UKA with mobile bearing is a one of the treatment of medial osteoarthritis. However, some reports refer to the risk of dislocation of the mobile bearing. Past reports pointed out that medial gap might be enlarged in deep flexion position (over 120 degrees), and says that it will lead to instability of the mobile bearing. The purpose of this study is to research the risk factors of enlargement of medial gap in deep flexion position.

We performed 81 UKAs with mobile bearing system from November 2013 to December 2015, and could evaluate 41 knees. This study of 41 knees included 9 males and 32 females, with average operation age of 75.4years(63–89years). The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 39 knees and osteonecrosis in 2 knees. The UKA(Oxford partial knee microplasty, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was used in all cases. We performed distal femur and proximal tibia osteotomy using CT-Free navigation system(Stryker Navigation System II/precision Knee Navigation ver4.0). And we inserted femoral and tibial trial component, then we placed an UKA tensioner on the medial component of the knee. Using tensioner under 30 lbs, we measured joint medial gap at 0,20,45,90,130(deep flexion) degrees. When we compared medial gap at 90 degrees position with at 130 degrees, we defined it as ‘instability group’ if there was gap enlargement more than 1mm, and defined it as ‘stability group’ if there wasn't.

We compared this two groups with regard to age, BMI, femoro-tibial angle (FTA), the diameter of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), tibial angle and tibial posterior slope angle of the implant. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative FTA by weightbearing long leg antero-posterior alignment view X-rays. We measured ACL diameter at its condyle level in coronal view of MRI. Also we evaluated tibial component implantation angle by postoperative CT using 3D template system. These measurement were analyzed statistically using t test.

The stability group contained 26 knees, and the instability group contained 15 knees. Compared with the stability group, the instability group indicated higher FTA (p=0.001). Between 20 and 90 degrees flexion position, there was no change of medial gap.

Dislocation of the mobile bearing is one of the complications of UKA and it will need re-operation. It is said to be caused by impingement of the bearing and osteophyte of femur. However, some reports said that dislocation was happened when the knee was flexed deeply or twisted, and there was no impingement. We think it may means that dislocation could be caused by medial gap enlargement.

This study indicates that higher FTA could be risk factor of dislocation of mobile bearing. It is important to evaluate preoperatively FTA by X-ray.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate accuracy of tibia cutting and tibia implantation in UKA which used navigation system for tibia cutting and tibia component implantation, and to evaluate clinical results.

We performed 72 UKAs using navigation system from November, 2012. This study of 72 knees included 56 females and 16 males with an average operation age of 74.2 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 24.8 kg/m2. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis (OA) in 67 knees and osteonecrosis (ON) in 5 knees. The UKA (Oxford partial knee microplasty, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was used all cases. We evaluated patients clinically using the Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score, range of motion (ROM), operation time, the amount of bleeding and complications. Patients were evaluated clinically at preoperation and final follow up in JOA score and ROM. As an radiologic examination, we evaluated preoperative and postoperative lower limb alignment in FTA (femoro-tibial angle) by weightbearing long leg antero-posterior alignment view X-rays. Also we evaluated a tibial component implantation angle by postoperative CT, and tibia cutting angle by intraoperative navigation system. We defined the tibial angle which a tibia functional axis and the tibia component made in coronal plane, also tibial posterior slope angle which a tibia axis and tibia component made in sagittal plane by CT. We measured tibial angle and tibial posterior slope angle by 3D template system.

We performed UKA in all cases mini-midvastus approach. At first we performed osteotomy of the proximal medial tibia using CT-Free navigation. At this procedure we performed osteotomy to do re-cut if check did cutting surface in navigation, and there was cutting error (>3°), and then to do check again in navigation. Next we did not use navigation and went the osteotomy of the distal femur with an IM rod and drill guide of microplasty system. And then we performed a trial and decided bearing gap and moved to cementing. At first we went cementing of the tibia component. At this procedure we went to drive implant again if check did implant surface in navigation, and there was implantation error(>3°), and to do check. We checked did tibia cutting, tibia implantation carefully in navigation. In addition, We sterilize a clips and use it came to be in this way possible for the check of the first osteotomy side exactly.

ROM was an average of 122.7° of preoperation became an average of 128.2° at final follow up, and JOA score was an average of 50.5 points of preoperation improved an average of 86.6 points at final follow up after UKA. An average of the operation time was 94 minutes, an average of the amount of bleeding was 137.7ml, and complications were one proximal type deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and one pin splinter joining pain by navigation, .Asetic loosening(tibial component) was one case, and this conversed the TKA.

In the radiologic evaluation, FTA was an average of 182.1° of preoperation corrected an average of 175.9°after UKA. In other words, an average of 6.2° were corrected by UKA. The tibia component implantation angle was an average of 90.18° in a measurement by the CT after UKA, intoraoperative tibia component implantation angle was an average of 90.32° in a measurement by the navigation system. These two differences did not accept the significant difference at an average of 1.33°.(P=0.5581). Similarly, the posterior slope angle were as follow; average of 5.65°by CT and average of 5.75°by navigation. These two differences did not accept the significant difference at an average of 1.33°. (P=0.6475)

Discussion: We performed UKA using navigation and evaluated the implantation accuracy for tibia osteotomy, tibia implantation. They were good alignment with an average of 90.18°, and outliers more than 3° were two cases(2.8%). It will be necessary to examine long-term progress including clinical results complications in future. We are performed UKA now in femur side using PSI(patient specific instruments) and tbia side using Navigation.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a higher risk of revision than total knee arthroplasty, particularly for low volume surgeons. The recent introduction of robotic-arm assisted systems has allowed for increased accuracy, however new systems typically have learning curves. The objective of this study was to determine the learning curve of a robotic-arm assisted system for UKA. Methods A total of 152 consecutive robotic-arm assisted primary medial UKA were performed by five surgeons between 2017 and 2021. Operative times, implant positioning, reoperations and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS; Oxford Knee Score, EuroQol-5D, and Forgotten Joint Score) were recorded. There was a learning curve of 11 cases with the system that was associated with increased operative time (13 minutes, p<0.01) and improved insert sizing over time (p=0.03). There was no difference in implant survival (98.2%) between learning and proficiency phases (p = 0.15), and no difference in survivorship between ‘high’ and ‘low’ usage surgeons (p = 0.23) at 36 months. There were no differences in PROMS related to the learning curve. This suggested that the learning curve did not lead to early adverse effects in this patient cohort. The introduction of a robotic-arm assisted UKA system led to learning curves for operative time and implant sizing, but there was no effect on patient outcomes at early follow- up. The short learning curve was independent of UKA usage and indicated that robotic-arm assisted UKA may be particularly useful for low-usage surgeons

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are well-established operative interventions in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, which of these interventions is more beneficial, to patients with KOA, is not known and remains a topic of much debate. Aims: (i) To determine whether UKA or HTO is more beneficial in the treatment of isolated medial compartment KOA, via an assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). (ii) To investigate the relationship between PROMs and radiographic parameters of knee joint orientation/alignment. This longitudinal observational study assessed a total of 42 patients that had undergone UKA (n=23) or HTO (n=19) to treat isolated medial compartment KOA. The PROMs assessed, pre-operatively and 1-year post-operatively, consisted of the: self-administered comorbidity questionnaire; short form-12; oxford knee score; knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; and the EQ-5D-5L. The radiographic parameters of knee joint alignment/orientation assessed, pre-operatively and 8-weeks post-operatively, included the: hip-knee-ankle angle; mechanical axis deviation; and the angle of the Mikulicz line. Statistical analysis demonstrated an overall significant (p<0.001), pre-operative to post-operative, improvement in the PROM scores of both groups. There were no significant differences in the post-operative PROM scores of the UKA and HTO group. Correlation analyses revealed that pre-operatively, a more distolaterally angled Mikulicz line was associated with worse knee function (p<0.05) and overall health (p<0.05); a relationship that, until now, has not been investigated nor commented upon within the literature. UKAs and HTOs are both efficacious operations that provide a comparable degree of clinical benefit to patients with isolated medial compartment KOA. To further the scientific/medical community's understanding of the factors that impact upon health-outcomes in KOA, future research should seek to investigate the mechanism underlying the relationship, between Mikulicz line and PROMs, observed within the current study

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is associated with a higher risk of revision compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The outcomes of knee arthroplasty are typically presented as implant survival or incidence of revision after a set number of years, which can be difficult for patients and clinicians to conceptualise. We aimed to calculate the ‘lifetime risk’ of revision for UKA as a more relatable estimate of risk projection over a patient's remaining lifetime, and make comparisons to TKA. All primary UKAS performed from 1999 to 2019 (n=13,481) captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) were included. The lifetime risk of revision was calculated and stratified by age, gender and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. The lifetime risk of revision for UKA was highest in the youngest patients (46-50 years; 40.4%) and lowest in the oldest patients (86-90 years; 3.7%). Lifetime risk of revision was higher for females (range 4.3%-43.4% cf. males 2.9%-37.4%) and patients with higher ASA status (ASA 3-4 range 8.8%-41.2% cf. ASA 1 1.8%-29.8%), regardless of age. The lifetime risk of UKA was two-fold higher than TKA (ranging from 3.7%-40.4% UKA, 1.6%-22.4% TKA) across all age groups. Increased risk of revision in the younger patients was associated with aseptic loosening in both males and females, and pain in females. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) accounted for 4% of all UKA revisions, in contrast to 27% for TKA; risk of PJI was higher for males than females for both procedures. The lifetime risk of revision is a more meaningful measure of arthroplasty outcomes and can aid with patient counselling prior to UKA. Findings from this study show the increased lifetime risk of UKA revision for younger patients, females and those with higher ASA status

Introduction and Objective. In recent studies, robotic-assisted surgical techniques for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have demonstrated superior implant positioning and limb alignment compared to a conventional technique. However, the impact of the robotic-assisted technique on clinical and functional outcomes is less clear. The aim of this study was to compare the gait parameters of UKA performed with conventional and image-free robotic-assisted techniques. Materials and Methods. This prospective, single center study included 66 medial UKA, randomized to a robotic-assisted (n=33) or conventional technique (n=33). Gait analysis was performed on a treadmill at 6 months to identify changes in gait characteristics (walking speed, each degree-of-freedom: flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior displacement). Clinical results were assessed at 6 months using the IKS score and the Forgotten Joint Score. Implants position was assessed on post-operative radiographs. Results. Post-operatively, the whole gait cycle was not significantly different between groups. In both groups there was a significant improvement in varus deformity between the pre- and post-operative gait cycle. There was no significant difference between the two groups in clinical scores, implant position, revision and complication rates. Conclusions. No difference of gait parameters could be identified between medial UKA performed with image-free robotic-assisted technique or with conventional technique

Objectives. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain. Methods. A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system. Results. A 5° increase in tibial component posterior slope resulted in a 53% increase in mean major principal strain in the posterior tibial zone adjacent to the implant (p = 0.003). The highest strains for all implant positions were recorded in the anterior cortex 2 cm to 3 cm distal to the implant. Posteriorly, strain tended to decrease with increasing distance from the implant. Lateral cortical strain showed no significant relationship with implant position. Conclusion. Relatively small changes in implant position and orientation may significantly affect tibial cortical strain. Avoidance of excessive posterior tibial slope may be advisable during lateral UKA. Cite this article: A. M. Ali, S. D. S. Newman, P. A. Hooper, C. M. Davies, J. P. Cobb. The effect of implant position on bone strain following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Model Using Digital Image Correlation. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:522–529. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2017-0067.R1

Objectives. This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. Methods. A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, Short Form-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale, somatic disease (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Score), Pain visual analogue scale, analgesic use, patient satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90-day pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery. Results. From the first post-operative day through to week 8 post-operatively, the median pain scores for the robotic arm-assisted group were 55.4% lower than those observed in the manual surgery group (p = 0.040). At three months post-operatively, the robotic arm-assisted group had better AKSS (robotic median 164, interquartile range (IQR) 131 to 178, manual median 143, IQR 132 to 166), although no difference was noted with the OKS. At one year post-operatively, the observed differences with the AKSS had narrowed from a median of 21 points to a median of seven points (p = 0.106) (robotic median 171, IQR 153 to 179; manual median 164, IQR 144 to 182). No difference was observed with the OKS, and almost half of each group reached the ceiling limit of the score (OKS > 43). A greater proportion of patients receiving robotic arm-assisted surgery improved their UCLA activity score. Binary logistic regression modelling for dichotomised outcome scores predicted the key factors associated with achieving excellent outcome on the AKSS: a pre-operative activity level > 5 on the UCLA activity score and use of robotic-arm surgery. For the same regression modelling, factors associated with a poor outcome were manual surgery and pre-operative depression. Conclusion. Robotic arm-assisted surgery results in improved early pain scores and early function scores in some patient-reported outcomes measures, but no difference was observed at one year post-operatively. Although improved results favoured the robotic arm-assisted group in active patients (i.e. UCLA ⩾ 5), these do not withstand adjustment for multiple comparisons. Cite this article: M. J. G. Blyth, I. Anthony, P. Rowe, M. S. Banger, A. MacLean, B. Jones. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:631–639. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2017-0060.R1

In recent years, reduction in the length of stay in patients undergoing UKA has gained considerable interest. This has led to development of ‘fast-track' and even day-case protocols aimed at decreasing length of stay (LOS), enhancing post-operative recovery and decreasing post-operative morbidity. One potential barrier to faster discharge and patient recovery is the need for post-operative haemoglobin checks and allogenic blood transfusion; which has been shown to increase LOS. Allogenic blood transfusion itself is not without risk, including immunological reactions, transfusion associated lung injury, infection and transmission of disease, thus reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion is imperative. Currently there is a knowledge gap regarding post-operative transfusion need and blood loss following UKA. We aimed to investigate blood loss and transfusion rates following UKA. Our primary aim was to evaluate the extent of post-operative transfusion need following UKA and identify which patients are at higher risk of needing transfusion. Following institutional approval, a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) at our level one academic university hospital was conducted. Operative records of all patients undergoing primary UKA were reviewed between March 2016 and March 2019. Patients' pre-operative haemoglobin and haematocrit, BMI, co-morbidities, application of tourniquet, tourniquet time, administration of Tranexamic Acid, need for post-operative blood transfusion, hospital length of stay, complications and re-admission were all recorded. Blood loss was estimated using the post-operative haematocrit. A total number of 155 patients were included. There were 70 females (45%) and 85 males (55%). The mean age was 66±10 years. Median pre-op blood volume was 4700mls (IQR; 4200–5100). Median blood loss was 600 mls (IQR; 400–830). Mean pre-op Haemoglobin was 135±14g/L and mean post-op Haemoglobin was 122±13g/L. No patient had a post-op Haemoglobin under 80g/L (Range 93–154). No patients in our study needed transfusion. A further comparison group of high-blood loss and low-blood loss patients was included in analysis. High-blood loss patients were defined as those losing greater than 20% of their pre-operative blood volume whilst low-blood loss patients were defined as those losing ≤20% of their blood volume. Results of these groups are presented in Table 3. No significance was found between the two groups in patient's demographics and in terms of intra-operative factors including TXA usage (p=0.68) and tourniquet time (p=0.99). There was no difference in terms of post-operative complications (p=1.0), length of stay (p=0.36) or readmission rates (p=0.59). The results of our study indicated that post-operative haemoglobin and haematocrit check proved unnecessary in all of our patients and could have been omitted from post-operative routines. We conclude that routine post UKA check of haemoglobin and haematocrit can be avoided and be saved for special circumstances depending on patient's physiology

Summary Statement. This project proves that Patellofemoral (PF) joint degeneration is not a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a recognised procedure for treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis. Patellofemoral (PF) joint degeneration is widely considered to be a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee replacement. We examined the validity of this preconception using information gathered prospectively on consecutive patients who underwent UKA using the Repicci II® UKA prosthesis for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Methods. We prospectively collected data on 147 consecutive patients who underwent the Repicci II® UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis. All operations were performed between July 1999 and September 2000 by the same surgeon. The status of the PF joint was assessed intra-operatively in all patients, and accordingly patients were divided into two groups, one group with a normal PF joint, and the second group with degenerative changes of the PF joint. Variables measured for outcome included the International Knee Society (IKS) score, limb alignment, and range of motion. Radiographs were assessed for progression of disease or failure of implant. The mean follow-up was 9.4 years (range: 5–10.7 years). Patients were reviewed initially at 2 weeks, and then at 6 months post-operatively. They were subsequently reviewed on an annual basis.. All patients completed an IKS score preoperatively and at last follow-up. Age, gender, BMI, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, all subsequent surgery, including revision of the prosthesis, and survivorship at 10 years was recorded, and results of the 2 groups compared. Results. A total of 147 patients were included in the study. None were lost to follow-up. Sixty nine had associated PF osteoarthritis (group A) while 78 patients had a normal PF compartment when assessed intra-operatively (group B). Post-operative outcomes of the two groups were compared using the ANCOVA analysis with adjustment for pre-operation values firstly, and adjusting also for gender, age, BMI and follow-up secondly. There were no significant differences in terms of IKS, alignment, and flexion between the two groups. However, patients in group B had significantly better extension post-operatively than patients in group A (p<0.05). Conclusion. We concluded that damage to the articular cartilage of the patellofemoral joint to the extent of full-thickness cartilage loss is not a contraindication to the Repicci II® unicondylar knee arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis. However, extension is significantly improved post-operatively in those patients with minimal or no PF joint degenerative disease

Great interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial osteoarthritis has rapidly increased following the introduction of minimally invasive UKA (MI-UKA). This approach preserves the normal anatomy of knee, causes less damage to extensor mechanism and results in a more rapid post-operative recovery. However, experience with this approach is limited in China. The aim of this report was to determine the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of MI-UKA in the Chinese, and to identify any features that are unique to this population. Fifty two knees, in forty-eight patients, with medial compartmental osteoarthritis treated by MI-UKA via C-arm intensifier guide (CAIG) from May 2005 to January 2009 were reviewed. Pain and range of motion (ROM) was assessed using the HSS scoring system before and after surgery. Pre- and postoperative alignment of the lower limbs was measured and compared. The mean follow up time was 24 months (12-42 months). In all cases the pain over medial compartment of the knees was relieved or subsided. The post-operative ROM was 0-136 degree (mean 122degree), and the mean alignment was 2degree varus (0- 7degree varus). The HSS score increased from 72(61-82) to 92(72-95). 93% of the postoperative scores were good or excellent. Interestingly, the distribution of femoral component sizes of these patients was XS 2%, Small 83%, Medium 15%, Large 0%, XL 0%; whereas tibial component size was AA 27%, A 55%, B 15%, C 3%, D 0%, E 0%, and F 0%. The optimal fitted match between tibial and femoral size was: tibia AA and A with XS and small femur, tibia B and C with medium femur. The estimated match was: tibia D and E with large femur, tibia F with XL femur. In contrast to the Oxford report, the sizes of these components are smaller and not in correlation with the height, weight and BMI of the patients. We conclude that MI-UKA is an effective method for treating medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee in the Chinese population. CAIG is a feasibly intraoperative measure to predict femoral component sizes. However, component sizes and combinations are different from the Oxford guideline