INTRODUCTION. Recently, the short stem has become popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The advantages of the short stem are that it preserves femoral bone stock, possibly results in less thigh pain, and is suitable for minimally invasive THA. However, because of the short stem, malposition may happen during surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the stem alignment, which was measured by CT, between the standard tapered round stem and the shorter tapered round stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT evaluation was performed in 28 patients (29 joints) who underwent primary THA. The standard tapered round stem (Bicontact D stem) was used in 13 patients. The shorter stem (Bicontact E stem) was used in 16 patients (17 joints). The proximal shapes of these two stems have almost the tame curvature. The mean age at surgery was 68 years. The mean BMI at surgery was 23.3 kg/m. 2. Eighteen patients had osteoarthrosis, 3 patients had osteonecrosis, and 1 patient had femoral neck fracture. All surgeries were performed in the supine position with the direct anterior approach. The OrthoPilot imageless navigation system was used during surgery. Evaluation of the stem antetorsion angle (AA), flexion angle (FA), and varus angle (VA) were carried out. RESULTS. The mean AA was 27.5±8.2 degrees [range 12.3–43.1 degrees] in the standard stem and 21.6±5.9 degrees [range 12.7–31.9 degrees] in the shorter stem. The standard stem showed significantly higher AA compared to the shorter stem. The mean FA was −2.3±1.2 degrees [−4.8 to 1.1 degrees] in the standard stem and −3.2±1.8 degrees [range −6.5–0.1 degrees] in the shorter stem. The mean VA was −0.3±1.2 degrees [−1.7 to 2.5 degrees] in the standard stem and −1.0±2.0 degrees [range −4.4–2.8 degrees] in the shorter stem. There was no significant difference in FA and VA between the standard stem and the shorter stem. DISCUSSION. This study demonstrated that there was no difference in FA and VA between the standard stem and the shorter stem. The standard stem showed relatively higher AA compared to the shorter stem. The shorter stem may have another advantage in control of the stem antetorsion angle during surgery

Introduction. The French paradox regarding cemented femoral components has not been resolved, so we compared the mechanical behavior of a French stem, the CMK stem (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), with a collarless, polished, tapered stem (CPT, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) using an original biomechanical instrument. Materials and Methods. Two size-3 CPT stems and two size-302 CMK stems stems were fixed with bone cement into a composite femur soaked in vegetable oil to simulate wet condition. The composite femur was attached to a biomechanical testing instrument after stem implantation, and a 1-Hz dynamic sine wave load (3000 N) was applied to the stems for a total of 1 million cycles. An 8-hour unload period was set after every 16 hours of load. Femur temperature was maintained at 37°C during testing. The femoral canal was prepared for the CPT stems by standard rasping; for the CMK stems, however, the French method was used, in which cancellous bone was removed with a reamer. One CMK stem (CMK-1) was inserted into a femur without collar contact (>2 mm above the calcar), and the other (CMK-2) was inserted into a femur with collar contact. Stem subsidence was measured at the stem shoulder. Compressive force and horizontal cement movement were measured via rods set at the cement–bone interface on the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior sides of the proximal and distal portions of the composite femurs. Results. Subsidence was as follows: 0.521 mm and 0.629 mm for the CPT stems, 0.46 mm for CMK-1, and 0.36 mm for CMK-2. Compressive force at the cement–bone interface was at the maximum level at the proximomedial portion of all stems. These forces increased gradually until the one-millionth loading. Maximum compressive forces were 183 N and 107 N for the CPT stems, 180 N for CMK-1, and 215 N for CMK-2. There was a strong positive correlation between stem subsidence and compressive force in all stems. Radial cement creep at the proximomedial portion was 90 μ for one of the CPT stems, 184 μ for CMK-1, and −636 μ for CMK-2. Discussion. We previously reported our findings of a positive correlation between stem subsidence and compressive force in CPT stems. In the current study, CMK stems also subsided even when there was stem collar contact with bone. Subsidence was less in CMK stems than in CPT stems, but the values were close. In addition, compressive force and radial cement creep in CMK stems were also similar to or greater than in CPT stems. Conclusion. The two different concept stems demonstrated similar behavior in relation to bone cement, a finding that may present a solution to the French paradox

Shoulder arthroplasty humeral stem design has evolved to accommodate patient anatomy characteristics. As a result, stems are available in numerous shapes, coatings, lengths, sizes, and vary by fixation method. This abundance of stem options creates a surgical paradox of choice. Metrics describing stem stability, including a stem's resistance to subsidence and micromotion, are important factors that should influence stem selection, but have yet to be assessed in response to the diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing of short stem humeral implants. Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized short-stemmed humeral implants, as well as 2mm ‘oversized’ implants. Stem sizing conditions were randomized to left and right humeral pairs. Following implantation, an anteroposterior radiograph was taken of each stem and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of 90º forward flexion loading. At regular intervals during loading, stem subsidence and micromotion were assessed using a validated system of two optical markers attached to the stem and humeral pot (accuracy of <15µm). The metaphyseal fill ratio did not differ significantly between the oversized and standard stems (0.50±0.06 vs 0.50±0.10; P = 0.997, Power = 0.05); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio did (0.52±0.06 vs 0.45±0.07; P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Neither fill ratio correlated significantly with stem subsidence or micromotion. Stem subsidence and micromotion were found to plateau following 400 cycles of loading. Oversizing stem thickness prevented implant head-back contact in all but one specimen with the least dense metaphyseal bone, while standard sizing only yielded incomplete head-back contact in the two subjects with the densest bone. Oversized stems subsided significantly less than their standard counterparts (standard: 1.4±0.6mm, oversized: 0.5±0.5mm; P = 0.018, Power = 0.748;), and resulted in slightly more micromotion (standard: 169±59µm, oversized: 187±52µm, P = 0.506, Power = 0.094,). Short stem diametral sizing (i.e., thickness) has an impact on stem subsidence and micromotion following humeral arthroplasty. In both cases, the resulting three-dimensional stem micromotion exceeded, the 150µm limit suggested for bone ingrowth, although that limit was derived from a uniaxial assessment. Though not statistically significant, the increased stem micromotion associated with stem oversizing may in-part be attributed to over-compacting the cancellous bed during broaching, which creates a denser, potentially smoother, interface, though this influence requires further assessment. The findings of the present investigation highlight the importance of proper short stem diametral sizing, as even a relatively small, 2mm, increase can negatively impact the subsidence and micromotion of the stem-bone construct. Future work should focus on developing tools and methods to support surgeons in what is currently a subjective process of stem selection

Background. Short stem has potential advantages of bone and muscle preservation. Current papers demonstrate that direct anterior approach (DAA) is a significant minimally invasive muscle-sparing approach to total hip arthroplasty. Theoretically, a short length stem with a reduced lateral shoulder is the most appropriate design for DAA. Objectives. To clarify the necessity of the standard length stem in tapered-wedge stem. Patients and methods. We prepared two kinds of tapered-wedge stem, Taperloc (standard length stem) and Microplasty (short stem) (Biomet, warsaw, Indiana) at the surgery. If the rasp for the short stem had not been fixed rigidly intra-operatively, it would have been changed to the standard length stem. Between May in 2010 and April in 2011, 94 patients (107 hips, 13 bilateral) were included in this study. All THAs were performed by direct anterior approach (DAA) on a standard surgical table. We analyzed the early clinical and radiographic results of 107 THAs in 94 patients (60 women, 34 men). The mean age was 61 (33∼84) years. The mean height was 161 (142∼182) cm and the mean weight was 63 (40∼92) kg. Results. All hips were implanted with the short stem. There was no need of the standard length stem. The mean operative time was 54 (28–140) minutes and the mean operative blood loss was 422 (60∼2400) ml. There was a significant improvement in functional outcome of these patients as measured by Japanese Orthopedic association hip scores. There were three complications intra-operatively or post-operatively. These were one intraoperative femoral fracture which was salvaged with circular wiring, one femoral fatigue fracture which occurred 6 weeks and cured conservatively, and one pulmonary embolism. There were no stem subsidence, dislocations and infections. Conclusion. This study confirms that there is no need of a standard length stem in THA using tapered-wedge stem. The short stem and DAA would be a winning combination for THA

Background. A stem sitting proud (SP) or that above the final rasp position remains in some patients who undergo hip replacement using proximally coated tapered wedge stems. Surgeons may face challenges providing the best fit due to unpredictable stem seating. Zimmer Inc. introduced a new rasp to solve this issue but the clinical results of this rasp have not yet been published. Therefore, we aimed to address the following: 1) What is SP incidence using a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem? 2) Does the new rasp system improve seating height? 3) What are the risk factors of SP?. Methods. We performed a retrospective study with 338 hips, in which Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem (BPS) was used in 181 and M/L Taper stem was used in 157 hips (82 hips before and 75 hips after the new rasp). A positive stem SP was defined as a stem proud height of >2 mm. We analyzed and compared SP incidence in two stems and in M/L Taper stems before and after the new rasp use. Results. Statistical differences were found across mean age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and Dorr type between the Tri-Lock BPS and M/L Taper stem groups (P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was found within the M/L Taper groups before and after the 0-mm Rasp use. The sitting proud incidence of the stem was 13% (23/181 hips) with a mean height of 3.0 mm (range: 2.1–4.3 mm) in Tri-Lock BPS and was 15% (12/82 hips) in M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use with a mean height of 2.8 mm (range: 2.1–4.0 mm). After the 0-mm Rasp use, only 4% (3/75 hips) showed stem sitting proud with a mean height of 2.2 mm (range: 2.1–2.5 mm). There was no significant difference in the sitting proud incidence between the Tri-Lock BPS and M/L Taper stem groups; however, the sitting proud incidence with M/L Taper stem substantially decreased after the 0-mm Rasp use (P = 0.024). According to the results of the univariate analysis, stem sitting proud was significantly higher at high offset (19%) than at standard offset (8%) in the Tri-Lock BPS system (P < 0.043). In the M/L Taper stem, however, there were no significant differences across all variables, including stem offset, between the stem sitting proud and non-proud groups (Tables 3 and 4). Regarding preoperative diagnosis, the sitting proud incidence was lower in fragility fractures in patients aged ≥50 years (0/18 hips) than in other diagnoses (12/64 hips) using M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use, but this result was not statistically significant. When multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, the significant risk factor for stem sitting proud was use of the high offset option in Tri-Lock BPS (P = 0.048; OR = 2.474; 95% CI, 1.009–6.063). There was no substantial difference in the sitting proud incidence between the case groups, each consisting of 30 cases. Regarding femoral head offset, short offset was more frequently used in the stem proud group (13% in Tri-Lock BPS and 58% in M/L Taper stem) than in the non-proud group (4% in Tri-Lock BPS and 21% in M/L Taper stem), and there was a significant difference in M/L Taper stem (P = 0.013). The mean postoperative LLD was 3.0 ± 2.9 mm in Tri-Lock BPS, 3.6 ± 3.2 mm in M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use, and 2.7 ± 2.3 mm in M/L Taper stem after the 0-mm Rasp use. There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative LLD between the stem proud and non-proud groups regardless of stem type. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, there was no measurable stem subsidence across all cases. Conclusions. The proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stems are associated with potential problems related to stem sitting proud. The newly developed 0-mm Rasp of M/L Taper stem showed significant improvement in initial seating height compared with the conventional rasp system without postoperative stem subsidence. The use of high offset Tri-Lock BPS stem was the only risk factor for stem proud, but its clinical significance remains unknown. Therefore, large-scale multicenter studies should be conducted to determine relevant risk factors for sitting proud of these stems using a conventional rasp system. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

INTRODUCTION. Recently, short shaped stem becomes popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Advantages of the short stem are preserving femoral bone stock, thought to be less thigh pain, suitable for minimally invasive THA. However, bony reaction around the short stem has not been well known. The purpose of this study was to compare the two years difference of radiographic change around the standard tapered round stem with the shorter tapered round stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Evaluation was performed in 96 patients (100 joints) who underwent primary THA. Standard tapered round stem (Bicontact D stem) was used in 44 patients from January 2011 to May 2013. Shorter stem (Bicontact E stem) was used in 56 patients from May 2015 to March 2016. The proximal shapes of these two stems are almost the same curvature. The mean age at surgery was 64 years. The mean BMI at surgery was 24.0 kg/m. 2. Eighty-six patients had osteoarthrosis and 10 patients had osteonecrosis. Evaluation was performed 2 years after surgery with standard AP radiographs. The OrthoPilot imageless navigation system was used during surgery. Evaluation of the stem fixation, stress shielding, and cortical hypertrophy were carried out. RESULTS. There were no differences of patient characteristics between the standard D stem group and the shorter E stem group. All 100 stems showed bony stable fixation two years after surgery. No subsidence was observed in both groups. No clear zone was observed around the stems in both groups. Cortical hypertrophy was observed 19 patients (43.2%) with the standard D stem group and 13 patients (23.2%) with the shorter E stem group. The standard D stem group showed higher incidence of cortical hypertrophy. Stress shielding was observed 35 patients (80%) with the standard D stem group and 42 patients (75%) with the shorter E stem group. The number of grade 1 and grade 2 stress shielding cases were 13 and 22 with the standard D stem group and 10 and 32 with the shorter E stem group, respectively. There were no grade 3 stress shielding case in both groups. Regarding the incidence of stress shielding, there was no difference between the two groups. DISCUSSION. This study demonstrated that the shorter stem showed less incidence of cortical hypertrophy compared to the standard stem. With radiographic evaluation, both standard and shorter stem showed good fixation. The meaning of cortical hypertrophy, whether it is a good reaction for the femur or not, has not been clarified yet. Less bony reaction around the shorter stem may suggest the potential for better clinical performance of the shorter stem compare to the standard stem

The Accolade®TMZF is a taper-wedge cementless metaphyseal coated femoral stem widely utilized from 2002-2012. In recent years, there have been reports of early catastrophic failure of this implant. Establishing a deeper understanding of the rate and causes of revision in patients who developed aseptic failure in stems with documented concerns about high failure rates is critical. Understanding any potential patient or implant factors which are risk factors for failure is important to inform both clinicians and patients. We propose a study to establish the long-term survival of this stem and analyze patients who underwent aseptic revision to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who received a primary total hip arthroplasty with an Accolade® TMZF stem at a high-volume arthroplasty center. The causes and timing of revision surgery were documented and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to minimize loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with use of the Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the overall and aseptic survival rates at final follow-up. Patient and implant factors commonly associated with aseptic failure were extracted and Cox proportional hazards model was used. A consecutive series of 2609 unilateral primary THA patients implanted with an Accolade®TMZF femoral hip stem were included. Mean time from primary surgery was 12.4 years (range 22 days to 19.5 years). Cumulative survival was 96.1% ± 0.2 at final follow-up. One hundred and seven patients underwent revision surgery with aseptic loosening of the femoral component was the most common cause of aseptic failure in this cohort (33/2609, 1.3%). Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure. To our knowledge, this is the largest series representing the longest follow-up of this taper-wedge cementless femoral implant. Despite early concerns, the Accolade® TMZF stem has excellent survivorship in this cohort. Trunnionosis as a recognized cause for revision surgery was rare. Younger age and larger femoral head offset were independent risk factors for aseptic failure

Introduction. There have been many attempts to reduce the risk of femoral component loosening. Using a tapered stem having a highly polished stem surface results in stem stabilization subsequent to debonding and stem-cement taper-lock and is consistent with force-closed fixation design. Purpose. In this study, we assessed the subsidence of two different polished triple tapered stems and two different cements in primary THA. Materials and methods. From March 2013 to March 2014, two kinds of polished triple tapered cemented stem were applied in 74 primary THA. 12 male, 62 female, mean age at surgery was 68 years old, mean F/U time was 12months. When they were compared by stems, this study comprises 35 THA with Trilliance stem(Aesculap, Germany) and 39 THA with SC stem (Kyocera, Japan), and when they were compared by cements, this study comprises 36 Simplex cement (Stryker, USA) cases and 38 Cobalt cement(Biomet, USA) cases. Using digitized x-ray, we measured the subsidence of each implants. Measurements were taken from initial postoperative radiographs to the final follow-up. We also evaluated the existence of radiolucent line between cement and stem and also evaluated calcar resorption. Results. The mean subsidence of Trilliance stem was 0.26mm and of SC stem was 0.44mm at 12months.(P<0.0001) Statistic significance was observed between the stems. When compared between 2 cements, the mean subsidence of Simplex cement was 0.25mm and of Cobalt cement was 0.48mm.(P=0.0563). No statistic significance was observed. There was no case of stem loosening and calcar resorption. Conclusion. 2 different designed cemented triple taper stems showed significantly different degree of subsidence after THA. No difference of subsidence was observed between two cements

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator. A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 74 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prosthesis over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Demographics, Dorr types and blood serum markers were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years. When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator. A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 70 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prostheses over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Demographics and Dorr types were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years. When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking

INTRODUCTION. Implantation of total hip arthroplasty (THA) components caused a significant alteration in stress environment. Several studies have reported that bone mineral density (BMD) decreases after THA, especially in the proximal femur. This phenomenon is explained as an adaptive remodeling response of bone tissue to a significant alteration in its stress environment. SL-PLUS MIA stem (Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG) is a modified implant of Zweymuller type SL-PLUS standard stem (Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG). The major change is an omission of the trochanteric wing, which enables a bone-sparing and may lead to changes of femoral stress distribution and rotational stability. The change of stress distribution in the femur could affect BMD after THA. In the present study, we constructed finite element (FE) models of femurs and stems before and at 1week after THA and analyzed equivalent stresses in the femur. In addition, we measured BMD in the femur by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) after THA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the equivalent stress in the femur and to compare the results of the FE analyses with changes in BMD after THA. METHODS. Twenty-one patients (18 women and 3 men) who underwent primary cementless THA with SL-PLUS MIA stem or SL-PLUS standard stem formed the basis of this study. Eleven patients received SL-PLUS MIA stem and ten patients received SL-PLUS standard stem. The mean age of the patients at THA was 67 years (range: 48∼82). BMD was measured with DEXA at 1 week and 3, and 6 months after THA. Zones were defined according to Gruen's system (zones 1∼7). Computed-tomography (CT) images of the femur of all patients were taken before and at 1 week after THA. FE models of the femur and prosthesis were obtained from CT data by Mechanical Finder (Research Center of Computational Mechanics Inc., Tokyo, Japan), software that creates FE models showing individual bone shape and density distribution. Equivalent stresses were analyzed in zones 1 to 7 and compared to the DEXA data. RESULTS. FE studies revealed that there was no significant difference in equivalent stress between SL-PLUS MIA stem group and SL-PLUS standard stem group after THA. BMD was maintained at 6months after THA in zones 3, 4, and 5, whereas BMD decreased in zones 2, 6, and 7. This means that BMD had decreased, especially in the proximal femur after THA. In zone 1, BMD decreased in SL-PLUS MIA stem group by 15%, while BMD was maintained in SL-PLUS standard stem. There was a significant difference in BMD percentage changes in zone 1 between SL-PLUS MIA stem group and SL-PLUS standard stem group at 6months after THA. DISCUSSION. The present study demonstrated that there was no significant difference in equivalent stress between SL-PLUS MIA stem group and SL-PLUS standard stem group after THA. In zone 1, BMD decreased in SL-PLUS MIA stem group by 15%, whereas BMD was maintained in SL-PLUS standard stem group. This result cannot be explained by our results of equivalent stress

Introduction. In cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), proper cement mantle thickness in the femoral canal is still controversial subject. It is widely accepted that the cement mantle around a femoral stem should be at least 2 mm in thickness. But articles from France reported good long-term result with thin cement mantle. It is so called “The French paradox”. We have already reported that the greater compressive force at the cement-bone interface was seen in collarless polished tapered (CPT, Zimmer, USA) stem with thick cement mantle than that with thin cement mantle. However, the stem with thick cement mantle subsided more than with thin mantle. It may have a possibility to cause an early mechanical failure of cemented THA. We compared to stem and cement subsidence in various cement mantles using tantalum ball into cement in this study. Methods. A cemented stem model was used for this study with a CPT stem into composite femur. Three sizes of CPT stems (No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3) and one size composite femur were prepared for this study. We inserted two stems for each size, for a total of six stems. Composite femurs were reamed with a No. 3 rasp, and various size of stem was fixed with cement in each composite femur to make a various thicknesses of cement mantle. Two to three tantalum marker balls were injected into the cement in each femur before cement was hardened. 1-Hz dynamic load applied to the stems for half a-million cycles. Each 16 hours of loading was followed by 8 hours without loading. We used micro-CT before and after loading to measure the movement of the tantalum balls in three dimensions. And we analyzed occupation ratio of stem in the femoral canal by computed reconstructed three dimensional model of bone cement and stem. Results. We were able to detect a total of 13 balls in the cement for the 6 stems. The range of cement thickness in the CT slice on balls was 1.52 to 5.32 mm. Stem subsidence showed a significantly positive correlation to the thickness of cement mantle. In the horizontal plane, 8 of these 13 balls moved in an outside direction and five moved in an inside direction. The horizontal/perpendicular ratio for the tantalum balls showed a significant negative correlation to the thickness of the cement mantle. The subsidence rate (ratio of stem subsidence to ball subsistence) showed a significant negative correlation to the stem occupation ratio. The effective radial cement creep was also detected when the cement mantle was less than 2.5 mm thick and more than 60% in the occupation ratio. Conclusions. Stem subsistence was more commonly associated with cement subsidence in the thicker cement mantles and with a low stem occupation rate in CPT stems

Introduction. We have been developed lateral flare stem and have been using it since 1989. It was custom stem at first. After being experienced, using the same software, off-the-shelf version lateral flare stem (Revelation) was developed in 1996 in the U.S. We could start using it since 2001 in our country. Lateral flare stems are designed to reproduce physiological proximal load transfer lateral side as well as medial side. It was obtained by having bigger and more accurate proximal part with lateral flare. The design is optimized by matching with 3D insertion path. Using many custom stems including different length and off-the-shelf standard stems, we have come to feel that as for this high proximal fit and load transfer design, it is not necessary to having long distal part and sometimes it is harmful to obtain good proximal load transfer in some situation such as type A (champagne flute) canal. So we have developed short version of the stem. Many makes of the hip stems have included short stems recently. Some aimed to improve easier insertion, some aimed to improve the volume of residual bone quantity. We have aimed to improve proximal fit expecting more proximal and more physiological load transfer to the femur. Objectives. Our objectives are to comare standard stem and short stem from biomechanical aspect and clinical aspect. Materials and methods. As for the biomechanical aspect, finite element analyses were done with standard and short stem. As for the clinical aspect, the very last 25 cases of the standard stems; which we have 12 years clinical experience; done at Nagoya City University, the very first 25 cases of the short stems, and the next 25 cases were examined. The distance between stem and cortical bone on medial and lateral side at lateral flare hight of the stem and the bottom of arc deposite coated area. Alignment was assessed by the angle of the stem and canal axis. Result. By the FEA, small stress point was observed at the tip of the standard stem which pushes canal wall from inside (Fig. 1), which was disappeared at the tip of the short stem. Less micromotion was observed in short stem too. No significant difference was observed in the stem cortical distance. No significant difference of stem alignment was observed between standard stem and all 50 short stems but better alignment (p = 0.07) was seen in the second 25 cases of the short stem than standard stem. Between the first 25 and the second 25 case high difference (p = 0.01) was seen. (Fig. 2). Discussion. The standard lateral flare stem has very physiological proximal load transfer in most of the cases, sometimes longer distal part could effect to the alignment because of the femoral bending. Short stem could be expected have better alignment being free from femoral bending. On the contrary, distal part could be the insertion guide during the surgery. For the short stem, learning curve exists to realize potentially better alignment

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of modular revision stems, uncemented fluted, tapered to treat periprosthetic femoral (PFF) fracture; we specifically evaluated fracture union, implant stability, patient outcomes, and complications to compare the differences between cemented and cementless primary stem. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 56 cases of unstable periporsthetic femoral fracture (forty B2 and sixteen B3) treated with the uncemented fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with or with or without autogenous bone graft. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Harris Hip Score and WOMAC score. Radiologic evaluations were conducted using Beals and Tower's criteria. Any complication during the follow-up period was recorded. Results. The average follow-up period was 52.1±32.7 months. The average Harris Hip Score was 72.4±19.1. All fractures were united, and a good consolidation was achieved in 47 cases. There was femoral stem subsidence in 3 cases less than 10 mm without an evidence of loosening both radiologically and clinically. The radiologic results using Beals and Towers’ criteria were excellent in 36 hips, good in 10 hips and poor in 10 hips. Radiologic bone union took longer time and statistically significant stem subsidence was observed in cemented primary stem compared to cementless primary stem (Fig1,2). At each follow-up examination the clinical score was significantly higher in patients with cementless primary stem. Conclusion. Our results support the view that cement primary stem has less favorable result in terms of revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fractures

Aims. Bone demonstrates good healing capacity, with a variety of strategies being utilized to enhance this healing. One potential strategy that has been suggested is the use of stem cells to accelerate healing. Methods. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, WHO-ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as reference checking of included studies. The inclusion criteria for the study were: population (any adults who have sustained a fracture, not including those with pre-existing bone defects); intervention (use of stem cells from any source in the fracture site by any mechanism); and control (fracture healing without the use of stem cells). Studies without a comparator were also included. The outcome was any reported outcomes. The study design was randomized controlled trials, non-randomized or observational studies, and case series. Results. In all, 94 eligible studies were identified. The clinical and methodological aspects of the studies were too heterogeneous for a meta-analysis to be undertaken. A narrative synthesis examined study characteristics, stem cell methods (source, aspiration, concentration, and application) and outcomes. Conclusion. Insufficient high-quality evidence is available to determine the efficacy of stem cells for fracture healing. The studies were heterogeneous in population, methods, and outcomes. Work to address these issues and establish standards for future research should be undertaken. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:628–638

Introduction. Revision of total knee endoprostheses (TKA) is increasing in number and causes rising healthcare costs. For constrained prostheses, the use of intramedullar femoral stems is standard. However, there is a big variety of available stem types with regard to length, type of fixation (cemented vs. hybrid) and fixation area (diaphyseal vs. metaphyseal). The aim of this biomechanical study was to investigate the primary stability of revision TKA with different stem types and different femoral bone defects, to find out whether smaller or shorter stems may achieve sufficient stability while preserving bone for re-revision. Methods. 30 right human femora were collected, fresh frozen and divided in six groups, matching for age, gender, height, weight and bone density. In group 1–3 a bone defect of AORI type F2a (15mm medial) and in group 4–6 a defect of AORI type F3 (25mm on both sides) was created. In all six groups the same modular femoral surface component (Endo-Model-W, Waldemar Link) was used, combined with different stem types (100/ 160 mm cemented / uncemented / standard/ anatomical with / without cone). Additionally, one trial was set up, omitting the modular stem. The correct fit of the implants was confirmed by fluoroscopy. After embedding, specimens were mechanically loaded 10mm medially and parallel to the mechanical femoral axis with an axial force of 2700N and a torsional moment of 5.6Nm at a flexion angle of 15° with respect to the coupled tibial plateau according to in-vivo gait load for 10,000 cycles (1Hz) in a servohydraulic testing machine (Bionix, MTS). The relative movement between implant, cement and distal femur was recorded using a stereo video system (Aramis3D,gom). An axial pull-out test at 1mm/min was performed after dynamic loading. Results. No clinical or radiological loosening of any configuration was observed. In all cases, relative movements were below 20µm and the differences between groups were very small. There were two cases, the trial without stem and one probe with short cemented stem with poor cementing technique (not included in the group result), which showed greatly increased relative movements. Pull-out test exhibited that forces of short stems with cones and uncemented anatomical cone stems with large defects (groups 4–6) were not significantly different to cemented stems in small defects. Discussion. Despite the high experimental load, even causing bone fracture in two cases, no difference between the investigated stem types concerning primary stability was found, partially probably due to the high inter-individual variations. Possible long-term differences cannot be assessed with in-vitro testing representing direct post-op situation, but the results might partially explain the controversial clinical observations and suggest further investigation on patient specific decisive parameters for implant choice. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. To evaluate the effect of hydroxyapatite coating, two same shape cementless stems were compared in this randomized control trial study. Methods. Between May 2003 and February 2010, 88 patients had a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different types of cementless stems. Forty-three patients had Proarc stems (P group) (Kyocera Medical, Osaka, Japan), and Forty-five patients had Proarc HA stems (HA group) (Kyocera Medical, Osaka, Japan) which was coated with thin (20 micrometer) hydroxyapatite on Proarc rough porous coating. Gender distribution, average age at surgery, average weight and average follow-up period were same in the two groups. The average follow-up period was 8.5 years (range, 5 to 13 years). The average age at the time of surgery was 63 years. Porous acetabular shells and highly crosslinked polyethylene liners made by Kyocera Medical corporation were implanted into all hips. Stems were implanted with a modified Hardinge surgical approach without trochanteric osteotomy. Harris Hip Score was used for clinical evaluation. Post-op radiographs of these patients were evaluated. Fisher's exact probability test was used for statistical analysis. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to be significant. Results. The mean preoperative score and postoperative score of P group were 39 points and 86 points, respectively. The mean preoperative score and postoperative score of HA group were 46 points and 87 points, respectively. All stems were evaluated as bone-ingrown fixation in both groups. The rate of varus inclination was not different between two groups. The rate of severe stress shielding was not different. Discussion. However hydroxyapatite coating is useful for early fixation, the adverse effect, such as delamination for long-term in vivo situation is questionable. There was no significant difference between P-group and HA group in the present study. Longer follow-up is required to evaluate hydroxyapatite coating

Introduction. The Accolade II taper stem incorporates design features which maximize proximal stem fit and bone contact and avoids more distal taper engagement which has been shown to be problematic. RSA was used in this study to analyze stem micromotion to 2 years post-surgery, providing an indication of long-term fixation. Pain, function and health-related quality of life were also compared before and after total hip arthroplasty (THA.). Method. This prospective, single centre case-series enrolled 35 patients into Parts A and B. The first 5 subjects were recruited to Part A of the study (learning curve), the subsequent 30 patients to part B. Radiopaque tantalum beads were inserted intra-operatively into each patient, with RSA radiographs taken immediately post-operatively, and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. These radiographs were digitized to DICOM file format and exported, allowing for independent analysis using the UmRSA system. Three Patient Reported Outcome Measurements; WOMAC, EQ-5D-3L and VAS pain were collected pre-operatively and at 6, 12 and 24 month intervals for all patients. Results. A total of 33 patients completed the study, with 1 patient from Part A lost to follow up and 1 patient from part B withdrawing voluntarily. The 4 completed patients from part A of the study did not have RSA X-rays analysed since Part A was included for surgeon training purposes only. Hence RSA X-rays at the 2 year timepoint for 29 completed Part B patients were compared to immediate post-op RSA X-rays. The Average Maximum Total Point Motion (MTPM) of the Accolade II femoral stem was 0.764mm (SD +/− 0.340), with a clinical precision (defined as the standard deviation of double RSA examinations taken during the post-operative interval) of +/− 0.195mm. Additionally, the mean distal, medial and posterior migrations for the 29 patients at 24 months were all less than 0.1mm. When comparing with the literature, these MTPM values show less than average stem migration. A systematic review conducted by de Vries et al (2014) recorded 2 year MTPM values between 0.66 and 2.73mm for clinically successful uncemented collarless stems, with an average of 1.50mm. The average WOMAC and VAS pain scores for 33 completed patients from parts A and B demonstrated decreased pain and functional limitations at 24 months when compared with pre-operative PROM results. In addition, average UK Time Trade-Off scores calculated from the EQ-5D-3L improved from 0.47 (SD +/− 0.29) pre-operatively to 0.86 (SD +/− 0.27) at 24 months, equating to improved health-related quality of life for all patients. Conclusions. The mean MTPM from this study falls well below the average for uncemented collarless stems suggested by de Vries et al (2014). This, together with the negligible distal stem migration, affirms excellent immediate stability of the Accolade II design. These RSA results imply successful biologic fixation and a high survival rate can be expected with the Accolade II stem

Thoracic hyperkyphosis (TH – Cobb angle >40°) is correlated with rotator cuff arthropathy and associated with anterior tilting and protraction of scapula, impacting the glenoid orientation and the surrounding musculature. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a reliable surgical treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and recent literature suggests that patients with TH may have comparable range of motion after RTSA. However, there exists no study reporting the possible link between patient-reported outcomes, humeral retroversion and TH after RTSA. While the risk of post-operative complications such as instability, hardware loosening, scapular notching, and prosthetic infection are low, we hypothesize that it is critical to optimize the biomechanical parameters through proper implant positioning and understanding patient-specific scapular and thoracic anatomy to improve surgical outcomes in this subset of patients with TH. Patients treated with primary RTSA at an academic hospital in 2018 were reviewed for a two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no pre-existing chest radiographs for Cobb angle measurement, change in post-operative functional status as a result of trauma or medical comorbidities, and missing component placement and parameter information in the operative note. As most patients did not have a pre-operative chest radiograph, only seven patients with a Cobb angle equal to or greater than 40° were eligible. Chart reviews were completed to determine indications for RTSA, hardware positioning parameters such as inferior tilting, humeral stem retroversion, glenosphere size/location, and baseplate size. Clinical data following surgery included review of radiographs and complications. Follow-up in all patients were to a period of two years. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score was used for patient-reported functional and pain outcomes. The average age of the patients at the time of RTSA was 71 years old, with six female patients and one male patient. The indication for RTSA was primarily rotator cuff arthropathy. Possible correlation between Cobb angle and humeral retroversion was noted, whereby, Cobb angle greater than 40° matched with humeral retroversion greater than 30°, and resulted in significantly higher ASES scores. Two patients with mean Cobb angle of 50° and mean humeral retroversion 37.5° had mean ASES scores of 92.5. Five patients who received mean humeral retroversion of 30° had mean lower ASES scores of 63.7 (p < 0 .05). There was no significant correlation with glenosphere size or position, baseplate size, degree of inferior tilting or lateralization. Patient-reported outcomes have not been reported in RTSA patients with TH. In this case series, we observed that humeral stem retroversion greater than 30° may be correlated with less post-operative pain and greater patient satisfaction in patients with TH. Further clinical studies are needed to understanding the biomechanical relationship between RTSA, humeral retroversion and TH to optimize patient outcomes

Collo MIS is a new short stem created to achieve minimal metaepiphyseal invasiveness, to respect the joint physiology, to get optimal primary stability and osteointegration. This stem needs a subcapital osteotomy to respect and preserve the physiologic anteversion of the femoral neck; the technique provide compactation of the cancellous bone of the greater trochanter using just compactors and not rasps during the femur preparation and the stem has to match the calcar curvature to get the right position. This stem has been designed with a lateral wedge to ensure a great primary stability in the femoral neck. Since November 2008 at Niguarda Hospital we have implanted 350 prosthesis in cooperation with Frankfurt Hospital. Patients age varies form 26 to 80 years old with a mean age of 61 y.o. This stem has to be implanted in patients with good bone quality to achieve the compactation of the cancellous bone. We have operated patients affected mostly by coaxrthrosis and just in few cases by dysplasia (Crowe 1); contraindications are represented by a CCD angle less than 120° and more than 140° because of the stem morphology, severe osteoporosis, dymorphism, and dysplasia (Crowe 2,3,4). We have evaluated the offset and CCD angle pre and post op that resulted mostly increased after surgery (average CCD angle +6,15°, offset + 5.95 mm). In the post-op we normally give partial weight bearing after 1 day and the full weight bearing after 20 days. The mean HSS score before surgery was of 57.5 points and after 1 year of 98 points. The complications we have found in these study were: 11 cases of dysmetrias less than 1 cm, 6 cases of neck fissuration. No infection, mobilization, neck impingemen, subsidence, radiolucency have been evaluated