Open tibia fractures are common injuries in our paediatric population and are often associated with high-energy trauma such as pedestrian-vehicle accidents. At our institution, these injuries are routinely treated with debridement and mono-lateral external fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of open tibia fractures treated according to this protocol, as well as the complication rate and factors contributing to the development of complications. We performed a retrospective folder review of all patients with open tibia fractures that were treated according to our protocol from 2015–2019. Patients treated by other means, who received primary treatment elsewhere, and with insufficient data, were excluded. Data was collected on presenting demographics, injury characteristics, management, and clinical course. Complications were defined as pin tract infections, delayed- or non-union, malunion, growth arrest, and neurovascular injury. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. One-hundred-and-fifteen fractures in 114 children (82 males) with a median age of 7 years (IQR 6–9) were included in the analysis. Pedestrian vehicle accidents (PVA's) accounted for 101 (88%) of fractures, and the tibial diaphysis was affected in 74 cases (64%). Fracture severity was equally distributed among the Gustillo-Anderson grades. The median Abbreviated Injury Score was 4 (IQR 4;5). Ninety-five fractures (83%) progressed to uneventful union within 7 weeks. Twenty patients (17%) developed complications, with delayed union and fracture site infections being the most common complications. Gustillo-Anderson Grade 3 fractures, an increased Abbreviated Injury Score, and the need for advanced wound closure techniques were risk factors for developing complications. Surgical debridement and external fixation in a simple mono-lateral frame is an effective treatment for open tibia fractures in children and good outcomes were seen in 83% of patients. More severe injuries requiring advanced wound closure were associated with the development of complications

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Shoulder arthroplasty is effective at restoring function and relieving pain in patients suffering from glenohumeral arthritis; however, cortex thinning has been significantly associated with larger press-fit stems (fill ratio = 0.57 vs 0.48; P = 0.013)1. Additionally, excessively stiff implant-bone constructs are considered undesirable, as high initial stiffness of rigid fracture fixation implants has been related to premature loosening and an ultimate failure of the implant-bone interface2. Consequently, one objective which has driven the evolution of humeral stem design has been the reduction of stress-shielding induced bone resorption; this in-part has led to the introduction of short stems, which rely on metaphyseal fixation. However, the selection of short stem diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing remains subjective, and its impact on the resulting stem-bone construct stiffness has yet to be quantified. Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized and 2mm ‘oversized’ short-stemmed implants. Standard stem sizing was based on a haptic assessment of stem and broach stability per typical surgical practice. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken, and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of compressive loading representing 90º forward flexion to simulate postoperative seating. Following this, a custom 3D printed metal implant adapter was affixed to the stem, which allowed for compressive loading in-line with the stem axis (Fig.1). Each stem was then forced to subside by 5mm at a rate of 1mm/min, from which the compressive stiffness of the stem-bone construct was assessed. The bone-implant construct stiffness was quantified as the slope of the linear portion of the resulting force-displacement curves. The metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were 0.50±0.10 and 0.45±0.07 for the standard sized stems and 0.50±0.06 and 0.52±0.06 for the oversized stems, respectively. Neither was found to correlate significantly with the stem-bone construct stiffness measure (metaphysis: P = 0.259, diaphysis: P = 0.529); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio was significantly different between standard and oversized stems (P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Increasing the stem size by 2mm had a significant impact on the stiffness of the stem-bone construct (P = 0.003, Power = 0.971; Fig.2). Stem oversizing yielded a construct stiffness of −741±243N/mm; more than double that of the standard stems, which was −334±120N/mm. The fill ratios reported in the present investigation match well with those of a finite element assessment of oversizing short humeral stems3. This work complements that investigation's conclusion, that small reductions in diaphyseal fill ratio may reduce the likelihood of stress shielding, by also demonstrating that oversizing stems by 2mm dramatically increases the stiffness of the resulting implant-bone construct, as stiffer implants have been associated with decreased bone stimulus4 and premature loosening2. The present findings suggest that even a small, 2mm, variation in the thickness of short stem humeral components can have a marked influence on the resulting stiffness of the implant-bone construct. This highlights the need for more objective intraoperative methods for selecting stem size to provide guidelines for appropriate diametral sizing. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Introduction. Fibrous dysplasia is a pathological condition, where normal medullary bone is replaced by fibrous tissue and small, woven specules of bone. Fibrous dysplasia can occur in epiphysis, metaphysis or diaphysis. Occationally, biopsy is necessary to establish the diagnosis. We present a review of operative treatment using the Ilizarov technique. The management of tibial fibrous dysplasia in children are curettage or subperiosteal resection to extra periosteal wide resection followed by bone transport. Materials and Methods. A total of 18 patients were treated between 2010 – 2020; 12 patients came with pain and 6 with pain and deformity. All patients were treated by Ilizarov technique. Age ranges from 4–14 years. 12 patients by enbloc excision and bone transportation and 6 patients were treated by osteotomy at the true apex of the deformity by introducing the k/wires in the medullary cavity with stable fixation by Ilizarov device. The longest duration for bone transport was 16 weeks (14–20 weeks) for application, after deformity correction was 20 weeks. We have never used any kind of bone grafts. Results. All the 18 patients were treated successfully by Ilizarov compression distraction device. The patients with localized tibial pathology with deformity had the shortest period on the Ilizarov apparatus, 14 weeks. Conclusions. Preservation and bone regeneration by distraction histogenesis constitutes a highly conservative limb saving surgery. Patients with bone defects of <10 cm, a great deal of preserved healthy tissue and good prognosis are good candidates for these methods

Background. Systemically administered vancomycin may provide insufficient target-site concentrations. Intraosseous vancomycin administration has the potential to overcome this concern by providing high target-site concentrations. Aim. To evaluate the local bone and tissue concentrations following tibial intraosseous vancomycin administration in a porcine model. Method. Eight female pigs were assigned to receive 500 mg diluted vancomycin (50 mg/mL) through an intraosseous cannula into the proximal tibial cancellous bone. Microdialysis was applied for sampling of vancomycin concentrations in tibial cancellous bone adjacent to the intraosseous cannula, in cortical bone, in the intramedullary canal of the diaphysis, in the synovial fluid of the knee joint, and in the subcutaneous tissue. Plasma samples were obtained. Samples were collected for 12 hours. Results. High vancomycin concentrations were found in the tibial cancellous bone with a mean peak drug concentration of 1,236 (range 28–5,295) µg/mL, which remained high throughout the sampling period with a mean end concentration of 278 (range 2.7–1,362.7) µg/mL after 690 min. The mean (standard derivation (SD)) peak drug concentration in plasma was 19 (2) µg/mL, which was obtained immediately after administration. For the intramedullary canal, in the synovial fluid of the knee joint, and subcutaneous tissue, comparable mean peak drug concentration and mean time to peak drug concentration were found in the range of 7.5–8.2 µg/mL and 45–70 min, respectively. Conclusions. Tibial intraosseous administration of vancomycin provided high mean concentrations in tibial cancellous bone throughout a 12-hour period, but with an immediate and high systemic absorption. The concentrations in cancellous bone had an unpredictable and wide range of peak concentration. Low mean concentrations were found in all the remaining compartments. Our findings suggest that intraosseous vancomycin administration in proximal tibial cancellous bone only is relevant as treatment in cases requiring high local concentrations nearby the intraosseous cannula

Femoral revision after cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) might include technical difficulties, following essential cement removal, which might lead to further loss of bone and consequently inadequate fixation of the subsequent revision stem. Bone loss may occur because of implant loosening or polyethylene wear, and should be addressed at time of revision surgery. Stem revision can be performed with modular cementless reconstruction stems involving the diaphysis for fixation, or alternatively with restoration of the bone stock of the proximal femur with the use of allografts. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) has been widely used in revision surgery for the acetabulum, and subsequently for the femur in Paprosky defects Type 1 or 2. In combination with a regular length cemented stem, impaction grafting allows for restoration of femoral bone stock through incorporation and remodeling of the proximal femur. Cavitary bone defects affecting the metaphysis and partly the diaphysis leading to a wide femoral canal are ideal indications for this technique. In case of combined segmental-cavitary defects a metal mesh is used to contain the defect which is then filled and impacted with bone grafts. Cancellous allograft bone chips of 2 to 4 mm size are used, and tapered into the canal with rods of increasing diameters. To impact the bone chips into the femoral canal a dummy of the dimensions of the definitive cemented stem is inserted and tapped into the femur to ensure that the chips are firmly impacted. Finally, a standard stem is implanted into the newly created medullary canal using bone cement. To date several studies from Europe have shown favorable results with this technique, with some excellent long-term results reported. Advantages of IBG include the restoration of the bone stock in the proximal femur, the use of standard length cemented stems and preserving the diaphysis for re-revision. As disadvantages of the technique: longer surgical time, increased blood loss and the necessity of a bone bank can be mentioned

There is no mathematical relationship between the internal diameter of the femoral metaphysis and diaphysis. Unless an infinite number of monolithic stems are available with variable metaphyseal and diaphyseal diameters, which is not economically possible, even in virgin cases, the surgeon has to decide if the stem is going to fit in the metaphysis or the diaphysis. It is not possible to match both. In revision cases with a hollowed out metaphysis, the situation is much worse. As it is obviously easier to fit the diaphysis, this is what stems such as the AML and Wagner stem have done. They completely ignore the metaphysis and obtain fixation in the diaphysis. This is all well and good, but it means that the proximal femur is unloaded, like an astronaut in space. While, there will be some recovery due to removal of the toxins and local muscle pull, it will be incomplete. Furthermore, should sepsis occur, one is faced with the horror of removing a distally fixed implant. Clearly, if proximal fixation, i.e. above the level of lesser trochanter could reliably be achieved, this would be preferable in terms of proximal loading leading to bone recovery and ease of removal should it be required. The only way that proximal loading can be achieved is if the metaphyseal and diaphyseal parts of the component can be varied infinitely. This clearly can only be achieved by using a modular stem. The concern with modularity always has been fretting at the sleeve-stem locking mechanism with release of metal ions. The stem, which I have been using for the last 25 years, is the SROM stem. Fretting and ion release had never been an issue. As the components are made of a relatively soft titanium alloy, it is likely that the sleeve and the stem cold weld, thus, eliminating any movement and eliminating friction. I have a follow-up of roughly 120 revision cases with a minimum follow-up of 5 years and a maximum follow-up of 22 years. I have no loosening in easy revision cases where a primary stem was used. I have had some loosenings in extremely difficult revision situations where a long bowed stem was required, but even then, the loosening rate is less than 3%. I use this stem in primary situations, i.e. in about 80% of all the primaries I have done. This means I have done roughly 1500 cases or more. Other than some late infections, I have never, ever had any stem loosening in a simple case. Obviously, I have had loosenings in some cases, where we have been doing fancy shortening or de-rotation osteotomies, but none in simple primary cases. I would, therefore, suggest that the surgeon, if he wishes to use this stem, please try it out on some simple primary cases. The ability to vary distal and proximal internal diameters and proximal geometry makes for easy surgery. I have been using this stem for 25 years and continue to use it in all my primary noncemented cases. I believe in the adage of “train hard and fight easy.” I think that surgeons should not get themselves into a situation where they are forced in a difficult case to use something they have never seen before

Introduction. The use of stems in TKA revision surgery is well established. Stems off-load stress over a broad surface area of the diaphysis and help protect the metaphyseal interface areas from failure. Stems can provide an area of extra fixation. Uncemented Stems. Pros and Cons. Advantages. (1) Expeditious, (2) Compatible with intramedullary based revision instrumentation (3) Easy to remove if necessary (4) By filling diaphysis they help guarantee axial alignment. Disadvantages. (1) They help off load stress, but how much fixation do they really provide? (2) They don't fit all canal deformities, and under some circumstances can actually force implants into malalignment. (3) ? potential for end of stem pain. Cemented Stems. Pros and Cons. Advantages. (1) Cemented stem adds fixation in fresh metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone. (2) Proven 10-year track record. (3) Allow the surgeon to adjust for canal geometry abnormalities. Disadvantages. (1) More difficult to remove, if required. (2) They don't fill the canal so they don't guarantee alignment as well under most circumstances. Results. Favorable results with uncemented and cemented stems have been reported in several series. Cemented stems have longer term data. Technique Issues. Uncemented Stems. (1) Take advantage of offset bolts, tibial trays, stems to fit the stem/implant to the patient's anatomy. (2) Don't let the stem force you into suboptimal implant position. (3) Longer stems can be narrower but help engage more diaphysis. (4) Do a good job of restoring/uncovering cancellous bone in metaphysis for cement interdigitation. The cement provides the fixation. Cemented Stems. (1) Intra-operative x-ray with trials helps guarantee optimal alignment. (2) Use cement restrictors. (3) Cement tibia/femur separately. Metaphyseal Fixation. (1) Area of new emphasis. (2) Cones and sleeves can improve cemented and uncemented fixation

Introduction. Circular frame fixation has become a cornerstone of non-union and deformity management since its inception in the 1950s. As a consequence of modularity and heterogenous patient and injury factors, the prediction of the mechanobiological environment within a defect is subject to wide variations in practice. Given these wide range of confounding variables, clinical and cadaveric experimentation is close to impossible and frame constructs are based upon clinician experience. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method provides a powerful tool to numerically analyse mechanics. This work aims to develop an FEA model of a tibial defect and predict the mechanical response within the construct. Materials and Methods. The geometry of a tibia was acquired via CT and a series of bone defects were digitally created in the tibial diaphysis. A 4-ring, 10-wire Ilizarov fixator was constructed using 180mm stainless steel rings and 1.8mm stainless steel wires tensioned to 1200N. An axial load (800N) was applied to simulate single leg stance of an 80kg patient. The magnitude of displacement was measured for defects with varying sizes (5–40mm). A numerical analysis was performed in large-strain regime using open-source FEA library (MoFEM). Results. Defect size did not effect displacement, but significantly influenced strain. Measured displacements were 5.72–5.78mm, however strain ranged from 14.5–100%. Moreover, it was found that bone material properties also have no significant impact on the results. Conclusions. Accounting for FEA assumptions, this model predicted a strain environment which was above expected favourable range for bone healing. The addition of graft within the environment is likely to change the mechanobiological environment which warrants further investigation. We plan to develop this model to answer further research questions in the limb reconstruction discipline and validate its accuracy with mechanical data. We believe the presented approach can be a useful tool for investigating the performance circular frames

Introduction. Ring breakage is a rare but significant complication requiring revision surgery and prolonging the course of treatment. We have encountered three cases with Taylor Spatial Frames (TSF) with breakage at the half ring junction of the distal ring. This experimental study examines the strains produced at different locations on the distal ring during loading and the effects of altering the construct in order to develop techniques to minimise the risk of breakage. Materials and Methods. We mounted different TSF constructs on tibia sawbone models. Construct 1 reproducing the configuration of cases where failure was seen, Construct 2 with different wire and half pin configuration and construct 3 with the distal ring rotated 60 degrees. Strain Gauges were attached to different locations and measurements were collected during loading. Statistical analysis was subsequently performed. Results. The highest strain values were recorded at the half ring junction of constructs 1,2 (>600 microstrains in tension). Rotating the ring 60 degrees significantly reduces the strain observed at the half ring junction (300 microstrains) (p=.000). Strain is increased in areas close to where a half pin attaches to the ring. Conclusions. The highest strains are observed in the half ring junction as the two half rings are subjected to different modes of loading. This area is at higher risk of failure as the thickness of the half rings is halved and their second moment of area significantly reduced. Positioning this junction close to the half pin frame interface increases the strain produced. This interface is dictated by the safe zone in the mid-distal diaphysis of the tibia. Rotating the distal ring 60 degrees has a protective effect by significantly reducing the strain. This simple technical tips should be taken into consideration in order to reduce the risk of breakage at the half ring junction

As the number of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty rises, the number of patients who require surgery for a failed total hip arthroplasty is also increasing. It is estimated that 183,000 total hip replacements were performed in the United States in the year 2000 and that 31,000 of these (17%) were revision procedures. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging from both a technical perspective and in preoperative planning. With multiple reconstructive options available, it is helpful to have a classification system which guides the surgeon in selecting the appropriate method of reconstruction. A classification of femoral deficiency has been developed and an algorithmic approach to femoral reconstruction is presented. An extensively coated, diaphyseal filling component reliably achieves successful fixation in the majority of revision femurs. The surgical technique is straightforward and we continue to use this type of device in the majority of our revision total hip arthroplasties. However, in the severely damaged femur (Type IIIB and Type IV), other reconstructive options may provide improved results. Based on our results, the following reconstructive algorithm is recommended for femoral reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Type I: In a Type I femur, there is minimal loss of cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Cemented or cementless fixation can be utilised. If cemented fixation is selected, great care must be taken in removing the neo-cortex often encountered to allow for appropriate cement intrusion into the remaining cancellous bone. Type II: In a Type II femur, there is extensive loss of the metaphyseal cancellous bone and thus, fixation with cement is unreliable. In this cohort of patients, successful fixation was achieved using a diaphyseal fitting, extensively porous coated implant. However, as the metaphysis is supportive, a cementless implant that achieves primary fixation in the metaphysis can be utilised. Type IIIA: In a Type IIIA femur, the metaphysis is non-supportive and an extensively coated stem of adequate length is utilised to ensure that more than 4cm of scratch fit is obtained in the diaphysis. Type IIIB: Based on the poor results obtained with a cylindrical, extensively porous coated implant (with 4 of 8 reconstructions failing), our present preference is a modular, cementless, tapered stem with flutes for obtaining rotational stability. Type IV: The isthmus is completely non-supportive and the femoral canal is widened. Cementless fixation cannot be reliably used in our experience, as it is difficult to obtain adequate initial implant stability that is required for osseointegration. Reconstruction can be performed with impaction grafting if the cortical tube of the proximal femur is intact. However, this technique can be technically difficult to perform, time consuming and costly given the amount of bone graft that is often required. Although implant subsidence and peri-prosthetic fractures have been associated with this technique, it can provide an excellent solution for the difficult revision femur where cementless fixation cannot be utilised. Alternatively, an allograft-prosthesis composite can be utilised for younger patients in an attempt to reconstitute bone stock and a proximal femoral replacing endoprosthesis used for more elderly patients

As the number of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty rises, the number of patients who require surgery for a failed total hip arthroplasty is also increasing. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty can be challenging from both a technical perspective and in pre-operative planning. With multiple reconstructive options available, it is helpful to have a classification system which guides the surgeon in selecting the appropriate method of reconstruction. Type I: Minimal loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often seen when conversion of a cementless femoral component without biological ingrowth surface requires revision. Type II: Extensive loss of metaphyseal cancellous bone with an intact diaphysis. Often encountered after the removal of a cemented femoral component. Type IIIA: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with more than 4 cm of intact diaphyseal bone for distal fixation. This type of defect is commonly seen after removal of grossly loose femoral components inserted with first generation cementing techniques. Type IIIB: The metaphysis is severely damaged and non-supportive with less than 4 cm of diaphyseal bone available for distal fixation. This type of defect is often seen following failure of a cemented femoral component that was inserted with a cement restrictor and cementless femoral components associated with significant distal osteolysis. Type IV: Extensive meta-diaphyseal damage in conjunction with a widened femoral canal. The isthmus is non-supportive. Based on our results, the following reconstructive algorithm is recommended for femoral reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. An extensively coated, diaphyseal filling component reliably achieves successful fixation in the majority of revision femurs and the surgical technique is straightforward. However, in the severely damaged femur (Type IIIB and Type IV), other reconstructive options may provide improved results. Type I: Cemented or cementless fixation can be utilised. If cemented fixation is selected, great care must be taken in removing the neo-cortex often encountered to allow for appropriate cement intrusion into the remaining cancellous bone. Type II: In this cohort of patients, successful fixation was achieved using a diaphyseal fitting, extensively porous coated implant. However, as the metaphysis is supportive, a cementless implant that achieves primary fixation in the metaphysis can be utilised. Type IIIA: An extensively coated stem of adequate length is utilised to ensure that more than 4 cm of scratch fit is obtained in the diaphysis. Type IIIB: Our present preference is a modular, cementless, tapered stem with flutes for obtaining rotational stability. Type IV: Cementless fixation cannot be reliably used in our experience, as it is difficult to obtain adequate initial implant stability that is required for osseointegration. Reconstruction can be performed with impaction grafting if the cortical tube of the proximal femur is intact. However, this technique can be technically difficult to perform, time consuming and costly given the amount of bone graft that is often required. Although implant subsidence and peri-prosthetic fractures (both intra-operatively and post-operatively) have been associated with this technique, it can provide an excellent solution for the difficult revision femur where cementless fixation cannot be utilised. Alternatively, an allograft-prosthesis composite can be utilised for younger patients in an attempt to reconstitute bone stock and a proximal femoral replacing endoprosthesis used for more elderly patients

Purpose. Tibial and femoral component overhang in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a source of pain, thus is it important to understand anatomic differences between races to minimize overhang by matching the tibial and femoral shaft axis to the knee articular surface. Thus, this study compared knee morphology between Caucasian and East Asian individuals to determine the optimal placement of tibial and femoral stems. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on a matched cohort of 50 East Asians (21F, 29M) and 50 Caucasians (21F, 29M) by age and gender. CT scans were obtained in healthy volunteers using <2mm slices. The distance from the proximal tibial diaphysis axis to the tibial plateau center was measured, and the distance from the distal femoral diaphysis axis to the center of distal femoral articular surface was measured. Tibial measurements were made using Akagi's AP axis and the widest ML diameter, and femoral measurements were based on Whiteside's line and the surgical epicondylar axis. Results. The ML distance between the tibial shaft center and Akagi line was significantly higher for Asians (9.9mm±2.7, Caucasians 7.7mm±3.1, p<0.001). The distance between the femoral shaft center and Whiteside line was lower, although not significantly different (Asians 1.9mm±1.0, Caucasians 2.2mm±1.1, p=0.11). However, there were no differences in the AP dimension for the femur or tibia comparing Asians to Caucasians. Conclusion. East Asian individuals have more offset in the ML dimension for the tibia. This should be taken into consideration when designing primary and revision TKA stemmed tibial implants for East Asian patients

Stems are a crucial part of implant stabilization in revision total knee arthroplasty. In most cases the metaphyseal bone is deficient, and stabilization in the diaphyseal cortical bone is necessary to keep the implant tightly fixed to bone and to prevent tilt and micromotion. While sleeves and cones can be effective in revision total joint arthroplasty, they are technically difficult and may lead to major bone loss in cases of loosening or infection, especially if the stem is cemented past the cone. A much more conservative method is to ream the diaphysis to the least depth possible to achieve tight circumferential fixation, and to apply porous augments to the undersurface of the tibial tray or inner surface of the femoral component to allow them to bottom out against the bone surface and apply compressive load. If a robust, strong taper, stem and component combination is used, rim contact on only one side is necessary to achieve rigid permanent fixation. Porous and non-porous stems are available. The non-porous stems should have a spline surface that engages the diaphyseal bone and achieves rigid initial fixation but does not provide long-term axillary support. In that way the porous rim-engaging surface can bear compressive load and finally unload the stem and taper junction. Correctly designed stems do not stress relieve unless they are porous-coated. In situations where metaphyseal bone is not available, porous-coated stems that link to hinge prostheses are a very important part of the armamentarium in complex revision arthroplasty. Use of stems requires experience and special technique. Slight underreaming and initial scratch fit are necessary techniques. This does not result in tight fixation every time because split of the cortex does occasionally occur. In most cases these splits do not need to be repaired, but when there is a question, an intra-operative x ray should be taken and the surgeon should be prepared to repair the fracture. Stems are an essential part of revision total knee arthroplasty. A tightly fit stem in the diaphysis is necessary for fixation when metaphyseal bone is deficient. No amount of cement pressed into the deficient metaphyseal bone will substitute for rigid stem fixation

Dorr bone type is both a qualitative and quantitative classification. Qualitatively on x-rays the cortical thickness determines the ABC type. The cortical thickness is best judged on a lateral x-ray and the focus is on the posterior cortex. In Type A bone it is a thick convex structure (posterior fin of bone) that can force the tip of the tapered implant anteriorly – which then displaces the femoral head posteriorly into relative retroversion. Fractures in DAA hips have had increased fractures in Type A bone because of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch (metaphysis is bigger than diaphysis in relation to stem size). Quantitatively, Type B bone has osteoclastic erosion of the posterior fin which proceeds from proximal to distal and is characterised by flattening of the fin, and erosive cysts in it from osteoclasts. A tapered stem works well in this bone type, and the bone cells respond positively. Type C bone has loss of the entire posterior fin (stove pipe bone), and the osteoblast function at a low level with dominance of osteoclasts. Type C is also progressive and is worse when both the lateral and AP views show a stove pipe shape. If just the lateral x-ray has thin cortices, and the AP has a tapered thickness of the cortex a non-cemented stem will work, but there is a higher risk for fracture because of weak bone. At surgery Type C bone has “mushy” cancellous bone compared to the hard structure of type A. Tapered stems have high risk for loosening because the diaphysis is bigger than the metaphysis (opposite of Type A). Fully coated rod type stems fix well, but have a high incidence of stress shielding. Cemented fixation is done by surgeons for Type C bone to avoid fracture, and insure a comfortable hip. The large size stem often required to fit Type C bone causes an adverse-stem-bone ratio which can cause chronic thigh pain. I cement patients over age 70 with Type C bone which is most common in women over that age

Infected nonunion of the femur or tibia diaphysis requires resection of infected bone, stabilization of bone and reconstruction of bone defect. External fixation of the femur is poorly tolerated by patients. In 2004 authors introduced in therapy for infected nonunions of tibia and femur diaphysis coating of IMN with a layer of antibiotic loaded acrylic cement (ALAC) containing 5% of culture specific antibiotic. Seven patients with infected nonunion of the diaphysis of femur (2) and tibia (2) were treated, aged 20–63 years, followed for 2–9 years (average 5,5 years). All have been infected with S. aureus (MSSA: 2 and MRSA: 4) or Staph. epidermidis (1) and in one case with MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All patients underwent 3 to 6 operations before authors IMN application. Custom-made IMN coated with acrylic cement (Palamed) loaded fabrically with gentamycin with admixture of 5% of culture-specific antibiotic: vancomycin (7 cases) and meropeneme (1 case) was used for bone stabilization. Static interlocking of IMN was applied in 4 cases and dynamic in 2 cases. In 1 case the femur was stabilized with IMN without interlocking screws. In 2 cases IMN was used for fixation of nonunion at docking site after bone transport. In 3 cases ALAC was used as temporary defect filling and dead space management. In one case after removal of IMN coated with ALAC, a new custom made Gamma nail and tubular bone allograft ranging 11 cm was used for defect reconstruction. Infection healing was achieved in all 7 cases, bone union was achieved in 4 from 7 cases. In 1 case of segmental diaphyseal defect ranging over 12 cm infection was healed, but bone defect was not reconstructed. This patient is waiting for total femoral replacement. In another case of segmental defect of 11 cm infection is healed, but allograft substitution and remodeling by host bone is poor. In the 3rd case of lacking bone healing, the 63 year old patients was noncooperative and not willing to walk in walker with weight bearing. This patient refused further treatment. Custom-made intramedullary nail coated with a layer of acrylic cement loaded with 5% of culture specific antibiotic can provide local infection control, offer comfortable bone stabilization, and replace standard IM nail in therapy for difficult to treat infected diaphyseal nonunion of femur or tibia

The unacceptable failure rate of cemented femoral revisions led to many different cementless femoral designs employing fixation in the damaged proximal femur with biological coatings limited to this area. The results of these devices were uniformly poor and were abandoned for the most part by the mid-1990's. Fully porous coated devices employing distal fixation in the diaphysis emerged as the gold standard for revisions with several authors reporting greater than 90% success rate 8–10 years of follow-up. Surgical techniques and ease of insertion improved with the introduction of the extended trochanteric osteotomy as well as curved, long, fully porous coated stems with diameters up to 23mm. The limits of these stems were stretched to include any stem diameter in which even 1–2cm of diaphyseal contact could be achieved. When diaphyseal fixation was not possible (Type IV), the alternatives were either impaction grafting or allograft prosthetic composite (APC). As the results of fully porous coated stems were very carefully scrutinised, it became apparent that certain types of bone loss did not yield the most satisfactory results both clinically and radiographically. When less than 4cm of diaphyseal press fit (Type IIIB) was achieved, the mechanical failure rate (MFR) was over 25%. It also became apparent that even when there was 4–6cm diaphyseal contact (Type IIIA), and the stem diameter was 18mm or greater, post-operative pain and function scores were significantly less than those with smaller diameter stems. This was probably due to poorer quality bone. Many of these Type IIIA and Type IIIB femurs had severe proximal torsional remodeling leading to marked distortion of anteversion. This made judging the amount of anteversion to apply to the stem at the time of insertion very difficult, leading to higher rates of dislocation. These distortions were not present in Type I and Type II femurs. This chain of events which was a combination of minimal diaphyseal fixation, excessively stiff stems and higher dislocation rates led to the conversion to modular type stems when these conditions existed. For the past 13 years, low modulus taper stems of the Wagner design have been used for almost all Type IIIA and Type IIIB bone defects. The taper design with fluted splines allows for fixation when there is less than 2cm of diaphysis. The results in these femurs even with diameters of up to 26mm have led to very low MFRs and significantly less thigh pain. Independent anteversion adjustment is also a huge advantage in these modular stems. Similar success rates, albeit with less follow-up, have been noted in Type IV femurs

Introduction. The use of stems in TKA revision surgery is well established. Stems off-load stress over a broad surface area of the diaphysis and help protect the metaphyseal interface areas from failure. Stems can provide an area of extra fixation. Uncemented Stems: Advantages – Expeditious; Compatible with intramedullary based revision instrumentation; Easy to remove if necessary; By filling diaphysis they help guarantee axial alignment. Disadvantages - They help off load stress, but how much fixation do they really provide?; They don't fit all canal deformities, and under some circumstances can actually force implants into malalignment; ? potential for end of stem pain. Cemented Stems: Advantages - Cemented stem adds fixation in fresh metaphyseal and diaphyseal bone; Proven 10-year track record; Allow the surgeon to adjust for canal geometry abnormalities. Disadvantages - More difficult to remove if required; They don't fill the canal so they don't guarantee alignment as well under most circumstances. Results:. Favorable results with uncemented and cemented stems have been reported in several series; Cemented stems have longer term data. Technique Issues: Uncemented Stems - Take advantage of offset bolts, tibial trays, stems to fit the stem/implant to the patient's anatomy. Don't let the stem force you into suboptimal implant position; Longer stems can be narrower but help engage more diaphysis; Do a good job of restoring/uncovering cancellous bone in metaphysis for cement interdigitation. The cement provides the fixation. Cemented Stems - Intraoperative x-ray with trials helps guarantee optimal alignment; Use cement restrictors; Cement tibia/femur separately. Metaphyseal Fixation - Area of new emphasis; Cover and sleeves can improve cemented and uncemented fixation

Implants without diaphyseal-fixed stems. The femoral component is removed first. Whether the implants are fixed with cement or osteointegration, the principles are the same. The interface between the metal implant and bone or cement is freed using both osteotome and saw. All interfaces are cut loose before the implant is driven off with either a hand-held driver and hammer or slap-hammer. Driving off the femoral component before it has been completely loosened removes excessive amounts of bone or causes major condylar fracture. The polyethylene component is removed next, and then the tibial component. If the tibial component has no metaphyseal stem, the interfaces are separated directly with osteotome and saw until the tibial component is completely loose. If the tibial component has a metaphyseal stem, it usually requires a direct approach to the stem through a tibial osteotomy to loosen the stem from the cement mantle or bone attachment. If a tibial tubercle osteotomy is used to expose the knee, direct access can be obtained through the osteotomy to expose the attached interfaces. Several cuts with the osteotome will loosen the cement from the stem and allow the tibial component to be lifted from the tibial surface. Special care is taken to ensure that the posterior portion of the tibial surface is completely loosened from the bone before final removal is done. Driving tools and slap-hammers almost never are needed on the tibial component without a diaphyseal stem. Implants with diaphyseal-fixed stems. Well-fixed diaphyseal stems are special challenges and often require bivalve osteotomy of the metaphysis and diaphysis to gain exposure. A sterile tourniquet is an important consideration for femoral stems that likely will require bivalve osteotomy. Preserving blood supply to both sides of the osteotomy can be achieved by maintaining a medial or lateral soft tissue hinge. A drill is used to penetrate the cortex and find the end of the stem, and then the oscillating saw is used to make a longitudinal cut along the medial side of the bone past the tip of the stem. A saw cut is made transversely at this level across the anterior surface of the diaphysis. Next the lateral side of the diaphysis and metaphysis is perforated multiple times with the drill bit and curved ¼-inch osteotome, leaving the periosteal attachment intact to the anterior bone flap. The bone flap then is carefully pried loose from the anterior surface of the stem. This exposes the stem in the posterior portion of the bone. The interfaces then can be carefully separated from the stem, allowing it to be lifted from the bone. Repair of the femur and tibia requires cables that are passed around the bone and through the soft tissue hinges of the bone flaps. Revising with stems that bypass the osteotomy is a theoretical advantage, but this is not always possible