The relevance of physical activity (PA) for general health and the value of assessing PA in the free-living environment especially for assessing orthopaedic conditions and outcome are discussed. Available methods for assessing PA such as self-reports, trackers, phone apps and clinical grade monitors are introduced. An overview of devices such as accelerometers for research quality assessments is given and aspects for choosing them such as wear location, usability or study population are reviewed. Basic principles to derive mobility parameters from the PA related sensor signals are presented. The symposium explains mobility parameters, their types, definitions, validity, analysis and those with particular relevance to assess orthopaedic conditions. The application of activity monitors is orthopaedic patient studies is demonstrated in various examples such as knee and hop osteoarthritis and total joint arthroplasty, in frail elderly subjects at fall risk or patients with shoulder pathologies.

Summary

Physical activity monitoring using a single accelerometer works reliably in clinical practice and is of added value as clinical outcome tool, as it provides objective and more precise information about a patient's activity compared to currently used questionnaires.

Background

Shoulder pain limits range of motion (ROM) and reduces performing activities of daily living (ADL). Objective assessment of shoulder function could be of interest for diagnosing shoulder pathology or functional assessment of the shoulder after therapy.

The feasibility of 2 wearable inertial sensors for functional assessment to differentiate between healthy subjects and patients with unilateral shoulder pathology is investigated using parameters as asymmetry.

Knee joint distraction (KJD) has been associated with clinical and structural improvement and synovial fluid (SF) marker changes. However, structural changes have not yet been shown satisfactorily in regular care, since radiographic acquisition was not fully standardized. AI-based modules have shown great potential to reduce reading time, increase inter-reader agreement and therefore function as a tool for treatment outcome assessment. The objective was to analyse structural changes after KJD in patients using this AI-based measurement method, and relate these changes to clinical outcome and SF markers. 20 knee OA patients (<65 years old) were included in this study. KJD treatment was performed using an external fixation device, providing 5 mm distraction for 6 weeks. SF was aspirated before, during and immediately after treatment. Weight-bearing antero-posterior knee radiographs and WOMAC questionnaires were collected before and ~one year after treatment. Radiographs were analysed with the Knee Osteoarthritis Labelling Assistant (KOALA, IB Lab GmbH, Vienna, Austria), and 10 pre-defined biomarker levels in SF were measured by immunoassay. Radiographic one-year changes were analysed and linear regression was used to calculate associations between changes in standardized joint space width (JSW) and WOMAC, and changes in JSW and SF markers. After treatment, radiographs showed an improvement in Kellgren-Lawrence grade in 7 of 16 patients that could be evaluated; 3 showed a worsening. Joint space narrowing scores and continuous JSW measures improved especially medially. A greater improvement in JSW was significantly associated with a greater improvement in WOMAC pain (β=0.64;p=0.020). A greater increase in MCP1 (β=0.67;p=0.033) and lower increase in TGFβ1 (β=-0.787;p=0.007) were associated with JSW improvement. Despite the small number of patients, also in regular care KJD treatment shows joint repair as measured automatically on radiographs, significantly associated with certain SF marker change and even with clinical outcome

Patient function is poorly characterised following revision TKA. Modern semi-constrained implants are suggested to offer high levels of function, however, data is lacking to justify this claim. 52 consecutive aseptic revision TKA procedures performed at a single centre were prospectively evaluated; all were revision of a primary implant to a Triathlon total stabiliser prosthesis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 6, 26, 52 and 104 weeks post-op. Outcome assessments were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion, pain rating scale and timed functional assessment battery. Analysis was by repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD 95% simultaneous confidence intervals as pairwise comparison. Secondary analysis compared the results of this revision cohort to previously reported primary TKA data, performed by the same surgeons, with identical outcome assessments at equivalent time points. Mean age was 73.23 (SD 10.41) years, 57% were male. Mean time since index surgery was 9.03 (SD 5.6) years. 3 patients were lost to follow-up. All outcome parameters improved significantly over time (p <0.001). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that all outcomes changed between pre-op, 6 week and 26 weeks post-op assessments. No difference was seen between primary and revision cohorts in OKS (p = 0.2) or pain scores (p=0.19). Range of motion and functional performance was different between groups over the 2 year period (p=0.03), however this was due to differing pre-operative scores, post-hoc analysis showed no difference between groups at any post-operative time point. Patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA with semi-constrained implants made substantial improvements in OKS, pain scores, knee flexion, and timed functional performance, with the outcomes achieved comparable to those of primary TKA. High levels of function can be achieved following revision knee arthroplasty, which may be important considering the changing need for, and demographics of, revision surgery

Patient-reported outcome measures are a cornerstone of outcome assessment in orthopaedics. However, completing the pencil and paper questionnaires in clinic is something of a burden to the individual patient and the health care institution. We do not provide much in the way of incentives to collect PRO data. Lengthy questionnaires and hidden data analysis offer no direct benefit to the individual patient nor the clinician. Employing ePRO, utilising tablet PCs for questionnaire completion, can improve this situation considerably. Swift and cost-effective data management and instant availability of results using intuitive graphical display make questionnaire completion more rewarding. Direct feedback of PRO data during the consultation can inform the individual's care. Completing electronic questionnaires also makes computer-adaptive testing (CAT) possible. CAT creates dynamic questionnaires, adapting to the individual symptom burden of the individual patient. CAT both increases measurement precision and reduces the number of questions required. As such, ePRO assessment may help to maximise the efficiency and the utilisation of PRO data

Background. Complete and reliable outcome assessment is important for clinical quality control and research evidence. Online questionnaires offer the opportunity to perform follow-up at distance and desired frequency saving efforts and cost to patients and hospitals increasingly not reimbursed for this service. Patients in this unique study have been invited by mail (not at visit or by phone) and were asked to complete both methods (online, paper) instead of only one option. For the first time, response, completion and reliability of the HOOS, KOOS-PS and New-KSS, popular patient-reported outcomes (PROM's) in TJA were measured. Methods. Patients (n=107) were invited pre-operative by mail to register at atriumproms.nl (Interactive Studios, Netherlands) and complete PROM's online, followed by a second invitation three days later to complete the same on paper. THA patients (n=48) completed EQ-5D-3L, VAS pain and HOOS. TKA (n=59) questionnaires consisted of KOOS-PS, VAS pain and New-KSS. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC was considered excellent >0.75 according to literature. Results. Overall response rate was 77.6% (83/107) with no difference between THA (77.1%) and TKA (79.3%). Paper had a higher response rate (70.1% vs. 34.9%, p<0.01, Fisher Exact test). However, completion rate was higher online (95%) than on paper (54%, p<0.01). Age had a significant influence on online response rates (<70yrs: 43%, >=70yrs: 23%, p=0.03). Reliability was excellent in the THA group (ICC: 0.84 – 0.95) except for the EQ-5D-3L (ICC: 0.72). The TKA group showed excellent reliability for VAS-pain (0.92). However, for New-KSS reliability was only good (0.60) or poor for KOOS-PS (0.39). Conclusions. A high response rate shows patient cooperation making distance follow-up by mail feasible. Online PROM's were only half as popular as paper questionnaires but achieve twice the completion rate. Taking scores online has excellent reliability. Only when conversions are performed (KOOS-PS, EQ-5D) reliability suffers

Background. The goal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is to reduce pain, restore function but also activity levels for general health benefits or social participation. Thus evaluating THA patient activity can be important for diagnosis, indication, outcome assessment or biofeedback. Methods. Physical activity (PA) of n=100 primary THA patients (age at surgery 63 ±8yrs; 49M/51F; 170 ±8cm, 79.8 ±14.0kg) was measured at 8 ±3yrs follow-up. A small 3D accelerometer was worn for 4 successive days during waking hours at the non-affected lateral upper leg. Data was analysed using validated algorithms (Matlab) producing quantitative (e.g. #steps, #transfers, #walking bouts) and qualitative (e.g. cadence, temporal distribution of events) activity parameters. An age matched healthy control group (n=40, 69 ±8yrs, 22M/18F) served as reference. Results. Daily steps were only 13% lower (n.s) for patients (avg. ±SD: 5989 ±3127) than controls (6890 ±2803). However, the Nr. of walking bouts (187 ±85 vs 223 ±78, −16%) and sit-stand transfers (35 ±14 vs 48 ±15, −27%) were sign. less in patients (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney). Patients showed equal amounts of walking bouts in medium duration (30-60s, 1–5min) but sign. less (−25%) short (<10s, 10–30s) and less (−43%) long events (>5min). This corresponds with sign. less (−32%) short sitting periods (>10min) in patients. Also cadence was sign. lower in patients (93.8 ±11.7 vs 98.9 ±7.3 steps/min). Conclusions. PA varies widely in patients with a substantial proportion (35%) being more active than average controls. Thus, THA must not per se reduce or limit PA. Only 17% of controls and 11% of patients reached the WHO target (10,000 steps/day) suggesting that the THA related drop in activity may inflate the risks for cardiovascular, metabolic or mental disease associated with low activity. Patients avoided short and long activities, both associated with effort. Targeted interventions may address this behaviour

Background. The majority of studies assessing minimal clinical important difference in outcome do so for management of chronic low back pain. Those that identify MCID following spinal surgical intervention fail to differentiate between the different pathologies and treatments or use variable methods and anchors in the calculation. Aim. To identify the MCID in scores across the most common spinal surgical procedures using standardised methods of calculation. Method. Prospective longitudinal study following elective lumbar spinal surgery. All patients had a complete set of spinal outcome assessments (ODI and VAS) and self perceived rating of the global and Mcnab criteria. MCID was calculated as defined by Hagg et al. Results. 244 patients of average age 53 years were followed up for 62 months post surgery. The MCID across the range of spinal surgeries was a 10 point change in ODI and 28 points for the VAS. A MCID following lumbar decompression surgery was a 3 point change in ODI and 29 points for VAS; 24 points in ODI and 37 points in the VAS for a discectomy, and 13 points in ODI and 23 point change in VAS for revision surgery. This value also varied depending on the anchor and method used for calculation. Conclusion. The MCID in score varies between different spinal procedures, method of calculation and the external anchor used. Standardised methods of calculating MCID in outcome measures should be used to allow comparative research and assessment. Generalisation of MCID in scores across a range of spinal procedures should be strongly discouraged. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. None. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Summary Statement. Discovery system produced effective functional improvement in both primary and revision total elbow replacement. The incidence of major complications was in an acceptable range. Introduction. The search for the ideal elbow prosthesis continues as instability and loosening remain the prime reasons for total elbow replacement (TER) failure. The Discovery Elbow System (Biomet) is one of the latest generations of linked prosthesis and has been used in UK since 2003. We report outcome of TER using this system. Methods. A total of 100 TERs (75 primary, 25 revisions) were performed between 2003 and 2010. The main primary underlying pathologies for TER were advanced rheumatoid arthritis (N=58), osteoarthritis (N=35), acute fractures (N=7). There were 60 female and 40 male patients with an average age of 62 years. The outcome assessment included pain, patient satisfaction, Liverpool Elbow Score (LES), range of movement, and imaging during a mean follow-up period of 48.5 months. Major complications are also reported. Results. For the whole patient group (primary + revision), the LES was significantly (p<0.001) improved from 3.79+/−1.71 to 6.36+/−1.85There were significant improvements in elbow flexion from 100°+/−24 to 118°+17, supination from 38°+/−26 to 50°+/−25 and pronation from 48°+/−22 to 61°+/−21. Mean improvement in flexion-extension and pronation-supination arc was 20° and 25°, respectively. 64% of cases were completely pain-free and at the final follow-up (compared to 7% preoperatively). Only 6% of patients scored “Not Satisfied” at the final follow-up. LES improvement was significantly higher in the primary TER compared to revision TER (p<0.05). Imaging reviewed for 60 cases showed loosening in 4% of patients. Other main complications included deep infection (N=2), ulnar neuropathy (N=3), pre-prosthetic fracture (N=2), and prosthetic failure (N=1). Discussion. TER using the Discovery Elbow System is an effective arthroplasty in terms of functional improvement, pain relief and range of motion in both primary and revision patients. TER resulted in no/mild pain in 78% of cases. Patients undergoing Acclaim, Souter-Strathclyde, GSB III, and Coonrad-Morrey TER have been reported to have no/mild pain in 64%, 67%, 50–92% and 60–100% of cases, respectively. A 20° improvement in flexion-extension arc is comparable to that of Acclaim (23°), Souter-Strathclyde (15°), GSBIII (19–33°), and Coonrad-Morrey (17–26°) TER. An improvement of 25° in pronation-supination arc in our series is also comparable to that of 21–28° reported the Coonrad-Morrey and 27–33° for Discovery prostheses. An infection rate of 2% is lower than several other reports for GSB III TER (7–11%) and Coonrad-Morrey (6–8%). The incidence of persistent ulnar neuropathy (3%) was lower compared to GSBIII TER (11–14%), Coonrad-Morrey (12–26%), and Acclaim (8%)

Summary. Movement analysis (IMA) and activity monitoring (AM) using a body-fixed inertia-sensor can discriminate patients with ankle injuries from controls and between patients of different pathology or post-injury time. Weak correlations with PROMs show its added value in objectifying outcome assessment. Introduction. Ankle injuries often result in residual complaints calling for objective methods to score outcome alongside subjective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Inertial motion analysis (IMA) and activity monitoring (AM) using a body-fixed sensor have shown clinical validity in patients suffering knee, hip and spine complaints. This study investigates the feasibility of IMA and AM 1) to differentiate patients suffering ankle injuries from healthy controls, 2) to compare different ankle injuries, 3) to monitor ankle patients during recovery. Methods. 32 patients suffering ankle problems (ankle sprain, n=17, 42 ±26yrs; operatively managed ankle fracture, n=15, 44 ±17yrs) during short-term recovery (6weeks to 3months post-trauma) were compared to 22 matched healthy controls (41 ±13yrs). Function was measured using IMA: Gait, Sit-Stand (STS) and 10s one-leg Balance test (OLB) were performed while wearing a 3D inertia-sensor at the lower back. Physical activity was measured during 4 successive days using a 3D accelerometer (AM), attached at the upper leg. Validated algorithms were used to derive motion parameters (e.g. speed for gait, bending angle for STS, sway area for OLB, # steps for AM). Moreover three ankle specific questionnaires were completed: Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score. Data was analysed using paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA and Pearson's r. Results. Both patient groups performed worse in function (IMA), activity (AM) and scales (PROM). Even at 3 months mean walking speed (−26%) and cadence (−9%) were slower while pelvic obliquity during ST (+18%) and sway during OLB (+230%) was higher than in controls (p<0.05). Activity was less regarding step/day (−31%) and sit-stand transfers (−11%, p<0.05). Also PROMs were significantly worse in patients (range 17–37%). Comparing in-between patients, significant differences were found in PROMs and function (IMA) with fracture patients walking slower (−30%) or showing more sway during one-legged balance (+250%). Mean activity scores (steps, bouts, cadence) were also less for fractures (p>0.05). During recovery, PROMs improved significantly, while function (IMA) and activity (AM) only showed small or selective improvements (e.g. 8° reduction in bending angle during ST, 20% increase in cadence). Only weak to moderate correlations were found between PROM, IMA (r-range: 0.32–0.79) and AM parameters (r-range: 0.31–0.71). Discussion & Conclusion. Function, physical activity and PROMs were impaired in patients with ankle injuries compared to healthy subjects, with the fracture group performing worse on IMA and PROMs than the sprain group. In this first study ever to measure activity in ankle patients, it was shown that e.g. fracture patients walk ca. half as many steps and bouts as age-matched controls even though at 6weeks they were unable to walk 20m without walking aids (floor effect of IMA function test). The lack of improvements in IMA and AM during recovery while PROMs improved significantly, together with the few and only weak-to-moderate correlations between PROMs, IMA and AM shows that subjective and objective recovery differ and highlight the added value of IMA and AM for objectifying routine clinical outcome assessment

Objectives

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) mobilises bone regenerative potential and avoids the complications of other treatments such as bone graft. The major disadvantage of DO is the length of time required for bone consolidation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been used to promote bone formation with some good results.

This protocol describes a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic and open surgery in the management of rotator cuff tears. This trial began in 2007 and was modified in 2010, with the removal of a non-operative arm due to high rates of early crossover to surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:155–60.

Objectives

We aimed to examine the characteristics of deep venous flow in the leg in a cast and the effects of a wearable neuromuscular stimulator (geko; FirstKind Ltd) and also to explore the participants’ tolerance of the stimulator.