Abstract
Introduction
Achieving prosthesis fixation in patients with glenoid defects can be challenging, particularly when the bony defects are large. To that end, this study quantifies the impact of 2 different sizes of large anterior glenoid defects on reverse shoulder glenoid fixation in a composite scapula model using the recently approved ASTM F 2028–14 reverse shoulder glenoid loosening test method.
Methods
This rTSA glenoid loosening test was conducted according to ASTM F 2028–14; we quantified glenoid fixation of a 38mm reverse shoulder (Equinoxe, Exactech, Inc) in composite/dual density scapulae (Pacific Research, Inc) before and after cyclic testing of 750N for 10k cycles. Anterior defects of 8.5mm (31% of glenoid width and 21% of glenoid height; n=7) and 12.5mm (46% of glenoid width and 30% of glenoid height; n=7) were milled into the composite scapula along the S/I glenoid axis with the aid of a custom jig. The baseplate fixation in scapula with anterior glenoid defects was compared to that of scapula without an anterior glenoid defect (n = 7). For the non-defect scapula, initial fixation of the glenoid baseplates were achieved using 4, 4.5×30mm diameter poly-axial locking compression screws. To simulate a worst case condition in each anterior defect scapulae, no 4.5×30mm compression screw were used anteriorly, instead fixation was achieved with only 3 screws (one superior, one inferior, and one posterior). A one-tailed unpaired student's t-test (p < 0.05) compared prosthesis displacements relative to each scapula (anterior defect vs no-anterior defect).
Results
All glenoid baseplates remained well-fixed after cyclic loading in composite scapula without a defect and those with an 8.5mm anterior glenoid defect. However, only 6 of the 7 glenoid baseplates remained well-fixed after cyclic loading in scapula with a 12.5mm anterior glenoid defect, where 1 device failed catastrophically at 5000 cycles by loosening from the substrate. As described in Table 1, the average pre- and post-cyclic glenoid baseplate displacement in scapula with 8.5mm and 12.5mm anterior glenoid defects was significantly greater than that of baseplates in scapula without an anterior glenoid defect in both the A/P and S/I directions. Similarly, the average pre- and post-cyclic glenoid baseplate displacement in scapula with 12.5mm anterior glenoid defects was significantly greater than that of baseplates in scapula with 8.5mm anterior glenoid defects in the both the A/P and S/I directions.
Discussion and Conclusions
These results demonstrate that reverse shoulder glenoid baseplate fixation was achievable in scapula with an 8.5mm anterior glenoid defect. Given that one sample catastrophically loosened in the 12.5mm anterior defect model, supplemental bone grafting may be required to achieve fixation in 12.5mm anterior glenoid defects with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Future work should evaluate whether adding additional screws mitigates the increased displacement observed in this anterior glenoid defect scenario. This study is limited by its use of polyurethane dual-density composite scapula.
