Introduction. Untreated hip osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition leading to pain, bone deformation, and limited range of motion. Unfortunately, studies have not been conducted under in vivo conditions to determine progressive kinematics variations to a hip joint from normal to pre-operative and post-operative THA conditions. Therefore, the objective was this study was to quantify normal and degenerative hip kinematics, compared to post-operative hip kinematics. Methods. Twenty unique subjects were analyzed; 10 healthy, normal subjects and 10 degenerative, subjects analyzed pre-operatively and then again post-operatively after receiving a THA. During each assessment, the subject performed a gait (stance and swing phase) activity under mobile, fluoroscopic surveillance. The normal and diseased subjects had CT scans in order to acquire bone geometry while implanted subjects had corresponding CAD models supplied. Femoral head and acetabular cup centers were approximated by spheres based on unique geometries while the component centers were pre-defined as the center of mass. These centers were used to compare femoral head sliding magnitudes on the acetabular cup during the activity for all subjects. Subjects were noted to have separation with changes in center magnitudes of more than 1 mm during gait. Utilizing 3D-to-2D registration techniques, the hip joint kinematics were derived and assessed. This allowed for visualization of normal subject positioning, pre-op bone deterioration, and implant placement within the bones. Results. None of the normal, experienced femoral head sliding (FHS) within the acetabulum. Two of the normal subjects revealed tendencies more similar to a degenerative hip. However, 4/10 of the degenerative subjects saw significant FHS with an average maximum of 1.344 0.522 mm. It was interesting to note that none of the implanted subjects experienced FHS, demonstrating improved kinematic trends more normal-like and revealing better kinematic patterns post-operative compared to their pre-operative conditions. Discussion. Overall, analysis has revealed trends of degenerative hips experiencing more abnormal hip kinematics due to lower surface area and greater magnitudes of femoral center head displacement. The implanted subjects saw decreased amounts of displacement which correlated to increases in contact area. These results more closely matched normal hip kinematics and showed an improvement over their diseased condition. It seems that the surgeon in this study better replicated the stem version angle to the pre-operative conditions, leaving less transverse stress of the femoral head on the acetabular cup, possibly leading to the femoral head remaining within the acetabular cup and the subjects not experiencing FHS. Significance. Pre-operative, degenerative hip subjects displayed abnormal femoral hip displacement at greater magnitudes to normal hip subjects. After THA, these subjects saw reduced magnitudes of displacement more in line with normal hip kinematics. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Subluxation and dislocation are frequently cited reasons for THA revision. For patients who cannot accommodate a larger femoral head, an offset liner may enhance stability. However, this change in biomechanics may impact the mechanical performance of the bearing surface. To our knowledge, no studies have compared wear rates of offset and neutral liners. Herein we radiographically compare the in-vivo wear performance of 0mm and 4mm offset acetabular liners. Methods. Two cohorts of 40 individuals (0mm, 4mm offset highly crosslinked acetabular liners, respectively) were selected from a single surgeon's consecutive caseload. All patients received the same THA system via the posterior approach. AP radiographs were taken at 6-week (‘pre’) and 5-year (‘post’) postoperative appointments. Patients with poor radiograph quality were excluded (n. 0mm. =5, n. 4mm. =4). Linear and volumetric wear were quantified according to Patent US5610966A. Briefly, images were processed in computer aided design (CAD) software. Differences in vector length between the center of the femoral head and the acetabular cup (pre- and post-vector, Figure 1) allow for calculation of linear wear and wear rate. The angle (β) between the linear wear vector and the cup inclination line was quantified (Figure 1). Patients with negative β were excluded from volumetric analyses (n. 0mm. =11, n. 4mm. =7). Volumetric wear was accordingly calculated accounting for wear vector direction. The results from three randomly selected patients were compared to results achieved using the “Hip Analysis Suite” software package (UChicagoTech). Results. Linear wear rate (Figure 2A) for 0mm offsets was significantly lower than the 4mm offsets (0.011±0.091 vs. 0.080±0.122mm/yr, p=0.008). Volumetric wear rate (Figure 2B) for 0mm offsets was significantly lower than the 4mm offsets (30.37±20.45 versus 61.58±42.14mm. 3. /year, p=0.001). Demographic differences existed between the two cohorts (age, gender, femoral head size, and acetabular cup size). However, there were no significant correlations found between linear/volumetric wear rate and any demographic including age, gender, BMI, femoral head size, or acetabular cup size. Validation showed no significant differences between the CAD method used herein and the gold standard method (0.083±0.014 versus 0.093±0.041mm/year, p=0.71). Discussion. This study is the first to show that 0mm offset liners have significantly lower linear and volumetric wear rates than do 4mm offset liners. Despite this difference, no revisions have been required in either cohort. The linear wear rates computed in this study are below literature-reported clinically relevant values for wear-induced-osteolysis (∼0.10mm/year). As such, the clinical impact of this wear rate difference is unknown. The higher wear rate in the offset group may owe to the altered biomechanics of the construct. By lateralizing the femoral head through an offset liner, the femur is lateralized with respect to the patient's center of mass (COM) (Figure 3). To maintain stability, the patient must pull the COM over the femoral head by increasing force from the hip abductors. This increased force is transmitted through the polyethylene acetabular liner. Thus, increased wear may result from the forces required to maintain balance in gait. Further work is needed to determine whether these higher wear rates will have clinical sequelae

For a proper rehabilitation of the knee following knee arthroplasty, a comprehensive understanding of bony and soft tissue structures and their effects on biomechanics of the individual patient is essential. Musculoskeletal models have the potential, however, to predict dynamic interactions of the knee joint and provide knowledge to the understanding of knee biomechanics. Our goal was to develop a generic musculoskeletal knee model which is adaptable to subject-specific situations and to use in-vivo kinematic measurements obtained under full-weight bearing condition in a previous Upright-MRI study of our group for a proper validation of the simulation results. The simulation model has been developed and adapted to subject-specific cases in the multi-body simulation software AnyBody. For the implementation of the knee model a reference model from the AnyBody Repository was adapted for the present issue. The standard hinge joint was replaced with a new complex knee joint with 6DoF. The 3D bone geometries were obtained from an optimized MRI scan and then post-processed in the mesh processing software MeshLab. A homogenous dilation of 3 mm was generated for each bone and used as articulating surfaces. The anatomical locations of viscoelastic ligaments and muscle attachments were determined based on literature data. Ligament parameters, such as elongation and slack length, were adjusted in a calibration study in two leg stance as reference position. For the subject-specific adaptation a general scaling law, taking segment length, mass and fat into account, was used for a global scaling. The scaling law was further modified to allow a detailed adaption of the knee region, e.g. align the subject-specific knee morphology (including ligament and muscle attachments) in the reference model. The boundary conditions were solely described by analytical methods since body motion (apart from the knee region) or force data were not recorded in the Upright-MRI study. Ground reaction forces have been predicted and a single leg deep knee bend was simulated by kinematic constraints, such as that the centre of mass is positioned above the ankle joint. The contact forces in the knee joint were computed using the force dependent kinematic algorithm. Finally, the simulation model was adapted to three subjects, a single leg deep knee bend was simulated, subject-specific kinematics were recorded and then compared to their corresponding in-vivo kinematic measurements data. We were able to simulate the whole group of subjects over the complete range of motion. The tibiofemoral kinematics of three subjects could be simulated showing the overall trend correctly, whereas absolute values partially differ. In conclusion, the presented simulation model is highly adaptable to an individual situation and seems to be suitable to approximate subject-specific knee kinematics without consideration of cartilage and menisci. The model enables sensitivity analyses regarding changes in patient specific knee kinematics following e.g. surgical interventions on bone or soft tissue as well as related to the design and placement of partial or total knee joint replacement. However, model optimisation, a higher case number, sensitivity analyses of selected parameters and a semi-automation of the workflow are parts of our ongoing work

Aims

The aetiologies of common degenerative spine, hip, and knee pathologies are still not completely understood. Mechanical theories have suggested that those diseases are related to sagittal pelvic morphology and spinopelvic-femoral dynamics. The link between the most widely used parameter for sagittal pelvic morphology, pelvic incidence (PI), and the onset of degenerative lumbar, hip, and knee pathologies has not been studied in a large-scale setting.