Background:. We studied the effect of posterior condylar offset on maximum knee flexion after a posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty. We also looked at gender difference and the post-operative change in posterior condylar offset. Methods:. Eighty consecutive computer navigated posterior stabilised total knee replacements were prospectively assessed intra-operatively for maximum knee flexion. The flexion angle was measured and recorded with an imageless computer navigation system (Brainlab) before and after implantation of the prosthesis. This was correlated with a radiological review of the posterior condylar offset pre- and post-operatively, as defined by posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) originally described by Soda (2007) and modified by the Bristol Knee Group (2010). Results:. No relationship could be found between change in posterior femoral offset ratio and the change in knee flexion before and after implantation of the prosthesis (p = 0.46.)This was especially true for female subjects (p = 0.87.)For male patients there was a trend towards an inverse relationship demonstrating decreasing flexion with an increase in PCOR (p = 0.16.) PCOR increased in 91 % of cases and overall increased from an average of 0.44 pre-operatively to 0.49 post-operatively. The increase in PCOR was smaller where a large pre-operative PCOR was present (p = 0.0006.)Pre-operative flexion correlated significantly with postoperative flexion (p = 0.00.)There was no difference in PCOR between male and female patients. Conclusion:. Knee flexion is not influenced by a change in posterior condylar offset in posterior stabilised knees. The increase in posterior condylar offset with a posterior stabilised TKA could by explained a larger increase in the flexion gap than in the extension gap, when sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament. The PCOR increases in cases with smaller pre-operative posterior condylar offset. Pre-operative flexion is a significant predictor of postoperative flexion

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative maximal flexion of Robotic assisted TKA which does not increase the posterior condylar offset after surgery and compare CT and conventional radiography in measuring the posterior condylar offset changes. Materials and method. 50 knees of 37 patients who underwent Robotic TKA and underwent follow-up minimal one year were evaluated. CT based preoperative surgical planning system was designed not to increase posterior condylar offset (PCO) after surgery. Maximal flexion angle of the knee was evaluated at 1 year after surgery. The change in PCO and joint line on x-ray and CT were evaluated. Results. The mean preoperative knee flexion was 121° (sd: 9.21; range: 80–135), and it was improved to 125.3° (sd: 4.85; range: 115–140) postoperatively. On radiographic evaluation, the mean preoperative PCO was 26.4 mm (sd: 0.5; range: 14.8 mm to 36.3 mm) and the mean postoperative PCO was 23.0 mm (sd: 0.37; range: 16.0 mm to 34.3 mm). On CT evaluation, the mean medial PCO was 28.7± 2.4 mm preoperatively and 24.9± 2.2 mm postoperatively. The mean lateral PCO was 26.3± 2.4 mm preoperatively and 24.9± 2.2 mm postoperatively. There were no significant correlations between x-ray and CT measurement in PCO and joint line. There were no significant correlations between the changes in the posterior condylar offsets and the postoperative knee flexion. Conclusion. After Robotic assisted TKA which is planned not to increase the medial and lateral posterior condylar offset, satisfactory maximal flexion angle of the knee was gained in all patients. Changes in medial and lateral posterior condylar offsets were not correlated with the postoperative knee flexion angle. And changes in PCO and joint line measured by x-ray did not reflect those of the medial and lateral condyle, and joint line on CT

Purpose. We sought to determine whether there was a difference in the posterior condylar offset (PCO), posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with anterior referencing (AR) or posterior referencing (PR) systems. We also assessed whether the PCO and PCOR changes, as well as patient factors were related to range of motion (ROM) in each referencing system. In addition, we examined whether the improvements in clinical outcomes differed between the two referencing systems. Methods. This retrospective study included 130 consecutive patients (184 knees) with osteoarthritis who underwent primary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-substituting fixed-bearing TKA. All patients were categorized into the AR or PR group according to the referencing system used. Radiographic parameters, including PCO and PCOR, were measured using true lateral radiographs. The difference between preoperative and postoperative PCO and PCOR values were calculated. Clinical outcomes including ROM and Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) scores were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years after TKA. The PCO, PCOR values, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors related to postoperative ROM in each referencing system. Results. The postoperative PCO was greater in the AR group (28.4 mm) than in the PR group (27.4 mm), whereas the PCO was more consistently preserved in the PR group. In contrast, there was no difference in the mean postoperative PCOR between the two groups. The mean postoperative ROM after TKA was greater in the AR group (129°) than in the PR group (122°), whereas improvement in WOMAC score did not differ between the two groups. Preoperative ROM was the only factor related to postoperative ROM in both groups. Conclusions. The postoperative PCO was greater in the AR group, whereas the PCO was more consistently preserved after surgery in the PR group. The postoperative PCO and PCOR changes did not affect the postoperative ROM, regardless of the referencing system used after PCL-substituting fixed-bearing TKA. Furthermore, similar clinical outcomes were achieved in the AR and PR groups

Background. Posterior referencing (PR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore posterior condylar offset. When a symmetric femoral implant is externally rotated (ER) to the posterior condylar axis, it is impossible to anatomically restore the offset of both condyles. PR jigs variously reference medially, laterally, or centrally. The distal femoral cutting jigs typically reference off the more distal medial condyle, causing distal and posterior resection discrepancies. We used sawbones to elucidate differences between commonly used PR cutting jigs with regards to posterior offset restoration. Materials/Methods. Using 32 identical sawbones, we performed distal and posterior femoral resections using cutting guides from 8 widely available TKA systems. 6 systems used a central-referencing strategy, 1 system used a lateral-referencing strategy, and 1 system used a medial-referencing strategy with implants of asymmetric thickness. Distal femoral valgus resection was set at 5 degrees for all specimens. Rotation was set at 3 degrees for 2 sawbones and 5 degrees for 2 sawbones with each system. We measured the thickness of all bone resections, and compared those values to known implant thickness. Results. Central- and lateral-referenced systems with symmetric implants showed distal lateral under-resection. The medial-referenced system with asymmetric implants restored the anatomic joint line medially and laterally. Central-referenced systems showed close to 1mm (SD ±0.2) postero-lateral offset over-restoration and postero-medial offset under-restoration at 3 degrees of ER, and a 1.6mm change in each offset at 5 degrees of ER. The lateral-referenced system demonstrated a 1.7mm mismatch between the distal-medial and the postero-medial resections at 3 degrees of rotation. There was a 3.9mm mismatch at 5 degrees of ER. Medial-referenced systems demonstrated a mismatch between the distal-lateral and postero-lateral resections, present only with 5 degrees of ER. Conclusion. Our data offers insight for arthroplasty surgeons into the bony resections taken by widely used TKA instrumentation systems. The lateral-referenced jigs reduced the postero-medial offset by 4 degrees at 5 degrees, a difference on the order of 1 to 2 femoral sizes depending on the implant system. The medial-referenced system, with the use of asymmetric condylar thicknesses, restored condylar anatomy within 1mm in the majority of circumstances. When set at 5 degrees of external rotation, over-restoration of the postero-lateral femoral offset occurred. Center-referenced systems resulted in minor changes in offset at 3 degrees of rotation, but a decrease in the postero-medial offset by 2mm at 5 degrees of external rotation. The distal femoral cutting jig typically restores the medial joint line in extension when there is minimal medial wear. Referencing laterally in flexion may introduce a discrepancy between the extension and flexion gaps. Available medial- and lateral-referenced jigs provide the option of shifting the bony resections anteriorly or posteriorly and adjusting the sizing as needed

Background. Joint line, patellar height and posterior condylar offset (PCO) are related to functional outcome such as stability and range of motion after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was (1) to determine whether revision TKA can restore the joint line, patella height and condylar offset after surgery, and (2) to assess factors associated with failed restoration. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA. Among 27 patients, 11 patients had two-stage revision TKA due to periprosthetic joint infection while 14 patients underwent revision TKA due to aseptic loosening. In addition, there were 2 patients who had traumatic event causing a periprosthetic fracture which led to revision TKA. The joint line was measured using the distance from the adductor tubercle of the femur to the most distal portion of the medial femoral component on knee anterior-posterior radiographs. Patella height was assessed using the Caton-Deschamps method. In addition, PCO were measured relative to the tangent of the posterior cortex of the femur using knee lateral radiograph. All parameters were compared between pre- and postoperative radiographs after revision TKA. Results. After revision TKA, mean joint line elevation was 0.9 mm. Seven of 27 patients showed joint line elevation of 5 mm or more. There was no significant difference between pre- and postoperative PCO (27.6 mm and 28.1 mm, respectively; P = 0.528). Fifteen patients (56%) showed patellar baja after revision TKA. Compared to the patients with aseptic loosening, the patients with periprosthetic joint infection or fracture showed greater joint line elevation (4.1 mm and −2.2 mm, respectively; P < 0.01), smaller PCO change (1.9 mm and −1.1 mm respectively, P < 0.05). Even if the cause of revision TKA was not associated with the postoperative patellar baja, presence of preoperative patellar baja was significantly associated with postoperative patellar baja (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Overall, restoration of the joint line and PCO were achieved in contemporary revision TKA. However, the patients who underwent revision TKA due to periprosthetic joint infection or fracture showed greater joint line elevation as well as smaller PCO. In addition, the patellar height was not improved in patients with preoperative patellar baja. Further evaluation of functional outcome is needed to assess correlation between radiological and functional outcome

Introduction:. One of the important criteria of the success of TKR is achievement of the Flexion ROM. Various factors responsible to achieve flexion are technique, Implant and patient related. Creation of the Posterior condylar offset is one of the important factors to achieve satisfactory flexion. Aim:. To correlate post op femoral condylar offset to final flexion ROM at 1 yr. post op. Methods:. This is a clinico-radiological study of the cases done prospectively between September 2011 and August 2012. Inclusion criteria:. All patients undergoing Bilateral TKRs and have agreed for the follow up at 1 yr. Exclusion criteria: . 1). Patients who had previous bony surgery on lower end femur. 2). Patients with previous fracture of lower end femur. All the patients had PS PFC Sigma (De Puy, Warsaw) components cemented. ROMs were measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, & 1 year post op. The last reading was taken as final flexion ROM as measured by an independent Physiotherapist with the help of a Goniometer. Results:. We had 21 cases of Bilateral TKRs who satisfied our criteria. Pre and post op femoral condylar offset was measured in mm. on lateral x ray. Pre and post op flexion was measured. Results showed that variation in the posterior femoral offset by > 3 mm in post op x ray was related to loss of flexion of an average 21 deg. (16–24 degrees). Greater the deflection from the normal offset, greater was the loss of flexion. These patients also showed lesser improvement in KSS functional sco. Discussion:. Flexion is one of the most important yardsticks for the measurement of success of TKR. This factor is more important more so in Asian population. Literature has shown that three important determinants for good flexion are…. . 1). Posterior Condylar Offset Restoration. 2). Tibial slope restoration. 3). Femoral Roll back in flexion. An increased offset permits greater flexion before impingement between the tibial insert and the femur. In our study we kept Tibial slope and Femoral Roll back constant by using the same prosthesis. The femoral condylar offset changed as per the size of the AP femoral cutting block. (Anterior referencing guide used). Overresection of the posterior condyles reduced the posterior femoral condylar offset and hence significant loss of post op flexion. The shorter posterior condyle of smaller-sized femoral component can increase the potential for bone impingement proximal to the posterior condyles. In our study the opposite side replaced knee acted as a control and hence eliminating patient bius. It is generally stated that after a TKR flexion can improve upto 1 year and hence that was taken as final possible flexion. Conclusion:. Keeping Tibial slope and Femoral roll back constant during the surgery, posterior condylar offset restoration within 3 mm of its original pre op offset was necessary to achieve satisfactory flexion at 1 year. Undersizing the femoral component to achieve more flexion is perhaps suboptimal. Appropriate AP femoral sizing is a must to restore the normal offset

Proper restoration of posterior condylar offset during TKA has been shown to be important to maximize range of motion and minimize flexion instability. However, there is little information as to the importance of restoration of mid-sagittal femoral geometry. There is controversy as to whether a TKA prosthesis should have a single radius or multiple radii of curvature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-radius femoral component at restoring mid sagittal femoral offset. A consecutive series of 100 TKAs with digital preoperative and postoperative radiographs and standardized radiographic markers were analyzed. There were 71 female and 29 male knees with mean age of 59 years. All TKAs were performed by a single surgeon using a multi-radius femoral component design. The distal femoral resection was set to resect 10 mm from the distal femoral condyle and a posterior referencing system was used to size the femoral component. Using radiographic perfect lateral projections of the knees, a line was drawn along the posterior femoral shaft and another parallel line down the anterior femoral shaft. A 3rd line was then drawn parallel to the posterior shaft at the furthest point posterior on the condyle. A 4th line was drawn parallel to the anterior shaft at the furthest point anterior on the femur. 90 degree angles were constructed to create a grid in the anterior and posterior directions, similar to a previously reported technique. Finally, 45 degree angle lines were created in the grid to assess mid flexion dimensions [Fig-1 and 2]. The percent change in posterior condylar offset (PCO), anterior femoral offset (AFO), mid femoral anterior offset (MAFO) and mid femoral posterior offset (MFPO) were calculated. The mean reproduction of the mid-anterior femoral offset and mid-posterior femoral offset were 101.1% [range 56.5%–167.5%] and 96.8% [range 54.9%–149.0%] of preoperative measurements respectively. The average restoration of posterior offset and anterior offset were 92.8% [range 49.0%–129.8%] and 115.3% of preoperative measurements [range 35.7%–400.0%] respectively. When the posterior condylar offset was restored to within 10% of the native anatomy, the MPFO restoration more closely resembled normal anatomy (103.0% vs. 93.9%, p = 0.005). When the postoperative posterior condylar offset was decreased greater than 20%, both the MAFO (90.1% vs. 104.5%, p = 0.004) and MPFO (78.5% vs. 102.9%, p < 0.001) decreased compared to the native knee. There was no relationship between restoration of the PCO and the MAFO correction (104.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.213). Finally, there was no correlation between restoration of anterior femoral offset within 10% of normal and the restoration of mid sagittal femoral offset; 98.0% vs 102.0% for MAFO (p = 0.320) and 98.7% vs 96.3% for MPFO (p = 0.569). A modern multi-radius condylar knee design is capable of reproducing the mid-sagittal geometry of the preoperative knee. However, the restoration of mid sagittal offset is largely dependent on the restoration of the posterior condylar offset. Intraoperative adjustments in anterior and posterior femoral resections can have significant impact in the ability of the implant to reproduce mid-sagittal femoral anatomy

Introduction. The effect of the implant posterior condylar offset has recently generated much enthusiasm among researchers. Some reports were concerned about the relationship between the posterior condylar offset and an extension gap. However, the posterior condylar offset was measured in a flexed knee position or in reference to femoral anatomy alone. Posterior femoral condylar offset relative to the posterior wall of the tibia (posterior offset ratio; POR) is possibly the risk of knee flexion contracture associated with posterior femoral condylar offset after TKA. However, there are no reports concerning the relationship between POR and flexion contracture in vivo. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the measurement of POR and flexion contracture of the knee in vivo. Methods. Twenty-seven patients who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (PFC Sigma RP-F) were participated in the study. The lateral femoro-tibial angle (lateral FTA) was measured using lateral radiographs obtained by two procedures. Two procedures are applied to obtain true lateral radiographs of the lower extremities. (1) Full-length true lateral radiographs on standing, (2) True lateral radiographs in the prone position (Fig. 1A). ‘Posterior offset ratio’ was defined as Fig. 1B. Significant differences among groups were assessed using two-tailed Student's t-tests. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between lateral FTA and posterior offset ratio of patients. Results. The mean value of the POR on standing was 14.94 ± 7.53%. The mean value of flexion contracture of the knee on standing was 11.67 ± 9.21 degree and that in the prone position was 4.22 ± 6.17 degree (P = 0.001). The POR was negatively correlated with flexion contracture of the knee in all procedures with statistical significance (standing: r = 0.62, P = 0.0039; prone: r = 0.66, P = 0.0001) (Fig. 2). Discussion. We have evaluated flexion contracture by two procedures. The mean value of flexion contracture of the knee on standing was 11.67 ± 9.21 degree, whereas that in the prone position was 4.22 ± 6.17 degree. We surmised that this discrepancy occurred due to the flexor muscle tension on standing. In terms of the evaluation of posterior soft tissue tightness of the knee, muscle relaxation can be achieved in prone position is rather than standing position. Our study investigated the relationship between the posterior protrusions of the posterior condyle of the femur relative to the tibia (POR) and flexion contracture after TKA evaluated by two measurement procedures. POR is strongly correlated with flexion contracture evaluated by both measurement procedures. The value of POR of this implant in vitro was about 25% in previous study, whereas the mean value of POR in vivo was 14.94%, suggesting that POR in the flexion contracture knee relatively reduced because posterior soft tissue pushed femoral component anteriorly. Our result clearly showed that if posterior clearance is insufficient, flexion contracture occur due to posterior soft tissue tightness. In conclusion, POR after TKA in vivo negatively correlate with flexion contracture presumably because posterior soft tissue pushed femoral component anteriorly

Introduction. One of the important criteria of the success of TKR is achievement of the Flexion ROM. Various factors responsible to achieve flexion are technique, Implant and patient related. Creation of the Posterior condylar offset is one such important factor to achieve satisfactory flexion. Aim. To correlate post op femoral condylar offset to final flexion ROM at 1 yr. post op. Methods. This is a clinico-radiological study of the cases done prospectively between September 2011 and August 2012. Inclusion criteria:. All patients undergoing Bilateral TKRs and have agreed for the follow up at 1 yr. Exclusion criteria:. Patients who had previous bony surgery on lower end femur. Patients with previous fracture of lower end femur. All the patients had PS PFC Sigma (De Puy, Warsaw) components cemented. ROMs were measured at 6 weeks, 3 months, & 1 year post op. The last reading was taken as final flexion ROM as measured by a Physiotherapist with the help of a Goniometer. Results. We had 21 cases of Bilateral TKRs who satisfied our criteria. Pre and post op femoral condylar offset was measured in mm. on lateral x ray. Pre and post op flexion was measured. Results showed that variation in the posterior femoral offset by > 3mm in post op x ray was related to loss of flexion of an average 21 deg. (16 – 24 degrees). Greater the deflection from the normal offset, greater was the loss of flexion. These patients also showed lesser improvement in KSS functional score. Discussion. Flexion is one of the most important yardsticks for the measurement of success of TKR. This factor is more important more so in Asian population. Literature has shown that three important determinants for good flexion are…. Posterior Condylar Offset Restoration. Tibial slope restoration. Femoral Roll back in flexion. An increased offset permits greater flexion before impingement between the tibial insert and the femur. In our study we kept Tibial slope and Femoral Roll back constant by using the same prosthesis. The femoral condylar offset changed as per the size of the AP femoral cutting block. (Anterior referencing guide used). Overresection of the posterior condyles reduced the posterior femoral condylar offset and hence significant loss of post op flexion. The shorter posterior condyle of smaller femoral component can increase the potential for bone impingement proximal to the posterior condyles. In our study the opposite side replaced knee acted as a control. It is generally stated that after a TKR flexion can improve upto 1 year and hence was taken as final possible flexion. Conclusion. Keeping Tibial slope and Femoral roll back constant during the surgery, posterior condylar offset restoration within 3 mm of its original pre op offset was necessary to achieve satisfactory flexion at 1 year. Undersizing the femoral component to achieve more flexion is perhaps suboptimal. Appropriate AP femoral sizing is a must to restore the normal offset

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has a tendency to change the individual anatomy of the patient within the limits of today used arthroplasty designs. Femoral external rotation will lead to mediolateral overhang by upsizing to avoid lateral notching and downsizing will lead to loss of posterior condylar offset. Posterior slope is usually reduced to avoid problems with posterior stabilized (PS) designs. We compared 50 bicompartimental arthroplasties (Uni + PFJ) with 50 TKA's. Demographics and BMI are compared. We looked specifically at patient type, preoperative deformity, postoperative function and alignment and results on functional scores. Bicompartimental arthroplasty is a resurfacing intervention that allows less correction of frontal deformity. Postop alignment was within 3° of varus. Better active flexion was obtained than in TKA. Better function was observed for stair climbing and single leg stability. Rotational position of foot was more natural in bicompartimental as compared to TKA. Functional scores like WOMAC, KOOS and IKDC showed better results for bicompartimental. Illness perception score showed that the resurfacing patient is another patient than the TKA patient. No overhang of components was observed. No change of posterior condylar offset was necessary. Posterior slope on the medial side was minimally reduced. In conclusion resurfacing by bicompartimental arthroplasty with two individual components (Uni + PFJ) is an excellent solution to gender and ethnic differences. The individual anatomy of the specific patient goes through minimal changes resulting in better functional results

Introduction. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported to occur due to component malpositioning and/or oversizing, improper femoral component (FC) flexion and tibial component (TC) slope, tight extension gap, inaccurate joint line placement, deficient posterior osteophyte resection, heterotopic ossification (HO), poor patellofemoral joint reconstruction, poor posterior condylar offset restoration, and/or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) under-resection or retraction. However, the importance of these potential factors for stiffness are not well documented in the medical literature. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate specific radiographic parameters in patients who had stiffness after primary TKA. Material and Methods. An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients that were revised due to stiffness after TKA. We defined stiffness as 15º or more of flexion contraction, less than 75º of flexion or a range of motion (ROM) of 90º with the chief complaint of limited ROM and pain. Patients with history of previous revisions and/or ORIF, infection, or isolated polyethylene exchange were excluded. Patients with a minimum of 1 year radiographic follow-up were included. Radiographic measurements were performed as described by the Knee Society TKA Roentgenographic Evaluation System (KSRES). Two blinded observers performed all measurements. Descriptive data is reported as mean (range). Inter-observer correlations were reported using Intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC). Results. A total of 44 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 13 (30%) were male and 31 (70%) were female. Mean BMI was 33.9 kg/m2 (19.5–58). ICCs ranged from good to excellent (>0.8) for all measurements performed. Coronal FC and TC alignments were 95.29º (82.4º–100.6º) and 89.16º (84.4º–94.2º) respectively. HO ranged from 0 to 3 (0:43%, 1:36%, 2:11%, 3:10%). FC-Flexion and TC-slope were 10.17 (3.5–19.8) and 86.7 (61.2–99.2) respectively. Insall-Salvati ratio was 1.01 (0.58–2.04). Posterior condylar offset (CO) ratio was 0.51 (0.34–1.11). Anterior CO ratio was 0.2 (0–0.34). Anterior femoral cortex notching ranged from 0 to 3 (0:39%, 1:43%, 2:14%, 3:4%). Femoral posterior osteophytes were observed in 32% of patients. A gap between the anterior flange and the femoral cortex was observed in 45% of patients. The patella was resurfaced in 93% of patients with a mean patellar tilt and patellar displacement of 5.34º (−8.9º to 5.34º) and 9.88% (−5 to 41%) respectively. Conclusion. To our knowledge this is the first study reporting specific radiographic data on postoperative stiffness following primary TKA. From the observed radiographic measurements, the increased mean femoral component flexion, the high amount of postoperative HO and posterior osteophytes, and the anterior cortical and component gap suggest possible risk factors influencing the occurrence of postoperative stiffness. Future focus will include a matched control population of patients in order to establish statistical significance of all observed values

Introduction. CT based systems that are used to create custom components and custom cutting guides in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have variable methods for accounting for the thickness of remaining cartilage that may influence component sizing and bone resection. Little information has been published about the thickness of this cartilage, especially on the posterior femoral condyles. Failure to account for this cartilage may lead to under-sizing of the femoral component, or a reduction in the posterior condylar offset that may adversely affect flexion after TKA. Methods. This IRB approved, retrospective study included 140 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA. The medial and lateral posterior condylar bone cuts were performed in the usual manner with mechanical instruments. The resected specimen was sectioned in the sagital plane and the cartilage thickness was measured at the mid portion to the nearest millimeter. Results. The mean cartilage thickness was 1.7 mm (range, 0 to 4 mm) on the medial posterior condyle and 2.0 mm (range, 0 to 5 mm) on the lateral posterior condyle. There was no correlation between the remaining medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage thickness (p=0.35). Conclusions. The thickness of remaining cartilage on the posterior condyles of the femur at the time of TKA is between 0 and 5 mm. This variable cartilage thickness may be poorly visualized on the CT studies used for creating custom femoral components or custom femoral cutting guides. This variability is greater than the 3 to 4 mm differences in AP measurement between femoral sizes in most contemporary TKA systems. Therefore, CT based custom systems may reproduce femoral sizing and posterior condylar offset less well than off the shelf femoral components implanted with conventional instruments. Future studies will be needed to evaluate the accuracy of component sizing between CT versus MRI based systems

Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was primarily considered a successful procedure, several new knee implants were introduced in recent years that seek to obtain improved stability and higher flexion. One of the implant, Vanguard XP. TM. BiCruciate retaining (BCR), Zinmmer-Biomet, USA recreates a specific kinematic model through the principle of normal joint. Patients and Method. An unselected consecutive series of sixty-two patients undergoing primary TKA using the cemented total knee system between August 2016 and April 2018 were studied. Twenty-seven knees was operated using Vanguard XP, subsequently thirty-five knees were received a TKA using cruciate retaining cemented total knee system FINE. TM. CR, Nakashimamedical, Japan. Postoperatively standing AP hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained, from which the lower extremity mechanical axis, component angle were measured. The alignment goals were a neutral mechanical axis defined as a hip-to-ankle angle of 0°with the femoral and tibial components aligned perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The total operating time were quantified utilising an operating room database. The total operating time between TKAs performed with Vanguard XP BCR and those performed with FINE CR was compared in each group. All patients postoperatively was evaluated of clinical results the Japan Orthopedics Association(JOA) Knee scores. We evaluated femoral component posterior offset (PFCO) in both of two group. The maximal protrusion of the posterior condyle, posteriorly to the extension line parallel to the tibial shaft from the edge of the posterior tibial component was measured on true lateral radiographs. Results. The JOA Knee score of Vanguard XP BCR group was 86.5±4.7 points, and the score of FINE group was 82.7±5.9 points, there was no statistical significance between the two groups on the clinical score. The operative time in Vanguard XP BCR was 137.2±14.6 minutes and significantly more compared to the time of FINE group 111.3±11.9 minutes. The mechanical axis angle in Vanguard XP BCR group was −1.3°±2.7, while FINE CR group was −0.7°±3.2, there was no statistical significance. The number of outliers for mechanical axis angle was Vanguard XP BCR group 25%, the FINE group 24%, between the two groups there was no statistical significance. The mean value of the femoral component posterior offset ratio of Vanguard XP BCR was 14.4%±0.1. The mean value of the posterior offset ratio of FINE group was 16.7%±0.1, between the two groups there was statistical significance. Discussion. Bellemans et al. first defined the concept of posterior condylar offset. They demonstrated that the maximum active flexion possible was limited by direct impingement of the posterior aspect of the tibial component against the posterior aspect of the femur. However, the offset also reduces the extension gap. An enlarged posterior femoral component may reduce the extension gap due to posterior tissue tightness. In this study, the femoral component posterior offset ratio of Vanguard XP BCR was good results compared to the CR type FINE. Clinical results and the mechanical axis angle was good both of the group, but the operative time in Vanguard XP BCR was significantly more compared to the time of FINE group. Conclusion. Good early clinical results were obtained with Vanguard XP BCR knee implant, long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm our findings

INTRODUCTION. Femur is one of the bones in humans that exhibit ethnic, racial, and gender difference. Several basic and clinical studies were conducted to explore these variations. Clinical anthropological studies have dealt with the compatibility of femoral prostheses and osteosythesis and materials with the femur. If there is a misalignment between the Total Knee Arthroplasy (TKA) femoral comportment installation position, Range of Motion (ROM) failure and several problems may arise. The aim of this study was to evaluate anterior bowing of the Japanese femur and to assess the adequacy of TKA femoral comportment installation position. METHODS. We analyzed 76 normal Japanese and 97 TKA patients. (June 2014-June 2015) The average age of the normal subjects was 62.0±20.90 (24–88) years old and the average of TKA subjects was 73.6±7.9 (53–89) years old. First we defined and measured the anterior curvature and the posterior condylar offset (PCO) in normal japanese femurs. Then in TKA patients we set the implant as same angle of the component. Third, we measured the post operative anterior curvature and PCO. Then calculated the anterior curvature difference and PCO differences and preformed statistical analysis with ROM. RESULTS SECTION. The average of anterior curvature in normal subjects was 7.87±6.60 degrees. Among 97 TKA patients, pre-operative anterior curvature was 7.58±0.16 degrees. Further, the angle of component which was set the post operatively was 7.32±0.25. The average of Anterior curvature difference and PCO differences had correlation with ROM. DISCUSSION. Gilbert reported that caucasian femurs are straight compared to asian femurs. Chinese and Japanese showed different anterior curvature because of different life style. The chalenges are when operating on different ethnic patients, Orthopedic Surgeons consider many factors. Previous studies yielded different suggestions for the ideal point of entry. We suggest difference between the curves of the femurs should be considered for TKA femoral comportment installation position. SIGNIFICANCE. 1)Our results gave an anatomical characteristics of Japanese femur. 2)These data will give clinical indication for TKA femoral comportment installation position

IN THE PAST success of TKA has been measured by ROM with maximum flexion as a bench mark, along with good stability of the knee joint MAINLY IN EXTENSION. Due to changing demographics our TKA population has shifted to more active and demanding patients which want to return to normal daily living, including professional and recreational sports activities. With the patella in place, we define a ligament “balanced resection” technique using the elibra device, and are able to optimize our results and meet younger, more active patient's expectations. Our workflow consists of a flexion gap first technique, maximizing posterior condylar offset, hence maximizing flexion with optimal ligament balance. This flexion gap is then transmitted to the extension gap, initially using custom made spacer blocks either neutral or angled in 1°, 2° or 3° applied to the elibra sensing device and more recently by using a specific designed extension gap balancer. The immediate and short term postoperative observations concerning femoral component rotation, patellar tracking, influence of patella in place versus subluxed on flexion gap balance, varus-valgus alignment and complete mitigation of ligament releases will be discussed

The natural knee allows multi-planar freedoms of rotation and translation, while retaining stability in the antero-posterior direction. It allows flexion with roll back, and medial, lateral and central rotation movements. The natural femoral condyles of the knee are spiral, therefore inducing a side to side translatory movement during flexion and extension. Incorporating all these features is vital in successful knee replacement design. The different knee designs currently in use demonstrate different deficiencies in knee function. A study of 150 Posterior Cruciate (PCL) Retaining Total Knee Replacements [1] has shown that in 72% of knees direct impingement of the tibial insert posteriorly against the back of the femur was responsible for blocking further flexion. The mean pre-operative range of flexion was 105° and post-operative was 105.9°. For every 2mm decrease in posterior condylar offset, the maximum flexion was reduced by 12.2°. The major disadvantage of the Posterior Stabilised (PS) Total Knee Replacement is gross anterior to posterior mid-flexion instability [2]. The Medial Rotation Total Knee Replacement is good in mid-flexion but not in high flexion where the femur slides forward on the tibia leading to impingement. The Birmingham Knee Replacement (BKR) is a rotating platform knee design which is stable throughout the range of flexion. In high flexion, the BKR brings the femur to the back of the tibia. The BKR also has spiral femoral condyles, matching the natural kinematics of the knee. The combined static and dynamic effect is 10mm lateral translation of the femur in flexion and vice versa in extension. Results for seventy nine BKRs (in seventy two patients) show the best Oxford Knee Score of 12 at follow up – excluding ten patients whose inferior scores were due to other pathologies. Knee flexion results show a 21° post-operative improvement in range of flexion. On objective independent testing, maximum walking speed is slower for patients with a standard knee replacement (6.5km/h) and the loading through the replaced side does not match the normal side. Comparatively, patients with a BKR have a faster maximum walking speed of 11km/h and the loading closely matches that of the normal knee. Studies based on the National Joint Register PROMs data [2] show that nearly thirty percent of Total Knee Replacement patients are not much better since their operation. A lot of improvement is needed in the design of knee replacements in order to achieve better function for knee replacement patients

Introduction. Two principal targets are dominating the spectrum of goals in total knee arthroplasty: first of all the orthopedic surgeon aims at achieving an optimal pain-free postoperative kinematic motion close to the individual physiologic range of the individual patient and secondly he aims for a concurrent high ligament stability within the entire range of movement in order to establish stability for all activities of daily living. This study presents a modified surgical procedure for total knee replacement which is ligament-controlled in order to put both component into the “ligamentous frame” of the patients individual kinematics. Methods. The posterior femero-condylar index (PFC-I) is defined as being the posterior condylar offset divided by the distal antero-posterior diameter on a lateral radiograph. After careful preoperative planning the positions and orientations of the osteotomies is controlled intraoperatively via ligamentous guidance. Anterior and distal femoral osteotomy are planned on antero-posterior and lateral radiographs considering intramedular and mechanical axes as well as the orientation of the posterior condyles. Osteotomies are carried out in a stepwise fashion, starting with the anterior femoral osteotomy followed by the distal femoral osteotomy as planned. Then the extension gap is finalized by tensioning the ligaments and “top-down” referencing the level of the tibial osteotomy. After rotating the femur into the 90°-flexion position the flexion gap is finalized by referencing the level of the posterior condyle osteotomy in a “bottom-up” fashion to the tibial osteotomy. Hence, this technique determines the size of the femoral component with the last osteotomy. It likewise respects the new, ACL-lacking ligamentous framework and it drives the prosthetic components to fit into the new ligamentous envelope to follow the modified kinematics. Results. More than 130 patients have been operated on using this surgical technique, 104 of them have been followed-up after a minimum of one year: age 73+/−9, m/f 37/67, 71% had a varus, 29% a valgus-deformity. In all patients a subvastus approach was applied, 12 from medial, 92 from lateral. Mean flexion reached 122°+/−7.4 and a 120°-flexion or more was achieved by 86% of the patients. All patients reveived a LCS total knee prosthesis with either a rotating or an antero-posterior gliding inlay. No fixed tibial inlays were used. Antero-posterior translation of the APG-insert was 13 to 16mm immediately postoperatively whereas after one year it decreased to 4 to 10mm. We succeeded in reconstructing the posterior femero-condylar index (PFC-I) and found a linear correlation of 0.98 +/−0.06 of pre- to postoperative PFC-I. Conclusion. This PCL-retaining surgical technique respects the new, ACL-lacking kinematics in total knee replacement. The anterior and distal femoral osteotomies are femur-axis-controlled while the extension and flexion gaps are ligament-controlled. The size of the femoral component is regarded as a variable within the procedure and is only determined while performing the last osteotomy, i.e. the posterior condylar osteotomy. This technique is suitable for both PCL-retaining and also for PCL–sacrificing techniques

Objective. We performed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patella resurfacing in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical results and the appropriateness TKA without patella resurfacing. Methods. A total of 61 patients (61 affected knees) who had undergone a Low Contact Stress mobile − bearing knee arthroplasty (LCS− TKA) (Depuy, Warsaw, IN. USA) 10 years or more before the present study were enrolled. The LCS− TKAs did not include patella resurfacing. The patients' mean age was 77.7 ± 6.1 years (range: 59−94 years). The mean follow-up period was 121 ± 2.4 months (range: 120−129 months). The clinical evaluation used the scoring system for OA of the knees issued by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score). We defined patellofemoral (PF) pain, crepitation, patellar clunk syndrome, spin-out, and reoperation as complications. We also used X-Ray imaging to measure the component angle, patella height, lateral shift ratio, tilting angle, femorotibial angle, posterior condylar offset and joint line, and evaluated the localization of sclerotic changes in the patella. All of the LCS− TKAs were performed by one surgeon using the midvastus approach. During the operation, the osteophyte around the patella was resected, and the osteophyte on the articular surface was shaped using a bone saw. For statistical analysis we performed Mann-Whitney's U test and adopted a significance level of P<5%. Results. The average JOA score improved significantly from 46.2 ± 10.4 before the LCS− TKA to 82.6 ± 6.1 after the LCS− TKAs (P = 0.0002). No cases of patellar clunk syndrome or spin-out. occurred. Revision surgery was performed for two cases, one involved an infection, and the other involved a patella fracture. Postoperative PF pain was found in 6 patients (6 affected knees) at the final evaluation. However, in these patients, the pain was less severe than it had been preoperatively, and revision surgery for PF pain was needed or performed. The postoperative radiological evaluation was favorable on the whole. The localization of sclerotic changes in the patella on X-ray were in 32 cases around tip of the patella, on the other no remarkable change were in 29 cases. Conclusion. The clinical and radiological evaluations of the patella non−resurfacing mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty was favorable overall. Treatment of the patella in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. We suggest that the patella in LCS−TKAs does not always need to be resurfaced

Objective:. Patient-specific or “custom” total knee replacements have been designed to fit the arthritic knee in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) better than “off-the-shelf” implants. Using computer technology, patient-specific cutting-blocks and custom-made implants are created to more accurately fit the contour of the knee and reproduce the anatomic J-curve with the hope of providing a better functional outcome. Purpose:. This retrospective, matched-pair study evaluates manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) rates in cemented patient-specific cruciate-retaining (PSCR) TKA compared to that in both cemented posterior-stabilized (PS) and non-cemented cruciate-retaining rotating-platform (NC CR RP) TKA. Materials and Methods:. From 2010 through November of 2012, 21 PSCR TKAs were performed in 19 patients. Using medical records from our patient database, these patients were matched for age, side, deformity, diagnosis, Charnley Class, and preoperative range of motion (ROM) with 42 PS TKAs performed during the same time period by the same surgeon using the same intra- and post-operative protocols. Additionally, 11 NC CR RP TKA were performed and evaluated based on the same criteria. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were performed using criteria as described by The Knee Society. Results:. Preoperatively the custom CR RP TKA cohort had a larger average ROM compared to the PS TKA cohort (P-value = 0.006). Postoperatively, however, the custom CR RP TKA cohort overall was found to have a significantly decreased average ROM compared to both the PS and NC CR RP TKA cohorts (2.0°–110.6° P-value = 0.0002 and 2.4°–117.3° P-value = 0.0003, respectively). 6 of the 21 (28.6%) PSCR TKAs performed underwent MUA to improve postoperative ROM. One manipulation was unsuccessful and the patient is scheduled for revision for arthrofibrosis. No patients in either the matched PS group or the CR RP group underwent postoperative MUA. Clinical and radiographic analysis including pre-operative ROM, deformity, side, Charnley Class, posterior tibial slope angle, epicondylar axis and posterior condylar offsets provided no insight into the reason for this higher MUA rate in the PSCR knees. Conclusion:. MUA rates in the patient-specific TKA group were significantly higher than that in the matched PS and NC CR RP groups. No correlations were found to clearly indicate the cause of the higher MUA rate among the PSCR knees. Early manipulation is recommended for stiffness with these custom devices. Level of Evidence: Level III, Retrospective comparative study. Keywords: Patient-specific total knee, Manipulation, TKA

Introduction. Computed tomography (CT) can be utilized to design patient specific instruments (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PSI preoperative plans predict bone resection, anterior-posterior implant position, implant rotation and implant size. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperatively predicted implant sizes (tibia and femur) to the actual implanted sizes. Data were compiled from two surgeons, one in the United Kingdom (Surgeon 1, cruciate retaining) and one in the United States (Surgeon 2, posterior stabilizing). Both used the same primary TKA implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®; DePuySynthes®, Warsaw, Indiana). This is the largest comparison of CT-based PSI size accuracy between two implant systems. Methods. An international cohort of 396 CT-based PSI-TKA preoperative plans (TruMatch®)were compared to postoperative implant records. Data were retrospectively analyzed for Sigma®(n=351) and Attune® (n=45), both as separate cohorts and as a combined cohort (Sigma® + Attune®). Three analyses were performed: Tibia and femur plan accuracy, major size changes (femoral size change or tibial size change resulting in a femoral size change) and minor size changes (tibial size change not impacting femoral size). Inter-rater reliability analyses using ICC (intra-class correlation) and the Kappa statistic were performed to determine reliability and agreement among the groups. Combined TKA implant data (Sigma® + Attune®) for surgeons 1 and 2 were compared for accuracy between users utilizing different implant designs, cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS). Results. In the combined system analysis (Sigma® + Attune®) femoral implant prediction was 97.0% accurate and combined tibial implant size accuracy was 79.5%. There were no significant differences between the systems for tibial or femoral accuracy. See Table 1. There were 12 major size changes, 11 downsized femoral implants and 1 upsized femoral implant (all femoral changes were with Sigma® system). There were 81 minor size changes. Per Kappa, the plans were in excellent agreement with the femoral implant size and had substantial agreement with tibial implant size (p<.01). See Table 2. Comparing size accuracy between Surgeon 1 and Surgeon 2, Surgeon 1 had significantly greater tibial accuracy (p<.01), while femoral accuracy showed no significant difference (p=0.49). See Table 3. Discussion. In this combined data set of two surgeons, we report high implant sizing accuracy overall. This accuracy was noted across implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®) and across surgeons (1 and 2) utilizing different implant designs (CR vs. PS) using TruMatch® PSI. In all cohorts, the femur was more accurately predicted than the tibia. Accurate size reconstitution and reconstruction of the femur is critical for maintenance of posterior condylar offset, avoidance of anterior compartment overstuffing and avoidance of anterior femoral cortical notching. This study demonstrates the reproducibility of CT-based PSI TKA across different implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®), implant designs (CR and PS) and different surgeons. The ability to accurately predict implant size can also contribute system efficiencies: improved implant inventory management, development of size-focused instrumentation sets and potentially reduced workload for sterile processing departments