Many factors can influence post-operative kinematics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These factors include intraoperative surgical conditions such as ligament release or quantity of bone resection as well as differences in implant design. Release of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is commonly performed to allow correction of varus knee. Precise biomechanical knowledge of the individual components of the MCL is critical for proper MCL release during TKA. The purpose of this study was to define the influences of the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) and the posterior oblique ligament (POL) on valgus and rotatory stability in TKA. This study used six fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with intact cruciate ligaments. All TKA procedures were performed by the same surgeon using CR-TKA with a CT-free navigation system. Each knee was tested at 0°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. One sequential sectioning sequence was performed on each knee, beginning with an intact knee (S0), and thereafter femoral arthroplasty only (S1), tibial arthroplasty (S2), release of the dMCL (S3), and finally, release of the POL (S4). The same examiner applied all external load of 10 N-m valgus and a 5 N-m internal and external rotation torque at each flexion angle for the each cutting state. All data were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and we investigated the correlation between the medial gap and the rotation angle. A significant difference was determined to be present for P < .05.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Injury to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been reported to contribute to high-grade anterolateral laxity following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Failure to address ALL injury has been suggested as a cause of persistent rotational laxity following ACL reconstruction. However, lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) tears have also has been shown to cause increased internal rotation and anterior translation of the knee. Due to the anatomic relationship of the ALL and the lateral meniscus, we hypothesise that the ALL and lateral meniscus work synergistically, and that a tear to the LMPR will have the same effect on anterolateral laxity as an ALL tear in the ACL deficient knee. Sixteen fresh frozen cadaveric knee specimens were potted into a hip simulator(femur) and a six degree-of-freedom load cell (tibia). Two rigid optical trackers were inserted into the proximal femur and distal tibia, allowing for the motion of the tibia with respect to the femur to be tracked during biomechanical tests. A series of points on the femur and tibia were digitised to create bone coordinate systems that were used to calculate the kinematic variables. Biomechanical testing involved applying a 5Nm internal rotation moment to the tibia while the knee was in full extension and tested sequentially in the following three conditions: i) ACLintact; ii) Partial ACL injury (ACLam) – anteromedial bundle sectioned; iii) Full ACL injury (ACLfull). The specimens were then randomised to either have the ALL sectioned first (ALLsec) followed by the LMPRsec or vice versa. Internal rotation and anterior translation of the tibia with respect to the femur were calculated. A mixed two-way (serial sectioning by ALL section order) repeated measures ANOVA (alpha = 0.05). Compared to the ACLintact condition, internal rotation was found to be 1.78° (p=0.06), 3.74° (p=0.001), and 3.84° (p=0.001) greater following ACLfull, LMPRsec and ALLsec respectively. LMPRsec and the ALLsec resulted in approximately 20 of additional internal rotation (p=0.004 and p=0.01, respectively) compared with the ACL deficient knee (ACLfull). No difference was observed between the ALL and LMPR sectioned states, or whether the ALL was sectioned before or after the LMPR (p=0.160). A trend of increasing anterior translation was observed when the 5Nm internal rotation moment was applied up until the ACL was fully sectioned; however, these differences were not significant (p=0.070). The ALL and LMPR seem to have a synergistic relationship in aiding the ACL in controlling anterolateral rotational laxity. High-grade anterolateral laxity following ACL injury may be attributed to injuries of the ALL and/or the LMPR. We suggest that the lateral meniscus should be thought of as part of the anterolateral capsulomeniscal complex (i.e., LM, ITB, and ALL) that acts as a stabiliser of anterolateral rotation in conjunction with the ACL.
This in-vitro study finds which hip joint soft tissues act as primary and secondary passive internal and external rotation restraints so that informed decisions can be made about which soft tissues should be preserved or repaired during hip surgery. The capsular ligaments provide primary hip rotation restraint through a complete hip range of motion protecting the labrum from impingement. The labrum and ligamentum teres only provided secondary stability in a limited number of positions. Within the capsule, the iliofemoral lateral arm and ischiofemoral ligaments were primary restraints in two-thirds of the positions tested and so preservation/repair of these tissues should be a priority to prevent excessive hip rotation and subsequent impingement/instability for both the native hip and after hip arthroplasty.
The aims of this study were (1) to assess whether rotational stability testing in Gartland III supracondylar fractures can be used intra-operatively in order to assess fracture stability following fixation with lateral-entry wires and (2) to quantify the incidence of rotational instability following lateral-entry wire fixation in Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Twenty-one consecutive patients admitted with Grade III supracondylar fractures at the Children's Hospital at Westmead were surgically treated according to a predetermined protocol. Following closed fracture reduction, 2 lateral-entry wires were inserted under radiographic control. Stability was then assessed by comparing lateral x-ray images in internal and external rotation. If the fracture was found to be rotationally unstable by the operating surgeon, a third lateral-entry wire was inserted and images repeated. A medial wire was used only if instability was demonstrated after the insertion of three lateral wires.
Background:. For hip prostheses, short stems allow easy insertion and reduce thigh pain risk, and are therefore suitable for Minimally Invasive Surgery. However, clinical outcome depends on sufficient initial fixation in the proximal femoral component. Revelation stems are designed to increase medullary cavity occupancy in the proximal femoral component and allow physiological load transmission within this component. Theoretically, on initial fixation of the proximal part of the stem, fixation remains unaffected by cutting the distal part of the stem. Recently, the Revelation micro MAX stem has become available. In this system, only the distal part of the stem is removed. To prepare for the introduction of this stem, we evaluated its rotational stability by installing it in the femurs of formalin-fixed cadavers. We then evaluated the time course of changes in bone density at the stem circumference and stem position by CT in the first eight patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Subjects and Methods:. Micro MAX stems were inserted into the left femurs of one male and six female cadavers (76 to 95 years of age). A commonly used torque meter was mounted on the stem, and stem fixation was evaluated by the application of clockwise torque of 6 to 12 N-m. Further, in patients, three men and five women (age range 38–83 years, mean 67 years; two cases of femoral head necrosis, two of femoral neck fracture, and four of osteoarthritis of the hip) who underwent surgery with the micro MAX stem from July 2012 to April 2013 were evaluated at 3 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after surgery for stem insertion angle and stem subsidence by CT, and for bone density around the stem by the DEXE method. Results:.
