Introduction. There is a need for a standardised guideline to assist in optimal decision-making in diabetics who have acquired an ankle fracture. Through a critical analysis of the literature, a diagnostic and management algorithm that incorporates a quantitative scoring system is proposed and presented for consideration. Methods. Publications were identified by conducting a comprehensive keyword search of Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Search terms included “diabetes,” “ankle,” and “fracture”. Articles published in the English language that were pertinent to the topic were included. Manual search of the references in these relevant papers were also completed to further identify publications for potential inclusion. Publications and conferences not published in the English language or not pertinent to the topic in the above databases were excluded. Duplicate results that occurred in different databases were truncated to a single result. Results. A total of 352 results were revealed using the above methods. Of these, 59 articles met our inclusion criteria. 293 articles met our exclusion criteria. A further 9 articles were included after reviewing the included articles and their respective references. From these results, we propose a detailed diagnostic algorithm that may provide a systematic approach to a diabetic patient who presents with acute ankle pain, swelling, warmth, and/or redness. If a fracture is noted on plain radiographs, a proposed management algorithm and scoring system can be used to assist in deciding whether to proceed with primary open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis/rigid fixation. This scoring system is based on factors acquired through history and examination. Major factors have been allocated a score of 2, which include: previous or coinciding history of Charcot arthropathy, peripheral neuropathy, insulin dependence with poor compliance, and a diabetic history of greater than 20 years. Minor factors have been allocated a score of 1, which include: age > 50, nephropathy, retinopathy, osteoporosis, vasculopathy, and presence of nutrition/diet deficiency. A score of greater than 7 suggests a primary limb-salvage arthrodesis/rigid fixation because of the likely poor outcome in a primary ORIF. A score of less than 7 suggests that an acceptable outcome will likely result with a primary ORIF. Discussion. Through the use of the AFDA algorithm and score, it will hopefully provide a standardised approach to diabetic ankle fractures and; a method of quantifying risks for both the patient and affected ankle joint, thus, allowing the surgeon to have confidence in achieving the best possible outcome. Although this score is based on a critical analysis of the current literature, further validation of both this algorithm and score is recommended. Once validated, the AFDA score in particular, can also potentially be used as a research tool for further follow-up and outcome studies on diabetic ankle fractures

We reviewed 27 diabetic patients who sustained a tibial fracture treated with a reamed intramedullary nail and compared them with a control group who did not have diabetes. There were 23 closed fractures and four were open. Union was delayed until after six months in 12 of the 23 (52%) diabetic patients with closed fractures and ten of the 23 (43%) control patients (p = 0.768). In two patients with diabetes (9%), closed tibial fractures failed to unite and required exchange nailing, whereas all closed fractures in the control group healed without further surgery (p = 0.489). In both the diabetic and control groups with closed fractures two patients (9%) developed superficial infections. There were two (9%) deep infections in diabetic patients with closed fractures, but none in the control group (p = 0.489). Overall, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the diabetic patients and the control group, but there was a tendency for more severe infections in patients with diabetes

To determine the relative risk of complications in treating ankle fractures in patients with diabetes, we compared the results of the management of displaced malleolar fractures in 26 patients with those of a matched group of non-diabetic patients, using a case-controlled study. The groups were matched for patient age, fracture type and treating surgeon. The incidence of significant complications in diabetic patients was 42.3%. By contrast, there were no complications in the matched group of non-diabetic patients. Of 19 diabetic patients treated surgically, six developed major complications including one case of malunion, one of necrosis of the wound edge requiring a flap, and two of deep sepsis. Two patients required amputation and both died. Diabetic patients with displaced ankle fractures treated non-operatively had a high incidence of loss of reduction and malunion but these caused few symptoms. In these patients, non-operative management may be preferable in view of the high risks of major complications after surgery and the acceptance of malunion by the older patient with lower demands

Between 2000 and 2006 we performed salvage tibiotalar arthrodesis in 17 diabetic patients (17 ankles) with grossly unstable ankles caused by bimalleolar fractures complicated by Charcot neuro-arthropathy. There were ten women and seven men with a mean age of 61.6 years (57 to 69). A crossed-screw technique was used. Two screws were used in eight patients and three screws in nine. Additional graft from the malleoli was used in all patients. The mean follow-up was 26 months (12 to 48) and the mean time to union was 5.8 months (4 to 8). A stable ankle was achieved in 14 patients (82.4%), nine of whom had bony fusion and five had a stiff fibrous union. The results were significantly better in underweight patients, in those in whom surgery had been performed three to six months after the onset of acute Charcot arthropathy, in those who had received anti-resorptive medication during the acute stage, in those without extensive peripheral neuropathy, and in those with adequate peripheral oxygen saturation (> 95%). The arthrodesis failed because of avascular necrosis of the talus in only three patients (17.6%), who developed grossly unstable, ulcerated hindfeet, and required below-knee amputation

Aims. Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. Methods. Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. Results. In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). Conclusion. This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):746–752

Reconfiguration of elective orthopaedic surgery presents challenges and opportunities to develop outpatient pathways to reduce surgical waiting times. Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a benign progressive fibroproliferative disorder of the fascia in the hand, which can be disabling. Percutaneous-needle-fasciotomy (PNF) can be performed successfully in the outpatient clinic. The Aberdeen hand-service has over 10 years' experience running dedicated PNF clinics. NHS Grampian covers a vast area of Scotland receiving over 11749 referrals to the orthopaedic unit yearly. 250 patients undergone PNF in the outpatient department annually. 100 patients who underwent PNF in outpatients (Jan2019–Jan2020). 79M, 21F. Average age 66 years range (29–87). 95 patients were right hand dominant. DD risk factors: 6 patients were diabetic, 2 epileptic, 87 patients drank alcohol. 76 patients had a family history of DD. Disease severity, single digit 20 patients, one hand multiple digits in 15 patients, bilateral hands in 65 patients of which 5 suffered form ectopic manifestation suggestive of Dupuytren's diasthesis. Using Tubiana Total flexion deformity score pre and post fasciotomy. Type 1 total flexion deformity (TFD) between 0–45 degrees pre PNF n=60 post N= 85, Type 2 TFD 45–90 degrees pre PNF n=18 post N=9, Type 3 TFD 90–135 pre PNF n=15 post N= 5, Type 4 TFD >135 pre PNF n=1 post PNF N=1. Using Chi-square statistical test, a significant difference was found at the p<0.05 between the pre and post PNF TFD. Complication: 8 recurrence, 1 skin tear. No patients sustained digital nerve injury. Outpatients PNF clinics are a valuable resource

Aims

To report the outcomes of patients with a fracture of the distal tibia who were treated with intramedullary nail versus locking plate in the five years after participating in the Fixation of Distal Tibia fracture (FixDT) trial.

Background. The recommended indications for total ankle replacement (TAR) are limited, leaving fusion as the only definitive alternative. As longer-term clinical results become more promising, should we be broadening our indications for TAR?. Materials and Methods. Our single-centre series has 133 Mobility TARs with 3–48 months' follow-up. 16 patients were excluded who were part of a separate RCT. The series was divided into two groups. ‘Ideal’ patients had all of the following criteria: age >60y, BMI <30, varus/valgus talar tilt <10°, not diabetic, not Charcot, not post-traumatic. The ‘Not ideal’ group contained those who did not fit any single criteria. We compared complications and outcome scores between both groups. Results. The ‘Ideal’ group contained 44 ankles vs. 80 in the ‘Not ideal’ group (124 ankles in 117 patients). Complications were (‘Ideal’ vs. ‘Not ideal’): infection: 1 (deep) vs. 3; DVT/PE: 0; periprostheticfracture: 4 vs. 7; CRPS: 2 vs. 2; revision: 0 vs. 2. AOFAS scores showed variable significance (mean values). Pre-op: 27.9 vs. 25.7 (p = 0.459); 3months: 79.4 vs. 73.2 (p = 0.041); 6 months: 79.9 vs. 75.4 (p = 0.053); 12 months: 79.7 vs. 75.8(p = 0.228), 36 months: 77.3 vs. 79.0 (p = 0.655). Further subgroup analysis has been performed. Discussion. Our results show that indications for TAR can be widened without further morbidity. Each case must be treated individually and accounted for other factors. Varus/valgus tilt can be corrected with appropriate calcaneal osteotomy +/- tendon transfers as a staged or combined procedure. TAR may be considered in younger patients based on functional and occupational demands. We may no longer be able to deter patients on BMI alone. Diabetic patients do not appear to have a higher complication rate. Conclusion. We have increasing evidence that we should now be considering TAR as the primary treatment for disabling ankle arthritis rather than fusion

Introduction. Segmental bone defect is a challenging problem. We report our experience of bone transport by hexapod external fixator in patients with segmental defects if the tibia. Method. We report herein 15 patients with segmental bone defect of tibia who completed their treatment protocol. All patients were treated had bone transport with Taylor Spatial Frame from 2012 to 2017. All were treated by the senior author NH. Parameters measured included age, sex, diabetes, smoking, diagnosis, method of fixation prior to treatment use of a free flap, bone defect size, frame-time, external fixation index. Results. Mean age at the time of frame application was 42.7 years. Mean follow-up after frame removal was 23.7 months. Three were diabetic, one smoked and one quit smoking during treatment. Seven had Gustilo-Anderson 3B (47%) and 5 Gustilo-Anderson 3A (33%) open fractures. Three (20%) had closed fractures. Nine (60%) had internal fixation with plate in eight and IM nail in one. Ten patients (67%) had soft tissue defect that required a free flap in seven, local flap in two and skin graft in one. Mean transport was 62 mm. Mean external fixator time and latency were 350.1 and 12 days, respectively. Mean External fixator, distraction and maturation indices were 2.1, 0.52 and 1.43 month per centimeter, respectively. Ten Extra- procedures were required in 7 patients. There were no docking site procedures, non-union of regenerate, adjunctive stabilization after frame removal, recurrence of bone infection and recurrence of deformity. Conclusions. Segmental resection and transport by TSF is an effective method to achieve length, alignment and eradicate infection. Although our cohort had longer external fixator indices than similar studies, the complication rate was low

We have previously reported that fibular nailing in the elderly is associated with a significantly reduced complication rate and greater cost-effectiveness when compared to ORIF. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fibular nailing to ORIF in patients under the age of 65. 100 patients aged 18 to 64 were randomly allocated between groups. Outcomes assessed over two years post-operatively included: development of wound complications or radiographic arthritis, the accuracy of reduction and patient satisfaction. The mean age was 44, 25% of patients were smokers and 35% had some form of comorbidity of whom three were diabetic. 27 injuries occurred after sport and two after assault the remainder occurred after a simple fall from a standing height. Superficial wound infections occurred in two patients in each group. Six patients requested removal of the nail, and six patients requested plate and screw removal. Patient reported outcome scores were comparable for the two groups. Two failures of fixation occurred in the fibular nail group; one in a patient with neuropathy. One failure of fixation occurred in the ORIF group. All other patients went on to an anatomical union without complication. Patient satisfaction with the surgical scar was higher after fibular nailing (visual analogue scale mean 0.75, range 0–5) than for ORIF (mean 1.5, range 0–7). The fibular nail allows accurate reduction and secure fixation of ankle fractures with comparable radiographic and patient-reported outcomes to ORIF at two years and a greater patient satisfaction with the appearance of the surgical scars

Aims

Despite long-standing dogma, a clear relationship between the timing of surgical irrigation and debridement (I&D) and the development of subsequent deep infection has not been established in the literature. Traditionally, I&D of an open fracture has been recommended within six hours of injury based on animal studies from the 1970s, however the clinical basis for this remains unclear. Using data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of 2,447 open fracture patients, the primary objective of this secondary analysis is to determine if a relationship exists between timing of wound I&D (within six hours of injury vs beyond six hours) and subsequent reoperation rate for infection or healing complications within one year for patients with open limb fractures requiring surgical treatment.

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to identify independent predictors associated with nonunion and delayed union of tibial diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. The secondary aim was to assess the Radiological Union Scale for Tibial fractures (RUST) score as an early predictor of tibial fracture nonunion.

Aims

To identify the prevalence of neuropathic pain after lower limb fracture surgery, assess associations with pain severity, quality of life and disability, and determine baseline predictors of chronic neuropathic pain at three and at six months post-injury.

Aims

This study sought to compare the rate of deep surgical site infection (SSI), as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition, after surgery for a fracture of the hip between patients treated with standard dressings and those treated with incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT). Secondary objectives included determining the rate of recruitment and willingness to participate in the trial.

Aims

Infection after surgery increases treatment costs and is associated with increased mortality. Hip fracture patients have historically had high rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and surgical site infection (SSI). This paper reports the impact of routine MRSA screening and the “cleanyourhands” campaign on rates of MRSA SSI and patient outcome.

Aims

Type IIIB open tibial fractures are devastating high-energy injuries. At initial debridement, the surgeon will often be faced with large bone fragments with tenuous, if any, soft-tissue attachments. Conventionally these are discarded to avoid infection. We aimed to determine if orthoplastic reconstruction using mechanically relevant devitalized bone (ORDB) was associated with an increased infection rate in type IIIB open tibial shaft fractures.

Aims

Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment.

Aims

The primary aim of this prognostic study was to identify baseline factors associated with physical health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients after a femoral neck fracture. The secondary aims were to identify baseline factors associated with mental HRQL, hip function, and health utility.

Aims

The aims of this study were to quantify health state utility values (HSUVs) after a tibial fracture, investigate the effect of complications, to determine the trajectory in HSUVs that result in these differences and to quantify the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) experienced by patients.

Our aim was to compare the one-year post-operative outcomes following retention or removal of syndesmotic screws in adult patients with a fracture of the ankle that was treated surgically. A total of 51 patients (35 males, 16 females), with a mean age of 33.5 years (16 to 62), undergoing fibular osteosynthesis and syndesmotic screw fixation, were randomly allocated to retention of the syndesmotic screw or removal at three months post-operatively. The two groups were comparable at baseline.

One year post-operatively, there was no significant difference in the mean Olerud–Molander ankle score (82.4 retention vs 86.7 removal, p = 0.367), the mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (88.6 vs 90.1, p = 0.688), the mean American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons foot and ankle score (96.3 vs 94.0, p = 0.250), the mean visual analogue pain score (1.0 vs 0.7, p = 0.237), the mean active dorsiflexion (10.2° vs 13.0°, p = 0.194) and plantar flexion (33.6° vs 31.3°, p = 0.503) of the ankle, or the mean radiological tibiofibular clear space (5.0 mm vs 5.3 mm, p = 0.276) between the two groups. A total of 19 patients (76%) in the retention group had a loose and/or broken screw one year post-operatively.

We conclude that removal of a syndesmotic screw produces no significant functional, clinical or radiological benefit in adult patients who are treated surgically for a fracture of the ankle.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1699–1705.