Introduction. Initial fixation of noncemented implants is critical to achieve a stable bone/implant interface during the first few months after surgery to potentiate bone in-growth and avoid aseptic loosening. Numerous reverse shoulder glenoid implant designs have been conceived in an attempt to improve implant performance and decrease the rate of aseptic glenoid loosening, commonly reported to be 5%. Design variations include: baseplate profile, baseplate size, backside geometry, center of rotation, surface finish and coatings, fixation screw diameters, number of fixation screw options, and type of screw fixation. However, little comparative biomechanical data exist to substantiate one design consideration over another. To that end, this study quantified glenoid fixation before and after cyclic loading of simulated abduction of 6 different reverse shoulder glenoid designs when secured to a low density polyurethane bone substitute block. Methods. A displacement test quantified fixation of 6 different reverse shoulder designs: 38 mm Equinoxe standard offset (EQ), 38 mm Equinoxe lateral offset (EQL), 36 mm Depuy Delta III (DRS), 36 mm Zimmer, (ZRS), 32 mm neutral DJO RSP (DJO), and a 36 mm Tornier BIO-RSA (BIO), secured to a 0.24 g/cm. 3. polyurethane block as a shear (357 N) and compressive (50 N) load was applied before and after cyclic loading. (Figure 1) Glenoid displacement was measured relative to the block using dial indicators in the directions of the applied loads along the superior/inferior axis. A cyclic test rotated each glenosphere (n = 7 for each design) about a 55° arc of abduction at 0.5 Hz for 10k cycles as 750N was constantly applied. (Figure 2) Each implant was cycled using a 145° humeral liner of the appropriate diameter to ensure each device is subjected to the same shear load. A two-tailed unpaired student's t-test was used to compare pre- and post-cyclic mean displacements between designs; p < 0.05 denotes significance. Results. The average pre-cyclic displacement of the EQ, EQL, DRS, ZRS, DJO, and BIO devices was 181, 137, 186, 381, 238, 232 microns, respectively. The average post-cyclic displacement of the EQ, EQL, DRS, DJO, and BIO devices was 186, 129, 189, 368, 249 microns, respectively. During the cyclic test, 6 of 7 ZRS devices failed at an average of 2603 cycles, 1 of 7 DJO failed at 7342 cycles, and 4 of 7 BIO devices failed at an average of 2926 cycles. All 7 of the EQ, EQL, and DRS devices remained well fixed throughout cyclic loading. Discussion and Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrate significant difference in fixation associated 6 different reverse shoulder designs. Despite many similarities in geometry between these designs, significant differences in fixation were observed between nearly every implant design tested. This suggests that subtle changes in glenoid baseplate design can dramatically impact fixation, particularly in low density bone substitutes which are intended to simulate the bone quality of the recipient population for reverse shoulders. Future work should attempt to isolate which design parameters are the most critical contributors for initial fixation and ultimately, long-term stability

Introduction. Achieving prosthesis fixation in patients with glenoid defects can be challenging, particularly when the bony defects are large. To that end, this study quantifies the impact of 2 different sizes of large anterior glenoid defects on reverse shoulder glenoid fixation in a composite scapula model using the recently approved ASTM F 2028–14 reverse shoulder glenoid loosening test method. Methods. This rTSA glenoid loosening test was conducted according to ASTM F 2028–14; we quantified glenoid fixation of a 38mm reverse shoulder (Equinoxe, Exactech, Inc) in composite/dual density scapulae (Pacific Research, Inc) before and after cyclic testing of 750N for 10k cycles. Anterior defects of 8.5mm (31% of glenoid width and 21% of glenoid height; n=7) and 12.5mm (46% of glenoid width and 30% of glenoid height; n=7) were milled into the composite scapula along the S/I glenoid axis with the aid of a custom jig. The baseplate fixation in scapula with anterior glenoid defects was compared to that of scapula without an anterior glenoid defect (n = 7). For the non-defect scapula, initial fixation of the glenoid baseplates were achieved using 4, 4.5×30mm diameter poly-axial locking compression screws. To simulate a worst case condition in each anterior defect scapulae, no 4.5×30mm compression screw were used anteriorly, instead fixation was achieved with only 3 screws (one superior, one inferior, and one posterior). A one-tailed unpaired student's t-test (p < 0.05) compared prosthesis displacements relative to each scapula (anterior defect vs no-anterior defect). Results. All glenoid baseplates remained well-fixed after cyclic loading in composite scapula without a defect and those with an 8.5mm anterior glenoid defect. However, only 6 of the 7 glenoid baseplates remained well-fixed after cyclic loading in scapula with a 12.5mm anterior glenoid defect, where 1 device failed catastrophically at 5000 cycles by loosening from the substrate. As described in Table 1, the average pre- and post-cyclic glenoid baseplate displacement in scapula with 8.5mm and 12.5mm anterior glenoid defects was significantly greater than that of baseplates in scapula without an anterior glenoid defect in both the A/P and S/I directions. Similarly, the average pre- and post-cyclic glenoid baseplate displacement in scapula with 12.5mm anterior glenoid defects was significantly greater than that of baseplates in scapula with 8.5mm anterior glenoid defects in the both the A/P and S/I directions. Discussion and Conclusions. These results demonstrate that reverse shoulder glenoid baseplate fixation was achievable in scapula with an 8.5mm anterior glenoid defect. Given that one sample catastrophically loosened in the 12.5mm anterior defect model, supplemental bone grafting may be required to achieve fixation in 12.5mm anterior glenoid defects with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Future work should evaluate whether adding additional screws mitigates the increased displacement observed in this anterior glenoid defect scenario. This study is limited by its use of polyurethane dual-density composite scapula

INTRODUCTION. Shoulder joint prostheses have become the most commonly replaced after knee and hip artificial implants. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the treatment option for patients with severe osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy or a massive rotator cuff tear with pseudoparalysis. Though successful, the long-term survival of such implants are limited by wear of the materials in contact [1, 2]. The aim of this study was to investigate RSA wear in vitro using a clinically relevant activities of daily living (ADLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four new JRI Orthopaedics Reverse Shoulder 42 mm diameter VAIOS with cobalt-chromium (CoCr) glenospheres and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) humeral components were tested. A five million cycles wear test was undertaken using the unique Newcastle Shoulder Wear Simulator with dilute bovine serum as a lubricant. “Mug to mouth” was performed as the ADL to the test prostheses in intervals of 100 cycles, following by 5 seconds of high load (450N) with no motion simulating an ADL such as “lifting an object”. This combined load cycle was then repeated. A fifth reverse shoulder prosthesis was subject to dynamic loading only in a soak control station. Wear was assessed gravimetrically and roughness (Sa) of the articulating surfaces was measured with a non-contacting profilometer. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The mean wear rate and standard deviation of the UHMWPE components was 11.4±3.7 mm. 3. /million cycles, while the CoCr components showed minimal wear over the test duration of 0.01± 0.02 mm. 3. /million cycles (Fig.1). Wear rates are comparable with Kohut et al. (14.1 mm. 3. /million cycles) [3] and Smith et al. (14.3±1.6 mm. 3. /million cycles) [4]. The CoCr glenospheres roughness was unchanged, from 32±8 nm Sa to 28±8 nm Sa over the 5 million cycles of the test (p=0.017), while the UHMWPE humeral components became smoother, from 692±123 nm Sa to 42±29 nm Sa (Fig.2), showing a statically significant change (p<0.001). CONCLUSION. The present study is the first wear test of artificial shoulder joints using a Motion-Load-Motion configuration as a clinically relevant physiological pattern of motion and load. Results are comparable with those found in the literature for in vitro testing of reverse shoulder replacements. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Summary Statement. Reverse shoulder design philosophy can impact external rotation moment arms. Lateralizing the humerus can increase the external rotator moment arms relative to normal anatomy. Introduction. The design of reverse shoulders continues to evolve. These devices are unique in that they are not meant to reproduce the healthy anatomy. The reversal of the fulcurm in these devices impacts every muscle that surrounds the joint. This study is focused on analyzing the moment arms for the rotator cuff muscles involved in internal and external rotation for a number of reverse shoulder design philosophies. Methods. Four of the most common design philosophies were chosen. The first, a Grammont style prosthesis, with a center of rotation (COR) on the glenoid face and a humeral cup countersunk into the proximal humerus (MGMH). The second concept is the MGMH design lateralised by a 10mm bone graft (BIO). The third concept has a lateralised glenosphere COR and a humeral component inside the proximal humerus (LGMH). The fourth design has a medialised COR with a humeral component placed on top of the humerus (MGLH). This places the humerus further lateral than the previous designs. For each component set, a representative implant was modeled based on published specifications. Each design was implanted into the same digital bone models (consisting of a humerus, scapula, clavicle, and ribcage) following the manufacturer's recommended surgical technique. The muscles analyzed were the posterior-deltoid (PD), subscapularis (SSC), infraspinatus (IS), and teres minor (TM). These muscles were allowed to wrap around the bone of the scapula and proximal humerus through the range of motion. All muscle origin and insertion points were kept constant throughout the analysis. The assemblies were externally rotated from an initial position of 45° internal rotation to 45° of external rotation of the humerus with the arm at 0° of abduction. The moment arms for all muscles were compared to those calculated for the anatomic shoulder. Results. All the rotator cuff muscles displayed a similar trend with the reverse shoulder. The external rotators all had similar moment arm values at neutral (IS∼22mm, TM∼20mm), but increased at rates proportional to their humeral offsets with external rotation (IS-MGLH 32.3mm, LGMH 27.5mm, MGMH and BIO 26.25mm; TM-MGLH 31.3mm, LGMH 27.8mm, MGMH and BIO 26.5mm). The SSC internal rotation moment arm remains roughly constant at 20mm for the anatomic shoulder, but varies widely from 45° external to 45° internal rotation with the different designs (MGLH 31.4mm to 6.7mm; MGMH 25.1mm to 11.2mm; LGMH 26.2mm to 10.8mm; BIO 25.4mm to 4.8mm). The PD moment arm is increased relative to the anatomic shoulder during external rotation for the MGLH design (9.3mm vs. 7.4mm). The other designs exhibit a decrease in the moment arm of this muscle relative to the anatomic design (LGMH 7.3mm, MGMH 5.8mm, BIO 6.4mm). Discussion. The lateral offset between the center of humeral axis and the muscle insertion on the humerus dominates the external rotation moment arm value through this range of motion. This is evident by the increase in the moment arms with external rotation for the different reverse shoulder designs. The increase in external rotation efficiency for the external rotators and PD could play a critical role in post-operative external rotation strength and motion

Background

Locked anterior shoulders (LAS) with static instability and anterior glenoid bone loss are challenging in the elderly population. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been employed in treating these patients. No study has compared RSA for LAS to classically indicated RSA.

Aim. A significant number of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty surgery have C acnes contamination at the end of the primary surgery. The objective of this study is to determine whether patients with C acnes contamination at the end of their primary shoulder surgery have a worse prognosis than those who end up without C. acnes contamination. Method. Prospective study including all patients who underwent a reverse shoulder prosthesis from January 2015 to December 2018. In all of them, 5 to 12 cultures were performed during primary surgery. The patients underwent surgery for shoulder arthritis secondary to rotator cuff tears, acute fracture of the proximal humerus, and sequelae of fracture of the proximal humerus. Exclusion criteria included the existence of previous surgeries on the affected shoulder, the presence of signs of infection, having received infiltrations and / or complementary invasive examinations (Arthro-MRI and Arthro-CT). Follow-up from 2 to 5 years. Functional assessment according to the Constant Functional Scale. All complications were also recorded. Results. 162 patients were included. Of these, 25 had positive cultures for C. acnes at the end of primary shoulder surgery. Average age of 74.8 years. 136 women and 26 men. 75.9% Shoulder arthritis secondary to rotator cuff tears, 13.6% acute fractures and 10.5% sequelae of fractures. There were no differences between patients with C. acnes and those without C. acnes regarding age and indication for surgery. Predominance of men in the group with positive C. acnes (p <0.001). No differences at 2 and 5 years in the Constant functional scale between the two groups (2 years, 59.6 vs 59.2 p 0.870) (5 years, 62.4 vs 59.5 p 0.360). Significant differences regarding the number of complications (p 0.001). Patients without C. acnes had 1 aseptic loosening of the metaglene and patients with C. acnes had 2 infections, 1 dislocation, and 1 revision surgery. Patients with contamination by C. acnes had more comorbidities (p 0.035) than patients without contamination. Conclusions. Patients with C acnes contamination at the end of primary surgery do not have functional differences when compared with patients without contamination at 2 and 5 years, but they have a higher number of complications in the medium term

We report the use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis in the revision of a failed shoulder hemiarthroplasty in 19 shoulders in 18 patients (7 men, 11 women) with severe pain and loss of function. The primary procedure had been undertaken for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. Statistically significant improvements were seen in pain and functional outcome. After a mean follow-up of 44 months (24 to 89), mean forward flexion improved by 26.4° and mean abduction improved by 35°. There were six prosthesis-related complications in six shoulders (32%), five of which had severe bone loss of the glenoid, proximal humerus or both. Three shoulders (16%) had non-prosthesis related complications. The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis provides improvement in pain and function for patients with failure of a hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. However, high rates of complications were associated with glenoid and proximal humeral bone loss

Wear of polyethylene is associated with aseptic loosening of orthopaedic implants and has been observed in hip and knee prostheses and anatomical implants for the shoulder. The reversed shoulder prostheses have not been assessed as yet. We investigated the volumetric polyethylene wear of the reversed and anatomical Aequalis shoulder prostheses using a mathematical musculoskeletal model. Movement and joint stability were achieved by EMG-controlled activation of the muscles. A non-constant wear factor was considered. Simulated activities of daily living were estimated from in vivo recorded data. After one year of use, the volumetric wear was 8.4 mm. 3. for the anatomical prosthesis, but 44.6 mm. 3. for the reversed version. For the anatomical prosthesis the predictions for contact pressure and wear were consistent with biomechanical and clinical data. The abrasive wear of the polyethylene in reversed prostheses should not be underestimated, and further analysis, both experimental and clinical, is required

Aims: Displaced proximal humeral fractures are considered a real challenge. Malunion, nonunion, avascular necrosis, arthritis are frequent complications. Thus revision surgery, using reverse shoulder prosthesis, is mandatory both to restore shoulder function and to relieve pain. Our purpose was to understand if clinical outcomes after revision surgery are influenced by the first surgical procedure performed to fix the fracture. Methods: 15 patients, mean age 67±2 yrs, sustained a complex humeral fracture. Group A (8 patients) was treated with reduction and fixation with K-wires, while in Group B (7 patients) a cemented hemiarthroplasty was performed. After primary surgical treatment, both groups required revision surgery and a shoulder reverse prosthesis was implanted. Constant score, Flexion, VAS scale and Dash questionnaire were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 year after revision surgery,. Results: Constant Score improved from 7 to 42 points in Group A, while in Group B from 15 to 41 points (n.s.). Flexion in Group A improved from 30° to 106°, while in Group B from 44° to 94° (n.s.). VAS value decreased from 9 to 2 in Group A and from 8 to 5 in Group B (n.s.). Dash value decreased from 82 to 49 points in Group A and from 75 to 55 points in Group B (n.s.). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that reverse shoulder prosthesis offers a salvage-type solution in revision surgery reguardless the surgical treatmet performed previously. In conclusion reverse shoulder prosthesis is an important tool the surgeon can use in shoulder revision surgery

Introduction. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (rTSA) is currently advised against in patient populations with movement disorders, due to potential premature failure of the implants from the use of walking assistive devices. The objective of this study is to measure the amount of displacement induced by the simulated loading of axillary crutches on a rTSA assembly in a laboratory mimicking immediate postoperative conditions. Methods. 8 reverse shoulder baseplate/glenosphere assemblies (Equinoxe, Exactech, Inc) were fixated to 15 lb/ft3 density rigid polyurethane bone substitute blocks. Displacement of the assemblies in the A/P and S/I axes was measured using digital displacement indicators by applying a physiologically relevant 357N shear load parallel to the face of the glenosphere, and a nominal 50N compressive axial load perpendicular to the glenosphere. Westerhoff et al. reported in vivo shoulder loads while ambulating with axillary crutches had a maximum resultant force of 170% times the patient's bodyweight with the arm at 45.25° of abduction1. This was recreated by applying a 1435.4N compressive load (Average bodyweight of 86.1kg*170%) to a humeral liner and reverse shoulder assembly in an Instron testing apparatus at 45.25° of abduction as shown in Figure 1. The glenosphere was rotated about the humeral component through the arc of the axillary crutch swing, from −5° of extension to 30° of flexion as shown in Figure 2 for 183,876 cycles2. The number of cycles was based on number of steps taken in a day from pedometer data reported by Tudor Locke et al. for patients with movement disorders, extrapolated out to a 6 week postoperative recovery period3. A Student's one-tailed, paired t-test was used to identify whether or not significant displacement occurred, where p<0.05 denoted a significant difference. Results. Displacement in the A/P and S/I axes before and after cyclic loading are presented in Table 1. The S/I direction showed no significant difference in displacement (p≤.0801), whereas the A/P direction showed significant increase in displacement (p≤.0340). The average increase in displacement in the A/P and S/I directions was 43.5 and 35.8 microns, respectively. Discussion and Conclusions. This study was designed to represent a worst case scenario, as a patient is unlikely to bear full bodyweight on crutches immediately postoperatively, and is also unlikely to take as many steps as a healthy individual until full recovery occurs. For these reasons, early results indicate statistically significant displacement could occur if a patient bears full bodyweight on axillary crutches immediately postoperatively. This risk could be lowered after the postoperative recovery period in combination with non-full weight bearing devices such as a cane or a walker. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Aims: Outcomes for a RSP to treat either a previous operated shoulder (revision procedure) was compared to a primary RSP. Methods: 20 Primary RSP (6M, 14F) for an irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT) with glenohumeral arthritis/anterior superior arch deþciency and 31 revision RSP (10M, 21F) (previous rotator or cuff surgery, hemi or total shoulder arthroplasty) were evaluated at an average of 24 months postoperatively. Mean age at the time of RSP was 72.3 for primaries 67.2 for revisions. Assessment with pre- and postoperatively SF-36, SST, ASES scores, physical exam, satisfaction surveys, and radiographs was performed. Results: Primary RSP improvements/Revision RSP improvements were: 9.4 sf-36 PCS/6.3 sf-36 PCS, 1.8 SST/1.6 SST, 31.8 ASES/17.5 ASES (p< 0.05), 49.2 elevation/14.2 elevation (p< 0.05) and 57.8 external rotation/30 external rotation. 71.3% Excellent/good/. 56% Excellent/good (p< 0.05), 21.4% satisfactory/33.3% satisfactory, 7.1% unsatisfactory outcome/9.5% unsatisfactory outcome. Complications only occurred in the revisions including component disassociation, glenoid loosening, recurrent instability, and infection. Conclusion: Primary RSP provides predictable improvements in pain and function with minimal complications. Revision RSP has a higher complication rate and improvements in pain and function are less reliable. Conventional shoulder arthroplasty for patients with IRCT with glenohumeral arthritis/anterior superior arch deþciency has resulted in adequate pain relief but functional improvement has not been predictable. Thus, the initial operative selection for these patients must consider the effect of a failed reconstructive attempt on patient outcomes

Does the pre-operative range of active anterior elevation alter the outcome of reverse shoulder prosthesis? A review of 96 cases. Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the results of reverse shoulder prosthesis in massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears in terms of the preoperative active anterior elevation (AAE). Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 96 reverse shoulder prostheses in patients with a mean age of 74 years, and with an average follow-up of 30 months. We divided the patients into three groups for the purposes of the study. Group 1 had an AAE less than 60° (n=51); group 2 had an AAE between 60 and 120° (n=39); group 3 had an AAE above 120° (n=6). The majority had off-centre arthritis with a Fukuda Hamada classification of IV or V (n=77); only 19 fell within classes I, II or III. We excluded patients who had previously had a failed anterior cuff repair or arthroplasty and those with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Results: There was no significant difference in constant score between the three groups based on preoperative AAE: group 1: 63.50; group 2: 65.05; group 3: 65.16. Analysis of the 96 reverse prostheses in relation to the Fukuda Hamada classification also showed no difference: types I, II and III had a constant score of 64.37; types IV and V a score of 63.68. However, the improvement in AAE (I), rotation (RE1 and RI) and in power was significantly greater in shoulders with pseudoparalysis (p< 0.001): group 1: I = 71.43%; group 2: I = 33.48%; group 3: I = 3.03%. The degree of improvement of the pseudoparalytic shoulders (group 1) was influenced by the Fukuda Hamada classification (p< 0.01): 77.78% for stages I, II and III compared with 69% for stages IV and V. Discusssion and conclusion: This retrospective study confirms that the reverse shoulder prosthesis is a beneficial treatment for massive, irreparable cuff tears in older patients with shoulder psuedoparalysis. Its use is debatable if the preoperative AAE is over 120°, in which case hemiarthroplasty may be a better option. The benefit of the reverse prosthesis is greatest in the shoulder with pseudoparalysis, no glenohumeral arthritis (Fukuda I, II or III), and no previous surgical intervention

Background. One of the main concern about reverse shoulder arthoplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency is scapular notching that is still an unsolved issue for this particular prosthesis. The purpose of this multicentric retrospective study is to compare two different concept of reverse prosthesis, one with a concentric glenoshere and the other one with a new eccentric glenoshere design that aim to minimize scapular notching. Methods. From 2004 to 2009 67 patients were treated with a SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis (LIMA) with either concentric (figure 2) or eccentric glenosphere (figure 1). We selected for the study patients with criteria as much homogeneous as possible by the age and pathology. We then included for the study 25 patients (Group 1) with a concentric glenosphere and 21 (Group 2) with a eccentric glenosphere. All baseplates of concentric glenospheres were implanted with the most inferior aspect of baseplate that matched with the inferior glenoid ream, so that the glenosphere extended 4 mm beyond the glenoid inferiorly in order to minimize scapular notching. Every patient were followed clinically (Constant and Murley Score [C.S.] and Simple Shuolder test [S.S.T.]) and radiographically (notching, loosening and mechanical failure) with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We also evaluated at the final follow-up psna (prosthesis-scapular neck angle), pgrd (peg glenoid rim distance) and DBSNG (distance between scapular neck and glenosfere). Results. At two years of follow up R.O.M. increased significantly in both groups especially in those with a eccentric glenosphere. Notably in patients with an eccentric glenosphere elevation improved from 66° to 148° and abduction from 60° to 115° while in those with a concentric glenosphere improved from 78° to 122° and 71° to 98° respectively for elevation and abduction. Outcomes for external-rotation and internal-rotation were very similar in both groups. 14 (56%) patients among those with a concentric glenosphere had scapular notching while we didn't have any notch in those with eccentric glenosphere even though we didn't find any significant different between the two groups in term of clinical outcomes and patient's satisfaction. The average C.S. increased from 38% to 69% in those with concentric SMR and from 30% to 74% in the other group. At the final follow-up PSNA, DBSNG and PGRD were respectively 88°, 3,2mm and 18,2 mm in group 1, while they were 92°, 4,3 mm and 21,2 mm in the group 2. Conclusions. Putting concentric glenosphere more inferiorly reduce the incidence of scapular notching but it doesn't solve the problem whereas, at medium follow-up, the new eccentric design seems to solved completely this issue. This study sustains PSNA, DBSNG, PGRD as reliable measures to predict scapular notching. Besides eccentric SMR glenosphere seems to increase R.O.M. mostly in flexion, abduction and adduction

Introduction. Aseptic glenoid loosening is a common failure mode of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Achieving initial glenoid fixation can be a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon since rTSA is commonly used in elderly osteoporotic patients and is increasingly used in scapula with significant boney defects. Multiple rTSA baseplate designs are available in the marketplace, these prostheses offer between 2 and 6 screw options, with each screw hole accepting a locking and/or compression screw of varying lengths (between 15 to 50mm). Despite these multiple implant offerings, little guidance exists regarding the minimal screw length and/or minimum screw number necessary to achieve fixation. To this end, this study analyzes the effect of multiple screw lengths and multiple screw numbers on rTSA initial glenoid fixation when tested in a low density (15pcf) polyurethane bone substitute model. Methods. This rTSA glenoid loosening test was conducted according to ASTM F 2028–17; we quantified glenoid fixation of a 38mm reverse shoulder (Equinoxe, Exactech, Inc) in a 15 pcf low density polyurethane block (Pacific Research, Inc) before and after cyclic testing of 750N for 10k cycles. To evaluate the effect of both screw fixation and screw number, glenoid baseplates were constructed using 2 and 4, 4.5×18mm diameter poly-axial locking compression screws (both n = 5) and 2 and 4, 4.5×46mm diameter poly-axial locking compression screws (both n = 5). A two-tailed unpaired student's t-test (p < 0.05) compared prosthesis displacements to evaluate each screw length (18 vs 46mm) and each screw number (2 vs 4). Results. All glenoid baseplates remained well-fixed after cyclic loading in the low density bone substitute block, regardless of screw length or screw number. As described in Table 1, the average pre- and post-cyclic displacement for baseplates with 18mm long screws was significantly greater than that of baseplates with 46mm long screws in both the A/P and S/I directions, with exception of displacements for 4 screws S/I-pre cyclic and 2 screws A/P-post cyclic loading. As described in Table 2, the average pre- and post-cyclic displacement for all baseplates with 2 screws was significantly greater than that of all baseplates with 4 screws, regardless of screw length in the A/P and S/I directions. Discussion and Conclusions. These results of this study demonstrate that rTSA glenoid baseplate fixation is impacted by both the number of screws and by the length of screws, with longer screws and more screws associated with significantly better initial fixation. However, it should be noted that none of the tested devices catastrophically failed in this non-defect/low-density model, demonstrating that adequate fixation can be achieved with as little as 2×18mm screws for some baseplate types. Care should be made when extrapolating these results to that of other designs. This study is limited by its use of only one implant design and by its use of a polyurethane substrate without any defect; future work should evaluate the effect of screw length and screw number in with multiple different prostheses in different densities of bone with and without defects

Introduction. The General Social Survey estimates that 19 million Americans shoot firearms, with 10% of this population being over the age of 65. More reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are seeking to return to physical activity after surgery, but the effects of shooting a firearm on the fixation of a rTSA implant are unknown. This study will seek to examine the recoil effect of a firearm on a rTSA baseplate fixation, by recording the forces absorbed by a shooter and applying these forces to a rTSA implant assembly in laboratory conditions. Methods. A total of 5 shooters over a range of heights and bodyweights fired a single action 12 gauge shotgun with 3 ounce slugs 5 times each. An accelerometer was rigidly fixated to the barrel of the firearm to record impulse values upon firing. 8 reverse shoulder baseplate/glenosphere assemblies (Equinoxe, Exactech, Inc) were fixated to 15 lb/ft3 density rigid polyurethane bone substitute blocks for drop tower testing. Displacement was measured before and after testing using digital displacement indicators by applying a physiologically relevant 357N shear load parallel to the face of the glenosphere, and a nominal 50N compressive axial load perpendicular to the glenosphere as shown in Figure 1. Measurements were taken for the S/I axis, and the sample was rotated 90 degrees for the A/P axis. The glenosphere/baseplate assemblies were loaded in a drop tower apparatus at 0° of abduction and 90° flexion to replicate the orientation of the joint seen while shooting. The drop tower utilized a 1.079kg weight set at 8” with a rubber impulse specific materil between the weight and impactor to reproduce the highest average impulse seen in shooting. A total of 50 drops were performed, to simulate two rounds of trap shooting at 25 shots each. A Student's one-tailed, paired t-test was used to identify whether or not significant loosening occurred, where p<0.05 denoted a significant difference. Results. The average shooting values for each shooter are presented in Table 1. Displacement measurements in the A/P and S/I axes before and after drop tower testing are presented in Table 2. All 8 samples remained well fixed after drop tower testing, and neither A/P nor S/I directions showed significant difference in displacement (p≤.279, p≤.158) with an average displacement of 4 and 10 microns, respectively. Discussion and Conclusions. This testing replicates a worst case scenario, as the combination of both round size and number of shots taken is not likely to be paired together while shooting recreationally. Additionally, the foam block used mimics an immediate postoperative scenario, where in reality a patient is unlikely to shoot again until recovering from the procedure. Shooting form also seemed to play a role, as shots that were considered “poor form” recorded up to 30% higher recoil values than those with “good form”. For these reasons, early results indicate chance of implant loosening due to the forces from shooting firearms is low, especially if the patient is a former experienced shooter who wishes to return to the sport. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Little guidance exists regarding the minimum screw length and number necessary to achieve fixation with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The goal of this study is to quantify the pre- and post-cyclic baseplate displacements associated with two baseplate designs of different sizes using multiple screw lengths and numbers in a low density polyurethane bone substitute model. Methods. The test was conducted according to ASTM F 2028–17. The baseplate displacements of standard and small reverse shoulder constructs (Equinoxe, Exactech, Inc.) were quantified in a 15pcf polyurethane block (Pacific Research, Inc.) before and after cyclic testing with an applied load of 750N for 10,000 cycles. Baseplates were constructed using 2 or 4 screws with 3 different poly-axial locking compression screw lengths: 4.5×18mm, 4.5×30mm, and 4.5×46mm. Five of each configuration were tested for a total of 30 specimens for each baseplate. A two-tailed, unpaired student's t-test (p<0.05) compared baseplate displacements before and after cyclic loading in both the superior-inferior (S/I) and anterior-posterior (A/P) directions. The standard and small results were then compared. Results. All standard and small reverse glenoid baseplates remained well-fixed after cyclic loading in the low-density bone substitute model regardless of screw length or number. The average pre- and post-cyclic displacement for baseplates with 2 screws was significantly greater than that of baseplates with 4 screws in both the A/P and S/I directions. The average pre- and post-cyclic displacements for baseplates with 18mm screws were significantly greater than baseplates with 46mm screws in the A/P and S/I directions, post-cyclic displacement with 18mm screws was significantly greater than with 30mm screws in the A/P and S/I directions, and post-cyclic displacement with 30mm screws was significantly greater than with 46mm screws in the S/I direction only. Few differences in fixation were observed between baseplate sizes. Statistically significant difference was reached for post cyclic S/I displacement for 30mm (small baseplate superior) and 46mm screws (standard baseplate superior). Discussion and Conclusions. The results demonstrate that rTSA glenoid displacement is impacted by both the number and length of screws for both standard and small baseplate sizes. Regardless of the number of screws, the use of longer screws was associated with significantly better initial fixation. Additionally, the use of more screws was associated with significantly better fixation irrespective of screw length in the A/P direction. None of the tested devices catastrophically failed, demonstrating that adequate fixation can be achieved with as little as two 18mm screws for the baseplates utilized. However, this screw configuration was associated with the largest pre- and post-cyclic displacements, so it is assumed to be at a greater risk for aseptic loosening. If using 4 screws is not feasible in a given case, the results suggest that using longer screws can be used to improve fixation. The results of the small and standard baseplates were comparable for the given lengths and quantities of screws, suggesting that the reduced surface area of the small baseplate has no detrimental impact on fixation. Care should be made when extrapolating these results to glenoid defects. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Purpose. Reverse shoulder prosthesis may lead to scapular notching, caused by attrition of the upper humeral component with scapular neck. We compared the clinical and radiographic results obtained with a SMR prosthesis, which allows a concentric or an eccentric glenosphere to be applied. Patients and methods. 67 patients, mean age 73 years, were treated with reverse prosthesis using concentric and eccentric glenosphere. In patients with concentric glenosphere, the glenosphere extended about 4 mm below the glenoid. The eccentric glenosphere protected the upper glenoid neck by its inferior prolongment. Patients were followed for a mean of 33 months. At final F-U the Constant Score (C.S.) and the score with the Simple Shoulder test (S.S.T.) were calculated. Radiographs were obtained to evaluate the presence of scapular notching, psna (prosthesis-scapular neck angle), pgrd (peg- glenoid rim distance) and DBSNG (distance between scapular neck and glenosfere). Included in this study were patients, as much homogeneous as possible by age and pathology, 25 with concentric (Group I) and 30 with eccentric (Group II) glenosphere, who had a minimum F-U of 24 months. Statistical analysis was performed with a paired test. Results. 25 patients of group I and 26 in group II were available for the study. In Group I mean elevation improved from 78° to 122° and mean abduction from 71° to 98°; in Group II from 66° to 148° and 60° to 115°. External and internal rotations were similar in both groups. 14 (56%) patients of Group I, and none of Group II had scapular notching (p<0.001). CS increased from 38 pt to 69 pt in Group I and from 30 pt to 74 pt in Group II. Conclusions. Low implantation of glenosphere did not eliminate scapular notching. Instead, no notching was detected with eccentric glenosphere, which also increased the ROM. The PSNA, DBSNG, PGRD are reliable measures to predict scapular notching

Introduction. A common phenomenon occurring as a result of reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RSA) is scapular notching. While bone loss of the scapula may be quantified using radiographic techniques,[1] the material loss on the humeral bearing has not been quantified. Depending on their functional biological activity, a high volume of polyethylene wear particles has been shown to be related to osteolysis, bone loss and ultimately, loosening of implants in other joints.[2] In order to understand the threshold for osteolysis in the shoulder, it is important to have a method that can accurately quantify the amount of material loss. The aim of this research was to (I) create and validate a method for quantifying material loss from a single humeral implant design which can then (II) be used to measure retrieved devices. Methods. Measurement of the surface topography of the implant was completed using coordinate measurement machine (CMM). The resulting point cloud was then imported into MATLAB and run through a custom algorithm to determine the volumetric wear of the humeral liner. Two never implanted humeral liners with an artificially damaged material loss were used for validation purposes. Each component was scanned three times, analyzed using the custom MATLAB program, and compared to gravimetric analysis (Figure 1). Following validation, an IRB-approved database was queried to identify 10 retrieved components of the same design which were then analyzed using the validated method. Results. All average measurements of the never implanted components were within +/- 5 mm. 3. of the gravimetrically determined values, providing a reasonable estimate of the volumetric wear (Figure 1). Ten retrieved components of a single design were analyzed using the same method and material loss ranged from immeasurable (within the accuracy limits) to approximately 90 mm. 3. (Figure 3). One short term duration implant (1.8 mos) exhibited approximately 78 mm. 3. of wear, resulting in a polyethylene dosage of more than 500 mm. 3. /yr. Discussion. The posterior-inferior wear pattern on the rim of these reverse shoulders appears consistent with repetitive scapular impingement. The significant wear of short duration implants indicates that wear associated with scapular notching may progress very quickly, resulting in large dose rates of debris in the joint space. However, the impingement may result in a more abrasive wear mechanism as opposed to an adhesive wear mechanism as seen in other joint wear environments. This may result in different size and shaped polyethylene particles with different biological activity. The algorithms presented in this work can be used to establish a dose-response relationship for scapular notching in RSA

Purpose. to analyze the survivorship of the RSA with a minimum 10 years follow up. Patients and Methods. Between 1992 and 1999, 145 Delta (DePuy) RSAs have been implanted in 138 patients. It was a mulicentric study. Initial etiologies were gathered as following: group A (92 cases) Cuff tear arthropaties (CTA), osteoarthritis (OA) with at least 2 involved cuff tendons, and massive cuff tear with pseudoparalysis (MCT); group B (39 cases) -failed hemiarthroplasties (HA), failed total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA), and fracture sequelae; and group C (14 cases) rheumatoid arthritis, fractures, tumor, and instability. Survival curves were established with the Kaplan-Meier technique. Two end-points were retained: -implant revision, defined by glenoid or humeral replacement or removal, or conversion to HA; - a poor clinical outcome defined by an absolute Constant score of less than 30. Results. At the time of review, 47 patients had died with their prosthesis in place and 30 were lost to follow-up. There were 12 revisions, 6 for infections, 3 for glenoid loosening, 1 for dislocation, 1 for glenoid dissociation (by unscrewing), and 1 for humeral loosening. The survival curve to prosthetic removal showed an overall survivorship of 92% at 10 years. Segmentation according to etiology showed a 97% survivorship for group A and 88% for group B This difference was not significant. No patients of group C had a minimum follow up of ten years because there were died or lost to follow up. The survival curve to a Constant score of less than 30 showed an overall survivorship of 90% at 10 years. Segmentation according to etiology showed a significant difference at 10 years in favor of group A (92%) compared to group B (86%) with a break of the curve after 9 years for group B. Discussion. Our results show that the overall survivorship of the reverse shoulder prosthesis to removal is good even 10 years after implantation, in particular if it had been implanted for CTA, OA, or MCT. However, functional results did deteriorate progressively after 9 years in particular if it had been implanted for revision (HA or TSA). Therefore, extreme caution must be observed in relation to the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty, especially in younger patients

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly utilized to restore shoulder function in patients with osteoarthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. There is currently little known about shoulder function after RSA or if differences in surgical technique or implant design affect shoulder performance. The purpose of this study was to quantify scapulohumeral rhythm in patients with RSA during loaded and unloaded shoulder abduction. Eleven patients with RSA performed shoulder abduction (elevation and lowering) with and without a handheld 3kg weight during fluoroscopic imaging. Three RSA designs were included. We used model-image registration techniques to determine the 3D position and orientation of the implants. Cubic curves were fit to the humeral elevation as a function of the scapular elevation over the entire motion. The slope of this curve was used to determine the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR). For abduction above 40°, shoulders with RSA exhibited an average SHR of 1.5:1. There was no significant difference in SHR between shoulder abduction with and without 3kg handheld weights (1.6±0.2 unweighted vs. 1.4±0.1 weighted), nor was there a significant difference between elevation and lowering. SHR was highly variable for abduction less than 40°, with SHR ranging from a low of 1 to greater than 10. For these very small groups, there was no apparent pattern of differences between implant designs having differing degrees of lateral offset. At arm elevation angles less than 40°, SHR in RSA shoulders is highly variable and the mean SHR (2–5) with RSA appears higher than SHR in normal shoulders (2–3). At higher elevation angles, SHR in shoulders with RSA (1.5–1.8) is much more consistent and appears lower than SHR in normal shoulders (2–4). With the small subject cohort, it was not possible to demonstrate differences between subjects with different implant designs. Ongoing analysis of reverse shoulder function with larger cohort sizes will allow us to refine our observations and determine if there are differences in shoulder function due to implant design, preoperative condition and rehabilitation protocols