Reconstruction of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty presents a significant surgical challenge. Such defects are associated with significant loss of host bone stock, which must be addressed in order to achieve stable implant fixation. A number of imaging techniques including CT scanning with 3D image reconstruction are available to assist the surgeon in the pre-operative planning of such procedures. We describe the use of a novel technique to assist the pre-operative planning of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. Patient and Methods – We present the use of this technique in the case of a 78 year old patient who presented 20 years from index procedure with severe hip pain and inability to weight bear due aseptic loosening of a previously revised total hip arthroplasty. A Paprosky 3B defect was noted with intra-pelvic migration of the acetabular component. Pre-operative investigations included: inflammatory markers, pelvic CT scan with 3D reconstruction, pelvic angiography and hip aspiration. Using DICOM images obtained from the CT scan, we used free open source software to carry out a 3D surface render of the bony pelvis. This was processed and converted to a suitable format for 3D printing. Using selective laser sintering, a physical 3D model of the pelvis, acetabular component and proximal femur were produced. Using this model the surgeon was able to gain an accurate representation of both the position of the intra-pelvic cup and more accurately assess the loss of bone stock. This novel technique is particularly useful in the pre-operative planning of such complex acetabular defects in order to determine if/which reconstruction technique is most likely to be successful. 3D printing is a relatively recent technology, which has numerous potential clinical applications. This is the first reported case of this technology being used to assess acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. The use of this technology gives the surgeon a 3D model of the pelvis, quickly (7 days from CT) and at a tenth of the cost (£280) of producing such a model through the traditional commercial routes. The model allowed the surgeon to size potential implant, quantify the amount of bone graft required (if applicable) and to more accurately classify the loss of acetabular bone stock

Background. Over 96% of primary total hip replacements (THR) recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) are performed through a posterior or lateral surgical approach. There is no high quality evidence available to support the use of one approach over the other in primary THR and even less evidence when the outcome of revision THR is considered. Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 267 patients who had revision hip replacements between January 2006 and March 2010 for aseptic loosening. They rated their pain from 0–10, and used the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale (SAPS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short form-12 (SF-12). Results. We performed 275 revision total hip replacements for aseptic loosening on patients in whom the primary operation details were available. Their mean age was 69 years (SD12) with 43% male and 57% right-sided procedures. 205 patients responded to our questionnaires (209/275 hips, 76%). Unfortunately 19 patients had died, 4 had dementia and 13 declined to participate. We were unable to contact a further 33.Grouping by approach, 20% (43/209) had primary and revision lateral approaches, 20% (43/209) had primary lateral and revision posterior and 60% (123/209) had both primary and revision via posterior approaches. The WOMAC and OHS were significantly better in patients who had a posterior approach for both primary and revision surgery, compared to those that did not (OHS p=0.028, WOMAC p=0.026). We found no significant differences in pain, satisfaction or health-related quality of life between the groups. Conclusions. Registry data may help further explore the relationship between surgical approach and outcome in revision hip surgery. A randomised controlled trial of the posterior versus lateral approach for revision surgery would provide a definitive answer. Level of Evidence. 2b - retrospective cohort study. Disclosures. No financial disclosures or conflicts of interests from any authors

Patients report similar or better pain and function before revision hip arthroplasty than before primary arthroplasty but poorer outcomes after revision surgery. The trajectory of post-operative recovery during the first 12 months and any differences by type of surgery have received little attention. We explored the trajectories of change in pain and function after revision hip arthroplasty to 12-months post-operatively and compared them with those observed after primary hip arthroplasty. We conducted a single-centre UK cohort study of patients undergoing primary (n = 80) or revision (n = 43) hip arthroplasty. WOMAC pain and function scores and 20-metres walking time were collected pre-operatively, at 3 and 12-months post-operatively. Multilevel regression models were used to chart and compare the trajectories of post-operative change (0–3 months and 3–12 months) between the types of surgery. Patients undergoing primary arthroplasty had a total hip replacement (n=74) or hip resurfacing (n=6). Osteoarthritis was the indication for surgery in 92% of primary cases. Patients undergoing revision arthroplasty had revision of a total hip arthroplasty (n=37), hemiarthroplasty (n=2) or hip resurfacing (n=4). The most common indication for revision arthroplasty was aseptic loosening (n=29); the remaining indications were pain (n=4), aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (n=4) or other reasons (n=6). Primary (87%) and revision arthroplasties (98%) were mostly commonly performed via a posterior surgical approach. The improvements in pain and function following revision arthroplasty occurred within the first 3-months following operation (WOMAC-pain, p<0.0001; WOMAC-function, p<0.0001; timed 20-metres walk, p<0.0001) with no evidence of further change beyond this initial period (p>0.05). While the pattern of recovery after revision arthroplasty was similar to that observed after primary arthroplasty, improvements in the first 3-months were smaller after revision compared to primary arthroplasty (p<0.0001). Patients listed for revision surgery reported lower pre-operative pain levels (p=0.03) but similar post-operative levels (p=0.268) compared to those undergoing primary surgery. At 12-months post-operation patients who underwent a revision arthroplasty had not reached the same level of function achieved by those who underwent primary arthroplasty (WOMAC-function p=0.015; Time walk p=0.004). Patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty should be informed that the majority of their improvement will occur in the first 3-months following surgery and that the expected improvement will be less marked than that experienced following primary surgery. More research is now required to 1.) identify whether specific in-patient and post-discharge rehabilitation tailored towards patients undergoing revision arthroplasty would improve or achieve equivalent outcomes to primary surgery and 2.) whether patients who are achieving limited improvements at 3-months post-operative would benefit from more intensive rehabilitation. This will become all the more important with the increasing volume of revision surgery and the high expectations of patients who aspire to a disease-free and active life

Abstract

Instruments used in surgery which rotate or vibrate at a high frequency can produce potentially contaminated aerosols. Such tools are in use in cemented hip revision arthroplasties. We aimed to measure the extent of the environmental and body contamination caused by an ultrasound device and a high-speed cutter.

On a human cadaver we carried out a complete surgical procedure including draping and simulated blood flow contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12600). After cemented total hip arthroplasty, we undertook repeated extractions of cement using either an ultrasound device or a high-speed cutter. Surveillance cultures detected any environmental and body contamination of the surgical team.

Environmental contamination was present in an area of 6 x 8 m for both devices. The concentration of contamination was lower for the ultrasound device. Both the ultrasound and the high-speed cutter contaminated all members of the surgical team. The devices tested produced aerosols which covered the whole operating theatre and all personnel present during the procedure. In contaminated and infected patients, infectious agents may be present in these aerosols. We therefore recommend the introduction of effective measures to control infection and thorough disinfection of the operating theatre after such procedures.

We studied various aspects of graft impaction and penetration of cement in an experimental model. Cancellous bone was removed proximally and local diaphyseal lytic defects were simulated in six human cadaver femora. After impaction grafting the specimens were sectioned and prepared for histomorphometric analysis.

The porosity of the graft was lowest in Gruen zone 4 (52%) and highest in Gruen zone 1 (76%). At the levels of Gruen zones 6 and 2 the entire cross-section was almost filled with cement. Cement sometimes reached the endosteal surface in other Gruen zones. The mean peak impaction forces exerted with the impactors were negatively correlated with the porosity of the graft.

An experimental sheep model was used for impaction allografting of 12 hemiarthroplasty femoral components placed into two equal-sized groups. In group 1, a 50:50 mixture of ApaPore hydroxyapatite bone-graft substitute and allograft was used. In group 2, ApaPore and allograft were mixed in a 90:10 ratio. Both groups were killed at six months. Ground reaction force results demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups at 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively, and all animals remained active. The mean bone turnover rates were significantly greater in group 1, at 0.00206 mm/day, compared to group 2 at 0.0013 mm/day (p < 0.05). The results for the area of new bone formation demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups in thickness of the cement mantle (p > 0.05) and percentage ApaPore-bone contact (p > 0.05).

The results of this animal study demonstrated that a mixture of ApaPore allograft in a 90:10 ratio was comparable to using a 50:50 mixture.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon but serious complication of hip and knee replacement. We investigated the rates of revision surgery for the treatment of PJI following primary and revision hip and knee replacement, explored time trends, and estimated the overall surgical burden created by PJI. We analysed the National Joint Registry for England and Wales for revision hip and knee replacements performed for a diagnosis of PJI and their index procedures from 2003–2014. The index hip replacements consisted of 623,253 primary and 63,222 aseptic revision hip replacements with 7,642 revisions subsequently performed for PJI; for knee replacements the figures were 679,010 primary and 33,920 aseptic revision knee replacements with 8,031 revisions subsequently performed for PJI. Cumulative incidence functions, prevalence rates and the burden of PJI in terms of total procedures performed as a result of PJI were calculated. Revision rates for PJI equated to 43 out of every 10,000 primary hip replacements (2,705/623,253), i.e. 0.43%(95%CI 0.42–0.45), subsequently being revised due to PJI. Around 158 out of every 10,000 aseptic revision hip replacements performed were subsequently revised for PJI (997/63,222), i.e. 1.58%(1.48–1.67). For knees, the respective rates were 0.54%(0.52–0.56) for primary replacements, i.e. 54 out of every 10,000 primary replacements performed (3,659/679,010) and 2.11%(1.96–2.23) for aseptic revision replacements, i.e. 211 out of every 10,000 aseptic revision replacements performed (717/33,920). Between 2005 and 2013, the risk of revision for PJI in the 3 months following primary hip replacement rose by 2.29 fold (1.28–4.08) and after aseptic revision by 3.00 fold (1.06–8.51); for knees, it rose by 2.46 fold (1.15–5.25) after primary replacement and 7.47 fold (1.00–56.12) after aseptic revision. The rates of revision for PJI performed at any time beyond 3 months from the index surgery remained stable or decreased over time. From a patient perspective, after accounting for the competing risk of revision for an aseptic indication and death, the 10-year cumulative incidence of revision hip replacement for PJI was 0.62%(95%CI 0.59–0.65) following primary and 2.25%(2.08–2.43) following aseptic revision; for knees, the figures were 0.75%(0.72–0.78) following primary replacement and 3.13%(2.81–3.49) following aseptic revision. At a health service level, the absolute number of procedures performed as a consequence of hip PJI increased from 387 in 2005 to 1,013 in 2014, i.e. a relative increase of 2.6 fold. While 70% of those revisions were two-stage, the use of single stage revision increased from 17.6% in 2005 to 38.5% in 2014. For knees, the burden of PJI increased by 2.8 fold between 2005 and 2014. Overall, 74% of revisions were two-stage with an increase in use of single stage from 10.0% in 2005 to 29.0% in 2014. Although the risk of revision due to PJI following hip or knee replacement is low, it is rising. Given the burden and costs associated with performing revision joint replacement for prosthetic joint infection and the predicted increased incidence of both primary and revision hip replacement, this has substantial implications for service delivery

Repeat revision hip replacements can lead to severe bone loss necessitating salvage procedures such as proximal or total femoral replacement. We present medium term outcomes from our experience of the Limb Preservation System (LPS) in patients with failed revision hip arthroplasties. All patients undergoing proximal femoral or total femoral replacement from 2003–2007 at our unit were reviewed. Data was collected preoperatively and at annual assessment post procedure for a minimum of 5 years. This included clinical review, functional outcome scores (WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score) and radiographic evaluation. A total of 17 patients underwent femoral replacement (13 proximal, 4 total) using the LPS during the study period. Within this cohort there were 13 males and 4 females with a mean age of 64 years (range 47–86). Median follow up was 7 years (range 5–9 years). Primary diagnoses were DDH (7), Primary OA (5), RA (2), proximal femoral fracture (2) and phocomelia (1). Five patients (29%) required further revision surgery for infection (2 patients) or recurrent dislocations (3 patients). No stems required revision due to aseptic loosening or stem failure at 5–9 years. Compared to preoperative assessment, there was significant improvement in median outcome scores at 5 years (WOMAC increased by 33 points, Oxford hip score by16 points and Harris hip score by 43 points). 82% of patients maintained functional independence at latest review. The Limb Preservation System offers a salvage procedure for failed revision total hip arthroplasty with significant symptom and functional improvement in most patients at medium term follow up

Total hip arthroplasty is well established as a successful treatment modality for end stage arthritis, with a variety of components currently available. However, utilising traditional stemmed implants in patients with distorted proximal femoral geometry can be technically challenging with increased risk of complications. We present seven patients with distorted proximal femoral anatomy or failed hip arthroplasty in whom a technically challenging primary or revision operation was simplified by use of a Proxima stem. This is a short, stemless, metaphyseal loading implant with a pronounced lateral flare. At twelve months follow up there have been no complications with average improvement in Oxford and Harris scores of forty and forty-nine respectively. Radiological analysis shows all stems to be stable and well fixed. Designed primarily as a bone conserving implant for primary hip arthroplasty we propose that the Proxima prosthesis also be considered in cases where a conventional stemmed implant may not be suitable due to challenging proximal femoral anatomy. The use of the stemless Proxima implant provided a simple solution in seven difficult and potentially lengthy complex primary and revision hip arthroplasties with gratifying clinical and radiological outcomes

250 words max Long polished cemented femoral stems, such as the Exeter Hip Revision stem, are one option available to the revision hip arthroplasty surgeon. When proximal bone stock is compromised, distal fixation is often relied upon for stability of the femoral component. In such circumstances, torsional forces can result in debonding and loosening. This study compared the torsional behaviour of a cemented polished and featureless (plain) stem with cemented, polished stems featuring fins or flutes. Nine torsional tests were carried out on each of these three different stem designs. The finned stem construct was significantly stiffer than the fluted stem (mean 24.5 Nm/deg v 17.5 Nm/deg). The plain stem mean stiffness was less than the featured stems (13 Nm/deg), but wide variability lead to no statistically significant difference. The maximum torque of the finned (30.5 Nm) and fluted stems (29 Nm) was significantly higher than the plain stem (10.5 Nm); with no significance to the difference between the finned and fluted stems. Distal stem features may provide a more reliable and greater resistance to torque in polished, cemented revision hip stems. Finned stem features may also increase the stiffness of the construct. Consideration should thus be given to the incorporation of distal stem features in the design of revision hip stems

The complications of impaction bone grafting in revision hip replacement includes fracture of the femur and subsidence of the prosthesis. In this in vitro study we aimed to investigate whether the use of vibration, combined with a perforated tamp during the compaction of morsellised allograft would reduce peak loads and hoop strains in the femur as a surrogate marker of the risk of fracture and whether it would also improve graft compaction and prosthetic stability. We found that the peak loads and hoop strains transmitted to the femoral cortex during graft compaction and subsidence of the stem in subsequent mechanical testing were reduced. This innovative technique has the potential to reduce the risk of intra-operative fracture and to improve graft compaction and therefore prosthetic stability

Summary Statement. Proximal femoral bony deficits present a surgical and biomechanical challenge to implant longevity in revision hip arthroplasty. This work finds comparable primary stability when a distally fixing tapered fluted stem was compared with a conical design in cadaveric tests. Introduction. Proximal bony deficits complicate revision hip surgery and compromise implant survival. Longer distally fixing stems which bypass such defects are therefore required to achieve stability compatible with bony ingrowth and implant longevity. Aims. It is hypothesised that a tapered stem will provide superior rotational stability to a conical design. This work therefore aims to compare the primary stability and biomechanical properties of a new design of tapered fluted modular femoral stem (Redapt®, Smith & Nephew) with that of a conical fluted stem (Restoration®, Stryker). Materials & Methods. 7 Pairs of cadaveric femora were obtained according to strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. Each underwent dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and calibration plain-film radiographs were taken. Digital templating was performed using TraumaCad (Voyant Health, Brainlab) to determine implant sizing. Both stems are fluted, modular and manufactured from titanium. The control stem (Restoration) featured a straight conical design and the investigation stem (Redapt) a straight tapered design. Implantation was performed by a revision arthroplasty surgeon familiar with both systems. Proximal bone deficiency was reproduced using an extended trochanteric osteotomy with removal of metaphyseal bone before reattaching the osteotomy. Primary stability in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes was assessed using micromotion transducers (HBM, Darmstadt, Germany) and also by Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA). RSA employs simultaneous biplanar radiographs to measure relative movement. Two 1mm tantalum beads were mounted on the prosthesis with the centre of the femoral head taken as the third reference point. Beads were placed proximally in the surrounding bone as rigid body markers. Each bone was potted according to the ISO standard for fatigue testing and cyclically loaded at 1Hz for at least 3 increments (750–350N, 1000–350N, 1500–350N) for 1000 cycles. RSA radiographs were taken at baseline and on completion of each cycle. A strain analysis was concurrently performed using a PhotoStress® (Vishay Precision Group, Raleigh, USA) photoelastic coating on the medial femoral cortex. Each bone was loaded intact and then with the prosthesis in-situ at 500N increments until strain fringes were identified. Once testing was completed, the stems were sectioned at the femoral isthmus and data is presented on the cross-sectional fit and fill observed. Results. Both stem designs showed comparable primary stability with all stems achieving clinically acceptable micromotion (<150 μm) when loaded at body weight. A larger proportion of the control stems remained stable as loading increased to x2-3 body weight. Transducer-recorded migration appeared greatest in the axial plane (y axis) with negligible distal movement in the coronal or sagittal planes. Point motion analysis (RSA) indicated most movement to be in the coronal plane (x-axis) whereas segment motion analysis showed rotation about the long axis of the prosthesis to be largest. Photoelastic strain patterns were transferred more distally in both designs, however substantial stress shielding was also observed. Discussion/Conclusion. Both designs achieved adequate distal fixation and primary stability under representative clinical loading conditions. This work supports the continued use of this novel stem design for revision surgery in the presence of extensive proximal bone loss

In vitro femoral studies have demonstrated the addition of hydroxyapatite (HA), to morcellised bone graft (MBG) decreases femoral prosthesis subsidence. However, with an increased risk of femoral fracture during the impaction of a MBG:HA mixture, possibly due to greater force transmission to the femoral cortex via the HA. The aim was to compare the hoop strains and subsidence of a 1:1 mixture of MBG:HA with pure bone allograft during impaction and subsequent endurance testing in a revision hip arthroplasty model. Materials and methods Large Sawbone femurs were prepared to represent a femur with bone loss (Sawbones, Sweden). 12 uniaxial strain gauges were attached to each femur at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees, at distal, midshaft, proximal points to measure hoop strain. Impaction grafting was performed using X-Change 2 instruments and an Instron servohydaulic machine for 2 distal impactions and 4 proximal impactions for 60 impactions each. Study groups. The study consisted of four experimental groups: 1)Pure MBG, force of 1.98 kN 2)Pure MBG, force 3.63kN. 3)1:1 mixture of MBG: porous HA (pHA), 4)1:1 mixture MBG: non porous HA (npHA). 6 samples of each group were performed. Endurance testing. The potted femur was loaded in a manner representing the walking cycle (1.98kN) at 1 Hz for 50 000 cycles. The displacement of the femoral head during loading was measured by two displacement transducers (LVDT) were mounted on aluminum brackets to measure vertical displacement and rotation. Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann – Whitney U test for total subsidence and prosthesis cyclical movement at 6 hours between the control MBG1.98 and the other experimental groups. Subsequent analysis compared pHA and npHA mixes with and HA to MBG3. 65kN. Level of significance was taken at p<0.05. Results. Distal strain gauges:. All experimental groups had a significantly greater distal hoop strain than MBG1.98 kN (p=0.004). Middle strain gauges:. No significant differences between the HA groups and MBG1.98. MBG3.65 was significantly greater (p=0.02). Top strain gauges:. No significant differences, p=0.9. Endurance testing There was a non significant trend towards decreased subsidence in the HA groups compared to the bone groups. (p=0.7) but significantly less cyclical subsidence between HA groups and MBG 1.98 (p=0.02). No difference between the MBG 3.65 kN and HA groups for the cyclical subsidence. Statistically significant difference in cyclical rotation between both the MBG1.98 and the pHA (p=0.02) and npHA(p=0.02) and the bone 3.65 and pHA and npHA groups(p=0.04). Conclusion. The addition of HA to MBG decreases total and cyclical subsidence. There were significantly greater hoop strains in the distal and midshaft strain gauges with greater impaction force and in the distal gauges with the use of HA. Endurance testing demonstrated a significant decrease in cyclical motion and cyclical rotational stability of the prosthesis with a trend to a decrease in total subsidence during endurance testing with HA groups. The addition of HA might have longer term benefits in terms of prosthesis stability and subsequent graft healing but caution is needed during impaction

INTRODUCTION. Warfarin remains the treatment of choice for the majority of patients with venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease or valve replacement unless contraindicated. Poor management of patients on warfarin often leads to delay in surgery, life threatening bleeding during or after operation and unnecessary delay in discharge from hospitals in United Kingdom. METHODS. We carried out a prospective study on patients who were on warfarin and underwent elective and emergency orthopaedic procedures during period of study- August 2007 to April 2008. All patients included in the study were identified from admission notes during period of study. All data regarding indications for warfarin, pre and post procedures INR, elective or emergency orthopaedic procedures and complications were collected using a standard proforma. RESULTS. 18 patients, 12 male and 6 female were included into the study. Patients' age ranged from 47-87 with mean of 76. The indications for warfarin therapy were atrial fibrillation in 12 patients, deep vein thrombosis in 5 patients and left ventricular aneurysm in 1 patient. 18 procedures, 10 elective and 8 emergency orthopaedic procedures were carried out during period of study. Elective procedures - 7 primary joint arthroplasty, 1 revision hip arthroplasty, 1 removal of metalwork and 1 metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. Emergency procedures - 4 hip hemiarthroplasty, 2 dynamic hip screw fixation, 1 external fixator application and 1 open reduction and internal fixation of ankle. All elective admission patients were pre-assessed in clinic prior to admission and were advised to stop warfarin based on their INR level. Patients with INR 2-3 had their warfarin stopped 4 days prior to surgery while patients with INR 3-4.5 had their warfarin stopped 5 days prior to surgery. This group of patients had their INR check on admission and ranged from 1.1-1.5. This group of patients had no reversal therapy and no cancellations were made to their operation. 8 emergency admission patients had INR of 1.4-4.7 on admission with mean of 2.7. 5 patients had reversal therapy while 3 patients had no reversal therapy. Pharmacological methods used to reduce the INR were fresh frozen plasma in 1 patient and Vitamin K in 4 other patients. 2 patients that received reversal therapy had operation on day 1, 2 on day 3 and 1 on day 5. 1 patient that had no reversal therapy was operated on day 1, 1 on day 3 and 1 on day 5. Patient that received no reversal therapy and operated on day 5 of admission died post-operatively from medical complications. Mean delay for patient that had reversal therapy was 2.2 days compared to 3 days in patient with no reversal therapy. All patients in this study had prophylactic low molecular weight heparin while off warfarin. Patients were recommenced on their normal dose of warfarin the day after their operation. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that patients on warfarin with INR 2-3 should have their warfarin stopped 4 days prior to surgery while patients with INR 3-4.5 should stop their warfarin 5 days prior to elective surgery. Trauma patients on warfarin requiring operation should have their INR reversed on admission to shorten delay in waiting time and improve outcomes

Aims

Osteoporosis and abnormal bone metabolism may prove to be significant factors influencing the outcome of arthroplasty surgery, predisposing to complications of aseptic loosening and peri-prosthetic fracture. We aimed to investigate baseline bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover in patients about to undergo arthroplasty of the hip and knee.

Objectives

The period of post-operative treatment before surgical wounds are completely closed remains a key window, during which one can apply new technologies that can minimise complications. One such technology is the use of negative pressure wound therapy to manage and accelerate healing of the closed incisional wound (incisional NPWT).

The human acetabulofemoral joint is commonly modelled as a pure ball-and-socket joint, but there has been no quantitative assessment of this assumption in the literature. Our aim was to test the limits and validity of this hypothesis. We performed experiments on four adult cadavers. Cortical pins, each equipped with a marker cluster, were implanted in the pelvis and the femur. Movements were recorded using stereophotogrammetry while an operator rotated the cadaver’s acetabulofemoral joint, exploiting the widest possible range of movement. The functional consistency of the acetabulofemoral joint as a pure spherical joint was assessed by comparing the magnitude of the translations of the hip joint centre as obtained on cadavers, with the centre of rotation of two metal segments linked through a perfectly spherical hinge. The results showed that the radii of the spheres containing 95% of the positions of the estimated centres of rotation were separated by less than 1 mm for both the acetabulofemoral joint and the mechanical spherical hinge.

Therefore, the acetabulofemoral joint can be modelled as a spherical joint within the considered range of movement (flexion/extension 20° to 70°; abduction/adduction 0° to 45°; internal/external rotation 0° to 30°).

In order to investigate the osteoinductive properties of allograft used in impaction grafting and the effect of strain during impaction on these properties, we designed an in vitro experiment to measure strain-related release of bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) from fresh-frozen femoral head allograft. A total of 40 10 mm cubes of cancellous bone were cut from ten samples of fresh-frozen femoral head. The marrow was removed from the cubes and the baseline concentrations of BMP-7 were measured. Specimens from each femoral head were allocated to four groups and subjected to different compressive strains with a material testing machine, after which BMP-7 activity was reassessed. It was present in all groups. There was a linear increase of 102.1 pg/g (95% confidence interval 68.6 to 135.6) BMP-7 for each 10% increase in strain. At 80% strain the mean concentration of BMP-7 released (830.3 pg/g bone) was approximately four times that released at 20% strain. Activity of BMP-7 in fresh-frozen allograft has not previously been demonstrated. This study shows that the freezing and storage of femoral heads allows some maintenance of biological activity, and that impaction grafting provides a source of osteoinductive bone for remodelling.

We have shown that BMP-7 is released from fresh-frozen femoral head cancellous bone in proportion to the strain applied to the bone. This suggests that the impaction process itself may contribute to the biological process of remodelling and bony incorporation.

This study investigates the use of porous biphasic ceramics as graft extenders in impaction grafting of the femur during revision hip surgery.

Impaction grafting of the femur was performed in four groups of sheep. Group one received pure allograft, group two 50% allograft and 50% BoneSave, group three 50% allograft and 50% BoneSave type 2 and group four 10% allograft and 90% BoneSave as the graft material. Function was assessed using an index of pre- and post-operative peak vertical ground reaction force ratios. Changes in bone mineral density were measured by dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning. Loosening and subsidence were assessed radiographically and by histological examination of the explanted specimens.

There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups after 18 months of unrestricted functional loading for all outcome measures.