This study aimed to quantify self-reported outcomes and walking gait biomechanics in patients following primary and revision THA. The specific goals of this study were to investigate: (i) if primary and revision THA patients have comparable preoperative outcomes; and (2) if revision THA patients have worse postoperative outcomes than primary THA patients. Forty-three patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis and 23 patients undergoing revision THA were recruited and followed longitudinally for their first 12 postoperative months. Reasons for revision were loosening (73%), dislocation (9%), and infection (18%). Patients completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and underwent gait analysis preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. A 10 camera motion analysis system (V5 Vantage, Vicon, UK) recorded marker trajectories (100 Hz) during walking at self- selected speeds. A generic lower-body musculoskeletal model (Gait2392) was scaled using principal component analysis [1] and the inverse kinematics tool in Opensim 3.3 was used to compute joint angles for the lower limbs in the sagittal plane. Independent samples t-test were used to compare patient reported outcomes between the primary and revision groups at each timepoint. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare gait patterns between the two groups at each timepoint. Preoperatively, patients undergoing primary THA reported significantly worse pain (p<0.001), symptoms (p<0.001), function (p<0.001), and quality of life (p=0.004). No differences were observed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between patients who had received a primary or revision THA. The only observed difference in gait pattern was that patients with a revision THA had reduced hip extension at 3 months, but no differences were observed preoperatively and 12 months. Despite the suggestions in the literature that revision THA is bound to have worse outcomes compared to primary THA, we found no differences in in patient-reported outcomes and gait patterns at 12 months postoperatively. This suggests that it may be possible, in some circumstances, for patients following revision THA to achieve similar outcomes to their peers undergoing primary THA

Abstract. Objective. Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) aims to preserve the proximal bone stock for future revisions, so that the first revision should resemble a primary intervention rather than a revision. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in revision THA after failed short stem versus after failed conventional stem THA. Methods. This study included forty-five patients with revision THA divided into three groups (15 each); group A: revision after short stem, group B: revision after conventional cementless stem and group C revision after conventional cemented stem. The studied groups were compared regarding 31 variables including demographic data, details of the primary and revision procedures, postoperative radiological subsidence, hospital stay, time for full weight bearing (FWB), preoperative and postoperative clinical scores. Results. Early stem subsidence (40%) was the main indication of revision in group A compared to peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) (73.3%) and aseptic loosening (53.3%) in group B and C respectively (P=0.021). The mean time to revision was significantly shorter in group A (15 months) compared to 95.33 and 189.40 months in group B and C respectively. (P=0.005). Sixty % (9 patients) in group A were revised in the first year. The mean operative time, blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion and hospital stay were significantly lower in group A compared to group B and C (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.002 and 0.001 respectively). Revisions in group A were performed using either short stems (13.3%) or conventional stems (86.7%) whilst 80% of patients needed long stems and 20% of patients needed conventional stems in group B and C (P<0.001). The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the latest follow up was 87.07, 87.53 and 85.47 in group A, B and C respectively. All PFFS had excellent results according to Beal's and Tower's criteria; all fractures healed and the implants were stable. Conclusion. The most common cause of failure of short stems is early stem subsidence. Short stem THA has specific indications and patient selection is very crucial. Preoperative templating for short stems and a detailed analysis of the individual patient anatomy in anteroposterior and lateral views are mandatory to predict the correct implant size more accurately. The use of intraoperative imaging can verify the sizing, implant position, and sufficient contact with the lateral cortex. Revision of short stem THA resembled the primary THA. If a standard implant can be used in a surgical revision instead of a longer revision stem, this can be considered as an advantage for the hip arthroplasty treatment concept. However, this only applies if the longevity of the first treatment with a short stem is comparable with that of a standard stem. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Femoral impaction bone grafting (IBG) may be used to restore bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and allow use of a shorter, than otherwise, length prosthesis. This is most beneficial in young patients who are more likely to require further revision surgery. This study aimed to assess the results of femoral IBG for staged revision THA for infection. A prospective cohort of 29 patients who underwent staged revision THA for infection with femoral IBG and a cemented polished double-tapered (CPDT) stem at the final reconstruction was investigated. The minimum follow-up was two years (2 – 10 years, median 6 years). Stem subsidence was measured with radiostereometric analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Harris Hip, Harris Pain, and and Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie Activity (SICOT) Scores. The original infection was eradicated in 28 patients. One patient required a repeat staged revision due to re-infection with the same organism. At two-year follow-up, the median subsidence at the stem-bone interface was −1.70 mm (−0.31 to −4.98mm). The median Harris Hip Score improved from 51 pre-operatively to 80 at two years (p=0.000), the Harris Pain Score from 20 to 44 (p=0.000) and the SICOT Score from 2.5 to 3 (p=0.003). As successful eradication of infection was achieved in the majority of patients and the stem migration was similar to that of a primary CPDT stem, this study supports the use of femoral IBG during the final reconstruction of the femur after staged revision THA for infection

First-time revision acetabular components have a 36% re-revision rate at 10 years in Australia, with subsequent revisions known to have even worse results. Acetabular component migration >1mm at two years following revision THA is a surrogate for long term loosening. This study aimed to measure the migration of porous tantalum components used at revision surgery and investigate the effect of achieving press-fit and/or three-point fixation within acetabular bone. Between May 2011 and March 2018, 55 patients (56 hips; 30 female, 25 male) underwent acetabular revision THR with a porous tantalum component, with a post-operative CT scan to assess implant to host bone contact achieved and Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) examinations on day 2, 3 months, 1 and 2 years. A porous tantalum component was used because the defects treated (Paprosky IIa:IIb:IIc:IIIa:IIIb; 2:6:8:22:18; 13 with pelvic discontinuity) were either deemed too large or in a position preventing screw fixation of an implant with low coefficient of friction. Press-fit and three-point fixation of the implant was assessed intra-operatively and on postoperative imaging. Three-point acetabular fixation was achieved in 51 hips (92%), 34 (62%) of which were press-fit. The mean implant to host bone contact achieved was 36% (range 9-71%). The majority (52/56, 93%) of components demonstrated acceptable early stability. Four components migrated >1mm proximally at two years (1.1, 3.2, 3.6 and 16.4mm). Three of these were in hips with Paprosky IIIB defects, including 2 with pelvic discontinuity. Neither press-fit nor three-point fixation was achieved for these three components and the cup to host bone contact achieved was low (30, 32 and 59%). The majority of porous tantalum components had acceptable stability at two years following revision surgery despite treating large acetabular defects and poor bone quality. Components without press-fit or three-point fixation were associated with unacceptable amounts of early migration

Background. Frequency of primary total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty procedures is increasing, with a subsequent rise in revision procedures. This study aims to describe timing and excess surgical mortality associated with revision THA and TKA compared to those on the waiting list. Methods. All patients from 2003–2013 in a single institution who underwent revision THA and TKA, or added to the waiting list for the same procedure were recorded. Mortality rates were calculated at cutoffs of 30- and 90-days post-operation or addition to the waiting list. Results. 561 and 547 patients were available for the survivorship analysis in the revision THA and TKA groups respectively. Following exclusion, 901 and 832 patients were available for the 30-day analysis and 484 and 568 patients for the 90-day analysis in the revision THA and revision TKA waiting list groups respectively. The 30- and 90-day mortality rate was significantly greater for the revision THA group compared to the waiting list group (excess surgical mortality of 0.357%, 95% confidence interval 0.098% to 0.866%; p=0.037) (odds ratio of 5.22, 95% confidence interval 0.626 to 43.524; excess surgical mortality of 0.863%, 95% confidence interval 0.455% to 1.153%; p=0.045). The 30- and 90-day mortality rate was not significantly greater for the revision TKA group compared to the waiting list group (excess surgical mortality of zero) (excess surgical mortality of 0.366%, 95% confidence interval 0.100% to 0.651%; p=0.075). Conclusions. Revision THA is associated with a significant excess surgical mortality rate at 30- and 90-days post operation when compared to the waiting list for the same procedure. However, we have been unable to quantify any increased risk after revision TKA. We would encourage other authors with access to larger samples to use our method to quantify excess mortality after revision TKA. Level of Evidence. III-Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract. Introduction. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty(BPHA) for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures(DICNOF) is a controversial topic as conflicting evidence exists. The most common reason for revision to total hip arthroplasty(THA) from BPHA is acetabular erosion. In our study, we sought to quantify the direction of migration of the bipolar head within the first 3 years post-operatively. Methods. A proportional index in the horizontal and vertical planes of the pelvis were used to quantify migration. This method removed the need to account for magnification and rotation of the radiographs. Results. There were a total of 35 patients (8males, 27females) included, with an average followup of 2.3years (816days). 7 did not migrate, these were all female. For the remainder, per year of insertion, the average horizontal migration was 0.005769439 and the average vertical migration was 0.004543352, suggesting superomedial movement. Discussion. BPHA has been shown to provide results similar to those of THA in patients with DICNOF. The main cause of revision to THA is migration thought to be from loss of cartilage volume from mechanical wear, that causes pain. We have quantified this migration as minimal. None of our patients required revision to THA and none sustained dislocation or loosening in this followup period. This would fit with the meta-analyses looking at BPHA, which shows bipolar articulations reduce the amount of wear. We also identified a trend that in the female population migration is less likely to occur. This would add evidence to the theory that mechanical factors are significant in the volumetric wear caused by hemiarthoplasty. Conclusion. BPHA was found to be safe and effective in our cohort of patients with minimal migration and no need for revision at an average of 2.3years. Our data is concurrent with the literature in theorising that BPHA reduces wear at the prosthesis-cartilage interface

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents with increasing challenges, potentially compromising the integrity of a revision. The objective of this study was to assess radiologic outcomes of patients who underwent revision THA with a modular tapered stem (Reclaim, DePuy Synthes). This study retrospectively examined all revision Reclaim THAs between 2012 and 2016. Radiologic assessment compared x-rays at two time points: immediately after surgery and the most recent x-ray available. Leg length discrepancy, subsidence and line-to-line fit was assessed. Significant subsidence was considered ≥10mm. Adequate line-to-line fit was considered ≥30mm of bicortical contact. Descriptive statistics included clinical factors (i.e. age, Paprosky classification). P values <0.05 were considered significant. A total of 81 femoral revisions were completed. There were 42 females and 38 males with a mean age of 71 years (range, 46–89). Of these, 6 were revised (dislocation, fracture or infection), and 7 were lost to follow up. Average follow up time was 18 months (range, 1–46 months). Femoral revisions were classified as Paprosky 3a or 3b. Mean stem subsidence was 4.15mm (range, 0–25.6mm). Subsidence of the femoral stem was <10mm in 88% of patients. A total of 62% of patients had both subsidence <10mm and ≥30mm of bicortical contact. In patients with <10mm subsidence, 70% had ≥30mm of bicortical contact. There was a positive trend between cortical contact and stem stability (OR 2.3). The Reclaim modular femoral system has demonstrated radiographic stability. Inadequate initial fit is a potential determinant of subsidence

Recent debate about changing population demographics and growing demands of younger patients has suggested a future explosion in the requirements for primary and revision lower limb arthroplasty (TKA/THA). This could represent a significant challenge for healthcare providers. This study aimed to predict the demands for lower limb arthroplasty in Scotland from 2010–2035. Population figures (2004–2010) and projected population data (five year increments) were obtained from the National Records of Scotland. The numbers of arthroplasties from 2004–2010 were provided by the Scottish Arthroplasty Project. Data were divided into three age groups (40–69, 60–79, 80+). The first model used mean incidence for each age group from 2006–2010 applied to the projected population figures. The second used linear regression to give predicted incidences 2015–2035 which were then applied to the projected population. The third-for revisions – used incidence per number of primary arthroplasties. For primary TKA model 1, comparing to 2010, showed demand increasing by 10% in 2020 and by 31% (to 8,650 procedures) in 2035. Model 2 gave increases of 60% and 161% respectively. An increase was found across all age groups with 60–79 more than doubling and 80+ increasing fourfold by 2035 (model 2). The revision TKA models predicted between 670 and 2,000 procedures by 2035. For primary THA models 1 and 2 showed demand increasing by 40% in 2020 and then by 60% and 110% (11,000 and 14,500 procedures) in 2035 respectively. All age groups had increasing demand with 60–79 doubling and 80+ tripling by 2035 (model 2). The revision THA models predicted between 1,300 and 2,100 procedures by 2035. These projections show large increases in the numbers of both primaries and revisions over the next two decades. They highlight that current resources may be insufficient or the selection criteria for surgery may need to be revisited

Objectives

The objective of this study was to develop a test for the rapid (within 25 minutes) intraoperative detection of bacteria from synovial fluid to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Impacted morsellised allografts have been used successfully to address the problem of poor bone stock in revision surgery. However, there are concerns about the transmission of pathogens, the high cost and the shortage of supply of donor bone. Bone-graft extenders, such as tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA), have been developed to minimise the use of donor bone. In a human cadaver model we have evaluated the surgical and mechanical feasibility of a TCP/HA bone-graft extender during impaction grafting revision surgery.

A TCP/HA allograft mix increased the risk of producing a fissure in the femur during the impaction procedure, but provided a higher initial mechanical stability when compared with bone graft alone. The implications of the use of this type of graft extender in impaction grafting revision surgery are discussed.

There is no diagnostic, non-invasive method for the early detection of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. In a pilot study, we have analysed two serum markers of bone remodelling, procollagen I C-terminal extension peptide (PICP) and cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide (NTx), as well as the diagnostic performance of NTx for the assessment of osteolysis. We recruited 21 patients with loosening (group I), 18 with a well-fixed prosthesis (group II) and 17 at the time of primary arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (OA) (group III). Internal normal reference ranges were obtained from 30 healthy subjects (group IV).

The serum PICP level was found to be significantly lower in patients with OA and those with loosening, when compared with those with stable implants, while the NTx level was significantly increased only in the group with loosening, suggesting that collagen degradation depended on the altered bone turnover induced by the implant. This hypothesis was reinforced by the finding that the values in the pre-surgery patients and stable subjects were comparable with the reference range of younger healthy subjects.

A high specificity and positive predictive value for NTx provided good diagnostic evidence of agreement between the test and the clinical and radiological evaluations. The NTx level could be used to indicate stability of the implant. However, further prospective, larger studies are necessary.