Abstract
Introduction
Total knee arthroplasty is effective for the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Conventional techniques utilizing manual instrumentation (MI) make use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. While MI techniques can achieve excellent results in the majority of patients, those with ipsilateral hardware, post-traumatic deformity or abnormal anatomy may be technically more challenging, resulting in poorer outcomes. Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) is an alternative that utilizes fixed trackers and anatomic registration points, foregoing the need for intramedullary guides. This technique has been shown to yield excellent results including superior alignment outcomes compared to MI with fewer outliers. However, studies report a high learning curve, increased expenses and increased operative times. As a result, few surgeons are trained and comfortable utilizing CAN. Patient-specific instrumentation is an alternative innovation for total knee arthroplasty. Custom guide blocks are fabricated based on a patient's unique anatomy, allowing for the benefits of CAN but without the increased operative times or the high learning curve. In this study we sought to evaluate the accuracy of PSI techniques in patients with previous ipsilateral hardware of the femur.
Methods
After reviewing our database of 300 PSI total knee arthroplasty patients, 16 were identified (10 male, 6 female) using the Zimmer NexGen Patient Specific Instrumentation System. Fourteen patients included in the study had a preexisting total hip arthroplasty on the ipsilateral side [Figure 1], 1 had a sliding hip screw, and 1 patient had a cephalomedullary nail. Postoperative mechanical axis alignment measurements were performed using plain long-standing radiographs [Figure 2]. The American Knee Society Score was used to evaluate clinical outcomes postoperatively.
Results
Sixteen total knee arthroplasties were performed using PSI, all in the setting of previous ipsilateral hardware placement. The average age at the time of surgery was 72, with patients ranging from 56 to 85 years of age [Table 1]. 11 of the included knees had a preoperative varus alignment and 5 had valgus alignment. The average value of a deformity identified via the preoperative planning software was 7.9°(1.5°–15.7°). The average value of a deformity identified via preoperative radiographs was 10.1°(2.2°–14.7°). Average postoperative mechanical axis was 3.1° (1°–5.3°) measured from plain radiographs. Average angle between the FMA and femoral component was 90.0° (85.3°–94.1°). The average angle between the TMA and tibial component was 90.6°(87.6°–92.9°). The average difference between the femoral mechanical and anatomic axes was 5.9°(3.4°–7.0°). The average discrepancy between medial and lateral joint space on an anterior-posterior standing radiograph was 0.4mm(0.0mm–1.1mm). At an average of 4.5 months follow-up, American Knee Society knee scores show an aggregate average score of 82.94.
Conclusions
Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is an innovative technology in TKA that replaces the use of intramedullary femoral guides and either extramedullary or intramedullary tibial guides. This study demonstrates that PSI is capable of producing favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes despite preexisting ipsilateral hardware, which may otherwise preclude the use of customary manual instrumentation. We believe PSI is an accurate and effective tool for use in patients with preexisting ipsilateral hardware.
