Introduction. Re-revision due to instability and dislocation can occur in up to 1 in 4 cases following
Background. Standard preoperative protocols in total joint arthroplasty utilize the International Normalized Ratio (INR) to determine patient coagulation profiles. However, the relevance of preoperative INR values in joint arthroplasty remains controversial. Acceptable INR cutoff values for joint replacement are inconsistent, and are often based on studies of primary arthroplasty, or even non-orthopedic procedures. This analysis examined the relationship between preoperative INR values and post-operative outcomes in
Instability and aseptic loosening are the two main complications after
Background. Failed ingrowth and subsequent separation of revision acetabular components from the inferior hemi-pelvis constitutes a primary mode of failure in
Aim. The aim of this study is to evaluate if obesity negatively affects: (1) complication rate, (2) reoperation and revision rate and (3) functional outcome (based on patient reported outcome measures, PROMs) in
Acetabular reconstruction of extensive bone defect is troublesome in
Introduction. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has been introduced to decrease osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear debris generation, but there are few long-term data on
Introduction. Modular tapered implants have been suggested as the optimal treatment in patients with severe femoral bone loss undergoing
Aims. Severe, superior acetabular bone defects are one of the most challenging aspects to
Aims.
Introduction. As the proximal femoral bone is generally compromised in failed total hip arthroplasty, achievement of solid fixation with a new component can be technically demanding. Clinical studies have demonstrated good medium-term results after
THA in patients with acetabular bone defects is associated with a high risk of dislocation. Dual mobility (DM) cups are known to prevent and treat chronic instability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dislocation rate and survival of jumbo DM cups. This was a retrospective, continuous, multicenter study of all the cases of jumbo DM cup implantation between 2010 and 2017 in patients with acetabular bone loss (Paprosky 2A: 46%, 2B: 32%, 2C: 15% and 3A: 6%). The indications for implantation were revisions for aseptic loosening of the cup (n=45), aseptic loosening of the femoral stem (n=3), bipolar loosening (n=11), septic loosening (n=10), periprosthetic fracture (n=5), chronic dislocation (n=4), intraprosthetic dislocation (n=2), cup impingement (n=1), primary posttraumatic arthroplasty (n=8), and acetabular dysplasia (n=4). The jumbo cups used were COPTOS TH (SERF), which combines press-fit fixation with supplemental fixation (acetabular hook, two superior flanges with one to four screws, two acetabular pegs). A bone graft was added in 74 cases (80%). The clinical assessment consisted of the Harris hip score. The primary endpoint was surgical revision for aseptic acetabular loosening or the occurrence of a dislocation episode. In all, 93 patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 2.3 years [0, 10]. As of the last follow-up, the acetabular cup had been changed in five cases: three due to aseptic loosening (3.2%) and two due to infection (2.1%). The survivorship free of aseptic loosening was 96.8%. Three patients (3%) suffered a dislocation. At the last follow-up visit, the mean HSS scores were 72.15, (p < 0.05). Use of a jumbo DM cup in cases of acetabular bone defects leads to satisfactory medium-term results with low dislocation and loosening rates.
BACKGROUND. During revision hip arthroplasty, removal of a well-fixed, ingrown metal acetabular component may not be possible. Therefore, a new polyethylene liner can be cemented into the existing shell via the cement locking mechanism. We report the indications, technique, and results of cementing an acetabular liner into a well-fixed cementless acetabular shell. PATIENTS AND METHODS. All patients were given informed consent to participate in this study, and the study was approved by our hospital institutional review board. Of 95
Revision of fractured ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements with a cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloy-on-polyethylene articulation can facilitate metallosis and require further expensive revision surgery [1–3]. In the present study, a fifty-two year old male patient suffered from fatal cardiomyopathy after undergoing
Introduction. The goal of
Introduction. Previous studies of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) hip bearings have focused on outcomes following primary surgery. Less is known about the utilization or outcomes of ceramic bearings in
To review prospectively collected data on patients undergoing femoral revision arthroplasty for failed cemented or cementless primary stems. Materials & Methods. All patients undergoing primary and revision joint replacement surgery at our institution are prospectively entered into a database which includes history and physical examination, radiology, WOMAC and SF-36 scores. These investigations are repeated 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter at each patient visit. This database identified all patients undergoing femoral revision arthroplasty over the last 10 years. Results. There were a total of 231 patients with 248 revision procedures performed. There were 127 female and 104 male patients and the mean age at the time of revision surgery was 69.4 years. Twenty-two of these patients had had at least one prior revision operation on the index hip. Thirty hips were treated with a cemented Echelon stem and 218 treated with a cementless Echelon stem. Of the 248 hips 14 patients were lost to follow-up (14 hips) and 9 patients (9 hips) are deceased. The average follow-up was 5.9 years. Of the 225 hips remaining in the follow-up series there was a single case of aseptic loosening confirmed radiologically. Twenty-one hips were diagnosed with infection (9.3%); 6 of those patients had had at least one prior revision procedure and 4 additional patients had a prior diagnosis of infection. Therefore, 10 of the 21 hips were either definitely or probably infected at the time of their revision operation on which we are reporting. Nine patients (4%) had multiple dislocations post-operatively. These were patients who had undergone multiple revisions or whose primary revision operation was for instability. An additional 18 patients (8%) had a single dislocation treated by closed reduction requiring no further treatment. There were 6 hips with intra-operative fracture requiring immediate re-revision plus fracture fixation and a further 12 hips (5.3%) who sustained a peri-prosthetic fracture some time after their revision procedure. Despite the number of complications the majority of patients required no further surgical treatment. Eleven hips (4.8%) required re-revision of the femoral component. Therefore the overall survival rate at 5.9 years of the Echelon revision stem was 95.2%. Discussion. Femoral
Introduction. The mid- or long-term results of acetabular
Introduction. Failure of acetabular components has been reported to lead to large bone defects, which determine outcome and management after