Objectives. Intramedullary fixation is considered the most stable treatment for pertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur and cut-out is one of the most frequent mechanical complications. In order to determine the role of clinical variables and radiological parameters in predicting the risk of this complication, we analysed the data pertaining to a group of patients recruited over the course of six years. Methods. A total of 571 patients were included in this study, which analysed the incidence of cut-out in relation to several clinical variables: age; gender; the AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification system (AO/OTA); type of nail; cervical-diaphyseal angle; surgical wait times; anti-osteoporotic medication; complete post-operative weight bearing; and radiological parameters (namely the lag-screw position with respect to the femoral head, the Cleveland system, the tip-apex distance (TAD), and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD)). Results. The incidence of cut-out across the sample was 5.6%, with a higher incidence in female patients. A significantly higher risk of this complication was correlated with lag-screw tip positioning in the upper part of the femoral head in the anteroposterior radiological view, posterior in the latero-lateral radiological view, and in the Cleveland peripheral zones. The tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance were found to be highly significant predictors of the risk of cut-out at cut-offs of 30.7 mm and 37.3 mm, respectively, but the former appeared more reliable than the latter in predicting the occurrence of this complication. Conclusion. The tip-apex distance remains the most accurate predictor of cut-out, which is significantly greater above a cut-off of 30.7 mm. Cite this article: G. Caruso, M. Bonomo, G. Valpiani, G. Salvatori, A. Gildone, V. Lorusso, L. Massari. A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:481–488. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2016-0299.R1

Introduction and Objective. Trochanteric fractures are associated with increasing incidence and represent serious adverse effect of osteoporosis. Their cephalomedullary nailing in poor bone stock can be challenging and associated with insufficient implant fixation in the femoral head. Despite ongoing implant improvements, the rate of mechanical complications in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures is high. Recently, two novel concepts for nailing with use of a helical blade – with or without bone cement augmentation – or an interlocking screw have demonstrated advantages as compared with single screw systems regarding rotational stability and cut-out resistance. However, these two concepts have not been subjected to direct biomechanical comparison so far. The aims of this study were to investigate in a human cadaveric model with low bone density (1) the biomechanical competence of cephalomedullary nailing with use of a helical blade versus an interlocking screw, and (2) the effect of cement augmentation on the fixation strength of the helical blade. Materials and Methods. Twelve osteoporotic and osteopenic femoral pairs were assigned for pairwise implantation using either short TFN-ADVANCED Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) with a helical blade head element, offering the option for cement augmentation, or short TRIGEN INTERTAN Intertrochanteric Antegrade Nail (InterTAN) with an interlocking screw. Six osteoporotic femora, implanted with TFNA, were augmented with 3 ml cement. Four study groups were created – group 1 (TFNA) paired with group 2 (InterTAN), and group 3 (TFNA augmented) paired with group 4 (InterTAN). An unstable pertrochanteric OTA/AO 31-A2.2 fracture was simulated. All specimens were biomechanically tested until failure under progressively increasing cyclic loading featuring physiologic loading trajectory, with monitoring via motion tracking. Results. T-score in groups 3 and 4 was significantly lower compared with groups 1 and 2, p=0.03. Stiffness (N/mm) in groups 1 to 4 was 335.7+/−65.3, 326.9+/−62.2, 371.5+/−63.8 and 301.6+/−85.9, being significantly different between groups 3 and 4, p=0.03. Varus (°) and femoral head rotation around neck axis (°) after 10,000 cycles were 1.9+/−0.9 and 0.3+/−0.2 in group 1, 2.2+/−0.7 and 0.7+/−0.4 in group 2, 1.5+/−1.3 and 0.3+/−0.2 in group 3, and 3.5+/−2.8 and 0.9+/−0.6 in group 4, both with significant difference between groups 3 and 4, p<=0.04. Cycles to failure and failure load (N) at 5° varus in groups 1 to 4 were 21428+/−6020 and 1571.4+/−301.0, 20611+/−7453 and 1530.6+/−372.7,21739+/−4248 and 1587.0+/−212.4, and 18622+/−6733 and 1431.1+/−336.7, both significantly different between groups 3 and 4, p=0.04. Conclusions. From a biomechanical perspective, cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures with use of helical blades is comparable to interlocking screw fixation in femoral head fragments with low bone density. Moreover, bone cement augmentation of helical blades considerably improves their fixation strength in poor bone quality

INTRODUCTION. Intramedullary nail fixation has been used for successful treatment of long bone fracture such as humerus, tibia and femur. We look at the experience of our trauma unit in treating long bone fracture using the AO approved Expert femoral/tibial nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). We look at the union and complication rates in patients treated with AO approved nailing system for pertrochanteric, femoral and tibial shaft fracture. METHODS. We carried out retrospective case notes review of patients that underwent femoral and tibial nailing during the period of study- October 2007 to August 2009. All patients were treated using the AO approved nailing system. We identified all trauma patients that underwent femoral and tibial nailing through the trauma register. Further information was then obtained by going through medical notes and reviewing all followed-up X-rays stored within the online radiology system. RESULTS. 149 patients, 85 male and 64 female were included into the study. 150 procedures were carried out during period of study as 1 patient underwent conversion of lateral entry femoral nail to PFNA due to refracture. Patients' age ranged from 14-96 with mean of 55. 140 patients had isolated long bone fracture (either femur or tibia) compared to 9 patients with multiple bone fractures. Our unit performed 64 Expert tibial nail, 36 PFNA, 31 Expert lateral entry femoral nail and 19 Expert retrograde femoral nail during period of study. 13 patients treated with intramedullary nail sustained open fracture, 9 of them were compound tibial fracture compared to 4 compound femoral fractures. All patients were followed-up between 2 to 24 months or until death. 9 out of 17 patients that died in this study had diagnosis of tumour. Complication rates were 17% for Expert tibial nail (1 patient with valgus deformity, peroneal nerve palsy and delayed union, 3 with delayed union, 4 with broken locking screw, 2 with wound infection and 1 with abscess over wound site), 4% for lateral/retrograde femoral nail (1 each for pulmonary embolism and broken locking screw) and 4% for PFNA (1 each for delayed union and deep vein thrombosis). The overall complication rates were 10% from this study. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that the AO approved nailing system used for treating pertrochanteric, femoral and tibial fractures were effective with high union rate. The overall complication rates were 10% from this study. Complication rates for tibial nail were as high as 17% compared to 4% for femoral nail or PFNA. The complication rates for PFNA in our study were lower compared to 29% in PFN that was reported in one literature

Introduction. Aged trauma patients with proximal femur fractures are prone to various complications. They may be associated with their comorbidities which also need to be adressed. These complications limit the patient”s postoperative health status and subsequently their activity and independency. As an attempt to improve the postoperative management of aged hip fracture patients a better understanding of the postoperative condition in these patients is necessary. Therefore, this meta-analysis is intended to provide an overview of postoperative complications in the elderly hip fracture patients and to improve the understanding of an adequate postoperative management. Material and method. Medline was used to screen for studies reporting on the complication rates of hip fracture patients > 65 years. The search criteria were: “proximal femur fracture, elderly, complication”. In addition to surgical studies, internal medicine and geriatric studies were also included. Randomized studies, retrospective studies as well as observation studies were included. Furthermore, reoperation rates as well as treatment-related complications were recorded. The 1-year mortality was calculated as outcome parameter. Results. Overall 54 studies were enrolled, published between 2011 and 2016. The mean age of the 9812 patients was 81 years (65–99 years). Follow-up was at least one year. The reoperation rate after osteosynthesis of pertrochanteric femur fractures was 8.7%. The reoperation rate was dependent on the type of fracture and the surgical method. Pneumonia (9,5%) and urinary tract infections (27%) were the most common postoperative infections. With 23%, delirium was one of the most common medical complications. The 1-year mortality rate was 18.7%. Conclusion. Orthogeriatric patients represent a complex patient population. Addressing the special needs of elderly patients reduces postoperative complications. Establishing comanagement or orthogeriatric wards can also be helpful to manage comorbidities and postoperative complications. It is important to not only choose the proper surgical procedure but to monitor orthogeriatric patients closely during their hospitalization

Background. A large proportion of the expense incurred due to hip fractures arises due to secondary factors such as duration of hospital stay and additional theatre time due to surgical complications. Studies have shown that the use of intramedullary (IM) nail fixation presents a statistically higher risk of re-fracture than plating, which has been attributed to the stress riser at the end of the nail. It is not clear, however, if this situation also applies to unstable fractures, for which plating has a higher fixation failure rate. Moreover, biomechanical studies to date have not considered newer designs of IM nails which have been specifically designed to better distribute weight-bearing loads. This aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the re-fracture risk produced by a newer type of nailing system compared to an equivalent plate. Methods. Experimental testing was conducted using fourth generation Sawbones composite femurs and X-Bolt IM hip nail (n=4) and fracture plate (n=4) implants. An unstable pertrochanteric fracture pattern was used (AO classification: 31-A1 / 31-A2). Loading was applied along the peak loading vector experienced during walking, up to a maximum load of 500N. The risk of re-fracture was evaluated from equivalent strains measured using four rosette strain gauges on the surface of the bone at known stress riser locations. Results. Strain gauge readings determined that the equivalent strains in the femoral diaphysis were approximately 25% larger for the nail than the plate (p < 0.005). The strain levels at the location coinciding with the end of the plate were also larger for the nail, but not significantly (p > 0.26). Conclusions. Although the risk of re-fracture for displaced tronchantaric fractures was found to be larger for nailing than plating, measured strains were substantially lower than the failure strain of cortical bone (even when scaled for full weight-bearing loads of 1800N). This indicates that fracture risk is not present in either implant for bone of healthy quality, but may still become problematic in highly osteoporotic patients. Level of Evidence. IIb - Evidence from at least one well designed experimental trial

Hip fractures constitute the most debilitating complication of osteoporosis with a steadily increasing incidence in an aging population. Intramedullary nailing of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures can be challenging because of poor implant anchorage in the femoral head. Recently, cement augmentation of PFNA blades with Polymethylmethycrylate (PMMA) has shown promising results by enhancing the cutout resistance in proximal femoral fractures. The aim of this biomechanical study was to assess the impact of cement augmentation on the fixation strength of TFNA blades and screws within the femoral head, and compare its effect with head elements placed in a center or antero–posterior off–center positions. Eight groups were formed out of 96 polyurethane foam specimens with low density, simulating isolated femoral heads with severe osteoporotic bone. The specimens in each group were implanted with either non–augmented or PMMA–augmented TFNA blades or screws in a center or antero–posterior off–center position, 7 mm anterior or 7 mm posterior. They were mechanically tested in a setup simulating an unstable pertrochanteric fracture with lack of postero–medial support and load sharing at the fracture gap. All specimens underwent progressively increasing cyclic loading until catastrophic construct failure. Varus–valgus and head rotation angles were monitored by an inclinometer mounted on the head. A varus collapse of 5° or a 10° head rotation were defined as the clinically relevant failure criterion. Load at failure for specimens with augmented TFNA head elements (screw center: 3799 N ± 326 (mean ± SD); blade center: 3228 N ± 478; screw off–center: 2680 N ± 182; blade off–center: 2591 N ± 244) was significantly higher compared to the respective non–augmented specimens (blade center: 1489 N ± 41; screw center: 1593 N ± 120; blade off–center: 1018 N ± 48; screw off–center: 515 N ± 73), p<0.001. In both non–augmented and augmented specimens, the failure load in center position was significantly higher compared to the respective off–center position, regardless of head element, p<0.001. Non–augmented TFNA blades in off–center position revealed significantly higher load at failure versus non–augmented screws in off–center position, p<0.001. Cement augmentation clearly enhances fixation stability of TFNA blades and screws. Non–augmented blades outperformed screws in antero–posterior off–center position. Positioning of TFNA blades in the femoral head is more forgiving than TFNA screws in terms of failure load. Augmentation with TFNA has not been approved by FDA

Summary. Biomechanically, a 2° screw deviation from the nominal axis in the PFLCP leads to significantly earlier implant failure. Screw deviation relies on a technical error on insertion, but in our opinion cannot be controlled intraoperatively with the existing instrumentation devices. Background. Several cases of clinical failure have been reported for the Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate (PFLCP). The current study was designed to investigate the failure mode and to explore biomechanically the underlying mechanism. Specifically, the study sought to determine if the observed failure was due to technical error on insertion or due to implant design. Methods. To exclude patient and fracture type related factors, an abstract foam block model simulating an unstable pertrochanteric fracture was created for three study groups with six specimens each (n=6). Group 1 was properly instrumented according to the manufacturer's guidelines. In Group 2 and 3, the first or second screw was placed in a posterior or anterior off-axis orientation by 2° measured in the transversal plane, respectively. Each construct was tested cyclically until failure using a test setup and protocol simulating complex axial and torsional loading. Radiographs were taken prior to and after the tests. Force, number of cycles and failure mode were compared. Results. The 2° screw deviation from the nominal axis led to significantly earlier construct failure in Group 2 and 3. The failure mode consisted of loosening of the off-axis screw due to disengagement with the plate, resulting in loss of construct stiffness and varus collapse of the fracture. Conclusions. In our biomechanical test setup, a screw deviation of only 2° from the nominal axis consistently led to the failure mode observed clinically. In our opinion, screw deviation mostly relies on technical error on insertion. But, proper screw insertion may be difficult or impossible with the existing instrumentation devices, especially as it cannot be controlled or guaranteed intraoperatively