Abstract
Abstract
Background
With the increasingly accepted method of suprapatellar tibial nailing for tibial shaft fractures, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of infrapatellar (IP) vs suprapatellar (SP) tibial nails.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis of 58 patients. 34 SP tibial nails over 3 years versus 24 IP tibial nails over a similar time frame. We compared; radiation exposure, patient positioning time (PPT), non-union rate and follow-up time. Knee pain in the SP group was evaluated, utilising the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS).
Results
58 patients with a mean age of 43 years were included. Mean intraoperative radiation dose for SP nails was 61.78cGy (range 11.60 to 156.01cGy) vs 121.09cGy (range 58.01 to 18.03cGy) for IP nails (p < 0.05). Mean PPT for SP nails was 10 minutes vs 18 minutes for IP nails (p < 0.05). All fractures united in the SP group vs one non-union in the IP group. Mean follow-up was 5.5 months vs 11 months in the SP and IP group respectively. Mean KOOS was 7 (range 0 to 22) at 6 months for the SP group.
Conclusion
The semi extended position (SP group) leads to reduced radiation exposure because of ease of imaging. All Patients in the SP group showed improved outcomes, with shorter follow-up and fracture union. The KOOS revealed SP nail patients had minimal pain and good knee function. This study establishes a management and PROMs baseline for ongoing evaluation of SP nails.
