods. The navigation technique was used in both laboratory and clinical setting, First, we compared between navigational and conventional techniques in performing TKA in 24 plastic knee specimens (Sawbones, Sweden) that have osteoarthritic changes and complex tibial or femoral deformities. A demo kit for conventional instrumentation of posterior stabilised TKA (Scorpio, Stryker) was used for 12 cases and an image-free navigation system (Stryker) was used for a corresponding 12 cases. There were 4 different deformities; severe mid-shaft tibial varus, severe distal third femoral valgus, complex deformity distal femur and deformity following a revision TKA. The surgical procedures were performed by 3 arthroplasty surgeons, each surgeon operated on 8 knee specimens (4 knees in each arm of the study with 4 different deformities). Deformities were corrected at the level of the knee joint during TKA without prior osteotomies. For conventional techniques, surgeons used a combination of both intramedullary and extramedullary guides. Postoperative long leg radiographs were used to assess coronal alignment. Second, we used the same navigational technique clinically to perform TKA in patients with extra-articular deformities. Results. Using both navigational and conventional techniques, it was possible to indirectly correct shaft deformities by adjusting the inclination of bone cuts at the level of the knee joint. The amount of bone cutting at distal femur and proximal tibia were variable depending on the location and direction of the deformity. There was no compromise of collateral ligaments or patellar tendons in both techniques. However, the accuracy of restoring normal alignment was better in navigational techniques. The results of the clinical cases are still in progress waiting analysis of a longer term follow up. Discussion. Navigational techniques eliminated the use of both intramedullary and extramedullary guides. The improved accuracy with navigational techniques led to better alignment that can improve functional and survival outcome of similar cases of TKA in real patients

INTRODUCTION. Revision total knee replacement (TKR) is a challenging procedure, especially because most of the standard bony and ligamentous landmarks used during primary TKR are lost due to the index implantation. However, as for primary TKR, restoration of the joint line, adequate limb axis correction and ligamentous stability are considered critical for the short- and long- term outcome of revision TKR. Navigation system might address this issue. MATERIAL AND METHODS. We are using an image-free system (ORTHOPILOT TM, AESCULAP, FRG) for routine implantation of primary TKR. The standard software was used for revision TKR. Registration of anatomic and cinematic data was performed with the index implant left in place. The components were then removed. New bone cuts as necessary were performed under the control of the navigation system. The system did not allow navigation for intra-medullary stem extensions and any bone filling which may have been required. This technique was used for 37 patients. The accuracy of implantation was assessed by measuring following angles on the post-operative long-leg radiographs: mechanical femoro-tibial angle, coronal orientation of the femoral component in comparison to the mechanical femoral axis, coronal orientation of the tibial component in comparison to the mechanical tibial axis, sagittal orientation of the tibial component in comparison to the proximal posterior tibial cortex. Individual analysis was performed as follows: one point was given for each fulfilled item, giving a maximal accuracy note of 4 points. Prosthesis implantation was considered as satisfactory when the accuracy note was 4 (all fulfilled items). The rate of globally satisfactory implanted prostheses and the rate of prostheses implanted within the desired range for each criterion were recorded. The results of the 37 navigated revision TKR were compared to 26 cases of revision TKR performed with conventional intramedullary guiding systems. RESULTS. We observed a significant improvement of all radiological items by navigated cases. Limb alignment was restored in 82% of the navigated cases and 74% of the conventional cases. The coronal orientation of the femoral component was acceptable in 85% of the navigated cases and 76% of the conventional cases. The coronal orientation of the tibial component was acceptable in 95% of the navigated cases and 89% of the conventional cases. The sagittal orientation of the tibial component was acceptable in 77% of the navigated cases and 66% of the conventional cases. Overall, 50% of the implants were oriented satisfactorily for the four criteria for navigated cases, and only 40% for conventional cases. DISCUSSION. The navigation system enables reaching the implantation goals for implant position in the large majority of cases, with a rate similar to that obtained for primary TKA. The rate of optimally implanted prosthesis was significantly higher with navigation than with conventional technique. The navigation system is a useful aid for these often difficult operations, where the visual information is often misleading

Component and limb alignment are important considerations during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Three-dimensional positioning of TKA implants has an effect on implant loosening, polyethylene stresses, and gait. Furthermore, alignment, in conjunction with other implant and patient variables such as body mass index (BMI) influence osseous loading and failure rates. Fortunately, implant survivorship after TKA has been reported to be greater than 95% at 20 years, despite up to 28% of TKAs having component position greater than 3 degrees from neutral. How good are we at positioning TKA implants? Ritter, et al examined 6,070 primary TKAs and found that from 2–7 degrees of valgus, the failure rate was 0.5% for limb alignment. Importantly 28% of the TKAs were outside the 2–7 degree range in the hands of experienced surgeons. Clearly there is room for improvement in surgical technique, but this improvement must be (1) time efficient and cost effective; (2) have a low complication rate, and (3) be reproducible with a minimal learning curve. A number of technologies have been developed to help surgeons implant and position TKA components including intramedullary guides, patient matched guides based on pre-operative imaging, Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) based on line-of-sight navigation, and most recently, hand-held navigation. All of these techniques have distinct advantages and disadvantages, but we have found that hand-held navigation in TKA meets the prerequisites. Nam, et al reported the first series with a handheld device in 42 knees, and was able to position 95% of the tibial components within 2 degrees of targeted sagittal slope and 96% within 3 degrees of coronal alignment. Advantages of hand-held navigation include low cost, minimal learning curve, reproducibility surgeon to surgeon, and time efficiency (usually taking less than 3 minutes). The disposable device can be used on all patients with all deformities, including those with retained hardware. Hand held navigation devices create a virtual alignment framework from known osseous landmarks, and this framework is used to position tibial and femoral cutting guides on the bone. Using tibial osseous landmarks, including the ACL footprint proximally and the medial and lateral malleoli distally, the device allows real-time feedback of tibial slope and coronal alignment. On the femur, the device locates and references the centre of rotation of the hip and the centre of the distal femur, which allows for real-time calculation of distal femoral valgus and flexion for the distal femoral cutting block. Receiving three-dimensional, real-time feedback of coronal and sagittal alignment, as well as resection depth, combining limited mechanical instruments aided by hand-held navigation devices is a significant step forward. Thus, this technology represents a significant help to the surgeon and patient

INTRODUCTION:. Despite clear clinical advantages Unicompartimetal Knee Replacement still remain an high demanding and less forgiving surgical procedure. Different Authors in literature pointed out how malalignment increases the rate of aseptic failure even more than in TKR. Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed to improve implant positioning in joint replacement surgery with no need of intramedullary guide despite no still proven clinical advantages. Likewise more recently Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested, even in partial knee reconstruction, as a new technology capable of new advantages such as shorter surgical times and lower blood losses maintaining at least the same accuracy. Aim of the study is to present a prospective study comparing 2 groups of UKR s using either a computer assisted technique or a CT-based Patient Specific Instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS:. Since January 2010, 54 patients undergoing UKR because medial compartment arthritis were enrolled in the study prospectively. Before surgery patients were alternatively assigned to either computer-assisted alignment (group A) or patient specific instrumentation group (group B). In the group A (27 knees) the implant (Sigma, Depuy Orthopaedics Inc, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) was positioned using a CT-free computer assisted alignment system specifically created for UKR surgery (OrthoKey, Delaware, USA). In group B (27 knees) the implant (GMK Uni, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) was performed using a CT-based PSI technology (MyKnee, Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). In both the groups all the implants were cemented and using always a fixed metal backed tibial component. The surgical time and complications were documented in all cases. Six months post-operatively the patients underwent to the same radiological investigation to determine the frontal femoral component angle (FFC), the frontal tibial component angle (FTC), the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation (slope) of tibial/femoral components. The number and percentage of outliners for each parameter was determined. In addition the percentage of patients in each group with all 5 parameters within the desired range was calculated. Furthermore the 2 groups were clinically assessed using KSS and Functional score. RESULTS:. There were no differences in the clinical outcome. The mean surgical time was longer in the navigated group of a mean of 5.9 minutes without any statistical differences in complications. The mechanical axes, tibial slope the FTC angle were significantly better aligned in the navigated group. A statistically significant higher number of outliners was seen in the PSI group. The number of implants with all 5 radiological parameters aligned within the desired range was statistically higher in the navigated group. All the implants in the navigated group were correctly aligned in all the planned parameters. Discussion:. To our knowledge this is the first prospective study in literature assessing navigation compared to PSI technique in UKR surgery. Despite a slight not significant longer surgical time in the navigated group, at a short follow-up the results could not demonstrate any clinical differences between the 2 technologies However according to their results the Authors indicate navigation as more helpful in UKR surgery compared to PSI technology in terms of accuracy

D-dimer is one of the useful laboratory tests to evaluate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after the total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The most recent guideline for the prophylaxis of VTE points out the surgical procedure itself is a major risk factor for developing VTE. Only a few literatures discuss the relationship of surgical procedures and the risk of venous thromboembolism. We therefore prospectively compare the difference of the perioperative plasma D-dimer levels between the patients undergoing navigation and convention TKA. Two hundred consecutive total knee arthroplasties were performed between September 2011 and March 2013. The patients were randomised according to their registration to the orthopaedic clinic. Ninety-six patients (100 knees) underwent a navigation-assisted TKA and ninety-four patients (100 knees) had a conventional TKA. No intramedullary violation was done in the navigation-assisted TKA, while the intramedullary femoral guiding was adapted in the conventional group. Pre-operative and post-operation day 1 plasma D-dimer levels were recorded and evaluated using Mann-Whitney U test. There was no difference in the demographic data and pre-operative D-dimer between the two groups (p=0.443). Significantly lower D-dimer levels on the post-operative day 1 were noted in the navigation group, when compared with the conventional group. (6.0 ± 4.4 mg/L vs 11.3 ± 9.6 mg/L, p = 0.000). We demonstrated that lower D-dimer level is developed after the navigation-assisted TKA than the conventional one. Less incidence of VTE is expected and the finding may help to explain the fact that less systemic emboli in the navigation assisted TKA

INTRODUCTION. Although the most commonly used method of femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an intramedullary (IM) guides, this method demonstrated a limited degree of accuracy. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a portable, accelerometer-based surgical navigation system (Knee Align 2 system; Orth Align, Inc, Aliso Viejo, Calif) improve accuracy of the post-operative radiographic femoral component alignment compared to conventional IM alignment guide. MATERIALS & METHODS. Since February 2014, 44 consecutive patients (39 female, 5 male) with primary arthritis of the knee were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study. 24 patients underwent TKA (Vanguard RP or PS, Biomet Japan) using the navigation device for the distal femoral resection (Navigated Group), and 20 patients with conventional femoral IM alignment guide. The proximal tibial resection was performed using an extramedullary guide. All the operation was performed by a single senior surgeon (YK) with the same gap balancing technique except for the use of the navigation system for the femur. Accuracy of femoral implant positioning was evaluated on 2 weeks postoperative standing anteroposterior (AP) hip to ankle radiographs. RESUTS. In the navigated group, 100% of patients had an alignment within 90 ± 3° to the femoral mechanical axis in the coronal plane, versus 90.0% in the IM guides cohort (Fig). The mean absolute difference between the intraoperative goal and the postoperative alignment was 0.79 ± 1.0° in the Knee Align 2 cohort, and 1.72 ± 1.6° in the IM guides cohort (P < 0.05). There was a difference in the standard deviations observed for the navigated cases and the conventional cases when femoral component position was considered. There were no technique specific complications associated with the navigation system. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION. The distal femoral resection has been the main source of error as for the neutral mechanical axis because of the difficulty in visualization and detection of the center of the femoral head. The results in the current study have shown that a portable, accelerometer-based navigation device (Knee Align 2 system) significantly decreases outliers in femoral component alignment compared to conventional IM alignment guides in TKA

Introduction. The efficacy and accuracy of computer navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been proven in recent years. However, potential disadvantages associated with navigation systems, such as increased surgical time and registration errors, have been reported. Currently, we use a navigation system only for the femoral side. We use the conventional extramedullary guide system for the tibial side (hybrid navigation method) because we have increased the accuracy of tibial positioning in the coronal plane with the conventional system by considering the following key points. (1) Set the extramedullary alignment guide to avoid the rotational mismatch between the proximal part of the tibia and the ankle joint. (2) Insert the tibial component along the AP axis of the resected surface. (3) Remove the protruding bone at the antero-lateral edge of the tibia to obtain the flat, resected surface of the tibia. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the hybrid navigation method. Methods. We compared the postoperative alignment of 60 TKAs implanted using the conventional alignment guide system with 30 TKAs implanted using the hybrid image-free navigation method. The average age was 74.2 (range, 50 to 85) years in the conventional group and 73.6 (range, 51 to 84) years in the hybrid group. The intramedullary alignment guide was used for the femur in the conventional group. The knees were evaluated using full-length, weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs. Results. For the conventional group, the mean coronal tibial component angle was 89.9 ± 1.09 degrees (range, 88.0 to 92.0 degrees) (Fig. 1b). The ideal angle within 3 degrees for the tibial component was obtained in 100% of the cases. The mean posterior inclination angle was 83.7 degrees. The mean coronal femoral angle was 90.5 ± 2.06 degrees (range, 84.0 to 96.0 degrees) (Fig. 1a). The ideal angle within 3 degrees for the femoral component was obtained in 85.0% of the cases. For the hybrid navigation group, the mean coronal tibial component angle was 89.6 ± 0.73 degrees (range, 88.0 to 91.0 degrees) (Fig. 2b). The ideal angle within 3 degrees for the tibial component was obtained in 100% of the cases. The mean coronal femoral component angle was 89.4 degrees (range, 86.0 to 92.0 degrees) (Fig. 2a). The ideal coronal angle within 3 degrees for the femoral component was obtained in 96.7% of the cases. Discussion and Conclusion. Our results demonstrated the accuracy of coronal tibial component positioning with the conventional extramedullary alignment guide system by considering the key points described above. However, the accuracy of femoral component positioning with the conventional intramedullary rod is limited. Therefore, the hybrid navigation method could be an alternative to reduce surgical time while maintaining the accuracy of the tibial component positioning. In conclusion, we recommend the hybrid navigation method in total knee arthroplasty

We report the results of using a combination of fixator-assisted nailing with lengthening over an intramedullary nail in patients with tibial deformity and shortening. Between 1997 and 2007, 13 tibiae in nine patients with a mean age of 25.4 years (17 to 34) were treated with a unilateral external fixator for acute correction of deformity, followed by lengthening over an intramedullary nail with a circular external fixator applied at the same operating session. At the end of the distraction period locking screws were inserted through the intramedullary nail and the external fixator was removed.

The mean amount of lengthening was 5.9 cm (2 to 8). The mean time of external fixation was 90 days (38 to 265). The mean external fixation index was 15.8 days/cm (8.9 to 33.1) and the mean bone healing index was 38 days/cm (30 to 60).

One patient developed an equinus deformity which responded to stretching and bracing. Another developed a drop foot due to a compartment syndrome, which was treated by fasciotomy. It recovered in three months. Two patients required bone grafting for poor callus formation.

We conclude that the combination of fixator-assisted nailing with lengthening over an intramedullary nail can reduce the overall external fixation time and prevent fractures and deformity of the regenerated bone.