Abstract. Ramp lesions are meniscocapsular or meniscosynovial tears associated with chronic ACL injury and are postulated to occur because of disruption of meniscotibial ligament. Various techniques have been described in literature for their diagnosis and repair. Each of the described techniques have had some concerns. The authors, hereby, describe a novel technique for RAMP repair. Our Technique. Patient is positioned supine with the knee at 90 degrees with a side support. Standard arthroscopic portals are established. Ramp lesions are visualised through a trans-notch approach and probed simultaneously using an 18-guage needle posteromedialy. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed a posteromedial (PM) portal is established. The edges of the tear are freshened from the PM portal using a shaver or rasp. Knee Scorpion device (Arthrex) is then introduced through the PM which is loaded with No. 0 Fibrewire (Arthrex) in its lower jaw. The Scorpion device is deployed on the capsular side first, avoiding injury to the posterior structures and the suture loop is retrieved. Scorpion is loaded again with the other strand and is passed through the meniscal edge. A sliding knot is used. Ramp lesion is re-probed after tying a sliding knot for requirement of another suture. This technique provides us with an improved visualisation and diagnosis, better quality of debridement and complete closure of the ramp lesion using a simple suture device. In our experience this is a safe, successful and easily reproducible technique

The purpose of this project was to evaluate North American trauma surgeon preferences regarding patient positioning for antegrade fixation of mid shaft femoral shaft fractures. This project was a cross sectional survey taken of orthopaedic fellows and staff surgeons, belonging to three organizations across North America. An estimated sample size was calculated a priori, while various online techniques were utilized to reduce non responder and fatigue bias. The survey was distributed multiple times to optimize yield. Two hundred twelve (212) participants responded in full, 134 (56%) of whom practiced in Canada. The majority of surgeons worked in level one trauma centres (74%), while 72% treated more than one femoral shaft fracture per week. The most common patient position for mid shaft fixation amongst all surgeons was lateral positioning with manual traction (68%), however community surgeons were significantly more likely to use a fracture table. The most common difficulties faced with using a fracture table were inability to achieve fracture reduction and peroneal nerve palsies. The majority (64%) of surgeons quoted a complication rate with fracture tables of greater than 1 per 100 cases. Lateral position with use of manual traction is the preferred set up for antegrade fixation of femoral shaft fracture in this large North American cohort of trauma surgeons. However, a large subset of community and non academic surgeons still prefer use of the fracture table. Amongst all respondents, a high rate of fracture table complications, including malreduction, were quoted. To date, there is no prospective data comparing these two options for patient positioning, and a randomized controlled trial may be an appropriate next step

Abstract. Background. With the increasingly accepted method of suprapatellar tibial nailing for tibial shaft fractures, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of infrapatellar (IP) vs suprapatellar (SP) tibial nails. Methods. A retrospective cohort analysis of 58 patients. 34 SP tibial nails over 3 years versus 24 IP tibial nails over a similar time frame. We compared; radiation exposure, patient positioning time (PPT), non-union rate and follow-up time. Knee pain in the SP group was evaluated, utilising the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Results. 58 patients with a mean age of 43 years were included. Mean intraoperative radiation dose for SP nails was 61.78cGy (range 11.60 to 156.01cGy) vs 121.09cGy (range 58.01 to 18.03cGy) for IP nails (p < 0.05). Mean PPT for SP nails was 10 minutes vs 18 minutes for IP nails (p < 0.05). All fractures united in the SP group vs one non-union in the IP group. Mean follow-up was 5.5 months vs 11 months in the SP and IP group respectively. Mean KOOS was 7 (range 0 to 22) at 6 months for the SP group. Conclusion. The semi extended position (SP group) leads to reduced radiation exposure because of ease of imaging. All Patients in the SP group showed improved outcomes, with shorter follow-up and fracture union. The KOOS revealed SP nail patients had minimal pain and good knee function. This study establishes a management and PROMs baseline for ongoing evaluation of SP nails

Neuromuscular scoliosis patients face rates of major complications of up to 49%. Along with pre-operative risk reduction strategies (including nutritional and bone health optimization), intra-operative strategies to decrease blood loss and decrease surgical time may help mitigate these risks. A major contributor to blood loss and surgical time is the insertion of instrumentation which is challenging in neuromuscular patient given their abnormal vertebral and pelvic anatomy. Standard pre-operative radiographs provide minimal information regarding pedicle diameter, length, blocks to pedicle entry (e.g. iliac crest overhang), or iliac crest orientation. To minimize blood loss and surgical time, we developed an “ultra-low dose” CT protocol without sedation for neuromuscular patients. Our prospective quality improvement study aimed to determine: if ultra-low dose CT without sedation was feasible given the movement disorders in this population; what the radiation exposure was compared to standard pre-operative imaging; whether the images allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy and intra-operative navigation given the ultra-low dose and potential movement during the scan. Fifteen non-ambulatory surgical patients with neuromuscular scoliosis received the standard spine XR and an ultra-low dose CT scan. Charts were reviewed for etiology of neuromuscular scoliosis and medical co-morbidities. The CT protocol was a high-speed, high-pitch, tube-current modulated acquisition at a fixed tube voltage. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction was applied to soft-tissue and bone kernels to mitigate noise. Radiation dose was quantified using reported dose indices (computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP)) and effective dose (E), calculated through Monte-Carlo simulation. Statistical analysis was completed using a paired student's T-test (α = 0.05). CT image quality was assessed for its use in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation using 7D Surgical System Spine Module (7D Surgical, Toronto, Canada). Eight males and seven females were included in the study. Their average age (14±2 years old), preoperative Cobb angle (95±21 degrees), and kyphosis (60±18 degrees) were recorded. One patient was unable to undergo the ultra-low dose CT protocol without sedation due to a co-diagnosis of severe autism. The average XR radiation dose was 0.5±0.3 mSv. Variability in radiographic dose was due to a wide range in patient size, positioning (supine, sitting), number of views, imaging technique and body habitus. Associated CT radiation metrics were CTDIvol = 0.46±0.14 mGy, DLP = 26.2±8.1 mGy.cm and E = 0.6±0.2 mSv. CT radiation variability was due to body habitus and arm orientation. The radiation dose differences between radiographic and CT imaging were not statistically significant. All CT scans had adequate quality for preoperative assessment of pedicle diameter and orientation, obstacles impeding pedicle entry, S2-Alar screw orientation, and intra-operative navigation. “Ultra-low dose” CT scans without sedation were feasible in paediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. The effective dose was similar between the standard preoperative spinal XR and “ultra-low dose” CT scans. The “ultra-low dose” CT scan allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy, aided in pre-operative planning, and allowed intra-operative navigation despite the movement disorders in this patient population

Neuromuscular scoliosis patients face rates of major complications of up to 49%. Along with pre-operative risk reduction strategies (including nutritional and bone health optimization), intra-operative strategies to decrease blood loss and decrease surgical time may help mitigate these risks. A major contributor to blood loss and surgical time is the insertion of instrumentation which is challenging in neuromuscular patient given their abnormal vertebral and pelvic anatomy. Standard pre-operative radiographs provide minimal information regarding pedicle diameter, length, blocks to pedicle entry (e.g. iliac crest overhang), or iliac crest orientation. To minimize blood loss and surgical time, we developed an “ultra-low dose” CT protocol without sedation for neuromuscular patients. Our prospective quality improvement study aimed to determine:. if ultra-low dose CT without sedation was feasible given the movement disorders in this population;. what the radiation exposure was compared to standard pre-operative imaging;. whether the images allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy and intra-operative navigation given the ultra-low dose and potential movement during the scan. Fifteen non-ambulatory surgical patients with neuromuscular scoliosis received the standard spine XR and an ultra-low dose CT scan. Charts were reviewed for etiology of neuromuscular scoliosis and medical co-morbidities. The CT protocol was a high-speed, high-pitch, tube-current modulated acquisition at a fixed tube voltage. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction was applied to soft-tissue and bone kernels to mitigate noise. Radiation dose was quantified using reported dose indices (computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP)) and effective dose (E), calculated through Monte-Carlo simulation. Statistical analysis was completed using a paired student's T-test (α= 0.05). CT image quality was assessed for its use in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation using 7D Surgical System Spine Module (7D Surgical, Toronto, Canada). Eight males and seven females were included in the study. Their average age (14±2 years old), preoperative Cobb angle (95±21 degrees), and kyphosis (60±18 degrees) were recorded. One patient was unable to undergo the ultra-low dose CT protocol without sedation due to a co-diagnosis of severe autism. The average XR radiation dose was 0.5±0.3 mSv. Variability in radiographic dose was due to a wide range in patient size, positioning (supine, sitting), number of views, imaging technique and body habitus. Associated CT radiation metrics were CTDIvol = 0.46±0.14 mGy, DLP = 26.2±8.1 mGy.cm and E = 0.6±0.2 mSv. CT radiation variability was due to body habitus and arm orientation. The radiation dose differences between radiographic and CT imaging were not statistically significant. All CT scans had adequate quality for preoperative assessment of pedicle diameter and orientation, obstacles impeding pedicle entry, S2-Alar screw orientation, and intra-operative navigation. “Ultra-low dose” CT scans without sedation were feasible in paediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. The effective dose was similar between the standard preoperative spinal XR and “ultra-low dose” CT scans. The “ultra-low dose” CT scan allowed accurate assessment of the anatomy, aided in pre-operative planning, and allowed intra-operative navigation despite the movement disorders in this patient population

Aims

The use of fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgery creates risk of radiation exposure to surgeons. Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) can help mitigate this. The primary aim of this study was to assess if current radiation protection in orthopaedic trauma is safe. The secondary aims were to describe normative data of radiation exposure during common orthopaedic procedures, evaluate ways to improve any deficits in protection, and validate the use of electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) in assessing radiation dose in orthopaedic surgery.

The anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with a faster earlier functional recovery and has gained increasing utilization for primary THA exposure. However, some studies have suggested a higher risk of femoral complications, as well as difficulty with femoral exposure. Techniques of soft tissue releases have been described to offer better femoral exposure, and to help mitigate complications like femoral fracture or breach of the canal with broaching. However, appropriate titrated soft release remains important to decrease potential risk of dislocation. Here we present a suggested technique and hierarchy of soft tissue releases to adequately expose the femur. In addition, we discuss adjunctive table and patient position maneuvers for femoral exposure, as well as more extensile and revision techniques if necessary. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

During a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), intra-operative assessment of correction of acetabular parameters is typically performed using fluoroscopy of the hip, a technique that has not been shown to produce predictable measurements. Furthermore, paralysing agents are used in order to facilitate dissection and fragment mobilization. The effect of paralysing agents on spino-pelvic posture is yet to be investigated. This study aims to: 1. Compare the reliability of intra-operative x-rays versus hip fluoroscopy in the assessment of acetabular fragment correction and 2. Evaluate the effect of changes in spino-pelvic alignment on the assessment of acetabular correction. An IRB approved, retrospective review of all patients who underwent a PAO at our institution between 2006–2018 was performed. Patient demographic data was collected and all available imaging studies were retrieved. Patients were excluded if there was no available to review intra-operative AP pelvis x-ray or intra-operative fluoroscopic PA image of the hip. Using a validated hip analysis software (Hip2Norm), the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) of plain radiographs were measured. The sacro-femoral-pubic angle (SFP), along with the LCEA and AI of the fluoroscopic image were measured using ImageJ. A oneway ANOVA was used to detect differences between measured parameters in the intra-operative x-ray, the post-operative x-ray and the fluoroscopic image. A total of 93 patients were identified. 26 patients were excluded due to missing data. The mean LCEA in the post-operative, intra-operative, and fluoroscopic groups were as follows: 33.67° (range 5.3° to 52.4°), 30.71°(range 9° to 55.6°), and 29.23°(range 12.4° to 51.4°) respectively. The mean AI in the post-operative, intra-operative, and fluoroscopic groups were as follows: −0.65° (range −18.10° to 27.30°), 0.35°(range −16.10° to 17.20°), and 5.54°(range −11.66° to 27.83°) respectively. When comparing intra-operative to post-operative plain radiographs, there was no statistically significant difference in AI (ΔAI −1±1.29° p=0.71) or LCEA (ΔLCEA 2.95±1.38° p=0.09). When comparing fluoroscopy to post-operative plain radiographs, there was a statistically significant difference in AI (ΔAI −6.21±1.29° p < 0 .0001) as well as LCEA (ΔLCEA 4.44±1.38° p < 0 .0001). Statistical analysis revealed no influence of demographics (age, BMI, gender), on acetabular correction parameters. The mean SPF angles measured from intra-operative and post-operative x-rays were 69.32±5.11° and 70.45±5.52°. There was a statistically significant difference between these 2 measurements with a ΔSFP of 1.03° (p < 0 .0001). The results of our study show that the use of intra-operative x-ray for the assessment of LCEA and AI is more reliable than fluoroscopic images. Further, we found a difference in SFP angle, which offers an indirect assessment of pelvic tilt, between the intra-operative and the post-operative plain x-rays. This suggests that there are changes in pelvic tilt during the surgery, which can be attributed to either patient positioning or changes in spino-pelvic posture secondary to the paralysing agents used by the anesthetists. The use of intra-operative x-rays as well as the effect of paralysing agents on spino-pelvic alignment should be considered by surgeons performing PAO's

In the polytrauma patient, intraoperative patient positioning is one factor thought to influence pulmonary complications associated with intramedullary (IM) nailing of the femur. With regards to lateral femoral nailing, it is currently unknown as to whether the position of the injured lung contributes to changes in pulmonary function. It has been proposed that, similar to prone positioning in the ICU for acute respiratory distress syndrome management, having the injured lung in a dependent position during lateral femoral nailing would prevent barotrauma from hyperinflation and promote gas exchange in the non-dependent healthy lung. This study aims to assess the association between the position of the injured lung during lateral femoral nailing and pulmonary complications as determined by ICU LOS. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single level 1 trauma centre. All patients treated with IM nailing for femur fracture between 2006 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. Only patients who 1) underwent lateral femoral nailing and 2) had a significant chest injury, defined by chest Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of three or greater, were included. Patients with bilateral femur fractures or symmetric bilateral thoracic injuries were excluded. Intraoperative position of the lung injury was described depending on whether the injured lung was down, or in the dependent position, during lateral femoral nailing, versus the healthy lung down. The primary outcome was ICU LOS in all study patients. Secondary analysis was performed on the subgroup of patients who were admitted to ICU prior to femoral nailing. Data analysis assessing for differences in ICU LOS between groups was performed through Wilcoxan testing. One hundred and thirteen femur fractures were included in the study. During lateral femoral nailing, 53 patients had the injured lung down and 60 patients had the healthy lung down. No differences between age, ICU admission rate, injury severity score, chest AIS or head AIS were detected between the groups. There were no detectable differences in the rate of ICU admission between patients with the injured lung down (47.2%) and patients with the healthy lung down (46.7%) (P=0.96). We were unable to detect a difference in average ICU LOS between patients who had the injured lung down (4.9 days, 95% CI 2.8 – 7) compared to patients with the healthy lung down (6 days, 95% CI 3.7 – 8.4) during lateral femoral nailing (P=0.73). When looking only at patients who were admitted to ICU prior to femoral nailing, the LOS was 10.3 days (95% CI 7 – 13.7) in injured lung down patients compared to 12.9 days (9.2 – 16.6) in healthy lung down patients (P= 0.25). In patients with chest AIS greater than three, the position of the injured lung during lateral femoral IM nailing does not appear to affect ICU LOS

INTRODUCTION. Dislocation is one of the most frequent complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA), affecting an estimated 1% to 5% of THA patients. Malposition of the acetabular cup is thought to be a likely contributor. As the field searches for solutions, new experimental methods can help engineers, scientists, and surgeons better understand the problem as well as evaluate novel techniques and products. OBJECTIVES. Create a laboratory simulation to assess patient positioning and pelvic motion during THA. Apply this simulation to assess (1) variation in patient positioning; (2) various methods to identify the pelvic plane via palpated anatomic landmarks. METHODS. A patient surrogate was developed to recreate patient-like modality, palpation, and motion, especially focusing on the spine's influence on pelvic flexion and rotation. Five different registration methods were evaluated (3 supine, 2 lateral decubitus). An ASIS-to-ASIS measurement was always used in calculations. The other axes measured were: 1) supine/trunk; 2) supine/ASIS-to-Pubis; 3) supine/neutral femoral axis; 4) LD/spine; and 5) LD/trunk. Three infrared LED markers were attached to the iliac spine of the surrogate's pelvis and monitored with an Optotrak Certus motion-tracking camera (Northern Digital). A second sensor was mounted to the top of a patient positioner (Innomed) to measure the orientation of the pelvis relative to the positioner. A third sensor was mounted to a set of calipers, which were aligned with anatomic landmarks during registration. To compare results from registration methods, a reference orientation of the pelvis was recorded by digitizing landmarks comprising the anterior pelvic plane (APP). The APP is the plane created by three points: the left ASIS, right ASIS, and midpoint of pubic tubercles. Theoretical pelvic orientation was calculated using these digitized points. The vectors generated from the gross anatomic registration steps were used to calculate the measured orientation of the pelvis compared to theoretical. The rotation, or error, matrix between theoretical and measured pelvic orientations was computed and then projected on an APP coordinate system to translate the error matrix to cup inclination and version. RESULTS. Inter- and intra-operator variability was good for most registration methods. The error in cup orientation when compared to the Lewinnek zone is promising. Of the 92 registrations, 91 (99%) were within the Lewinnek abduction range (30°–50°), 80 (87%) were within the Lewinnek version range (5°–25°), and 79 (85%) were within the range for both. When only considering the supine trunk and ASIS-pubis registrations, all 37 calculated cup orientations were within the Lewinnek zone. CONCLUSIONS. By aligning an instrument with rigid body markers along two vectors, operators were able to create a patient coordinate system that translated to error of cup inclination and version of only a few degrees from the theoretical target. The laboratory simulation developed in this study will aid scientists and engineers in evaluating novel patient positioning solutions for THA. While further research with more operators and perhaps cadaveric tissue is warranted to confirm these results, there is promise that a simple and intuitive patient registration method may reduce variation in cup placement during THA

Introduction. Component position and overall limb alignment following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to influence device survivorship and clinical outcomes. However current methods for measuring post-operative alignment through 2D radiographs and CTs may be prone to inaccuracies due to variations in patient positioning, and certain anatomical configurations such as rotation and flexion contractures. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new vector based method for overall limb alignment and component position measurements using CT. The technique utilizes a new mathematical model to calculate prosthesis alignment from the coordinates of anatomical landmarks. The hypothesis is that the proposed technique demonstrated good accuracy to surgical plan, as well as low intra and inter-observer variability. Methods. This study received institutional review board approval. A total of 30 patients who underwent robotic assisted TKA (RATKA) at four different sites between March 2017 and January 2018 were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, non-randomized clinical study. CT scans were performed prior to and 4–6 weeks post-operatively. Each subject was positioned headfirst supine with the legs in a neutral position and the knees at full extension. Three separate CT scans were performed at the anatomical location of the hip, knee, and ankle joint. Hip, knee, and ankle images were viewed in 3D software and the following vertices were generated using anatomical landmarks: Hip Center (HC), Medial Epicondyle Sulcus (MES), Lateral Epicondyle (LE), Femur Center (FC), Tibia Center (TC), Medial Malleolus (MM), Lateral Malleolus (LM), Femur Component Superior (FCS), Femur Component Inferior (FCI), Coronal Femoral Lateral (CFL), Coronal Femoral Medial (CFM), Coronal Tibia Lateral (CTL), and Coronal Tibia Medial (CTM). Limb alignment and component positions were calculated from these vertices using a new mathematical model. The measurements were compared to the surgeons’ operative plan and component targeted positions for accuracy analysis. Two analysts performed the same measurements separately for inter-observer variability analysis. One of the two analysts repeated the measurements at least 30 days apart to assess intra-observer variability. Correlation analysis was performed on the intra-observer analysis, while Bland Altman analysis was performed on the inter-observer analysis. Results. Average measurement errors of overall limb alignments, femoral and tibial component position were less than 1 degree. Bland Altman plots for inter-observer analysis demonstrate great reproducibility in limb and component alignment measurements between surgeons with no bias. Correlation plots for intra-observer analysis demonstrate low variability with slopes ranging between 0.86 to 1.00 and R value greater than 0.88. Discussion. The proposed method demonstrated good accuracy to plan and low intra- and inter observer variability. This technique may be considered for assessing component position accuracy with post-operative CTs. Further studies are needed to investigate the robustness of the method in a larger cohort. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

INTRODUCTION. Acetabular cup malpositioning has been implicated in instability and wear-related complications after total hip arthroplasty. Although computer navigation and robotic assistance have been shown to improve the precision of implant placement, most surgeons use mechanical and visual guides to place acetabular components. Authors have shown that, when using a bean bag positioner, mechanical guides are misleading as they are unable to account for the variability in pelvic orientation during positioning and surgery. However, more rigid patient positioning devices may allow for more accurate free hand cup placement. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the ability of rigid devices to afford surgeons with ideal pelvic positioning throughout surgery. The purpose of this study is to utilize robotic-arm assisted computer navigation to assess the reliability of pelvic position in total hip arthroplasty performed on patients positioned with rigid positioning devices. METHODS. 100 hips (94 patients) prospectively underwent total hip Makoplasty in the lateral decubitus position from the posterior approach; 77 stabilized by universal lateral positioner, and 23 by peg board. After dislocation but prior to reaming, one fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeon manually placed the robotic arm parallel to both the longitudinal axis of the patient and the horizontal surface of the operating table, which, if the pelvis were oriented perfectly, would represent 0 degrees of anteversion and 0 degrees of inclination. The CT-templated computer software then generated true values of this perceived zero degrees of anteversion and inclination based on the position of the robot arm registered to a preoperative pelvic CT. Therefore, variations in pelvic positioning are represented by these robotic navigation generated values. To assure the accuracy of robotic measurements, cup anteversion and inclination at times of impaction were recorded and compared to those calculated via the trigonometric ellipse method of Lewinnek on standardized 3 months postoperative X-rays. RESULTS. Mean alteration in anteversion and inclination values were 1.7 degrees (absolute value 5.3 degrees, range −20 – 20 degrees) and 1.6 degrees (absolute value 2.6 degrees, range −8 – 10 degrees) respectively. 22% of anteversion values were altered by >10 degrees; 41% by > 5 degrees. There was no difference between positioners (p=0.36) and regression analysis revealed that anteversion differences were correlated with BMI (p=0.02). Robotic navigation acetabular cup anteversion (mean 21.8 degrees) was not different from postoperative X-ray anteversion (mean 21.9 degrees)(p=0.50), nor was robotic navigation acetabular cup inclination (mean 40.6 degrees) different from postoperative X-ray inclination (mean 40.5 degrees)(p=0.34). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Rigid pelvic positioning devices present 5 to 20 degrees of variability in acetabular cup orientation, particularly with regards to anteversion. Compounding this with 20 degree safe zones and prior author demonstrations that human error is prone to 10 degrees of anteversion inaccuracy in a fixed pelvis model, there is a clear need to pay particular attention to anatomic landmarks or computer assisted techniques to assure accurate acetabular cup positioning. Patient positioning by itself should not be trusted

The direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA) is growing in popularity. This growth is fueled by interest from surgeons and patients alike, both of whom are in search of improved outcomes in THA. While the benefits of the approach are likely less pronounced than some marketing claims made, delivering a surgical recovery that has less pain and faster function is of significant value to today's patient. Published data has demonstrated subtle improvement in pain and function when compared with both the lateral and posterior approaches. Usually these clinical results are equivalent by 2 or 3 months post-operative. This can lead to accelerated recovery, a shorter length of stay, and a more cost-effective result. Some surgeons have utilised this approach as they implement outpatient THA as well. Another added benefit is that a supine patient positioning allows for easy implementation of intra-operative fluoroscopy, which has been shown to reduce outliers in component positioning. Improved component positioning has the potential to reduce dislocation rates, lower bearing wear, and improve longevity. While image guided implant positioning can be used with any approach or patient position, it is efficient, affordable, and available to implement with the anterior approach. Using intra-operative imaging requires learning how to use and interpret the image, because incorrect utilization of fluoroscopy can be as harmful as it can be helpful. Surgeons who are contemplating adapting the approach in practice must be aware of the potential pitfalls and learning curve, as studies have demonstrated increased operative time, blood loss, and peri-operative complications in the early cases. However, with appropriate training, patient selection, and implementation, the approach can be safely used in all THA patients

Introduction. Accurate prosthetic cup placement is very important in total hip arthroplasty (THA). When the surgeon is impacting the acetabular cup, it is assumed that the patient's pelvis is perpendicular to the operating table. In reality the pelvis may not be truly lateral, and error in patient positioning may influence the resultant cup orientation. Objectives. The primary aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of patient positioning prior to THA. A secondary aim was to see if patient BMI influenced the accuracy of positioning. Method. A consecutive series of 36 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were investigated. Once the lead surgeon believed that the patient had been correctly positioned in lateral decubitus, a lateral fluoroscopic image of the pelvis was taken. The C-arm of the image intensifier was manipulated in two planes until a proper lateral view of the hip was obtained, defined as when the native acetabulae overlapped. The number of degrees of positioning error in two planes (coronal, axial) was recorded, along with the patient's BMI. Results. Only 6 patients (17%) were positioned within 2° of true lateral in both planes. A further 20 patients (56%) had an error of 5° or more in at least one plane. In the axial plane the mean error was 2.9° and 7 patients (19%) were tilted by 5 degrees or more. In the coronal plane the mean error was 3.1° and 14 patients (39%) were tilted by 5 degrees or more. A statistically significant correlation was shown between patient BMI and combined error in the two planes (R=0.47, P < 0.01). Conclusion. Large errors can occur frequently and these may pass by unnoticed without the use of an image intensifier. Further research into the clinical significance of this finding would help decide if the use of fluoroscopy to aid patient positioning should be routine

Good clinical outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) demand the ability to plan a surgery precisely and measure the outcome accurately. In comparison with plain radiograph, CT-based 3D planning offers several advantages. More specifically, CT has the benefits of avoiding errors resulting from magnification and inaccurate patient positioning. Additional benefits include the assessment in the axial plane and the replacement of 2D projections with 3D data. The concern on 3D CT-based planning, however, lies in the increase of radiation dosage to the patients. An alternative is to reconstruct a patient-specific 3D model of the complete lower extremity from 2D X-ray radiographs. This study presents a clinical validation of a novel technology called “3XPlan” which allows for 3D prosthesis planning using 2D X-ray radiographs. After a local institution review board (IRB) approval, 3XPlan was evaluated on 24 patients TKA. Pre-operatively, all the patients underwent a CT scan according to a standard protocol. Image acquisition consisted of three separate short spiral axial scans: 1) ipsilateral hip, 2) affected knee and 3) ipsilateral ankle. All the CT images were segmented to extract 3D surface models of both femur and tibia, which were regarded as the ground truth. Additionally, 2 X-ray images were acquired for each affected leg and were used in 3XPlan to derive patient-specific models of the leg. For 3D models derived from both modalities (CT vs. X-ray), five most relevant anatomical parameters for planning TKA were measured and compared with each other. Except for tibial torsion, the average differences for all other anatomical parameters are smaller than or close to 3 degrees

Background. The current orthopaedic literature demonstrates a clear relationship between acetabular component positioning, polyethylene wear and risk of dislocation following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Problems with edge loading, stripe wear and squeaking are also associated with higher acetabular inclination angles, particularly in hard-on-hard bearing implants. The important parameters of acetabular component positioning are depth, height, version and inclination. Acetabular component depth, height and version can be controlled with intra-operative reference to the transverse acetabular ligament. Control of acetabular component inclination, particularly in the lateral decubitus position, is more difficult and remains a challenge for the Orthopaedic Surgeon. Lewinnek et al described a ‘safe zone’ of acetabular component orientation: Radiological acetabular inclination of 40 ± 10° and radiological anteversion of 15 ± 10°. Accurate implantation of the acetabular component within the ‘safe zone’ of radiological inclination is dependent on operative inclination, operative version and pelvic position. Traditionally during surgery, the acetabular component has been inserted with an operative inclination of 45°. This assumes that patient positioning is correct and does not take into account the impact of operative anteversion or patient malpositioning. However, precise patient positioning in order to orientate acetabular components using this method cannot always be relied upon. Hill et al demonstrated a mean 6.9° difference between photographically simulated radiological inclination and the post-operative radiological inclination. The most likely explanation was felt to be adduction of the uppermost hemipelvis in the lateral decubitus position. The study changed the practice of the senior author, with target operative inclination now 35° rather than 40° as before, aiming to achieve a post-operative radiological inclination of 42° ± 5°. Aim. To determine which of the following three techniques of acetabular component implantation most accurately obtains a desired operative inclination of 35 degrees:. Freehand. Modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide, or. Digital inclinometer assisted. Methods. 270 patients undergoing primary uncemented THA were randomised to one of the three methods of acetabular component implantation. Target operative inclination for all three techniques was 35°. Operative inclination was measured intra-operatively using both a digital inclinometer and stereophotogrammetric system. For both the freehand and Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation techniques, the surgeon was blinded to intra-operative digital inclinometer readings. Results. The freehand implantation technique had an operative inclination range of 25.2 – 43.2° (Mean 32.9°, SD 2.90°). The modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation technique had an operative inclination range of 29.3 – 39.3° (Mean 33.7°, SD 1.89°). The digital inclinometer assisted technique had an operative inclination range of 27.5 – 37.5° (Mean 34.0°, SD 1.57°). Mean unsigned deviation from target 35° operative inclination was 2.92° (SD 2.03) for the freehand implantation technique, 1.83° (SD 1.41) for the modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide implantation technique and 1.28° (SD 1.33) for the digital inclinometer assisted technique. Conclusions. When aiming for 35° of operative inclination, the digital inclinometer technique appears more accurate than either the freehand or Mechanical Alignment Guide techniques. In order to improve accuracy of acetabular component orientation during Total Hip Arthroplasty, the surgeon should consider using such a technique

We perform the direct approach using a standard radiolucent operative table with extender at the foot, and the assistance of fluoroscopy. The patient is positioned supine with the pubic symphysis aligned at the table break. The anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and center of the knee are marked, and a line drawn between. The incision commences proximally from two finger breadths distal and two finger breadths lateral to the ASIS, and extends distally 8–10 cm. Using fluoroscopy, the anterior aspect femoral neck is located. The incision is placed over the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter, which avoids the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. The tensor fascia lata is identified, which has a distinctive purple hue, and dissected free from the intermuscular septum lateral to the sartorius and the rectus muscles. The deep, investing aponeurosis of the tensor fascia lata is split using a tonsil. Just below lie the lateral circumflex vessels, two veins and one artery, which must be either ligated or cauterised. A retractor is placed superior to the femoral neck over top of the superior hip capsule. A blunt, cobra-type retractor is then placed along the inferior femoral neck, deep to the rectus muscle and the rectus tendon. A sharp retractor is then used to peel the rectus off from the anterior capsule and placed over the anterior rim of the acetabulum. An anterior capsulectomy is performed. A saw blade is positioned for femoral neck resection and confirmed with fluoroscopy. After resection, acetabular retractors are placed, the socket is reamed, the cup is placed, and position confirmed with fluoroscopy. Turning to the femoral side, the surgeon palpates underneath and around the tensor, around the lateral aspect of the femur, proximal to the gluteus maximus tendon, and places a bone hook around the proximal femur. Femoral preparation and stem insertion require maneuvering the table and adjusting the patient position. The table is “jack-knifed” by lowering the foot of the table to approximately 45 degrees and placing the bed into approximately 15 degrees of Trendelenburg. The contralateral well leg is placed on the padded Mayo stand. A table-mounted femur elevator is attached to the bed, requiring a change in surgical gloves, and attached to the traction hook around the proximal femur. Gentle retraction is placed on the femur to tension the capsule. As the capsule is released the femur will begin to come up/out of the wound and into view. With increasing gentle retraction via the table-mounted hook, the femur is elevated. Simultaneously, the operative limb is externally rotated and adducted underneath the non-operative leg in a lazy “figure of 4” position by the assistant. The use of a “broach-only” stem design is preferred as direct straight reaming of the femur is difficult in most cases. Fluoroscopic images are obtained to confirm femoral implant positioning, offset, neck and leg length. A standardised rapid recovery hospitalization and rehabilitation protocol is used in all cases

Introduction. Coronal misalignment of the lower limbs is closely related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. In cases of severe genu varus or valgus, evaluating this alignment can assist in choosing specific surgical strategies. Furthermore, restoring satisfactory alignment after total knee replacement promotes longevity of the implant and better functional results. Knee coronal alignment is typically evaluated with the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle. It is generally measured on standing AP long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, patient positioning influences the accuracy of this 2D measurement. A new 3D method to measure coronal lower limb alignment using low-dose EOS images has recently been developed and validated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relevance of this technique when determining knee coronal alignment in a referral population, and more specifically to evaluate how the HKA angle measured with this 3D method differs from conventional 2D methods. Materials and methods. 70 patients (140 lower extremities) were studied for 2D and 3D lower limb alignment measurements. Each patient received AP monoplane and biplane acquisition of their entire lower extremities on the EOS system according the classical protocols for LLR. For each patient, the HKA angle was measured on this AP X-ray with a 2D viewer. The biplane acquisition was used to perform stereoradiographic 3D modeling. Valgus angulation was considered positive, varus angulation negative. Student's T-test was used to determine if there was a bias in the HKA angle measurement between these two methods and to assess the effect of flexion/hyperextension, femoral rotation and tibial rotation on the 2D measurements. One operator did measurements 2 times. Results. The average total dose for both acquisitions was 0.75mGy (± 0.11mGy). The 2D and 3D measurements are reported in table 1. Intraoperator reliability was >0,99 for all measurements. In the whole series, 2D–3D HKA differences were >2° in 34% of cases, >3° in 22% of cases, >5° in 9% of cases and >10° in 3% of cases >10°. We compared 2D and 3D measurements according to the degree of flessum/recurvatum (> or <5° and > or <10°). The results are reported in table 2. The statistical analysis of parameters influencing 2D/3D measurements is reported in table 3. Discussion and conclusion. The HKA angle is typically assessed from 2D long-leg radiographs. However, several studies highlighted that 2D assessment of this angle may be affected by patient's positioning. Radtke showed that lower limb rotation during imaging significantly affected measurements of coronal plane knee alignment. Brouwer showed that axial rotation had an even greater effect on the apparent limb alignment on AP radiographs when the knee was flexed. This last finding is particularly relevant as many lower extremities present some amount of flexion or hyperextension, especially in aging subjects. This low dose biplanar EOS acquisitions provide a more accurate evaluation of coronal alignment compared to 2D, eliminating bias due to wrong knee positioning. This study points out the interest of EOS in outliers patients and opens new perspectives for preoperative planning and postoperative control of deformity correction or knee joint replacement

Total hip replacement is among the most successful interventions in medicine and has been termed “The Operation of the Century”. Most major problems have been solved including femoral fixation, acetabular fixation, and wear. With a success rate of over 95% at 10 years in both hip and knee arthroplasty in a number of studies, the question remains as to whether the current status quo is optimal or acceptable. The literature, however, reports are from centers that represent optimised results and registry data, including the Medicare database, indicates that substantial short-term problems persist. The major issue is the variability in the performance of the procedure. The inability to consistently position components, particularly the acetabular component, results in major problems including instability and limb length discrepancy. A report by Malchau, et al. reveals that even among the best surgeons, optimal acetabular component positioning is only achieved 50% of the time. The penalty for missing the target is increased incidence of instability, increased wear rate, and diminished function due to restricted motion. Complications are related to position and a major potential explanation is the impact of patient position. Traditional imaging presents a two-dimensional rather than three-dimensional view of the patient and the patient is in a supine, non-functional position at the time that imaging is performed. Adverse events attributed to malposition, however, occur in functional positions and there is evidence that the orientation of the pelvis changes from the supine position at which imaging is performed. This topic has been studied extensively on three continents and the consensus is that the pelvis shifts on the order of 30–40 degrees from the supine to standing and sitting and furthermore, the acetabular component position changes proportionally with the rotation of the pelvis that occurs. How do we incorporate this information into imaging arthroplasty patients? This would require imaging the entire body, acquiring AP and lateral images simultaneously so that 3D imaging can be performed, performing imaging in a functional position (standing or sitting) and optimally at a lower radiation dose since these patients have repeated images and therefore a cumulative radiation dose over their lifetime. This technology was FDA approved for use in the hip and knee in 2011 and pilot studies have been performed at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis to validate the number of the hip and knee arthroplasty applications. In conclusion, weightbearing and rotation have substantial impact on the standard measurements obtained before and after hip and knee arthroplasty. These differences in measurements between supine, sitting, and standing as well as correction for rotation may explain the lack of a stronger correlation between component position and a variety of complications that are observed such as variability in wear rates as well as instability. In knee arthroplasty, the change in mechanical axis that occurs from restoring all of patients to a neutral mechanical axis may explain some of the persistent pain and dissatisfaction that has been recently been reported at a relatively high percentage of knee arthroplasty patients. Because of the numerous potential clinical implications of three-dimensional weightbearing imaging, it is likely that the future of arthroplasty imaging will focus on functional three-dimensional imaging of the patient

Background. The accuracy of cup placement in navigated THA depends on the bony landmark registration intraoperatively. The usual patient position for registration is supine, but supine position has some drawbacks such as it's more difficult for femoral canal visualisation. The alternate patient position is lateral decubitus, but registration in this position may be unreliable because of the contralateral ASIS can't be palpated accurately. The other technique is registration in supine position first and then placing the patient in lateral decubitus for operation. The drawbacks of this technique are time consumption and increased risk of contamination. We created a semilateral decubitus position which combined the advantage of supine position for registration and lateral decubitus position for better femoral canal visualisation. We modified the registration technique by compressing the soft tissue above Pubic Symphysis(PS) to the abdomen and registered at the Antero-Superior-Pubic-Symphysis(ASPS). Objective. Evaluate the accuracy of cup placement within the “safe zone” and the accuracy of imageless navigation measurement by comparing the intraoperative values of acetabular cup abduction and anteversion to postoperative computed tomography (CT) values. Method. The prospective study consisted of 30 patients who received short stem navigated THA in semilateral decubitus position from May to October 2012. The abduction and anteversion angle measured on postoperative CT were compared to the intraoperative measurement with a paired t-test and a correlation test at a 0.05 level of significance. Results. The mean CT abduction was 41.37° (range, 37° to 45°, SD 2.01) and the mean navigated abduction was 40.29° (range, 37.6° to 45.5°, SD 1.99). The mean paired difference was 1.26° (range, −0.8° to 4.6°, SD 1.05), this difference was significant (p = 0.02) but considered to be clinically irrelevant. There was a significant correlation between the CT abduction and navigated abduction (p < 0.001). All cases showed a difference of less than 5° between the two measurements and all cases were within the safe zone of CT measurement. The mean CT anteversion was 13.57° (range, 7° to 18°, SD 3.28) and the mean navigated anteversion was 11.18° (range, 5.9° to 15.5°, SD 2.52). The mean paired difference was 3.02° (range, −2.6° to 8.6°, SD 2.33), this difference was significant (p = 0.001) but considered to be clinically irrelevant. There was a significant correlation between the CT anteversion and navigated anteversion (p = 0.005). Twenty-two cases (22/30, 73%) showed a difference of less than 5° between the two measurements and all cases were within the safe zone of CT measurement. Soft tissue thickness overlying the PS and ASIS were measured in axial CT images and averaged 28.53 mm. (range, 11.7 to 54.6, SD 9.97) and 8.03 mm. (range, 3.2 to 26, SD 4.86) respectively. We found no significant correlation between the difference and the thickness of the soft tissue above the PS (p = 0.09) nor above ASIS (p = 0.09). Conclusion. The navigated THA with modified registration technique in semilateral decubitus position offered a more precise cup position. All cases were within the safe zone in both abduction and anteversion angles