Derriford Hospital gained Major Trauma Centre (MTC) status in April 2012, this led to a significant increase in the trauma case load. Our aim was to review registrar exposure to theatre and clinic in the elective and trauma setting. This was then compared to audits performed pre-MTC status and shortly following MTC changes to see if training standards were being maintained. Improvements in registrar rota planning were made following the previous assessment of training. Training was assessed with respect to national recommendations for registrar training. Data was collected for 8 weeks in February and March 2014 for all 12 registrars, and cross-referenced with the on-call and daily rota. The data was divided into training and non -training registrars. Elective exposure had improved in both theatres and clinic along with trauma theatre exposure whilst fracture clinic exposure had reduced since the previous audit. The reduction may be a result of the on-call registrar no longer being present in fracture clinic when on-call in compliance with MTC guidance. Rota management requires a fine balance between service and training commitments. Recent improvements to the management of the registrar rota appear to provide satisfactory training despite the pressures of MTC changes at Derriford Hospital

Aims

The aims of this study were to describe the demographic, socioeconomic, and educational factors associated with core surgical trainees (CSTs) who apply to and receive offers for higher surgical training (ST3) posts in Trauma & Orthopaedics (T&O).

Introduction

Following the publication of our original survey in 2000 (Eur. Sp. J. 11(6):515-8 2002) we have sought to re-evaluate the perceptions and attitudes towards spinal surgery of the current UK orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs), and to identify factors influencing an interest in spinal surgery. At that time 175 orthopaedic spinal surgeons in the UK needed to increase by 25% to satisfy parity with other European countries.

Orthopaedic surgery is a practical surgical specialization field, the exit exam for registrars remains written and oral. Despite logbook evaluation and surgical work-based assessments, the question remains: can registrars perform elective surgery upon qualification? In South Africa, obstacles to elective surgical training include the trauma workload, financial constraints, fellowships and the Covid pandemic. In hip and knee arthroplasty, new approaches like the direct anterior approach (DAA) and robotic-assisted knee surgery also contributed to the dilution of cases available for registrar training. There are concerns that orthopaedic registrars do not perform enough cases to achieve surgical proficiency. Review of the last 4 years of registrar logbooks in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery performed in a single tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. We included all primary total hip replacements (THR), total knee replacements (TKR) and hemiarthroplasties (HA) done for neck of femur (NOF) fractures between 1 April 2019 and 30 March 2023. Differentiation between registrar assisting, registrar performing with consultant supervision and registrar performing independent surgery was done. 990 hip arthroplasties (472 Primary THR, 216 NOF THR, 302 NOF HA) and 316 Primary TKR were performed during the study period. In primary elective THR the posterior approach was dominant and used in 76% of cases. In NOF THA the DAA was dominant used in 98% of cases. Primary TKR robotic-assisted technologies was used in 27% (n=94) cases. Registrars as the primary surgeon were the highest in NOF THA at 70% of cases and the lowest performing TKR at 25%. During 3-month rotations, an average registrar performed 12 (2 TKR and 10 THR) and assisted in 35 (10 TKR and 25 THR) cases. Despite the large number of arthroplasties operations being performed over the last 4-year period, the surgical cases done by registrars are below, the proposed minimal cases to provide surgical proficiency during their training period

Distal radius fractures are common in South Africa. Accurate, decisive radiographic parameter interpretation is key in appropriate management. Digital radiographic facilities are rare in the public setting and goniometer usage is known to be low, thus, visual estimates are the primary form of radiographic assessment. Previous research associated orthopaedic experience with accuracy of distal radius fracture parameter estimation but, oftentimes, doctors treating orthopaedic patients are not experienced in orthopaedics. A cross-sectional questionnaire including four distal radius fracture radiographs administered to 149 orthopaedic doctors at three Johannesburg teaching hospitals. Participants grouped into ranks of: consultants (n=36), registrars (n=41), medical officers (n=20) and interns (n=52). Participants visually estimated values of distal radius fracture parameters, stated whether they would accept the position of the fractures and stated their percentage of routine usage of goniometers in real practice. The registrar group was most accurate in visually estimating radial height, whilst the interns were least accurate (p=0.0237). The consultant, registrar and medical officer groups were equally accurate in estimating radial inclination whilst the intern group was the least accurate (p<0.0001). The consultant and registrar group were equally accurate at estimating volar tilt, whilst the medical officer and intern groups were least accurate (p<0.0001). The Gwet's AC agreement was 0.1612 (p=0.047) for acceptance of position of the first radiograph, 0.8768 (p<0.0001) for the second, 0.8884 (p<0.0001) for the third and 0.8064 (p<0.0001) for the fourth. All groups showed no difference in goniometer usage, using them largely 0–25% of practice (p=0.1937). The study found that accuracy in visual estimations of distal radius fracture parameters was linked to orthopaedic experience but not linked to routine practice goniometer usage, which was minimal across all groups. Inter-rater agreement on acceptability of fracture position is potentially dependent on severity of deviation from acceptable parameters

Classifying trochlear dysplasia (TD) is useful to determine the treatment options for patients suffering from patellofemoral instability (PFI). There is no consensus on which classification system is more reliable and reproducible for this purpose to guide clinicians in order to treat PFI. There are also concerns about validity of the Dejour classification (DJC), which is the most widely used classification for TD, having only a fair reliability score. The Oswestry-Bristol classification (OBC) is a recently proposed system of classification of TD and the authors report a fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intra-observer agreement in the assessment of TD. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of these two classifications. 6 assessors (4 consultants and 2 registrars) independently evaluated 100 magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint for TD and classified them according to OBC and DJC. These assessments were again repeated by all raters after 4 weeks. The inter and intra-observer reliability scores were calculated using Cohen's kappa and Cronbach's alpha. Both classifications showed good to excellent interobserver reliability with high alpha scores. The OBC classification showed a substantial intra-observer agreement (mean kappa 0.628)[p<0.005] whereas the DJC showed a moderate agreement (mean kappa 0.572) [p<0.005]. There was no significant difference in the kappa values when comparing the assessments by consultants to those by registrars, in either classification systems. This large study from a non-founding institute shows both classification systems to be reliable for classifying TD based on magnetic resonance axial images of the patella-femoral joint, with the simple to use OBC having a higher intra-observer reliability score compared to the DJC

Conventional fracture courses utilise prefabricated sawbones that are not realistic or patient specific. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of creating 3D fracture models and utilising them in fracture courses to teach surgical technique. We selected an AO type 2R3C2 fracture that underwent open reduction internal fixation. De-identified CT scan images were converted to a stereolithography (STL) format. This was then processed using Computer Aided Design (CAD) to create a virtual 3D model. The model was 3D printed using a combination of standard thermoplastic polymer (STP) and a porous filler to create a realistic cortical and cancellous bone. A case-based sawbone workshop was organised for residents, unaccredited registrars, and orthopaedic trainees comparing the fracture model with a prefabricated T-split distal radius fracture. Pre-operative images aided discussion of fixation, and post-operative x-rays allowed comparison between the participants fixation. Participants were provided with identical reduction tools. We created a questionnaire for participants to rate their satisfaction and experience using a Likert scale. The 3D printed fracture model aided understanding and appreciation of the fracture pattern and key fragments amongst residents and unaccredited trainees. Real case-based models provided a superior learning experience and environment to aid teaching. The generic sawbone provided easier drilling and inserting of screws. Preliminary results show that the cost of 3D printing can be comparable to generic sawbones. It is feasible to create a fracture model with a real bone feel. Further research and development is required to determine the optimum material to use for a more realistic feel. The use of 3D printed fracture models is feasible and provides an alternative to generic sawbone fracture models in providing surgical training to residents

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common types of fracture and one which is often treated surgically. Standard X-rays are obtained for DRFs, and in most cases that have an intra-articular component, a routine CT is also performed. However, it is estimated that CT is only required in 20% of cases and therefore routine CT's results in the overutilisation of resources burdening radiology and emergency departments. In this study, we explore the feasibility of using deep learning to differentiate intra- and extra-articular DRFs automatically and help streamline which fractures require a CT. Retrospectively x-ray images were retrieved from 615 DRF patients who were treated with an ORIF at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital. The images were classified into AO Type A, B or C fractures by three training registrars supervised by a consultant. Deep learning was utilised in a two-stage process: 1) localise and focus the region of interest around the wrist using the YOLOv5 object detection network and 2) classify the fracture using a EfficientNet-B3 network to differentiate intra- and extra-articular fractures. The distal radius region of interest (ROI) detection stage using the ensemble model of YOLO networks detected all ROIs on the test set with no false positives. The average intersection over union between the YOLO detections and the ROI ground truth was Error! Digit expected.. The DRF classification stage using the EfficientNet-B3 ensemble achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 for differentiating intra-articular fractures. The proposed DRF classification framework using ensemble models of YOLO and EfficientNet achieved satisfactory performance in intra- and extra-articular fracture classification. This work demonstrates the potential in automatic fracture characterization using deep learning and can serve to streamline decision making for axial imaging helping to reduce unnecessary CT scans

Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures suffer from poor interobserver agreement, and their value in preoperative assessment to guide surgical fixation strategies is limited. For tibial plateau fractures four major characteristics are identified: lateral split fragment, posteromedial fragment, anterior tubercle fragment, and central zone of comminution. These fracture characteristics support preoperative assessment of fractures and guide surgical decision-making as each specific component requires a respective fixation strategy. We aimed to evaluate the additional value of 3D-printed models for the identification of tibial plateau fracture characteristics in terms of the interobserver agreement on different fracture characteristics. Preoperative images of 40 patients were randomly selected. Nine trauma surgeons, eight senior and eight junior registrars indicated the presence or absence of four fracture characteristics with and without 3D-printed models. The Fleiss kappa was used to determine interobserver agreement for fracture classification and for interpretation, the Landis and Koch criteria were used. 3D-printed models lead to a categorical improvement in interobserver agreement for three of four fracture characteristics: lateral split (Kconv = 0.445 versus K3Dprint = 0.620; P < 0.001), anterior tubercle fragment (Kconv = 0.288 versus K3Dprint = 0.449; P < 0.001) and zone of comminution (Kconv = 0.535 versus K3Dprint = 0.652; P < 0.001). The overall interobserver agreement improved for three of four fracture characteristics after the addition of 3D printed models. For two fracture characteristics, lateral split and zone of comminution, a substantial interobserver agreement was achieved. Fracture characteristics seem to be a more reliable way to assess tibial plateau fractures and one should consider including these in the preoperative assessment of tibial plateau fractures compared to the commonly used classification systems

Aims. COVID-19 has changed the practice of orthopaedics across the globe. The medical workforce has dealt with this outbreak with varying strategies and adaptations, which are relevant to its field and to the region. As one of the ‘hotspots’ in the UK , the surgical branch of trauma and orthopaedics need strategies to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of COVID-19. Methods. Adapting to the crisis locally involved five operational elements: 1) triaging and workflow of orthopaedic patients; 2) operation theatre feasibility and functioning; 3) conservation of human resources and management of workforce in the department; 4) speciality training and progression; and 5) developing an exit strategy to resume elective work. Two hospitals under our trust were redesignated based on the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Registrar/consultant led telehealth reviews were carried out for early postoperative patients. Workflows for the management of outpatient care and inpatient care were created. We looked into the development of a dedicated operating space to perform the emergency orthopaedic surgeries without symptoms of COVID-19. Between March 23 and April 23, 2020, we have surgically treated 133 patients across both our hospitals in our trust. This mainly included hip fractures and fractures/infection affecting the hand. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic is not the first disease outbreak affecting the UK, nor will it be the last. The current crisis has necessitated rapid development of new hospital guidelines and early adaptive strategies in our services. Protocols and directives need to be formalized keeping in mind that COVID-19 will have a long and protracted course until a definitive cure is discovered

Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the provision of orthopaedic care across the UK. During the pandemic orthopaedic specialist registrars were redeployed to “frontline” specialties occupying non-surgical roles. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic training in the UK is unknown. This paper sought to examine the role of orthopaedic trainees during the COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate orthopaedic education. Methods. A 42-point questionnaire was designed, validated, and disseminated via e-mail and an instant-messaging platform. Results. A total of 101 orthopaedic trainees, representing the four nations (Wales, England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland), completed the questionnaire. Overall, 23.1% (23/101) of trainees were redeployed to non-surgical roles. Of these, 73% (17/23) were redeployed to intensive treatment units (ITUs), 13% (3/23) to A/E, and 13%(3/23%) to general medicine. Of the trainees redeployed to ITU 100%, (17/17) received formal induction. Non-deployed or returning trainees had a significant reduction in sessions. In total, 42.9% (42/101) % of trainees were not timetabled into fracture clinic, 53% (53/101) of trainees had one allocated theatre list per week, and 63.8%(64/101) of trainees did not feel they obtained enough experience in the attached subspecialty and preferred repeating this. Overall, 93% (93/101) of respondents attended at least one weekly online webinar, with 79% (79/101) of trainees rating these as useful or very useful, while 95% (95/101) trainees attended online deanery teaching which was rated as more useful than online webinars (p = 0.005). Conclusion. Orthopaedic specialist trainees occupied an important role during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 has had a significant impact on orthopaedic training. It is imperative this is properly understood to ensure orthopaedic specialist trainees achieve competencies set out in the training curriculum. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:676–682

Time at the surgical ‘coal-face’ has been reduced by introduction of the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) significantly impacting training opportunity. Our null hypothesis was that duration of surgery is significantly longer if a trainee were performing the operation despite supervision or level of trainee experience. Cemented hip hemiarthroplasty was chosen as our index procedure as complexity is largely comparable between cases. 461 patients were identified on the hospital trauma database. Data were augmented by information regarding level of surgeon, assistant and time of surgery from the hospital theatre database. There was no significant difference in registrar and consultant operative times, mean time 69 and 72 minutes respectively. SHOs were significantly slower (mean 80 minutes, p=0.0006). Junior (ST5 or less) registrars were significantly slower (mean 81minutes, p=0.0002) whereas senior registrars were not. Supervision level had no effect on duration of senior registrar operations but when junior registrars were consultant supervised they were not significantly slower (mean 75 minutes, p=0.09). Supervised operating therefore reduces time variability and should be promoted within a climate of training. Increase in mean operative time in registrars and SHOs is insignificant within a day's operating and is unlikely to lead to cancellations of cases

Background and Aims:. Forearm fractures are common in the paediatric population and most are treated in a moulded plaster of Paris (POP) cast. It is our concern that many casts applied by our registrars are sub-optimal and that we need to improve our training process. The aim of our study was to review the adequacy of forearm cast application in paediatric patients at our institution and to identify if there is a need for a more formal training program with regard to plaster cast application. Methods:. A retrospective review of control x-rays of forearm fractures treated at our institution was undertaken. X-rays that were reviewed were done as part of the routine treatment protocol. X-ray measurements to assess POP application were the cast index and the gap index. A cast index of > 0.81 and Gap index of > 0.15 were regarded as an indication of poor cast application. Results:. Adequate control X-rays of twenty eight patients with a forearm fracture were available. The average patient age range was 5–12 years. There were thirteen distal metaphyseal fractures, nine diaphyseal fractures and six Salter-Harris type fractures. Of the 28 patients, 20 patients had a poor cast index and 17 patients had poor gap index. In 12 patients both the gap and the cast index were unacceptable. Conclusion:. Our study suggests that paediatric forearm plaster cast application by registrars at our institution is inadequate. This indicates a need for a strategy to improve the training in plaster cast application amongst our registrars

Parallel operating lists are a contentious subject. Many people feel that supervision, training and quality of patient care is negatively affected and consider this an outdated model in modern practice. Dual and parallel lists have been largely abandoned due to training committees' opinions that standards of orthopaedic training were being negatively affected. A new model of dual lists was implemented in a district general hospital as part of an arthroplasty service. The training impact was evaluated. Adjacent theatres were utilised for a single session. Two joint replacement surgeries were undertaken in each theatre. The sequential timing of the lists allowed the consultant to perform or supervise all of the operations in a consecutive manor. Staggering the start times allowed the consultant to approach and implant the first joint replacement, leaving the junior doctor or nurse practitioner to close the first operation and get the patient off the table while the consultant transferred to the adjoining theatre where the registrar had positioned, painted and draped the second patient, allowing the consultant to perform or supervise the second surgery. The process was then repeated until all four cases were performed. Evaluation of two registrar's elogbooks was undertaken and compared to the national average. During a twelve month period the trainees was involved in a mean of 72 joint replacement surgeries compared to a national average of 49. The trainees were the primary surgeon in a significantly higher number of operations compared to the national average. This model of sequential operating lists facilitated a service of high volume arthroplasty surgeries and significantly increased the exposure of the training registrar to joint replacements. Supervision of trainees was not significantly impacted. The model requires effective support services and a dedicated team of theatre staff, but can be very rewarding for consultant surgeon and trainee alike

We propose a model of care where by Regular scheduled outreach visits by a Single team provides more dependability of care and understanding of the local needs and cultural practises. Thereby titrating the care to meet local needs rather than enforcing the Western model of care to a very different cultural background. I have been fortunate as a SET 4 Registrar to be involved with an Outreach team to Latouka Hospital. Spear headed by Dr M McAuliffe over the last 3 years the annual visit has taken shape as a dependable way of providing care to the community of Latouka. The team has evolved over the years to involve Dr Brazel, Dr Tetsworth, Dr Bansi, and our scrub staff. The team consists of 2 teams which visit Latouka every 6 months and help institute a multimodal care plan. 1) Regularity of visits helps build confidence locally and engraves the foundations of dependability of care. 2) Difficult and complex cases are discussed in specially earmarked clinics held every 6 months providing a brain storming sessions to the local clinicians and helping them achieve the best care for the patients under the restrictions of the local infrastructure. 3) Regular teaching sessions / practical workshops are held for the registrars and junior doctors empowering them to carry the baton once the visiting team leaves. 4) Regular follow up of the patients operated upon is attained to titrate care to the locals based upon the local needs and cultural practises. 5) Helping the surgical teams, nurses, radiographers, physiotherapists formulate protocols of care and comparing them to the protocols used in Australia/NZ. 6) Creating an educational fund for the local registrars enabling them to attend observer ships and courses in Australia/New Zealand. We think that this model of care provides a much more organised and long term benefit to the local community compared to erratic visits by volunteer teams. A similar model of care, if instituted over many divisional hospitals of the South Pacific, will be vital in improving the health care needs of the locals and provide the local staff with the much needed support they deserve

Introduction. Surgical complications are common and most of them are preventable. Up to 70 % of surgical errors originate outside theatre and recent studies have shown that pre-op checklists can reduce such problems. We hypothesized that in our institution outcomes could be improved by introducing a safety checklist. Method. A modified multidisciplinary WHO safety checklist was introduced at our institution on the 1st March 2011. The primary focus was for elective patients admitted in all the units of the division. Prior to that all involved personnel (Consultants in Orthopaedics and Anaesthesia, Registrars in both departments, nursing staff in the wards and theatre and clerical staff) were fully oriented. To further ensure that everyone was familiar with the new checklist the whole month of March 2011 was used as a training month. We prospectively collected data from daily Mortality and Morbidity (MM) meetings by units from 1/1/2011 to 29/2/2011 (2 months). A pre-induction survey was completed by all Registrars. The same survey was given to the same registrars for comparison at the end of the 2 month implementation period in June 2011. Results. Only 77% of registrars acknowledged doing pre-op planning prior to implementation of the check list compared to 87.5% post implementation. There was also an increase from 50 to 71% of those who had heard of the surgical check list pre-implementation compared to post implementation. There were 35 cancellations before and 36 after implementation. However if one breaks them into unavoidable and avoidable groups there was 70% reduction of avoidable cancellations (from 10 to 3 patients). There was a 25% reduction of mortality and a 25% reduction of avoidable morbidity. Discussion. In our study there was significant increase in the percentage of registrars who were doing pre-op planning after the implementation of the modified WHO safety check list. The avoidable theatre case cancellations were significantly reduced. It is very hard to attribute the reduction of mortality in our studies to our checklist as the documented causes of death were unavoidable. Compared to published studies our numbers were relatively small but comparable to the SURPASS study which showed reduction of complications from 27.7 % to 16.7 %. The time for getting acquainted to the safety checklist was also very short (1 month) compared to other published studies. Conclusion. The implementation of the modified WHO safety check list was associated with reduction in cancellations, avoidable morbidity and mortality. It should be regarded as a standard practice for all orthopaedic procedures to decrease complications especially in high operation volume and training centres. NO DISCLOSURES

Frequently, radiological data is transferred verbally between ED/GP/LMO to the Orthopaedic registrar. Given the different medical backgrounds and presentation skills there is often a limit to the verbal description of the radiographs. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and benefits of concurrently using picture messaging of X-rays to enhance communication between ED and Orthopaedic Registrars to optimise patient care. The X-rays of 40 patients referred to orthopaedics OPD or admitted from the ED were photographed and retrospectively reviewed on a mobile phone screen (240 × 320) by an orthopaedic registrar along with a printout of the patient history and verbal description of the x-ray as interpreted by the ED staff. No further information was provided to the registrar. A questionnaire was completed to subjectively and objectively evaluate the therapeutic benefit of the image review. Patient(tm)s management was compared to management plans after image review and differences were attributed to the visual inspection of the x-rays on the mobile phone. Concurrent to the retrospective review, the ED is currently trialling this with a Sony-Erickson K750i. After hours orthopaedic cases are sent via MMS to the registrar prior to consultation. In the emergency department, 10% of patients who presented with a fracture were reviewed in person by an orthopaedics registrar and none were admitted straight from ED whilst two were admitted following review at the OPD. X-rays of 40 patients were reviewed in this study. Twenty-seven patients presented with a fracture and four with islocations. When the clinical data was reviewed alongside images of x-rays by an orthopaedic registrar, a difference in management plans were observed in 25% of cases and 7.5% where surgical intervention would yield a better result. Twenty-six of the twenty-seven fractures and four dislocations were successfully visualised on the MMS. In 18 cases, picture messaging provided additional information compared to verbal report alone. The limiting factor in picture messaging was the resolution and size of the radiograph. Ease of operation and portability was found to be satisfactory by both ED and Orthopaedic staff. Equipping the ED with the phone has enhanced communication with the orthopaedics department and increased the potential for optimising patient care. This will be formally assessed through questionnaires after 12 months trial of the phone. Picture messaging is an inexpensive way of utilising technical advancements to improve patient care. Consistent with current literature, the quality of images was not sufficient as a diagnostic tool but rather a screening tool. Picture messaging is valuable practically and educationally and enhances the consultation and teaching process whilst encompassing medical staff who have limited skills in radiological description

Recent reports observe that orthopaedic surgeons lack essential knowledge about ionising radiation. We aim to demonstrate perceived use of image-intensifiers by surgeons and awareness of radiation doses used during fractured neck of femur surgery. Surgeons at a regional trauma centre were sent an online questionnaire. They were shown two neck of femur fracture radiographs and asked the total number of images they would use to reduce and fix the fracture with a dynamic-hip-screw / inter-medullary nail respectively. They were asked the maximum safe radiation dose, and that of ‘hip pining’ compared to CXR as outlined by the Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999. For a DHS, consultants and registrars estimate their image use similarly. For IM nailing, consultants estimated higher image use than registrars, and double the number of X-rays taken for IM nailing compared to DHS. Knowledge levels regarding radiation doses during orthopaedic hip procedures are very low. There is an expectation that more images will be used in IM nailing procedures. We plan to educate orthopaedic surgeons about radiation dose and safety. Correlating our findings with actual use of image in theatre when performing hip fracture surgery would extend the use of this study

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has established standards for radiation protection. This study aims to determine actual and perceived radiation dose and audit safe practice when using image-intensifiers in theatre. Between September 2012 and March 2013, 50 surgeons were surveyed during 39 procedures. Information collected by radiographers included the number of images the surgeons thought they used, actual number used, dose, screening time, number of people scrubbed, wearing thyroid collars and standing within 1m of the image-intensifier when in use. The primary surgeon was more likely to estimate the number of images used correctly compared to the assistant. Supervising consultants were most accurate, followed by registrars as primary surgeons, consultants as primary surgeons then assisting registrars, and lastly SHOs. Most surgeons underestimated the number of images used. 87.5% of scrubbed staff were standing within 1m of the image-intensifier during screening and 36.5% were wearing thyroid protection. Three surgeons stated they were not wearing collars as they were unavailable. We conclude that surgeons have a reasonable estimation of the x-rays used but are not undertaking simple steps to protect themselves from radiation. We plan to initiate an education program within the department and have ordered new, lightweight thyroid collars

Background. The gold standard of care of clubfoot is the Ponseti method of serial manipulation and casting, followed by percutaneous tendo-achilles tenotomy. In our setting, registrars work in district hospitals where they run Ponseti clubfoot clinics with little or no specialist supervision. They use the Pirani score to serially assess improvement of the deformity during casting and to determine whether the foot is ready for tenotomy. Purpose of Study. To test the inter-observer reliability of the Pirani score, and whether it can be used by non-specialist doctors running Ponseti clubfoot clinics. Methods. Ethics permission was obtained from our institution. This is a prospective study where patients under the age of one year with idiopathic clubfoot were recruited from clubfoot clinics at our institution, over a period of four months. Following a training session using the original description of the score, each foot was independently assessed using the Pirani score by two paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, two orthopaedic registrars and two medical officers. The inter-observer reliability was assessed using the Fixed-marginal Kappa statistic and Percentage agreement. The first 15 feet were used as a learning curve, and hence excluded from final analysis. Results. 73 feet in 37 patients with idiopathic clubfoot (25 boys, 12 girls) under the age of 1 year were included in the study. The Kappa statistic and percentage agreement for the six variables of the Pirani score were determined. Whilst the overall agreement was determined by the Kappa statistic to be slight to fair, the two consultants were found to have a higher inter-observer reliability than the registrars and medical officers. Conclusion. Our results conflict with previously published studies in that the inter-observer reliability of the Pirani score was poor. In addition, we feel that this score cannot be reliably used by non-specialist doctors running Ponseti clubfoot clinics. NO DISCLOSURES